From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 00:02:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D1BC4B for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41CFA29B for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ey11so2951228pad.38 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:02:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SDfWzkDfvalc0qzk5hNX3SkZCpZrWbCdECHN8ZtXM60=; b=TBOPDpGruLJ4+ySAfVRgk16PhndWYrINykXgGvXhn5avAsjcDFHG4hrcKtAIXv8QLO QbBD05uiPxnZ0hb7vv3aMSEhRH4SnLiH8C3YttyLgVbAFipZkOh0Jj3l5BwP/2DwnoBI DdE+Fq6KKdSvsUlpylf5+kKjt2XTA/UYkXJ4wpo9v+Xt4vQbRli8RGlQ3p04VnliVR2B f8+HXUCe2nd/tDB7YEKIIr5k/cFm7M8xLQGHewbX40td4klz3ygxn1du6OeRW8mYrAaA u6EklstOqAuQYJi6h2FR9YkVA1E8l5ln/tofl8d53AbDJ8GPrhdu3pRroL84RQKoIfOx RBbw== X-Received: by 10.66.124.196 with SMTP id mk4mr40429428pab.144.1417910567679; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:02:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.116] ([120.29.118.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yp5sm31585111pbb.16.2014.12.06.16.02.46 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:02:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54839927.10002@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:02:47 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: Dropping audio in ffmpeg conversion References: <20141206234358.0b17f55f.freebsd@edvax.de> <548399D1.8070405@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <548399D1.8070405@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 00:02:48 -0000 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 12/06/14 17:17, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> >>> I'm searching for a convenient way to drop audio from >>> an AVI file (video and audio) upon conversion to MP4. >>> My tool of choice is ffmpeg, which works perfectly fine >>> with the default options: >>> >>> % ffmpeg -i in.avi out.mp4 >>> >>> The quality loss, the "pixelated" and "blocky" output >>> is what I expect, and the result file is small. I just >>> can't find a way to get rid of audio (which I don't >>> need). Reading "man ffmeg" told me about "sinks" which >>> "do nothing", but I'm too stupid to conclude how to use >>> them properly. What I want to have is a converted video >>> with no audio track at all (also smaller file size). >>> >>> Can ffmpeg do this, or do I have to "preprocess" the >>> input file with mencoder somehow? >>> >>> Does anybody know how to proceed? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Polytropon >>> Magdeburg, Germany >>> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 >>> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> I think it's -an switch. >> > > Out of curiosity from this thread, I decided to install ffmpeg & > possibly play around w/ it. Here's the transcript: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 12:20:50pm] 332 % pkg install -y ffmpeg > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > Fetching meta.txz: 100% 968 B 1.0k/s 00:01 > Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 341.9k/s 00:06 > Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 354.7k/s 00:15 > Removing expired repository entries: 100% > Processing new repository entries: 100% > FreeBSD repository update completed. 23602 packages processed: > 17694 updated, 147 removed and 41 added. > Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > The following 15 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > ffmpeg: 2.3.5_3,1 [FreeBSD] > linux_base-f10: 10_9 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] > schroedinger: 1.0.11_3 [FreeBSD] > libx264: 0.142.2455 [FreeBSD] > opencv-core: 2.4.9_1 [FreeBSD] > > The process will require 209 MB more space. > 33 MB to be downloaded. > Fetching ffmpeg-2.3.5_3,1.txz: 100% 8 MB 380.5k/s 00:24 > Fetching linux_base-f10-10_9.txz: 100% 16 MB 366.0k/s 00:48 > Fetching linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1.txz: 100% 1 MB 316.6k/s 00:05 > Fetching linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0_1.txz: 100% 118 kB 121.1k/s 00:01 > Fetching linux-f10-expat-2.0.1_1.txz: 100% 65 kB 67.2k/s 00:01 > Fetching linux-f10-pango-1.28.3_1.txz: 100% 274 kB 281.3k/s 00:01 > Fetching linux-f10-png-1.2.37_2.txz: 100% 150 kB 154.2k/s 00:01 > Fetching linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_3.txz: 100% 353 kB 361.8k/s 00:01 > Fetching linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_5.txz: 100% 3 MB 351.0k/s 00:09 > Fetching linux-f10-tiff-3.8.2.txz: 100% 241 kB 247.5k/s 00:01 > Fetching linux-f10-jpeg-6b.txz: 100% 115 kB 118.1k/s 00:01 > Fetching linux-f10-atk-1.24.0_1.txz: 100% 144 kB 148.0k/s 00:01 > Fetching schroedinger-1.0.11_3.txz: 100% 396 kB 405.9k/s 00:01 > Fetching libx264-0.142.2455.txz: 100% 407 kB 208.4k/s 00:02 > Fetching opencv-core-2.4.9_1.txz: 100% 1 MB 401.3k/s 00:04 > Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. > One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. > The following 5 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > schroedinger: 1.0.11_3 [FreeBSD] > libx264: 0.142.2455 [FreeBSD] > opencv-core: 2.4.9_1 [FreeBSD] > ffmpeg: 2.3.5_3,1 [FreeBSD] > > The process will require 49 MB more space. > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > whew !!!! that took (43.233 cpu + 5.569 sys) sec., 2:50.10 elapsed > time tot, 28.6% CPU efficiency > (207 text, 2549 data, 46500 max) KB, (0+1411) io, 7318 pfs + 0 > swaps > [root@kabini1, /etc, 6:03:18pm] 333 % > > in short, it tried to install linux-f10, rather than relying on > linux-c6 .... pkg bug ? ffmpeg package bug ? pilot error ? TIA for any > clarifications .... > I also have this problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 00:21:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED20E7F for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out4.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out4.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF924639 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:21:17 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AngGAEqcg1R8lVcA/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBKrNSAQEBAQEBBpkWAoEOFgEBAQEBfYQDAQEDATo/BQsLDRQlDwUYMROIMgjUOwEBAQEGAQEBAR6GJ4ooB4MhgRUFlV+Df4ZhKIw3hAMrMIJDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,531,1413216000"; d="scan'208";a="387284119" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([124.149.87.0]) by icp-osb-irony-out4.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2014 08:21:09 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 201715B2; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:21:08 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:21:08 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: Polytropon Subject: Re: Dropping audio in ffmpeg conversion Message-ID: <20141207002108.GA96985@ozzmosis.com> References: <20141206234358.0b17f55f.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141206234358.0b17f55f.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 00:21:18 -0000 On Sat 2014-12-06 23:43:58 UTC+0100, Polytropon (freebsd@edvax.de) wrote: > I'm searching for a convenient way to drop audio from > an AVI file (video and audio) upon conversion to MP4. > My tool of choice is ffmpeg, which works perfectly fine > with the default options: > > % ffmpeg -i in.avi out.mp4 ffmpeg -i in.avi -an out.mp4 Order of the arguments is important. This won't work as expected: ffmpeg -an -i in.avi out.mp4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 01:02:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0979C5DE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 01:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rc1.surewest.net (rc1.surewest.net [66.60.130.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0A699E for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 01:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.surewest.net ([66.60.130.145]) by rc1.surewest.net ({dfaaa318-551d-4a0a-8038-7c31cf31c4f6}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20141207005840351 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 00:58:40 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from smtpauth.surewest.net (smtpauth.surewest.net [66.60.130.153]) by smtp3.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27E889662 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (mykitchentable.net [69.62.167.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpauth.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B09A9C1CA for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (blacksheep.mykitchentable.net [192.168.1.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drew) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C616CDBF02 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:58:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5483A639.2050704@mykitchentable.net> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:58:33 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Probably Hardware Trouble But What Is It? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 141206-1, 12/06/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-MAG-OUTBOUND: surewest.redcondor.net@66.60.130.145/32 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:02:02 -0000 I'm running FBS 9.1 RELEASE that I built several years ago. It's mostly a Samba server and has "just worked" so I've never done much more with it. However recently, I find it "locked up" with thousands of these messages on the console: kernel: kern.maxfiles limit exceeded by uid 0, please see tuning(7) I've looked in /var/log/messages and also see lots of messages like these: Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 18000000 Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 28 Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss 78000000 rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 08000000 Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 27 Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss 78000000 rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): FLUSHCACHE48. ACB: ea 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. ACB: 60 01 fe d8 74 40 39 00 00 00 00 00 Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. ACB: 60 0a a5 7f 00 40 4c 00 00 00 00 00 This machine uses zfs. I have two pools: # zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zback 1.81T 848G 1008G 45% 1.00x ONLINE - zroot 1.81T 1.16T 666G 64% 1.00x ONLINE - Then I tried this and my ssh window is now stuck: # zpool status pool: zback state: ONLINE status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures. action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run 'zpool clear'. see: http://illumos.org/msg/ZFS-8000-HC scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zback ONLINE 3 0 0 ada0 ONLINE 4 0 0 I opened another ssh window and tried 'zpool clear zback' as suggested but it appears stuck too. I'm sure I haven't provided all the relevant information so please ask and I will do so. I'd appreciate any guidance on how to take a proper backup of ada0 and what I should do next. I think this zback pool is just the one disk which is a 2TB drive. I'd like to know how to confirm that if possible since it seems the zpool commands aren't able to complete. I appreciate any suggestions or guidance. Thanks, Drew -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 02:03:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A752BF5 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 02:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.mgedv.net (mail.mgedv.net [83.64.34.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26155E01 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 02:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from my.loop (client.my.loop [255.255.255.255]) From: "no@spam@mgEDV.net" To: Subject: freebsd 10.1-RELEASE: jail security errors - GID 0 not dropped completely Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 02:34:04 +0100 Message-ID: <042a01d011bd$e4cb1530$ae613f90$@mgedv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdARvRoyhhoN78+nRXOFgSXhOGFpug== Content-Language: de-at Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 02:03:32 -0000 hi guys, as the "real" application faces the same problems, i created a test jail on a clean box just to check the behaviour using "/usr/bin/id". problem description (hopefully i nailed it): if a jailed process needs any .so for startup, the path to those *.so needs to be world r-x, although the GID of the jail execute user is allowed to r/x the dirs, where the *.so files are to be found. there could be (ordering) errors with SET(e)GID in jail_* functions, because it works as expected when prefixing with "chroot -g test /". the EGID is dropped to the jail user's gid, but the GID is still 0! we end up with a jailed proc (UID=999, GID=0), which of course is not allowed to access the dirs for the *.so's to be loaded by exec. [see end of message for setup details] === the symptom === /jail# /jail/a.sh Shared object "libbsm.so.3" not found, required by "id" jail: /bin/id: failed === details from truss === 619: access("/lib/libbsm.so.3",0) ERR#13 'Permission denied' 619: access("/usr/lib/libbsm.so.3",0) ERR#13 'Permission denied' === some UID/GID details from kdump === /jail# grep -i '[g|s]et.*id' jail.kdump 64746 100091 jail CALL issetugid 64746 100091 jail RET issetugid 0 64746 100091 jail CALL issetugid 64746 100091 jail RET issetugid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL geteuid 64747 100093 jail RET geteuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL setuid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET setuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL getuid 64747 100093 jail RET getuid 999/0x3e7 64747 100093 jail CALL geteuid 64747 100093 jail RET geteuid 999/0x3e7 64747 100093 jail CALL getegid 64747 100093 jail RET getegid 999/0x3e7 64747 100093 jail CALL setegid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET setegid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted 64747 100093 jail CALL seteuid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET seteuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL seteuid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET seteuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL setegid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET setegid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted 64747 100093 id CALL issetugid 64747 100093 id RET issetugid 1 === proof 1: chroot fixes the jail .so load problem === # outside the jail - just to know what's changing: /jail# chroot -g test / id uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) egid=999(test) groups=999(test),5(operator) # inside the jail - this is our "fix": /jail# chroot -g test / /jail/a.sh uid=999 gid=999(test) groups=999(test) === proof 2: chmod fixes *.so load, but GID=0 here! === if i chmod the jail homedir and jail's lib dir, it works: /jail# chmod a+rx /jail /jail/lib /jail# ./a.sh uid=999 gid=0(wheel) egid=999(test) groups=999(test) user and group names are read fine from the jailed "id", although the file perms are as listed beyond. is this a bug or am i missing something? any help/info/enlightenment appreciated ;-) [just reply to the list, i'm on it] ==== CONFIG (tested 3 different times with GENERIC and a CUSTOM kernel): LiveCD install source: FreeBSD-10.