From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Feb 26 12:08:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA29986
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:08:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA29979
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 12:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA28589; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:06:10 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199702262006.NAA28589@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD
To: toneil@visigenic.com (Tim Oneil)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 13:06:10 -0700 (MST)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970226113632.008f4eb0@visigenic.com> from "Tim Oneil" at Feb 26, 97 11:36:32 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> If anyone cares, I've put together three machines this year alone, and
> never used parity chips. No problems.

That you could detect, that resulted in a "parity error".  8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.