From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 16:16:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E3AB7C for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.rootservice.org (devgate.rootservice.org [144.76.199.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475151CD2 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from devnoip.rootservice.org (devnoip.rootservice.org [46.59.210.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rootservice.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3g3r556WSczdG4C for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:08:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:08:31 +0200 From: Joe User Organization: RootService MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3g3r546WVbz62Xv@devnoip.rootservice.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: joeuser@rootservice.org List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:16:40 -0000 On 09.04.2014 17:29, Pawel Biernacki wrote: > [snip] > We need more transparency here. > Please read this and other related threads and you'll understand that the FreeBSD-SecTeam had no real chance to react earlier than they did. http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q2/22 In fact, they were realy fast, thanks therefor. Regards, Joe User