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso sha256: 0c3d64ce48c3ef761761d0fea07e1935e296f8c045c249118bc91a7faf053a6b fresh install on 2 different ESXi 5.5 hosts and a 3rd physical PC. only base.tgz+kernel.tgz or liveCD, tried on UFS2 (gpt) and tmpfs. i used the www user and tmpfs on the liveCD, but everything else was the same. === the test user === /jail# id -P test test:*:999:999::0:0:User &:/home/test:/bin/sh === the jail (before the mentioned chmod) === /jail# ls -Ralo total 68 dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 . drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel - 512 Dec 7 00:06 .. -rwx------ 1 root test - 773 Dec 7 01:00 a.sh dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:58 bin drwxr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:01 etc -rw-r----- 1 root test - 37157 Dec 7 01:02 jail.truss dr-xr-xr-x 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:59 lib dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 00:00 libexec ./bin: total 24 dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:58 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -r-xr-x--- 1 root test - 12432 Nov 11 22:03 id ./etc: total 60 drwxr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:01 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -rw-r----- 1 root test - 473 Dec 7 00:04 group -rw-r----- 1 root test - 321 Dec 7 01:01 nsswitch.conf -rw-r----- 1 root test - 1570 Dec 7 00:27 passwd -rw------- 1 root test - 40960 Dec 7 00:27 spwd.db ./lib: total 1744 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:59 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -r--r----- 1 root test - 106264 Nov 11 22:03 libbsm.so.3 -r--r----- 1 root test - 1631216 Nov 11 22:03 libc.so.7 ./libexec: total 124 dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 00:00 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -r-xr-x--- 1 root test - 118520 Nov 11 22:03 ld-elf.so.1 === the start command ==== /jail# cat a.sh umask 027; rm -f /jail/jail.truss /jail/jail.kdump /jail/jail.ktrace #/usr/bin/truss -f -e -a -o /jail/jail.truss -s 1000 \ ktrace -d -f /jail/jail.ktrace -i -t cinpstuy \ jail -c jid=1 \ name=test \ path=/jail \ ip4.addr=1.1.1.1 \ host.hostuuid=c91e438a-1a44-4b7e-8732-0441ca9e2b97 \ host.hostid=6146666201 \ allow.sysvipc=0 \ allow.raw_sockets=0 \ exec.jail_user=test \ exec.system_user=test \ exec.system_jail_user=true \ host.hostname=test \ host.domainname=test.me \ allow.set_hostname=0 \ allow.chflags=0 \ allow.mount=0 \ allow.quotas=0 \ allow.socket_af=0 \ enforce_statfs=2 \ ip4=new \ ip6=disable \ command=/bin/id \ kdump -H -f /jail/jail.ktrace >/jail/jail.kdump === EOM === From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 03:13:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78D3EEE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 03:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A81C26BF for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 03:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-5-37.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.5.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A222D3CE8F; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 04:13:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sB73DnDo003069; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 04:13:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 04:13:49 +0100 From: Polytropon To: andrew clarke Subject: Re: Dropping audio in ffmpeg conversion Message-Id: <20141207041349.9617643c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20141207002108.GA96985@ozzmosis.com> References: <20141206234358.0b17f55f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20141207002108.GA96985@ozzmosis.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 03:14:00 -0000 On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:21:08 +1100, andrew clarke wrote: > On Sat 2014-12-06 23:43:58 UTC+0100, Polytropon (freebsd@edvax.de) wrote: > > > I'm searching for a convenient way to drop audio from > > an AVI file (video and audio) upon conversion to MP4. > > My tool of choice is ffmpeg, which works perfectly fine > > with the default options: > > > > % ffmpeg -i in.avi out.mp4 > > ffmpeg -i in.avi -an out.mp4 > > Order of the arguments is important. This won't work as expected: > > ffmpeg -an -i in.avi out.mp4 Thanks to all who answered - this is exactly what I needed, and it works as expected. You may conclude the amount of my stupidity by the fact that I did _not_ find this in "man ffmpeg", even though an explicit search for "-an" answered the question. ;-) By the way, the SYOPSIS on top of "man ffmpeg" states the fact that input options come first, _then_ output options. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 03:16:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2706F92 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 03:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DCF86DB for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 03:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q200so1376738ykb.7 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 19:16:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KmzkTnMKC40QqOz+uVbscnSKCO7LQeNt467MOPB4oOw=; b=yxdz5DqD2vKidsd5+EVlLGsNUVEz8LO5HpdqiXriotyIhV2Z4UWfSNNi2wQ6bqpfEc TuQ2Ph/ssHPlMK41INMcsTLt1T1Y8BenuQQZXYXQrLgd2BYe+8F+t58uENxi5b23z+uj wO9bE9YjzfqjJNCgkRzfgGf0oZVAyEEGSaMR1pLbExzF/oAh9j1m0GbgQBC9ncmTEdIt Z2ZnXDFWYUck2SMd7czUTykSCYZmRx/uqEhRfe15NeYSUfOrGLXAtzik2JAHuu/qhPa8 FFLAT9XmOUlzx8KYD/QfsPvC0C30yZisYCNog3bVeuozKfvagGvNBba5ZTkx6bL2P+8o jM0w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.26.138 with SMTP id c10mr25394800yha.192.1417922215826; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 19:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.90.131 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 19:16:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5483A639.2050704@mykitchentable.net> References: <5483A639.2050704@mykitchentable.net> Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 19:16:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Probably Hardware Trouble But What Is It? From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Drew Tomlinson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 03:16:56 -0000 On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I'm running FBS 9.1 RELEASE that I built several years ago. It's mostly a > Samba server and has "just worked" so I've never done much more with it. > However recently, I find it "locked up" with thousands of these messages on > the console: > > kernel: kern.maxfiles limit exceeded by uid 0, please see tuning(7) > > I've looked in /var/log/messages and also see lots of messages like these: > > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 18000000 > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 28 > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss 78000000 > rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 08000000 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 27 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss 78000000 > rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): FLUSHCACHE48. ACB: ea 00 > 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command > timeout > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. ACB: > 60 01 fe d8 74 40 39 00 00 00 00 00 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command > timeout > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. ACB: > 60 0a a5 7f 00 40 4c 00 00 00 00 00 > > This machine uses zfs. I have two pools: > > # zpool list > NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT > zback 1.81T 848G 1008G 45% 1.00x ONLINE - > zroot 1.81T 1.16T 666G 64% 1.00x ONLINE - > > Then I tried this and my ssh window is now stuck: > > # zpool status > pool: zback > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures. > action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run 'zpool > clear'. > see: http://illumos.org/msg/ZFS-8000-HC > scan: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zback ONLINE 3 0 0 > ada0 ONLINE 4 0 0 > > I opened another ssh window and tried 'zpool clear zback' as suggested but > it appears stuck too. > > I'm sure I haven't provided all the relevant information so please ask and > I will do so. I'd appreciate any guidance on how to take a proper backup > of ada0 and what I should do next. I think this zback pool is just the one > disk which is a 2TB drive. I'd like to know how to confirm that if > possible since it seems the zpool commands aren't able to complete. > > I appreciate any suggestions or guidance. > > Thanks, > > Drew > > -- > Like card tricks? > > Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to > learn card magic secrets for free! > > http://alchemistswarehouse.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cable connectors may be oxidized and lost signal transmission capability . Please check by replacing connection cables with new and good quality ones . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 08:40:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C383D759 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0CA6359 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type:mime-version; b=tlPBbJQVozbuopsJkWmP8vjBrwtRBCjm5+/FJHUKiDMWMgHDleWZS9T8bG6oX0BVEptVW5I8duR1 9LIb32zMzXqtD13bMWpYt8gJpztNpQWNTMCgpAQkSp1+PA+Q7fiM Received: from [10.1.2.6] (46.229.54.117 [46.229.54.117]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1417941628213237.7671597182349; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:40:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1417941614.17411.1.camel@zoho.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD working from RAM (MFSROOT) as a Workstation. From: clutton To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:40:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1417753488.2773.1.camel@zoho.com> References: <1417734458.1772.1.camel@zoho.com> <20141205014616.da37661a.freebsd@edvax.de> <54812A0A.6080105@yahoo.com> <1417753488.2773.1.camel@zoho.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ZohoMail: Ss SS_10 UW UB ZCF-710TPL UW UB SF_TD_EXT SGR3_1_27114_351 X-ZohoMail-Owner: <1417941614.17411.1.camel@zoho.com>+zmo_0_ X-ZohoMail-Sender: 46.229.54.117 X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 X-ZohoMailClient: External X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:40:38 -0000 So after some experiments I'm off. I was interested because one of my friend from ISP guys did this with his linux. The reason to discard this approach is having to maintain two copies of data. My friend somehow has 64G of ram and he syncs the data from working ram to hd before reboot. There are no simple way to do this on FreeBSD. You have to cook your image manually. Booting from image is not a long process, but even the gzipping the cooked image back will take a while. So, I'm probably will remain using zfs. With this it works pretty fast anyway: vfs.zfs.arc_min=1073741824 # 1GB vfs.zfs.arc_max=4294967296 # 4GB vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit=3221225472 # 3GB On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 06:24 +0200, clutton wrote: > I'm going to try. Will post the results here. > > First I'll try on one of my relatively fast machines. The world is > already compiling. :) > > Then if everything is ok on my notebook with 8G RAM. > > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 22:44 -0500, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would be interested in this as well. If no one has done it lately, > > I'd like to work with some people and get this going as well. > > > > I'm sure PXEboot, NFSv4, with a KDE Desktop would be fairly useful with > > about 8GB of RAM and a Gb network. > > > > P. > > > > On 12/04/2014 19:46, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 01:07:38 +0200, clutton wrote: > > >> Is anyone use a FreeBSD as a Desktop working from RAM, using MFSROOT? > > > Many live systems work that way. For FreeBSD, check out > > > FreeSBIE (sadly discontinued, but probably still available > > > for download; NB: FreeBSD 5 and 6). Programs are loaded > > > from CD (slow), but once they are "buffered" in RAM, things > > > work fine. It would be interesting to see of this > > > bottleneck could be removed by pre-loading as much into > > > RAM as possible, and of course avoiding optical media > > > as load media (instead, using a SSD or at least USB to > > > boot). > > > > > > > > > > > >> As a memory is relatively cheep it can be even faster then ssd. > > > Then check this out: > > > > > > http://www.sandisk.com.br/enterprise/ulltradimm-ssd/ > > > > > > Best of both worlds, and it could make the past come > > > back (cf. AS/400 single-level storage). :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 08:44:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E3C891 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net [68.230.241.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8FA5F5 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20141207084449.RFMS26047.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 03:44:49 -0500 Received: from macbook.local.popelka.us ([72.205.45.227]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id QYko1p00X4u5WUQ01YkpMV; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 03:44:49 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.54841381.003E,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H/cFNZki c=1 sm=1 a=KPoI11KysOGbLPnGgDkkuA==:17 a=Ihlm5HH3WnQA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=j4nzMFrpAAAA:8 a=KJZ9TahP6v4UK8vocl8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=lGFnjCU29OkA:10 a=FgJNlXltDwUA:10 a=GNC6S8jFRNYA:10 a=0wKxPq9R6ZIA:10 a=KPoI11KysOGbLPnGgDkkuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=arickp@cox.net Message-ID: <54841380.7070804@cox.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 03:44:48 -0500 From: Eric Popelka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getting rid of a zpool References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:44:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I'd do a 'zpool offline home2 /dev/gpt/home2' - -- Eric Popelka arickp@cox.net (703) 543-7093 - Home (571) 247-3031 - Cell -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUhBOAAAoJEBQPax3MeNrTIu4QAIRB4R+5Ni9JIMgLmN0AUn9C AGYls02X7qRZTyZWnyrxPjIlrpw3T0B7ydd6dsSn+B9jGvYuxCGGlUWaeA/i/E1N LFSaNOoM+YFZWseVeEWBbknvvMay3fCfqTbhhY7Sv1RHqxUMAy+oD1U2XAe/zfjh U0/IoPBqT7lYsi7/bJD7Iw34YoWSibc/Jdld/SgKRbLqv7h8Dw0AAvts69Yik4WJ 8pq9VdWE9O5Ywav6NuOvFu9J3BnoTezXN9Ez8f0mLOFcyegpXdXvD+f3U1/dxdOg XgAeek1Fdk+ysU04YfcxxwkLaGm/LaMGhtBVAaR/yjC7HHp3l0ZtmqCxpjg+m23X QIpsrajsufq9mUequSuTh8o1Ef8kf0VUR5h0nCfnZVU800/dDZ/jWkvnou14y3mz xYIeDoZbr5limiFk1KGqkcP9ZyJg253kiiD+usoQbt88Tbj8p+G7qXTGRGcm1hML OK1aZwxmO8Uxlu8SM67YfRu59Co5I6Pe23u2RUW/0oZjlzCGz5HTKOh+IHZ68IZJ ojGZ6GsgwB8Ble8/kQIK3qFeQ4CSadNrrZH5RAwieL1ye2BuijFAnwiVZa+2kFkC xaSWklr5FUsmu1x8ib2k9BF6LAhGZTzLJ+2pGWNOCJUlVLPIDJLVYgPuFUHMMo8k 5dib2QBkrTxiWDw++Kxh =t496 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 09:19:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D660C69 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 09:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02188CC for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 09:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h11so2229052wiw.13 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:19:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nileshgr.