From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Feb 7 17:29:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA20723 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 17:29:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA20691 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 17:29:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.32]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with ESMTP id AAA4620; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 20:27:57 -0500 Message-ID: <36BE3DEC.433E8A2E@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 20:29:16 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Sutter CC: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New CODA release References: <199902071900.LAA09317@kithrup.com> <36BE1B25.653A5341@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> <19990207162848.L27505@orcrist.mediacity.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Gregory Sutter wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 06:00:53PM -0500, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > Sean Eric Fagan wrote: > > > > > > Whiner. You don't like it, go write your own. > > > > Ohh.. so everyone that doesn't like GPL is a whiner nowadays...The nice > > No, the guy that was whining was a whiner. The coders of Coda made up > their minds to go with the GPL. The whining guy didn't try to > influence their decision, didn't present new reasons why Coda shouldn't > be GPLed, but was just bitching and moaning about it. That's fine, but > then if Sean wants to call him a whiner, he won't be far off. > OK, I didn't bitch and moan so I still don't classify :-)...There was a short discussion about it in the coda-announce list, the reason seemed pretty stupid to me: "- Coda is now GPL'd - primarily because we want to indicate that we are really an OSS project." Theo d'Raadt, speaking for OpenBSD _only_ responded: > > good move -- you've just alienated all the other operating systems and > ensured that none of them will ever fully integrate coda into the > default install. i bet you'll be seeing freebsd and netbsd deleting > coda in the next couple of days, since they have rules against > dropping GPL code into their kernel tree. > > We'll stick with ARLA. It's really _free_ software. > Since you wanna hear reasons why it isn't a good idea: -Commercial distributions don't like to be forced to carry sources for parts of their OS. That's of course part of the success of X and many BSD tools. I haven't heard of any commercial UNIX bundling gcc yet.. - From an economical point of view, the GPL has a negative effect over capitalism, and will eventually have some effect on employment (I'm not kidding, I'll have to write a dissertation about this, but I haven't found the time). The BSD license doesn't have this effect. Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message