From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  4 14:38:25 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 916)
	id 9A30316A4E5; Fri,  4 Aug 2006 14:38:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:25 +0000
From: Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@FreeBSD.org>
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20060804143825.GA8797@hub.freebsd.org>
References: <200608031905.k73J55D2061870@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20060804095414.GU96644@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060804095414.GU96644@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE on an i386
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:38:25 -0000

Gleb Smirnoff [glebius@FreeBSD.org] wrote:
>   Prafulla,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +0000, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> P> pdeuskar    2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
> P> 
> P>   FreeBSD src repository
> P> 
> P>   Modified files:
> P>     sys/dev/em           if_em.c if_em.h 
> P>   Log:
> P>   Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were unnecessary.
> P>   This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to -stable quickly.
> 
> Can you please confirm that this was a mechanical substitution like this:
> 
> s/sc/adapter/g
> s/em_softc/adapter/g
> 
> and no more additional changes? If this is true, then I hope that we
> (FreeBSD and Intel) have finally came to a common codebase. This is good. :)
> I can stand the long unusual name for driver softc with no problems.
> 
> I'm only a bit disappointed by the fact, that I haven't received a single
> email about these plans. You were in the void for a long time, and
> then began your work with a commit, w/o informing people who were
> maintaining driver while the vendor maintanance was on a hiatus.
>

Yes - it was a mechanical substitution.
And thanks for taking care of 6.0.5 release.

Thanks,
Prafulla