From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 17 17:12:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AE9106566C for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7DF8FC14 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so4022986iwn.13 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:12:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LVKji5m8ycS6zEE5m+Bk+zvHnFimMDmRP6khPBqHij0=; b=TwzcP8hK80bSqiYUvxYEeB/IGZIXr6hrRijdBv82JUEX1904VSn1blyKD0O+o313DA 3++3A/hepsOIpfyjzY//ATjQiLKxbVDeGeMOEgeCZ/bARgYiwrlDmiNAxNFxoE3tgCO4 QPuGJA/T+GUL03IA4zuoHuk0VfnNx+rpGd0qc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UI6Hr9bVkoTgjLafMDKN1HqOCZiCatnL9s9XiNaJMjXSDidI6elDIytR6orQ/1UWXv dQ3OR6aqOM12QggrXdS0a/b+QUVyDPYgTu2JpVhWXZgpbFnLoJCKSBwuX4xcQeLGBAO8 FbHmF1kK5sHQCQZyo7jieEAZJRo+hitAi3IHw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.36.9 with SMTP id r9mr2771373ibd.105.1279386730959; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.12.129 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100717105134.GB13626@lordsith.net> References: <4C3C7202.7090103@FreeBSD.org> <20100717101459.GA13626@lordsith.net> <9E4FCF4C-7A69-426E-9F39-B5487D4CB07C@lassitu.de> <20100717105134.GB13626@lordsith.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: From: Freddie Cash To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:12:12 -0000 On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Marco van Lienen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent the fo= llowing to the -current list: >> Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: >> >> > # zpool list pool1 >> > NAME =C2=A0 =C2=A0SIZE =C2=A0 USED =C2=A0AVAIL =C2=A0 =C2=A0CAP =C2=A0= HEALTH =C2=A0ALTROOT >> > pool1 =C2=A05.44T =C2=A0 147K =C2=A05.44T =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0% =C2=A0ONLIN= E =C2=A0- >> ... >> > zfs list however only shows: >> > # zfs list pool1 >> > NAME =C2=A0 =C2=A0USED =C2=A0AVAIL =C2=A0REFER =C2=A0MOUNTPOINT >> > pool1 =C2=A091.9K =C2=A03.56T =C2=A028.0K =C2=A0/pool1 >> > >> > I just lost the space of an entire hdd! >> >> zpool always shows the raw capacity (without redundancy), zfs the actual= available capacity. > > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs on= opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does not? > That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't fill up h= is raidz pool past the 3.56T. You used different commands to check the disk space on OSol (zpool vs df). Try the same commands on both FreeBSD and OSol (zpool and zfs) and you'll see the same results. df works differently on OSol than it does on FreeBSD, you can't compare the= m. --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com