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y9xf7gEtRJjfS/Dfh8aYo2xwCoGccgbRr0lDDyYraNQ=; b=erV7XjZtKaR620tQiN49EOuUcZwqpfCgm1MC5kF3qg4NUirmbH5kl540vVLGW3h0oB UW8ezz4mDFK9Ngltovi75w2lTkJXleB3ySGoyEOFxqnVEqMsFrCb5Is4S6J7aBkNZ+U+ xa51urRM9A7i2/Jjp/zI948p1u+XHs8uX+DyQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y9xf7gEtRJjfS/Dfh8aYo2xwCoGccgbRr0lDDyYraNQ=; b=eWuzKJ3q12N7GDtv0pD/uAnmDuLki0jigHI86Sht3UfLjpOSy+kzkwMBnVKL1jciBr UZWzVQPaI0P75ZwZDyTwCjbqxgcoEbuoqvm9TPHTGZxFgm6hO6SXJ/xGXSajkQWrX9p1 CrpQPhVaVKfgN5gfAPtXAwrkiCYtHHx7lr4DRGG3YuJxOTMCINa70I+PNecFHybCNtls h5ACUSL/rT1QFE8go4xmAjhRFlbfzILgM1zQo3EDksoVHUssF7IVjV/gSvn0oCsXQMi2 dCM9UkEt6nayUwmxtBfCjkmIdYkH/syLosJnu1X8hrjAcza9gFPRIE6BNqj59JGfhcTx sk/w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaVy5eS72dV41G2F8nP/SQD9PY1JTVIbiWi6W3ehcB90S+MMwKQwXkP3mHzJFtFuxCUWxd X-Received: by 10.180.90.16 with SMTP id bs16mr8309576wib.4.1417943989078; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:19:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:1f13:d18::11? (i5.d.nileshgr.com. [2001:470:1f13:d18::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cz3sm51829314wjb.23.2014.12.07.01.19.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:19:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54841B6D.7030901@nileshgr.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 14:48:37 +0530 From: Nilesh Govindrajan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPFW NAT with filtering Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 09:19:51 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to implement NAT using IPFW for jails. Each jail has an ip in 10.0.0.0/8 subnet, I want to NAT from that private range. The server has multiple public IPs and some jails may have direct assignment of public ip. I'm using workstation in firewall_type and I tried this: ipfw add 49 nat 123 from any to in ipfw add 50 nat 123 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any out via ipfw nat 123 config ip Then there are rules inserted by rc.firewall This doesn't work and I'm a bit clueless as to why it doesn't. I should be able to restrict the outgoing traffic (i.e., limit the outgoing ports to 22,80,443,etc -- preventing torrents / etc). Where am I going wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 10:15:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C13BBA4; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 10:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp25.services.sfr.fr (smtp25.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED90D96; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 10:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2508.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AA515700027F; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:15:37 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (137.34.4.93.rev.sfr.net [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2508.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 67CBF7000278; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:15:37 +0100 (CET) X-SFR-UUID: 20141207101537425.67CBF7000278@msfrf2508.sfr.fr Message-ID: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 11:15:35 +0100 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:15:38 -0000 Hi! Now that the new_xorg and ssp repositories are not being updated any more, what is the reason for the 'beefy' machines to build ports only once a week? Can we expect the frequency of package upgrades to be higher soon? Best regards, Juan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 11:36:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36348B34 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B076EB for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l13so1583105iga.8 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 03:36:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wr4gWSJQRHOADwRCj2gsHC64uBkAnSaJUWmPIjg+298=; b=NWQDuJ5JYOEUUryzVGEWzjDRvi3DjpRAHnXXtNjyy7gWTIdvbWBOPGls6S8jycHzTK 0qsgk/ehvVzEAV/1hK+ZJIG17e57JebYq/SVEzjHWG+IlmGIyRsY8qA2Y3hWKpekKOSm +K/T1SalgDoApgZDnJ8LEMVxpA1HDhoPDH3RSonCBGKly/ByMEM51H6QVRIZYuvPy9ly vH0i+FuyV4/8Gq0dz6+ZwW3gc3cp317vQzeS8WMUkbTa7fF1/1a0cgd811o0ndeiyGw4 X6d0T8meoMY4368hwe/AatZWTFY94R4iAuIcpyp7VIHJT8k2Iq3R6Xkd/3BMBWdNvQun XmNQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.170.162 with SMTP id g34mr6530815ioj.2.1417952176302; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 03:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.164.233 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 03:36:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:36:16 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: ZFS create crashes my system. From: Pierre Ancelot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 11:36:17 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to figure out how to get out of this situation and most importantly, to learn from it: In order to use poudriere, I attempted to create a zpool on a file vdev. Here is what I did. mkdir /vdev mkfile 8g /vdev/disk1 # I was surprised that the space wasn't showing as used by df zpool create tank /vdev/disk1 Then, my system crashed and every reboot kept on crashing. So I started it in single user mode and seen the "tank" pool was listed as "unavail". Single user mode won't crash until I mount -rw / Did I create a race condition having my vdev on / (which uses ZFS)? How can I recover from this? Cancel my create request (which is certainly trying to complete everytime it has a chance but never get there because of the crash)? Thank you. Pierre. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 12:43:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895F77E5 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 12:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAB8D17 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 12:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id uz6so2530495obc.30 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 04:43:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Xr6GKxdPO9prnXi93D2vsXM7TELdI33uufBY5e5iKZQ=; b=ChXYuA5yKdS6Z/Q5D7suqQLAd0xnseczb6IXp1KrmTIHN5hMP/cb8CBv5Po/fFeCv+ aYZ0uCXxjkYEvUviEJjbBVHSnrUjad2H1k8v7MnDRQwppyDCfHB20BIaX4OCa9/K1QAU ul9l19b8gKzttwiNxl66uab4/KuI60Ho9zpz9gWtqRD0MgVE+O1J6KC8E3UgMT0urUOu bbFFNuJDtA6g7Qj3WYFYfFMRvfJq6iRRw//7cylF7TOT2fr0fDUw3WcCI1bnIbZUdODQ w0IE9TWVLK4nRJv6jqRJ4Z0uGVbyhDsxiIn2taaUPlXXPZe+uti97hTXsFppmesesgKZ bmYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.97.138 with SMTP id v132mr3890727oib.55.1417956186573; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 04:43:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.230.146 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 04:43:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:43:06 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Example of ppp, ipv6 configuration for LAN gateway From: Khairil Yusof To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:43:07 -0000 I can't seem to easily understand from the handbook or googling basics on getting ipv6 setup for typical home network server connected to ISP with ppp. ipv4: - re0 is internal eth device - tun0 is ppp device, tun0 ip is default gateway - gateway enabled - dhcpd.conf - nat via pf (not needed on ipv6 of course) Standard ipv4 server setup, tun0 external ip is gateway, default router for LAN is 192.168.0.1 (gateway server IP), which then forwards to external tun0 gateway. ipv4 clients get address and routing via dhcp. ipv6: - re0 is still internal eth device - tun0 is ppp device, but no IP - ipv6_gateway is enabled - re0 inet6 rtadvd accpet - rtadvd (to broadcast ipv6 addresses) Now if I enable HISADDR6 in ppp.conf, run ndisc6 tun0 to get IP, and add it to re0 manually. IPv6 works OK for the gateway server, but not for LAN. Is there any examples on the Internet to have basic configuration where: - gateway server automatically gets ipv6 addr from tun0/ppp device - gateway server shares correct IPV6 route for other ipv6 devices on LAN via re0 The manual and sources I find on the internet all seem to be a mix of tunnel brokers, host only and even dhcpv6 options. I'm just looking for simple setup similar to the IPv4 home gateway to ppp setup above. Any pointers would be much appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 13:18:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87BEEC7 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 13:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x242.google.com (mail-pa0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7370FCF for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 13:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f66.google.com with SMTP id rd3so1910260pab.9 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 05:18:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e5EDtiupgeLfSXg8WNlDMtArvIoxa+q7br+AFixS0Cs=; b=VrtWlyWeEMekc68nQGsiJcXp2FDqNRtMTvQO78RnWfPws01HV+DlGuLRyt3jyQzbri H+93J6uu27qmIsQlaHAtTcIcuvPOZby07MqzVRdzgSsgUC+LGCmSgtR0uRPaL8b7kb6Y 0Yf2u0CsT39b67esrusl8aU9jjMHi5wmFV+YlIofdfiAKEoIwapZHTPAfFfNKbmkOFnM C0ddO5k+RNabPeKSRG69p/4G92k6DFrxPmJu8kjieASpSa5Tx3BHmm6qJO2wAs48dbXL SZ/YUCGrDRYysZAqSy4yscPPYyVWUCkfQz0PeU/xSheXSVDQ0XDJoFsE/kJRapal3Ud0 96Xg== X-Received: by 10.68.130.66 with SMTP id oc2mr52257185pbb.134.1417957548350; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 05:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.116] ([120.29.118.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm33929598pdp.9.2014.12.07.05.05.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2014 05:05:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 21:06:14 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:18:14 -0000 Hello list Keep getting spam email from some guy selling bulk solar panels. I know SpamAssassin has built in check of different places that provide list of known spam email addresses. Where can I find a list of places to notify them of this spam email address? list@beawindhog.com Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 14:04:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA493FB for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 14:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C2736DB for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 14:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r2so1573202igi.6 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 06:04:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rtnkL0EWEVrzCY657571WOWliMmm9KrsExeRBfgrwII=; b=y+FjkiO2ZvWlkgnXa6zUcp39gJY1UUNISZcJ7YUqESF+60j5ZmNdk0jXT/VOGIzTip PUnd7ytBBti9r5uuCK0avBuZNoGRh2BjkU1MC2fAIqq9Hj9xpylwuG1MkEeINkBO1wWm 68K+nxtkv7HbLlyulWDirH6ZiWZIIPbKMDzMf6qUyM4/JVZ+NUiePW0WJ70kqq7RjsEv nQzjD7cvQuO2h6DzHaboTPxqHy9dehEv2pI60RAsA+0o2rxL40ZHdNjZ45AeUko6GW0N VKntfohBx65T2NbcAY+EpyM3AaHUKG5gGsb/XOEr8N3IYk5XRNhiSGyq/FoEmkZgl31W WOBA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.205.197 with SMTP id fr5mr18033676icb.5.1417961093709; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 06:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.164.233 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 06:04:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 14:04:53 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS create crashes my system. From: Pierre Ancelot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 14:04:54 -0000 I have found the solution, I will post it here shortly (busy with something else now). Pointers, http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-November/081024.html https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D195061 On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Pierre Ancelot wrote= : > Hello, > > I'm trying to figure out how to get out of this situation and most > importantly, to learn from it: > > In order to use poudriere, I attempted to create a zpool on a file vdev. > Here is what I did. > > mkdir /vdev > mkfile 8g /vdev/disk1 # I was surprised that the space > wasn't showing as used by df > zpool create tank /vdev/disk1 > > Then, my system crashed and every reboot kept on crashing. > So I started it in single user mode and seen the "tank" pool was > listed as "unavail". > > Single user mode won't crash until I mount -rw / > > Did I create a race condition having my vdev on / (which uses ZFS)? > > How can I recover from this? Cancel my create request (which is > certainly trying to complete everytime it has a chance but never get > there because of the crash)? > > Thank you. > Pierre. --=20 http://www.neko-consulting.com =E2=80=9CLive as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live = forever.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=95 Mahatma Gandhi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 14:32:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B8C8E0 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 14:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 102279A6 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 14:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so4396536wgh.16 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 06:32:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nileshgr.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8a1oYkKWmK1lRYXBFkpkKHKnDfF6TlQiVyqvb12qMcs=; b=a3k/W9yd+ap8ELRDEJzwngSlsFVjR35NOxQqGr89z+S8+LnR5dfjU6j5353AWVVraF mabxIrEfWvSahTpdqdQJqQHOZU9WMuxSXtMasZL5PoPPduSs8+h+ZMfUeN7h0CCLc6v8 WwoKBvjwD82yFcPxOZF+ZnjC+JGtBaRDk3UrM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8a1oYkKWmK1lRYXBFkpkKHKnDfF6TlQiVyqvb12qMcs=; b=Qx7Z808+WgHlHmwkR0fttOWaUnPPdMIYy7qRDAiz9dlU8wwH92Br/N72zYMUW4xOXY LPo+7i3mzr84VYoUcjDylc+S9SOl9e1oLed70LYVMYx/nLebQUXnW71MiwSPNHV/JXeA QpwUogfwClwo17SUixo4me9JogH6dlgHVCrOkZO69DcxZWbqvPb+qK5KA8yrFJYVM/pZ odwMFz2Saf6XlG6BzEbx9iarYCDENRriwBNkhQAKRvJM+e88hXWwPis14bMYGsHmlbnj q5I2lsRqaVe3kztdXuyxE0+hJdXKLv3mre0cNTAj9GEuSLRXTrs+8ZxDsrKrMQwC5uKF XPpg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/djeAPeK8/DuKjdY1KnvN3MLUsySuboWkBrWDrkoaT2EHgVclaxwia3IgdtJOVQBlScIS X-Received: by 10.194.94.233 with SMTP id df9mr37509851wjb.46.1417962726180; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 06:32:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:1f13:d18::11? (i5.d.nileshgr.com. [2001:470:1f13:d18::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jr4sm12606110wjc.20.2014.12.07.06.32.04 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2014 06:32:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5484649E.8040208@nileshgr.