Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:03:05 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: make WITH[OUT]_* more useful? Message-ID: <00367FFD-4F88-4257-B25F-D4B3F0644FE1@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <E5334597-4951-49A2-BFAA-2B4A6F8C28DD@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <20140401051327.F20F958097@chaos.jnpr.net> <E5334597-4951-49A2-BFAA-2B4A6F8C28DD@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:40 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb = <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: >=20 > On 01 Apr 2014, at 05:13 , Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote: >=20 >> # NO_* takes precedence >> # If both WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are defined, WITHOUT_ wins unless >> # DOMINANT_* is set to "yes" >> # Otherwise WITH_* and WITHOUT_* override the default. >> and >> MK_* can be pre-set without causing an error. > ... >> Thoughts? >=20 > I am a it worried that we are increasing the number of prefixes again = rather than reducing it. I was hoping a while ago that NO_ would die. That was my plan=85 Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00367FFD-4F88-4257-B25F-D4B3F0644FE1>