Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Dec 2018 09:42:33 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
Cc:        Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.net>, Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org>, Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, freebsd-current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: workaround for VMware WS NAT bug triggered by OpenSSH 7.8p1 changes
Message-ID:  <86pntszlae.fsf@next.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <201812230803.wBN83TL0045135@slippy.cwsent.com> (Cy Schubert's message of "Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:03:29 -0800")
References:  <201812230803.wBN83TL0045135@slippy.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> writes:
> Hmmm. I guess Red Hat Enterprise Linux must be a toy OS then.

I don't speak for them, but I assure you that both their code and ours
are full of workarounds for bugs in third-party software and hardware,
and it is ridiculous to claim otherwise.

> No. We do like Red Hat does. Advise the customer to use a workaround=20
> until the other vendor fixes their code.

With respect, that's not your decision.  It's mine.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86pntszlae.fsf>