From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 16 17:15:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1FD37B644 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:15:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA00415; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 20:15:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 20:15:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200007170015.UAA00415@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Christopher Masto Cc: Garance A Drosihn , "Louis A. Mamakos" , Garrett Wollman , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for comments: new `lpd' suite feature In-Reply-To: <20000716164658.A25557@netmonger.net> References: <200007142139.RAA88779@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200007150409.AAA32685@whizzo.transsys.com> <20000716164658.A25557@netmonger.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Huh? Security through ignorance? Remember that `lpr' is setuid-root and uses a ``privileged'' port for its communications. Many sites may still be using trusted-host ``authentication'' internally, and LPRng's ``feature'' may enable a compromise of some such service. (Got enough scare quotes there?) -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message