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 20:00:54 +0530 From: Nilesh Govindrajan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW NAT with filtering References: <54841B6D.7030901@nileshgr.com> In-Reply-To: <54841B6D.7030901@nileshgr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 14:32:08 -0000 On Sunday 07 December 2014 02:48 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to implement NAT using IPFW for jails. Each jail has an ip in > 10.0.0.0/8 subnet, I want to NAT from that private range. > > The server has multiple public IPs and some jails may have direct > assignment of public ip. > > I'm using workstation in firewall_type and I tried this: > > ipfw add 49 nat 123 from any to in > ipfw add 50 nat 123 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any out via > ipfw nat 123 config ip > > Then there are rules inserted by rc.firewall > > This doesn't work and I'm a bit clueless as to why it doesn't. > > I should be able to restrict the outgoing traffic (i.e., limit the > outgoing ports to 22,80,443,etc -- preventing torrents / etc). > > Where am I going wrong? > Never mind, figured it out. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 15:43:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3326E6 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nqhost.drenet.net (nqhost.drenet.net [184.95.47.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DDEAF50 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nqhost.drenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354CF3ADFE; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 10:42:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from nqhost.drenet.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nqhost.drenet.net [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57711-09; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 10:42:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by nqhost.drenet.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id F0A4D3AD9B; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 10:42:43 -0500 (EST) To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Issue with swap file X-PHP-Originating-Script: 501:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:42:43 -0500 From: Andre Goree In-Reply-To: <44oarj5gwl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <44fvcwgzaw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <2a3b7da1d03fd215ba1792e6617cfdb7@drenet.net> <44wq675qya.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <3aff40bfeeb66db5cf30286a804ea5d0@drenet.net> <44oarj5gwl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: <338fb3168d8da21795ba733137a8a826@drenet.net> X-Sender: andre@drenet.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 Cc: Lowell Gilbert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 15:43:06 -0000 On 12/04/2014 2:55 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Andre Goree writes: > >> Progress perhaps being made. >> >> agoree@fbsd10-atl ~ % sudo mdconfig -a -t vnode -n -f /usr/swap0 -u 99 >> mdconfig: ioctl(/dev/mdctl): Device busy >> agoree@fbsd10-atl ~ % swapinfo >> Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity >> agoree@fbsd10-atl ~ % >> >> Wtf? This is the newly created file too... > > fstat /usr/swap0 So weird. agoree@fbsd10-atl ~ % sudo swapon -a swapon: md99 on /usr/swap0: Device already in use agoree@fbsd10-atl ~ % sudo fstat /usr/swap0 USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME agoree@fbsd10-atl ~ % sudo fstat /usr/swap USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME agoree@fbsd10-atl ~ % -- Andre Goree -=-=-=-=-=- Email - andre at drenet.net Website - http://www.drenet.net PGP key - http://www.drenet.net/pubkey.txt -=-=-=-=-=- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 17:08:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B688FCC0 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm45-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm45-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB0F9B5 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:08:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1417971920; bh=W05RGgA53e4NRRIpj8obOvAdYvgo0tVKkeWKCSKecmg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=EO3jRDCKppbpUm4QfLBy9Ro9lxyW2Bt42irZG87uaWlYEIkXy34gssmgzuAknE8I1xfLux0ZDwFVNi31EaBW75E1LLH5QRSQ2ecGNbQCPElkKzaT9fAJxNVxsJnqDqtckuuR6lKf8x5sArpHVwV2mhE2UerxZBnLoPSxv8uIzaq3N0y2cTlOkuzH3KILw5Urke0l8OEK8r5G14y19P5Khbj7mwFFvZ7tqtrr+7Fbcjd8hUy1/jhvs3Mk55mKq6yaUNheL8vY34m6FGru24tA8tvKUXuKBN0ekH+QrT6P+sEEBHBrb/NY+b4qvEqPWbeEPetwAKbT3YPE/1Ha/Z1jbw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.com; b=jvOe9YtrDk7qxzA8I/KCI1rJDLi3pKusOiiDOt7DTUQnyu56Eqs4Grl4Vw9P3sEPoGhaXcipASx703gGFgMLJmQy+EHuYH4U/0st2a5mz7cHB2rtu5jVDdT/sP1oUj+uQEeAmoyaO9nMrjvurxAEYdcv8h8rdOtfN6L83ZMphuMLZb/XmIheDbyQ1qGcHCKQUCoaGUa6IfkK5lrdjfzv0sgqYB52awMM68IM7WO24NmH9dDHXekYE4vKZKlSle7NpOgK5iEcaWQ5nA3u8yEOy5Q3zm7SpE5wngmOCxiOYETtkVghXJorUtXhTd2hXnNqtv+U9dygPHuBw2LNJFFnxA==; Received: from [98.139.212.149] by nm45.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec 2014 17:05:20 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.8] by tm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec 2014 17:05:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp108.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec 2014 17:05:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 561908.74464.bm@smtp108.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Krkxg_QVM1kxM0avf0Tf222d2CY_FvPEP1Ct8JvNLTvujlr wnGw5cfup3WE9nRGGCikzvOb0ZcNGsALTel.tJ.rXz3c5y013Crdz8wg_kPH b4v13ULPpdasEJrgqwksi9C.GCKsBtFM.pUeP3doiQ6jvb7Zb9ZjtRMtmes. zE29.YEMkEsLQWwkmWhYtCkbM8pPfOL1B1PM1RHguZOJbMdeqg4x8YNaF9r8 qLeVEB_GUSIge2FfYNrJPWEToKxgrmOLHE12lAsXJUs_IFt_JixSrK6mm0iq 32nyo8qUkigRZwoFBrQBhsqguMm73FXgW1x2PngPmCwgqO2IeQgjsmdoe4Nf tO4BXRyjdemJKV05MSwwAEYpn_mrqWPglvMnkpjP.HkptzoAKH4x.klT_V24 EZorJqmXE3w9YqVr1cT_ERM5sl7w9rgS7706kk5XKplMKrr9rZwlBeMqObCF eUgND5JhJxOJLCoMinpoCuh8_ddT6t1ibN1yj_RreQPv0nfZZxYpvupo6s7G mm4Ilxi.yDZ3.rYopCKMuEsTBlWIPvr2mSxjYkaZRH0wNWzPZOUroJgTuCgN YzPp.sGyW6tTIlCtm.vwuTz0bpxbp8_WoepMUDhTK X-Yahoo-SMTP: h3Xqg6.swBC0yI913RMMwp94grO_cg-- Message-ID: <548488CD.50207@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:05:17 -0500 From: Paul Pathiakis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Probably Hardware Trouble But What Is It? References: <5483A639.2050704@mykitchentable.net> In-Reply-To: <5483A639.2050704@mykitchentable.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:08:20 -0000 Drew, Just trying to assist.... From the look of it, something is definitely failing and it is either the controller or the disk. FreeBSD is trying to stay alive. (I've had something similar happen in the past. When I rebooted, a disk showed to be faulted and inaccessible.) I'd theorize that the first line about the kernel maxfiles being exceeded by root (borrowing you haven't changed the setting) is due to the failure trying to allocate file handles to handle the requests that can't be completed due to the failure. If you have access to the console and another drive, you may want to connect a second drive, configure it to mirror the first and hope that it can mirror the first. If it works, great. BTW, don't forget to install bootblocks if this is your boot drive. Now, if it doesn't start to mirror the drive after being attached, you're going to have to reboot. That's probably going to show you the real failure. :-( If the controller card is onboard, not much you can do. If it's a PCIe bus card, try to re-seat it. Sometimes things get pulled on, or hit inadvertently and aren't sitting in the slot correctly any more. I agree with the other post in either replacing the connecting cables and/or re-seating them. If, after all this, it doesn't work, it's probably the disk itself. Now, comes the patient part. If it's the drive, it's probably pretty hot from failing and trying to do it's job. Don't laugh at this it's worked for me 5 out of 7 times. Remove it from the machine, let it cool to room temperature on anti-static bag. Once cool, put it in the bag, put it in your freezer for at least three hours. Re-insert into the machine. (At this point, you should have that other drive for the mirror connected.) If the drive isn't a catastrophic loss, it will work for a short time. I recommend you allow it to mirror. Ask the drive to do NOTHING but let it sit and mirror while in single-user mode. However, before going to that last 'iffy' part, check everything before that. P. On 12/06/2014 19:58, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I'm running FBS 9.1 RELEASE that I built several years ago. It's > mostly a Samba server and has "just worked" so I've never done much > more with it. However recently, I find it "locked up" with thousands > of these messages on the console: > > kernel: kern.maxfiles limit exceeded by uid 0, please see tuning(7) > > I've looked in /var/log/messages and also see lots of messages like > these: > > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 18000000 > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 28 > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss > 78000000 rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 > Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 08000000 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 27 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss > 78000000 rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): FLUSHCACHE48. ACB: ea > 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command > timeout > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. > ACB: 60 01 fe d8 74 40 39 00 00 00 00 00 > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command > timeout > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command > Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. > ACB: 60 0a a5 7f 00 40 4c 00 00 00 00 00 > > This machine uses zfs. I have two pools: > > # zpool list > NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT > zback 1.81T 848G 1008G 45% 1.00x ONLINE - > zroot 1.81T 1.16T 666G 64% 1.00x ONLINE - > > Then I tried this and my ssh window is now stuck: > > # zpool status > pool: zback > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures. > action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run 'zpool > clear'. > see: http://illumos.org/msg/ZFS-8000-HC > scan: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zback ONLINE 3 0 0 > ada0 ONLINE 4 0 0 > > I opened another ssh window and tried 'zpool clear zback' as suggested > but it appears stuck too. > > I'm sure I haven't provided all the relevant information so please ask > and I will do so. I'd appreciate any guidance on how to take a proper > backup of ada0 and what I should do next. I think this zback pool is > just the one disk which is a 2TB drive. I'd like to know how to > confirm that if possible since it seems the zpool commands aren't able > to complete. > > I appreciate any suggestions or guidance. > > Thanks, > > Drew > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 17:15:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7158DD9 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD9CA80 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id tr6so3236017ieb.7 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 09:15:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O77yfwGTM3fXfpUEx7a96Z9fU9rTvrPUomgK+ZE6vX4=; b=IrwwdkJIV0ZSwroIm91bGMH0cbt/JV6rBrLOyhePLM1bfFcqgL+CwgZfZolS8EQZg0 6kpxE9rPHoLz2IDOTniL3kV5tNF/giXf3lrL9/rkx2P6BqRI57aZgqgGI2xcB/XuEKYL 9XHzHeKu04jDZUwgwD2J9zQgyU1xW+UxjpqDtfdzw8HA1K+V2yPr6U2ARvzX1Y0gAvpU PXE0QLOuL2a25GtmOI9JYYbKgH/fJnT9p46gJPs3viIK7gw8p/pTqDZOTeGAmxi77ecl BHxhkGWgoDo6xUOSfE1LA0PGi7lISnXwS4CUHWJ58a31TkWy/CxDUHXHFSogJxaOrYgg Px2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.34.201 with SMTP id i192mr7598553ioi.40.1417972507933; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 09:15:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.164.233 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 09:15:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:15:07 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS create crashes my system. From: Pierre Ancelot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:15:09 -0000 So, for anyone who may be impacted by this later, this is how I solved it. The goal is to put those in your /boot/loader.conf vfs.zfs.vdev.trim_on_init=3D0 vfs.zfs.trim.enabled=3D0 At least until the patch is released. When I booted up, my system was constantly crashing, so I booted in single user mode. If you mount your / partition rw now, it will crash. I had to: zpool destroy tank (tank is my zpool name here) mount -o rw zroot/ROOT/default / Then, put the lines above in your /boot/loader.conf. reboot! Should be set. After reboot, your zpool should be there because the destroy command was done when the FS was read-only so the changes have been done in memory only. Thanks. On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Pierre Ancelot wrote: > I have found the solution, I will post it here shortly (busy with > something else now). > Pointers, > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-November/081024.ht= ml > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D195061 > > > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Pierre Ancelot wro= te: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to figure out how to get out of this situation and most >> importantly, to learn from it: >> >> In order to use poudriere, I attempted to create a zpool on a file vdev. >> Here is what I did. >> >> mkdir /vdev >> mkfile 8g /vdev/disk1 # I was surprised that the space >> wasn't showing as used by df >> zpool create tank /vdev/disk1 >> >> Then, my system crashed and every reboot kept on crashing. >> So I started it in single user mode and seen the "tank" pool was >> listed as "unavail". >> >> Single user mode won't crash until I mount -rw / >> >> Did I create a race condition having my vdev on / (which uses ZFS)? >> >> How can I recover from this? Cancel my create request (which is >> certainly trying to complete everytime it has a chance but never get >> there because of the crash)? >> >> Thank you. >> Pierre. > > > > -- > http://www.neko-consulting.com > > =E2=80=9CLive as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to liv= e forever.=E2=80=9D > =E2=80=95 Mahatma Gandhi --=20 http://www.neko-consulting.com =E2=80=9CLive as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live = forever.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=95 Mahatma Gandhi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 17:27:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03ECC1BF for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fed1rmfepi204.cox.net (fed1rmfepi204.cox.net [68.230.241.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B96B70 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20141207172625.SNVJ20647.