From owner-freebsd-small Mon Oct 22 21: 0: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from granite.he.net (granite.he.net [216.218.226.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761DB37B401 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from donner (ACB43983.ipt.aol.com [172.180.57.131]) by granite.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with SMTP id VAA32005 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:00:03 -0700 Delivered-To: Message-ID: <00dc01c15b76$45d2dc80$76a8fea9@donner> From: "Eric Chiu" To: References: <200110200551.f9K5pfp72804@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> Subject: web browser and xml parser on picoBSD Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 20:41:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am working on porting lightweight version 1) a web brower and 2) XML paser to picoBSD. . . Please let me know if anyone has already done this. In theory, I should.... 1) use the source code and recompile on the version of gcc on picoBSD, correct? (Is there a significant difference with the gcc on BSD?) 2) trim down the feature set of the application to a minimal set... do I need to rewrite file I/O features here for picoBSD, versus a standard BSD distribution? I assume the syntax is something like "open(FILE, "filename)"... Anything else I missed? FYI - I would be open to contributing this to the base package distribution of picoBSD, if there is interest. Thanks, Eric Chiu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message