Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 16:45:34 -0500 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, hfwirth@eunet.at, giffunip@asme.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can't get Linux-gdb (from ports collection) to work Message-ID: <19980201164534.00142@scsn.net> In-Reply-To: <199802012135.OAA00244@usr09.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 09:35:22PM %2B0000 References: <19980201093839.06233@scsn.net> <199802012135.OAA00244@usr09.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 09:35:22PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > I can build Mesa2.6b5 using the linux-glide target with no problems; > > however, if I try to use the linux-386-glide target, every program > > that uses the Mesa libraries will coredump with an illegal instruction > > exception. It seems that the assembler doesn't do it's job as well > > under our emulation as it does under Linux... > > Stupid question: > > Since you built the Linux code on FreeBSD using the Linux > tools, did you remember to "brandelf" them Linux so FreeBSD > doesn't think they are FreeBSD ELF binaries? As far as I know, brandelf is only necessary for statically-linked ELF binaries. Also, as I stated above, the binaries that are produced work fine if I use the linux-glide target, so it would appear that branding is definitely not the problem. I'm pretty sure it's been established now that the old binutils present in our linux_devel port have problems with Mesa even under Linux.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980201164534.00142>