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 12:26:25 -0500 Received: from macbook.local.popelka.us ([72.205.45.227]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id QhSQ1p0084u5WUQ01hSRqM; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:26:25 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.54848DC1.007D,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H/cFNZki c=1 sm=1 a=KPoI11KysOGbLPnGgDkkuA==:17 a=Ihlm5HH3WnQA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=f7lOjL92AAAA:8 a=j4nzMFrpAAAA:8 a=KJZ9TahP6v4UK8vocl8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=lGFnjCU29OkA:10 a=FgJNlXltDwUA:10 a=GNC6S8jFRNYA:10 a=0wKxPq9R6ZIA:10 a=tYzGpaHQ_yoA:10 a=KPoI11KysOGbLPnGgDkkuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=arickp@cox.net Message-ID: <54848DC0.5030906@cox.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:26:24 -0500 From: Eric Popelka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:27:09 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Ernie, Last time I checked if my IP was a known spammer, mxtoolbox.com checked at least 80 different databases. So we have two issues here: (a) There's so many spam databases that you'll spend all day reporting the person (b) Some ban/unban entire class C subnets (e.g., SpamCannibal says I'm a spammer because they blacklisted 107.128.230.*.) You're a good guy, but how does the spam DB know that the 255 others aren't? So I would start with by contacting your hosting company (or ISP, or your work/school's network team) and go from there. - -- Eric Popelka arickp@cox.net (703) 543-7093 - Home (571) 247-3031 - Cell -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUhI3AAAoJEBQPax3MeNrT3PMQAJNpKDIH8ZoxM3CPNVHkUc+c 3tyWyFkZPfqEldJt5dfjieiwdTGgrQUGO9H07VoOrAXqm700fCIgY57JjmpttNXn uBa2CXK1WezhpF2VAJZyKMGZZC6aRm5vZG476fCJPkoaxkoxGOiL2OGOm7abxvIW 132KcQYJB46+CQ81ctUIyIO+Z/C1FJywQ3lAt/fxlwsWhd4ku6L0XM9i4qrICB+T P8t1u4MA9GyDncK0ifzG2bGNl773STfdkH+EqIsltdz2m5ZlIpBBrsXhLndnIvh7 M0ZJXMIGlIzqRCnvKD+S3jmFYq/XwQ+/IH7O8IpzlVzCP4MqY92FDMMsm5sl6J/3 9t70BMQtGK7jBLzES727KWR+LJysv0wbGYIZeToEAgFVVzf6mt9q8bwTH6qPv57b 58LMrYuf3Sgb13ndWI+XZojrXLQ6GDLZHNaZD9UPhXlkwSujCA8TewR3LmD76DCs v/oJ8skWG+fkvg8PWDZGaJv24cfUJEMZQ0O6OVMKJKQsnWuLKqMxO5Wz4lNV/wsq g6Sn7c4rpkW8zGhsKQfwQf101jP893mlxmE4MUvBKLwhiFIQ4jZIevCYh8ZFF4ug gt1tJGarwydYp6kK0B4f4tdm9Hfq7iHBQa+sSaTpg3m9D/dDz4GihwWIhOhBrODt 5LXhBZWZ1sdqwgycp7qV =aacl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 17:52:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A95B2827 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net (eastrmfepo101.cox.net [68.230.241.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADC9E77 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20141207175204.SZGI20647.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 12:52:04 -0500 Received: from macbook.local.popelka.us ([72.205.45.227]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id Qhs31p00T4u5WUQ01hs4fy; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:52:04 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.54844C0E.00E7,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H/cFNZki c=1 sm=1 a=KPoI11KysOGbLPnGgDkkuA==:17 a=Ihlm5HH3WnQA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=chQHjRG-AAAA:8 a=j4nzMFrpAAAA:8 a=7ogjv6mWBXhQDesTcZAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=13qU_acP9T0A:10 a=KPoI11KysOGbLPnGgDkkuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=arickp@cox.net Message-ID: <548493C3.8020302@cox.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:52:03 -0500 From: Eric Popelka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:52:05 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 P.S.: You can always whois the domain and look for the owner's e-mail; also, most domains have an abuse@mydomain.com address. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUhJPDAAoJEBQPax3MeNrT6EoP/00PKYrIZYOTfDD+Jt8+buJQ Ea2EKk5oNwrwqWBiGra6M27LmwrqGxV7QjJmPU9nsrSxtCWPJW2iiuKfW80p2UjA 9koAtgkkloU+dWm3VdYyXaF/aH33kQKS9Bw7vgZvG3mEMVgxYQkao8tO5Bx2XzMB hJv+4v78pCpvHamg8juBOjRONO4zgg/U3pY3eIpseBlAam1Y+T8KfPycNkbwnVO7 i+yoxLHGsnOCLBT4HERe0Xb9uapEGRhg85aJSstPXbFNBZv7gCRGar7ufV2mhnz4 3YPn+s6eORqfAl5XLGuHDRzdl6o+kow7YwH/kA+4nQq+76rk56EuQJFz/cKgGgE4 9ac+bPb0wPpHDkircq4171cQuM45OrehnU40uHZNR9Y5AKMw0CWDpvA9QnA337Lv SLycOnW7ADJURmp/VIuwtWUb0hkzcWfsfqpQ8exkMzZPdjiBYsamB4pDR5QiIuYM LVQ/WduUG+ijdVq7gIBofA9/qu57rJJClOGoNwWhLbxtJRStLmeWN+LBBAx64giQ V3flJxRd2pYNhev+M0bMWgOoUrCNCALu/GzZsXTz7o0bRiMXbQ+PsaiI6IXaGHCx YWDWv0wA3s6GcLSG8xPHQX4zmNn2+GTKwsWQPCBVxVpArthwd6B7QtNjZjHNnaKl fGHMvbdhTrZQ2gj1svAX =lzyH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 18:06:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C31B50 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm30-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm30-vm3.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A13AF5F for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:06:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s2048; t=1417975607; bh=W/rBSn+fDlUW4RAMJJdmC0g6lXDXIbhV8EeDOllW2EA=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=e4ZK8AGT2/J4mfMKxazfXA7rRoGApmUadYxISjYhbC6L2xXEzMcf4VwFHgOxii8DZ+ZFBdIDi+2pOkvmF7Mvix1FQ4Ciz6zMXFitP1mV7gZCaArCDYAVro9ZCEV65WaZ8w4D9ckxCkk7OUKj/KaLaSLbePJT7Z9TQSzUzQ+dMSJbOlksdRhbKBn06hYESLFm0EMbWCqUXZE+0x3IUHSza6Z+UxGxQVtUHMAiudPMmVZgno/JXh2Pq436knupme0XOH8UyQMrrPbLSb/3Nfx9GjFBbsxXSV8qZ5eruDtXZuurVgs7kr0SRMu9JaGXSoggmxidZ0M8SERtqh7r7ggFsg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=rocketmail.com; b=gZJ1WdB+RY+ysCDkAUX3fgauxOzFBOxGIncBQo9KAgBEVWXU9W7yTKzZPeR3lCJJWVIargNvbbu8jqwrKFw6Wm0iW5/+74FQMU+ok0b8si4ExamiA25DmpELoNtVur1cZsF5u2An3FYG6pHWoTntdui5q099tQ+kaZUtYvmwJEiL15WjWnk4cQWEsGtYYNhURMUWcTthp7hUk/MS/R7LmDjUH4zU9y48R915AuxsyqR60fs17krwqRZ+50KSWDWPysK+/BMCAVHqQlOZbiXL4qtBbOF4JOQFrRMzjCdZ4O/Zj3U7U1dHz/eTOw2mtBI/Flnra/6QEtDnRzy4Y3vGOw==; Received: from [212.82.98.51] by nm30.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec 2014 18:06:47 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.95] by tm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec 2014 18:06:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp132.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Dec 2014 18:06:47 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 548432.80655.bm@smtp132.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: DZ8hvrcVM1lLBZRbM6MDwEsJfYKLxSndC2mSFTyi1ErPk_I MqS8iMxUh2TazsmJ4EdZcV1dsQWQKg1i9t2jRkc3r7wRYHc5dCXexZkN65tc HqowyESV76jLbH.XM2.aBFKb2d99b13k1ttLJbzqWVYk8mlnpwNPQss0.Xd. DpS_EP3pe6kCPp1qbhUeQtGbI8SV6sH1k53zYKDjf98mReqb3VmWDjQhT1Iu C5i0xrhWkhQcfzILNqURXBv.l8lnMiD.9ODCVAzfDPsEzC6LH_IaOB8V2q78 5JWNOsiOgVH7V5GG2P_.d_5LSvTcUExxZsYTodMs6ROU4Ea7bwpn23cgzbvU wH8AQWHa0BwbTrEZB7ncm0kyOeV1VE7Dq.hm8Bmo_73l7LcbEO6sTOCPI9nW XV0DodDvBSKkBQyHVg9BXjUowqJcNvexeu5pVK009ESLfKn9qCL0ga83ulJI Tyyi3bWNEjX5lofSEKcJmZn4xj1SLWlW.3seyZyEx6GUiipuTJp3RHTtjkPO CTjuFwwoRjfJkqXaFrXfD55tZRU7w0Q-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Message-ID: <1417975606.10161.21.camel@rocketmail.com> Subject: Re: [Bulk] How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 19:06:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 18:06:56 -0000 On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 21:06 +0800, Ernie Luzar wrote: > SpamAssassin Are you using it for a server or for a MUA? For a MUA you should consider to use Bogofilter and simply teach it to ignore this junk. Sure, at some amount of the same junk it's wiser to already ban some addresses before they reaches the MUA, if you should care about what does reach your MUA, then block it by your ISP's web-interface. Assumed you maintain a server, then indeed my points are wrong, IOW you should provide more information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 18:42:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791D0371 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C827346 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l15so2927614wiw.2 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:42:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=547cvsfOKin4hI7cHvM0mBShTwmaQcEa/STXDOeIK7w=; b=aZsiftf6lxZOZAvxI5bHm/EoUy4EirzyynlOJh1JEO47b+lWEUvnIEHC+ZjyjuJ91X HLiKJ8ieIR/ZVF0jQe2lrG07V/uRj37vCIgSDgdqwhAcdsdXH4sLQmz6vhXEtxTTUCYF MD8Sd2I6loAQXHU7eW/frB4YCWmLijUJb09DR7CjopgVcm44KNczPTmjEl4jJM1C4U5E fJyIoYLugsxt/BPmlXSAbDGorFWLvNjemC/hDaVDRhTXd3wduIWTezfT8TqiP5VQztzQ p/RImgWNocvgbQss5qhb/sFr26Tj1P51kG4NV4MsQRuUynh9tTgfGQrxkdlO5Kt2xv3s 60TA== X-Received: by 10.194.108.98 with SMTP id hj2mr8517687wjb.102.1417977729336; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:42:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (5ec3c54b.skybroadband.com. [94.195.197.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fq1sm6758129wib.12.2014.12.07.10.42.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:42:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:42:05 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out Message-ID: <20141207184205.53bc0918@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 18:42:11 -0000 On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 21:06:14 +0800 Ernie Luzar wrote: > Hello list > > Keep getting spam email from some guy selling bulk solar panels. > I know SpamAssassin has built in check of different places that > provide list of known spam email addresses. It doesn't, most "From" addresses in spam are forged. If you are running your own Spamassassin or have access to user configuration you can set a blacklist entry for the address. If you can train SA's Bayes component manually then do so - this is the kind of spam that Bayes will probably catch easily. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 22:54:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32FBF7A5 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 22:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011EDECB for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 22:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-21.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sB7MsBj8021959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 16:54:12 -0600 Message-ID: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:00:25 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: problems installing svg pkg .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:54:14 -0000 .... I just tried to install svg in order to view content on the dragonflyBSD website. Transcript follows: [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:08pm] 334 % pkg install -y svg svg2pdf svg2png Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified The following 16 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] linux_base-f10: 10_9 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] The process will require 160 MB more space. 77 kB to be downloaded. Fetching svg-1.0.3.txz: 100% 7 kB 7.4k/s 00:01 Fetching svg2pdf-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 Fetching libsvg-cairo-0.1.6_8.txz: 100% 15 kB 16.2k/s 00:01 Fetching libsvg-0.1.4_7.txz: 100% 44 kB 45.3k/s 00:01 Fetching svg2png-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be REMOVED: nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 New packages to be INSTALLED: libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] The operation will free 46 kB. nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified whew !!!! that took (10.443 cpu + 0.401 sys) sec., 0:13.10 elapsed time tot, 82.7% CPU efficiency (208 text, 2555 data, 38980 max) KB, (0+58) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % It seems to require/think-it-requires linux-f10 compatibility pkg's instead of linux-c6, which I have installed & am using where needed, notably firefox/flash support. pkg bug ? svg pkg bug ? pilot error ? TIA for any clues .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 22:55:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6F38BE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 22:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961F9EE0 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 22:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-21.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sB7Mt1fK022148 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 16:55:02 -0600 Message-ID: <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:01:16 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:55:04 -0000 On 12/07/14 17:00, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > .... I just tried to install svg in order to view content on the > dragonflyBSD website. Transcript follows: > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:08pm] 334 % pkg install -y svg svg2pdf svg2png > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > The following 16 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > linux_base-f10: 10_9 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] > svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > The process will require 160 MB more space. > 77 kB to be downloaded. > Fetching svg-1.0.3.txz: 100% 7 kB 7.4k/s 00:01 > Fetching svg2pdf-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > Fetching libsvg-cairo-0.1.6_8.txz: 100% 15 kB 16.2k/s 00:01 > Fetching libsvg-0.1.4_7.txz: 100% 44 kB 45.3k/s 00:01 > Fetching svg2png-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. > One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. > The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > The operation will free 46 kB. > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > whew !!!! that took (10.443 cpu + 0.401 sys) sec., 0:13.10 elapsed > time tot, 82.7% CPU efficiency > (208 text, 2555 data, 38980 max) KB, (0+58) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % > > > It seems to require/think-it-requires linux-f10 compatibility pkg's > instead of linux-c6, which I have installed & am using where needed, > notably firefox/flash support. pkg bug ? svg pkg bug ? pilot error ? > TIA for any clues .... > > BTW: [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov 3 22:38:58 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:01:03pm] 336 % -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 23:06:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33BEA1F for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A663FFD8 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:06:23 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=bsdjunk; d=bsdjunk.com; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; b=byQoB58+MrYQTwgssfU0KrvsZly0RkkAsmZPAF4tQFrSmeR7svQXNrifMqt8tKuoguzIHQGDpIQZ 8vaGbgrTuP+U2XSjiV/VCl9y/1kae9ekvC80Kc/of4a5hvRDsmcqdURJTO4JE9mEtMAVGkPgOZoj lQpmqrRVxLpsQHvP0ps= Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1417993580585439.5433942401818; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:06:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:05:20 -0600 From: chris To: William A. Mahaffey III Message-Id: <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> In-Reply-To: <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> Subject: Re: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Medium User-Agent: Zoho Mail X-Mailer: Zoho Mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:06:23 -0000 You fail to read UPDATING. ---- On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:55:09 -0600 William A. Mahaffey III <wam@hiwaay.net> wrote ---- On 12/07/14 17:00, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > .... I just tried to install svg in order to view content on the > dragonflyBSD website. Transcript follows: > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:08pm] 334 % pkg install -y svg svg2pdf svg2png > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > The following 16 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > linux_base-f10: 10_9 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] > svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > The process will require 160 MB more space. > 77 kB to be downloaded. > Fetching svg-1.0.3.txz: 100% 7 kB 7.4k/s 00:01 > Fetching svg2pdf-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > Fetching libsvg-cairo-0.1.6_8.txz: 100% 15 kB 16.2k/s 00:01 > Fetching libsvg-0.1.4_7.txz: 100% 44 kB 45.3k/s 00:01 > Fetching svg2png-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. > One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. > The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > The operation will free 46 kB. > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > whew !!!! that took (10.443 cpu + 0.401 sys) sec., 0:13.10 elapsed > time tot, 82.7% CPU efficiency > (208 text, 2555 data, 38980 max) KB, (0+58) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % > > > It seems to require/think-it-requires linux-f10 compatibility pkg's > instead of linux-c6, which I have installed & am using where needed, > notably firefox/flash support. pkg bug ? svg pkg bug ? pilot error ? > TIA for any clues .... > > BTW: [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov 3 22:38:58 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:01:03pm] 336 % -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 23:08:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34254AE6 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rc1.surewest.net (rc1.surewest.net [66.60.130.