Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:11:35 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/zziplib Makefile Message-ID: <20110417151134.GX33232@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <4DA89911.1060201@FreeBSD.org> References: <201104112012.p3BKCD6n037990@repoman.freebsd.org> <4DA89911.1060201@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:14:25PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >=20 > I can't reproduce this on 7.1-RELEASE amd64. It builds fine, and passes= =20 > all of its self-tests. Perhaps this was a transient error, or something= =20 > related specifically to a more recent version of 7.x? Can someone with=20 > the latter test this? My understanding is that pointyhat is using=20 > 7.3-RELEASE-p4 for the amd64 builds, is that correct? The package building policy is to use the oldest minor release that is still supported within each major branch, where portmgr has the same EOL times as our security officer: http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup As of now for 7.x, that is indeed 7.3. -erwin P.S.: yes, I know this hasn't hit the portmgr webpage yet, it's very high on my todo list. --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFNqwMmqy9aWxUlaZARAkUSAKD4t3Zs415tVngHefKwPrzJah1XIQCffdeI smNC2ANUzqMLKjujbv4NU3U= =k9Ud -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110417151134.GX33232>