From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 10:54:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4A716A4CE; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2899443D48; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:53:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i28IrqOJ049428; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:53:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i28IrjXw049427; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:53:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:53:45 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20040308185344.GA51736@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040306005134.8F98016A536@hub.freebsd.org> <20040306102629.O38217@root.org> <200403061848.33776.peter@wemm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403061848.33776.peter@wemm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Peter Wemm cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 identcpu.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:54:00 -0000 On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:48:33PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > BTW, it's pretty funny that all x86-64 machines will forever be > > running the amd64 kernel (including Linux). AMD must have had some > > inside information about the release cycle before changing the name. > > It's my understanding that it was Microsoft that was originally behind > the change from x86-64 to amd64. > Its interesting that their > most recent release that has 'windows for extended 64 bit systems' Now those are the folks who had some inside information....