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11063FFA for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.surewest.net ([66.60.130.145]) by rc1.surewest.net ({dfaaa318-551d-4a0a-8038-7c31cf31c4f6}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20141207230803975; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:08:03 +0000 X-RC-FROM: Received: from smtpauth.surewest.net (smtpauth.surewest.net [66.60.130.153]) by smtp4.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772F189662; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (mykitchentable.net [69.62.167.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpauth.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77FAE58B3; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (blacksheep.mykitchentable.net [192.168.1.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drew) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16F21E0299; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:08:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5484DDD0.2090005@mykitchentable.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 15:08:00 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Pathiakis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Probably Hardware Trouble But What Is It? References: <5483A639.2050704@mykitchentable.net> <548488CD.50207@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <548488CD.50207@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 141207-2, 12/07/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-MAG-OUTBOUND: surewest.redcondor.net@66.60.130.145/32 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:08:06 -0000 On 12/7/2014 9:05 AM, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions wrote: > Drew, > > Just trying to assist.... > > From the look of it, something is definitely failing and it is either > the controller or the disk. FreeBSD is trying to stay alive. (I've > had something similar happen in the past. When I rebooted, a disk > showed to be faulted and inaccessible.) > > I'd theorize that the first line about the kernel maxfiles being > exceeded by root (borrowing you haven't changed the setting) is due to > the failure trying to allocate file handles to handle the requests > that can't be completed due to the failure. > > If you have access to the console and another drive, you may want to > connect a second drive, configure it to mirror the first and hope that > it can mirror the first. If it works, great. BTW, don't forget to > install bootblocks if this is your boot drive. > > Now, if it doesn't start to mirror the drive after being attached, > you're going to have to reboot. That's probably going to show you the > real failure. :-( > > If the controller card is onboard, not much you can do. If it's a > PCIe bus card, try to re-seat it. Sometimes things get pulled on, or > hit inadvertently and aren't sitting in the slot correctly any more. > > I agree with the other post in either replacing the connecting cables > and/or re-seating them. > > If, after all this, it doesn't work, it's probably the disk itself. > > Now, comes the patient part. If it's the drive, it's probably pretty > hot from failing and trying to do it's job. Don't laugh at this it's > worked for me 5 out of 7 times. Remove it from the machine, let it > cool to room temperature on anti-static bag. Once cool, put it in the > bag, put it in your freezer for at least three hours. Re-insert into > the machine. (At this point, you should have that other drive for the > mirror connected.) If the drive isn't a catastrophic loss, it will > work for a short time. I recommend you allow it to mirror. Ask the > drive to do NOTHING but let it sit and mirror while in single-user mode. > > However, before going to that last 'iffy' part, check everything > before that. Thank you for your suggestions. Funny you mention the freezer trick. I was just telling a co-worker about that as he's having trouble with a drive. My problem was that because of the failing drive, I couldn't verify which drive was causing the problem. Every time I'd try to issue a zpool or zfs command, it would just hang. I actually have 4 drives internally in the box and they are all together in a raidz1 pool and this pool contains my full FBSD system. Then I have another drive in an external SATA dock which I've put in it's own pool and mounted just to use for backups. I disconnected this drive and rebooted. Now I can access my system and have been able to verify that this is the failing drive. So I am lucky. All I have lost are backups. And thus all I need to do is replace this drive and then resume my backups. Thanks for your suggestions! Cheers, Drew -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com > > > On 12/06/2014 19:58, Drew Tomlinson wrote: >> I'm running FBS 9.1 RELEASE that I built several years ago. It's >> mostly a Samba server and has "just worked" so I've never done much >> more with it. However recently, I find it "locked up" with thousands >> of these messages on the console: >> >> kernel: kern.maxfiles limit exceeded by uid 0, please see tuning(7) >> >> I've looked in /var/log/messages and also see lots of messages like >> these: >> >> Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 18000000 >> Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 28 >> Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss >> 78000000 rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 >> Dec 6 13:55:53 vm kernel: siisch0: ... waiting for slots 08000000 >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: Timeout on slot 27 >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: siisch0: siis_timeout is 00040000 ss >> 78000000 rs 78000000 es 00000000 sts 801b0000 serr 00000000 >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): FLUSHCACHE48. ACB: >> ea 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command >> timeout >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. >> ACB: 60 01 fe d8 74 40 39 00 00 00 00 00 >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command >> timeout >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): Retrying command >> Dec 6 13:55:55 vm kernel: (ada0:siisch0:0:0:0): READ_FPDMA_QUEUED. >> ACB: 60 0a a5 7f 00 40 4c 00 00 00 00 00 >> >> This machine uses zfs. I have two pools: >> >> # zpool list >> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT >> zback 1.81T 848G 1008G 45% 1.00x ONLINE - >> zroot 1.81T 1.16T 666G 64% 1.00x ONLINE - >> >> Then I tried this and my ssh window is now stuck: >> >> # zpool status >> pool: zback >> state: ONLINE >> status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures. >> action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run 'zpool >> clear'. >> see: http://illumos.org/msg/ZFS-8000-HC >> scan: none requested >> config: >> >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> zback ONLINE 3 0 0 >> ada0 ONLINE 4 0 0 >> >> I opened another ssh window and tried 'zpool clear zback' as >> suggested but it appears stuck too. >> >> I'm sure I haven't provided all the relevant information so please >> ask and I will do so. I'd appreciate any guidance on how to take a >> proper backup of ada0 and what I should do next. I think this zback >> pool is just the one disk which is a 2TB drive. I'd like to know how >> to confirm that if possible since it seems the zpool commands aren't >> able to complete. >> >> I appreciate any suggestions or guidance. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Drew >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 23:15:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B033DA4 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45EBB14C for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-21.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sB7NFNha029806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:15:24 -0600 Message-ID: <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:21:38 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> In-Reply-To: <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:15:25 -0000 On 12/07/14 17:05, chris wrote: > You fail to read UPDATING. > > ---- On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:55:09 -0600 William A. Mahaffey III <wam@hiwaay.net> wrote ---- > > On 12/07/14 17:00, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > > > > .... I just tried to install svg in order to view content on the > > dragonflyBSD website. Transcript follows: > > > > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:08pm] 334 % pkg install -y svg svg2pdf svg2png > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > > Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > > FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > > All repositories are up-to-date. > > > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > > The following 16 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > > svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > > linux_base-f10: 10_9 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] > > linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] > > svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > > libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > > svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > > > The process will require 160 MB more space. > > 77 kB to be downloaded. > > Fetching svg-1.0.3.txz: 100% 7 kB 7.4k/s 00:01 > > Fetching svg2pdf-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > > Fetching libsvg-cairo-0.1.6_8.txz: 100% 15 kB 16.2k/s 00:01 > > Fetching libsvg-0.1.4_7.txz: 100% 44 kB 45.3k/s 00:01 > > Fetching svg2png-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > > Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) > > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > > Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. > > One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. > > The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 > > > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > > libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > > libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > > svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > > svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > > > The operation will free 46 kB. > > > > nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > > whew !!!! that took (10.443 cpu + 0.401 sys) sec., 0:13.10 elapsed > > time tot, 82.7% CPU efficiency > > (208 text, 2555 data, 38980 max) KB, (0+58) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % > > > > > > It seems to require/think-it-requires linux-f10 compatibility pkg's > > instead of linux-c6, which I have installed & am using where needed, > > notably firefox/flash support. pkg bug ? svg pkg bug ? pilot error ? > > TIA for any clues .... > > > > > > > BTW: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % uname -a > FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov > 3 22:38:58 UTC 2014 > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:01:03pm] 336 % > if you are referring to the 20140922 entry, I implemented all of those changes many weeks ago (wrongly, perhaps, but best as I understood them), still have this problem w/ most pkg updates/installs .... What do you think I missed ? [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:49:08am] 323 % cat /etc/make.conf WITH_PKGNG=yes OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6 CPUTYPE=native WITH_NEW_XORG=yes MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4 FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes You have new mail. [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:17:59pm] 324 % cat /etc/sysctl.conf # $FreeBSD: releng/9.3/etc/sysctl.conf 112200 2003-03-13 18:43:50Z mux $ # # This file is read when going to multi-user and its contents piped thru # ``sysctl'' to adjust kernel values. ``man 5 sysctl.conf'' for details. # # Uncomment this to prevent users from seeing information about processes that # are being run under another UID. #security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=0 # logs stuff about stray TCP inputs from other machines .... [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:18:41pm] 325 % ll /etc/make.conf /etc/sysctl.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 150 Dec 4 09:34 /etc/make.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 492 Oct 12 13:29 /etc/sysctl.conf [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:18:53pm] 326 % I think this may trace to nspluginwrapper depending on linux-f10 in pkg's, but that may not be correct .... in any event, if you need more info to diagnose, please don't hesitate .... TIA & thx .