From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 28 06:26:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56C1106566B for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDA78FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx43 with SMTP id x43so1300907wey.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6UwKUvq/W6CAQNgAjb5FLh+VR6zYoewBUODXYwgwiwQ=; b=Rd/kXGJiXK9+EQ7EfcVP4MhR5gS1vTbkDd2GfeBNWucNP3d/OAWQ3K1tp3VmhssOzR trsJtXgeoNPeq/XbLc4QilLGAfznJu+h/e6Szrr9B4a6VZuxuU+9PPhk5i7lW7Rcl7V6 BMzBAggU14bF+y3uUka+oAO5ePfIxZOHQpI8X9G35YlGlfcgznnmikd70/GvwhkZSNBK JeFJjJ4k2lfDLFVDXKbrWUnMxUtTdCMSe92fal+Ld2Q/4blr6TpP4XhfANv8KqzKbTMU iV7M6VeBAElCA0T16RXiUDyZspdZTbGPQGfh5SZG5s951SF9++g1FkDz05XRKzeD1p66 evlw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.197.104 with SMTP id s82mr2795007wen.62.1348813605617; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.66.194 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:26:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1156205530.9964665.1348688310662.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> <201209280117.AA00092@h115.65.228.10.32118.vlan.kuins.net> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:26:45 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Tsurutani Naoki Subject: Re: aspell conflicts with ispell? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:26:47 -0000 On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 27 September 2012 22:52, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there >> should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are >> two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect >> should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell >> wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line >> in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. > > On a quick look, this seems correct. Please file a PR so it doesn't get lost! Wow! Sounds exactly like one of my responses. PR ports/172131. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com