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 23:18:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE0EDE49 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F1A916B for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:18:41 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=bsdjunk; d=bsdjunk.com; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; b=W9bFojpNvf95RX3KIvmIva6u8Zz1EhsK0sZVHezCN9qWFkvEhB1icDSJWVzUshZ7ETZ4tCpUIQwV HgKNkSyFB+XZ7vj57fYONs/3oa/ALoqT2uyf2vRT7byyukxC2X4Rz743bMSrMgX+AU91HxVJKNii TlPVtzMYNdeDZfgQE3o= Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1417994319717112.74913652746898; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:18:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:17:39 -0600 From: chris To: William A. Mahaffey III Message-Id: <14a270a7c9d.e9ba1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com> In-Reply-To: <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Medium User-Agent: Zoho Mail X-Mailer: Zoho Mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:18:41 -0000 Yeah sorry, in this case you must install this using normal ports. ---- On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:15:32 -0600 William A. Mahaffey III<wam@hiwaay.net> wrote ---- On 12/07/14 17:05, chris wrote: > You fail to read UPDATING. > > ---- On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:55:09 -0600 William A. Mahaffey III &lt;wam@hiwaay.net&gt; wrote ---- > > On 12/07/14 17:00, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; .... I just tried to install svg in order to view content on the > &gt; dragonflyBSD website. Transcript follows: > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:08pm] 334 % pkg install -y svg svg2pdf svg2png > &gt; Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > &gt; FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > &gt; Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > &gt; FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > &gt; All repositories are up-to-date. > &gt; > &gt; nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > &gt; The following 16 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > &gt; > &gt; New packages to be INSTALLED: > &gt; svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux_base-f10: 10_9 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] > &gt; linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] > &gt; svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > &gt; libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > &gt; libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > &gt; svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > &gt; > &gt; The process will require 160 MB more space. > &gt; 77 kB to be downloaded. > &gt; Fetching svg-1.0.3.txz: 100% 7 kB 7.4k/s 00:01 > &gt; Fetching svg2pdf-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > &gt; Fetching libsvg-cairo-0.1.6_8.txz: 100% 15 kB 16.2k/s 00:01 > &gt; Fetching libsvg-0.1.4_7.txz: 100% 44 kB 45.3k/s 00:01 > &gt; Fetching svg2png-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > &gt; Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) > &gt; Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > &gt; Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. > &gt; One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. > &gt; The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > &gt; > &gt; Installed packages to be REMOVED: > &gt; nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 > &gt; > &gt; New packages to be INSTALLED: > &gt; libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > &gt; libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > &gt; svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > &gt; svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > &gt; svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > &gt; > &gt; The operation will free 46 kB. > &gt; > &gt; nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > &gt; whew !!!! that took (10.443 cpu + 0.401 sys) sec., 0:13.10 elapsed > &gt; time tot, 82.7% CPU efficiency > &gt; (208 text, 2555 data, 38980 max) KB, (0+58) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps > &gt; [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; It seems to require/think-it-requires linux-f10 compatibility pkg's > &gt; instead of linux-c6, which I have installed &amp; am using where needed, > &gt; notably firefox/flash support. pkg bug ? svg pkg bug ? pilot error ? > &gt; TIA for any clues .... > &gt; > &gt; > > > BTW: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % uname -a > FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov > 3 22:38:58 UTC 2014 > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:01:03pm] 336 % > if you are referring to the 20140922 entry, I implemented all of those changes many weeks ago (wrongly, perhaps, but best as I understood them), still have this problem w/ most pkg updates/installs .... What do you think I missed ? [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:49:08am] 323 % cat /etc/make.conf WITH_PKGNG=yes OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6 CPUTYPE=native WITH_NEW_XORG=yes MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4 FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes You have new mail. [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:17:59pm] 324 % cat /etc/sysctl.conf # $FreeBSD: releng/9.3/etc/sysctl.conf 112200 2003-03-13 18:43:50Z mux $ # # This file is read when going to multi-user and its contents piped thru # ``sysctl'' to adjust kernel values. ``man 5 sysctl.conf'' for details. # # Uncomment this to prevent users from seeing information about processes that # are being run under another UID. #security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=0 # logs stuff about stray TCP inputs from other machines .... [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:18:41pm] 325 % ll /etc/make.conf /etc/sysctl.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 150 Dec 4 09:34 /etc/make.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 492 Oct 12 13:29 /etc/sysctl.conf [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:18:53pm] 326 % I think this may trace to nspluginwrapper depending on linux-f10 in pkg's, but that may not be correct .... in any event, if you need more info to diagnose, please don't hesitate .... TIA & thx .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 23:21:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C38EE6 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB004-OMC4S5.hotmail.com (dub004-omc4s5.hotmail.com [157.55.2.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E865121C for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB126-W32 ([157.55.2.72]) by DUB004-OMC4S5.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Sun, 7 Dec 2014 15:19:51 -0800 X-TMN: [quxo3CAnty3RltDiNKnBVPfv324qDjO6] X-Originating-Email: [onoffon@live.it] Message-ID: From: helen ly To: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: File Transfer Protocol ftpd(8) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 00:19:52 +0100 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2014 23:19:51.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D74C930:01D01274] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:21:02 -0000 IGkgaW5zdGFsbGVkIGZ0cGQgYW4gcnVuIHdpdGggZnRwZCAtRCBhbmQNCkkgZWRpdCBmdHBjaHJv b3Qgd2l0aCBlYWNoIHVzZXIgY2FuIGFjY2VzcyB0aGUgZmlsZXMgb24gdGhlaXIgaG9tZS1kaXJl Y3RvcnkgKHVzZXJzPW1vb24gYW5kIHN1bikNCmFuZCBpIGNyZWF0ZWQgIC9Xb3JsZCBkaXJlY3Rv cnkNCnRoZXJlIGlzIGEgR3JvdXAgY2FsbGVkIGZyaWVuZHMgYW5kIGZyaWVuZHMgR3JvdXAgbWVt YmVyIG1vb24gYW5kIHN1bg0KaG93IHRvIG9ubHkgdGhlIHVzZXJzIHRoYXQgYmVsb25nIHRvIHRo ZSBmcmllbmRzIEdyb3VwIHNob3VkZCBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIGFjY2VzcyB0aGUgL1dvcmxkIGRpcmVj dG9yeQ0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIAogCiAgCQkgCSAgIAkJICA= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 23:22:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D08DFA9 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DA3236 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-21.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sB7NMV2e032322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 17:22:32 -0600 Message-ID: <5484E2AE.1000105@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:28:46 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> <14a270a7c9d.e9ba1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com> In-Reply-To: <14a270a7c9d.e9ba1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:22:33 -0000 On 12/07/14 17:17, chris wrote: > Yeah sorry, in this case you must install this using normal ports. > > ---- On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:15:32 -0600 William A. Mahaffey III<wam@hiwaay.net> wrote ---- > > On 12/07/14 17:05, chris wrote: > > You fail to read UPDATING. > > > > ---- On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:55:09 -0600 William A. Mahaffey III &lt;wam@hiwaay.net&gt; wrote ---- > > > > On 12/07/14 17:00, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt; .... I just tried to install svg in order to view content on the > > &gt; dragonflyBSD website. Transcript follows: > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt; [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:08pm] 334 % pkg install -y svg svg2pdf svg2png > > &gt; Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > &gt; FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > > &gt; Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > > &gt; FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > > &gt; All repositories are up-to-date. > > &gt; > > &gt; nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > > &gt; The following 16 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > &gt; > > &gt; New packages to be INSTALLED: > > &gt; svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux_base-f10: 10_9 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] > > &gt; linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; > > &gt; The process will require 160 MB more space. > > &gt; 77 kB to be downloaded. > > &gt; Fetching svg-1.0.3.txz: 100% 7 kB 7.4k/s 00:01 > > &gt; Fetching svg2pdf-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > > &gt; Fetching libsvg-cairo-0.1.6_8.txz: 100% 15 kB 16.2k/s 00:01 > > &gt; Fetching libsvg-0.1.4_7.txz: 100% 44 kB 45.3k/s 00:01 > > &gt; Fetching svg2png-0.1.3_5.txz: 100% 5 kB 5.2k/s 00:01 > > &gt; Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) > > &gt; Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > > &gt; Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. > > &gt; One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. > > &gt; The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > &gt; > > &gt; Installed packages to be REMOVED: > > &gt; nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 > > &gt; > > &gt; New packages to be INSTALLED: > > &gt; libsvg: 0.1.4_7 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; libsvg-cairo: 0.1.6_8 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; svg: 1.0.3 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; svg2pdf: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; svg2png: 0.1.3_5 [FreeBSD] > > &gt; > > &gt; The operation will free 46 kB. > > &gt; > > &gt; nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 is locked and may not be modified > > &gt; whew !!!! that took (10.443 cpu + 0.401 sys) sec., 0:13.10 elapsed > > &gt; time tot, 82.7% CPU efficiency > > &gt; (208 text, 2555 data, 38980 max) KB, (0+58) io, 0 pfs + 0 swaps > > &gt; [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % > > &gt; > > &gt; > > &gt; It seems to require/think-it-requires linux-f10 compatibility pkg's > > &gt; instead of linux-c6, which I have installed &amp; am using where needed, > > &gt; notably firefox/flash support. pkg bug ? svg pkg bug ? pilot error ? > > &gt; TIA for any clues .... > > &gt; > > &gt; > > > > > > BTW: > > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:55:55pm] 335 % uname -a > > FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov > > 3 22:38:58 UTC 2014 > > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:01:03pm] 336 % > > > > if you are referring to the 20140922 entry, I implemented all of those > changes many weeks ago (wrongly, perhaps, but best as I understood > them), still have this problem w/ most pkg updates/installs .... What do > you think I missed ? > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:49:08am] 323 % cat /etc/make.conf > WITH_PKGNG=yes > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6 > OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6 > CPUTYPE=native > WITH_NEW_XORG=yes > MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4 > FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes > You have new mail. > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:17:59pm] 324 % cat /etc/sysctl.conf > # $FreeBSD: releng/9.3/etc/sysctl.conf 112200 2003-03-13 18:43:50Z mux $ > # > # This file is read when going to multi-user and its contents piped thru > # ``sysctl'' to adjust kernel values. ``man 5 sysctl.conf'' for details. > # > > # Uncomment this to prevent users from seeing information about > processes that > # are being run under another UID. > #security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 > > compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 > net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=0 # logs stuff about stray TCP inputs from > other machines .... > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:18:41pm] 325 % ll /etc/make.conf /etc/sysctl.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 150 Dec 4 09:34 /etc/make.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 492 Oct 12 13:29 /etc/sysctl.conf > [root@kabini1, /etc, 5:18:53pm] 326 % > > I think this may trace to nspluginwrapper depending on linux-f10 in > pkg's, but that may not be correct .... in any event, if you need more > info to diagnose, please don't hesitate .... TIA & thx .... > Rats !!!! I have been trying to avoid mixing ports & pkg's AMAP, as per many on-list recommendations, so I guess I'll just wait until some of this stuff gets cleared up :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 00:00:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7139F3E8 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 00:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466C27C5 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 00:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F0133C1D; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 19:00:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C785439813; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 19:00:17 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> <14a270a7c9d.e9ba1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com> <5484E2AE.1000105@hiwaay.net> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 19:00:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5484E2AE.1000105@hiwaay.net> (William A. Mahaffey, III's message of "Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:28:46 -0600") Message-ID: <44388rqacu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:27 -0000 "William A. Mahaffey III" writes: > Rats !!!! I have been trying to avoid mixing ports & pkg's AMAP There is Absolutely No Reason to follow this approach. There was, at one time, but that time is now many years in the past. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 00:09:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347C4550 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 00:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C57811 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 00:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-5-37.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.5.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BFE03CC66; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 01:09:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sB809bxL002161; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 01:09:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 01:09:37 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... Message-Id: <20141208010937.0b1f1b52.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5484E2AE.1000105@hiwaay.net> References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> <14a270a7c9d.e9ba1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com> <5484E2AE.1000105@hiwaay.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:09:41 -0000 On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:28:46 -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Rats !!!! I have been trying to avoid mixing ports & pkg's AMAP, as per > many on-list recommendations, so I guess I'll just wait until some of > this stuff gets cleared up :-/ .... But you aren't mixing anything. Heavily simplified, this is what happens, when you (a) install with pkg: 1. download binary archive 2. extract binary archive 3. copy files to correct locations 4. register installed files in system's database (b) install via ports ("make install", portmaster etc.): 1. download source archive 2. extract source archive 3. apply patches, if any 4. compile 5. copy files to correct locations 6. register installed files in system's database As you can see, the last two steps are identical, and the files in question are also the same (because the packages you can install with pkg are generated from the ports with the default options). To the system, it's basically the same - and it can't even tell in _which_ way you initially have installed something. This is because "make install" will simply create a binary package and install it, just what pkg would do. Nowadays, mixing ports and pkg isn't very problematic. There are very few "edge cases", but pkg also has methods to deal with those. So your rule could be: Install via pkg; if it does not work, install from ports. As I said, it doesn't really make a difference. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 02:34:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898CC5DB for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell.msen.com (msen.com [148.59.86.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551795F0 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:34:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Sent-To: Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-170-102-4.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.170.102.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.msen.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id sB82YQTq017174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 21:34:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mark@msen.com) Message-ID: <54850E3C.7030206@msen.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 21:34:36 -0500 From: Mark Moellering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Raspberry Pi issues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=99.170.102.4; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=99.170.102.4; helo=[192.168.1.67] X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: shell.msen.com; Sender-ip: 99.170.102.4; Sender-helo: [192.168.1.67]; ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 02:34:33 -0000 Everyone, I am trying to get FreeBSD running on a Raspberry Pi. I have found a lot of info and many stories of success online but I am having some real difficulty with Release 10.1 , using the official arm6 release image. I am using a Raspberry Pi B+ 512MB Ram, only 256MB found. Initially, it would not boot properly. I downloaded various versions of start.elf from github. The latest one also gave problems but a slightly older one worked. I found several posts from late october claiming success and used a version from around that time. All of the posts I found referncing success were either 11-current or 10.1-RC3 , so I don't know if there is something different for 10.1 Release. Not seeing all of the memory is my first problem. The second problem is I am unable to compile software, which obviously could be related to the memory issue. The error I see every time is when compiling is: sqlite/sqlite3.c:8542:26: warning: unused variable 'sqlite3one' [-Wunused-const-variable] SQLITE_PRIVATE const int sqlite3one = 1; ^ cc: error: unable to execute command: Killed cc: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 Target: armv6--freebsd10.1-gnueabi Thread model: posix cc: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. cc: note: diagnostic msg: Error generating preprocessed source(s). *** [sqlite/libsqlite_static_la-sqlite3.lo] Error code 1 If anyone has any suggestions, etc. it would be greatly appreciated. Mark Moellering From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 02:55:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E80901 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAC3800 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3jwppZ0gnSzVq; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 21:47:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 21:47:33 -0500 From: Daniel Staal To: Ernie Luzar , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 02:55:16 -0000 --As of December 7, 2014 9:06:14 PM +0800, Ernie Luzar is alleged to have said: > Hello list > > Keep getting spam email from some guy selling bulk solar panels. > I know SpamAssassin has built in check of different places that provide > list of known spam email addresses. > Where can I find a list of places to notify them of this spam email > address? list@beawindhog.com --As for the rest, it is mine. There's several good ways to report this to Spamassassin - write a rule that catches it, or contribute to their spam corpus so that they can test rules against it, or use spamassassin's reporting features. For the first, the best place to start is the Spamassassin mailing list: > list-help: > list-unsubscribe: > list-subscribe: > List-Post: (See also: , as you're asking one of them.) For the second, I'd still start with the mailing list, but instructions on setup are here: (Note they will want you to analyze all your mail - spam and ham - not just a few messages. Actual emails are not uploaded - just the record of what rules your messages hit.) The most direct answer for your question - in the FAQ above - is to use Spamassassin's reporting features - `man spamassassin-run` lists them, or as I said the FAQ above. Short version: `spamassassin -r < fullemailmessage.txt` (Fuller details in the FAQ and man page.) Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 03:41:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2E4430 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 03:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229A7CCE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 03:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id sB83HL0n048063; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:17:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <54851841.8090103@bananmonarki.se> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 04:17:21 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ernie Luzar , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 03:41:53 -0000 On 2014-12-07 14:06, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Hello list > > Keep getting spam email from some guy selling bulk solar panels. > I know SpamAssassin has built in check of different places that provide > list of known spam email addresses. > Where can I find a list of places to notify them of this spam email > address? list@beawindhog.com > > Thanks Put the sending IP in your firewall. Problem gone. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 04:34:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034CDB93 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell.msen.com (msen.com [148.59.86.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF7C9F7 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:34:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Sent-To: Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-170-102-4.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.170.102.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.msen.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id sB84Yh7o038004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:34:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mark@msen.com) Message-ID: <54852A6D.7040208@msen.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:34:53 -0500 From: Mark Moellering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi issues [SOLVED] References: <54850E3C.7030206@msen.com> In-Reply-To: <54850E3C.7030206@msen.com> Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=99.170.102.4; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=99.170.102.4; helo=[192.168.1.67] X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: shell.msen.com; Sender-ip: 99.170.102.4; Sender-helo: [192.168.1.67]; ) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 04:34:45 -0000 On 12/7/2014 9:34 PM, Mark Moellering wrote: > Everyone, > > I am trying to get FreeBSD running on a Raspberry Pi. I have > found a lot of info and many stories of success online but I am having > some real difficulty with Release 10.1 , using the official arm6 > release image. > > I am using a Raspberry Pi B+ 512MB Ram, only 256MB found. Initially, > it would not boot properly. I downloaded various versions of > start.elf from github. The latest one also gave problems but a > slightly older one worked. I found several posts from late october > claiming success and used a version from around that time. All of the > posts I found referncing success were either 11-current or 10.1-RC3 , > so I don't know if there is something different for 10.1 Release. Not > seeing all of the memory is my first problem. > > The second problem is I am unable to compile software, which obviously > could be related to the memory issue. The error I see every time is > when compiling is: > > sqlite/sqlite3.c:8542:26: warning: unused variable 'sqlite3one' > [-Wunused-const-variable] > SQLITE_PRIVATE const int sqlite3one = 1; > ^ > cc: error: unable to execute command: Killed > cc: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see > invocation) > FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 > Target: armv6--freebsd10.1-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > cc: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to > https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace, > preprocessed source, and associated run script. > cc: note: diagnostic msg: Error generating preprocessed source(s). > *** [sqlite/libsqlite_static_la-sqlite3.lo] Error code 1 > > > If anyone has any suggestions, etc. it would be greatly appreciated. > > Mark Moellering > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > All, I carefully reread the following Raspberry Pi Forum Post : http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=89622 The important part was an update where it specified getting FreeBSD Specific boot files from a directory on github, which is different than the 'master' boot files specified elsewhere: ************************************************************************************** UPDATE: There are some new boot files at the following URL: https://github.com/kientzle/crochet-fre ... rryPi/boot Download the following files and copy them to your MSDOS partition: bootcode.bin fixup.dat fixup_cd.dat start.elf start_cd.elf *********************************************************************************** using the above files fixed the memory and subsequently, the compiling problem. I also found the suggestion : echo 'hw.bcm2835.sdhci.hs="0"' >> /boot/loader.conf extremely helpful. I hope this helps someone. Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 04:51:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDB2205 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096B8232 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-21.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sB84oxmW027489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 22:50:59 -0600 Message-ID: <54852FA9.6040108@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:57:13 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> <14a270a7c9d.e9ba1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com> <5484E2AE.1000105@hiwaay.net> <20141208010937.0b1f1b52.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20141208010937.0b1f1b52.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 04:51:07 -0000 On 12/07/14 18:09, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:28:46 -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> Rats !!!! I have been trying to avoid mixing ports & pkg's AMAP, as per >> many on-list recommendations, so I guess I'll just wait until some of >> this stuff gets cleared up :-/ .... > But you aren't mixing anything. Heavily simplified, this > is what happens, when you > > (a) install with pkg: > 1. download binary archive > 2. extract binary archive > 3. copy files to correct locations > 4. register installed files in system's database > > (b) install via ports ("make install", portmaster etc.): > 1. download source archive > 2. extract source archive > 3. apply patches, if any > 4. compile > 5. copy files to correct locations > 6. register installed files in system's database > > As you can see, the last two steps are identical, and the > files in question are also the same (because the packages > you can install with pkg are generated from the ports with > the default options). To the system, it's basically the > same - and it can't even tell in _which_ way you initially > have installed something. This is because "make install" > will simply create a binary package and install it, just > what pkg would do. > > Nowadays, mixing ports and pkg isn't very problematic. There > are very few "edge cases", but pkg also has methods to deal > with those. So your rule could be: Install via pkg; if it > does not work, install from ports. As I said, it doesn't > really make a difference. :-) > > > Hmmmmm .... OK, I'll reconsider, but I'm fairly sure I got that advice (not to mix the 2) on this list, & I have only been here a few months .... The biggest problem I have with mixing the 2 is remembering which package gets updated w/ pkg & which w/ ports .... If I just stick w/ pkg, that's 1 less thing to screw up :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 07:15:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9223F936 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6E4324 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB87FPJu030831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:15:25 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk sB87FPJu030831 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1418022925; bh=rZ51+cXhTgcBQvpIBVWRXt42Y9oI/j9WChPlFRKEAVs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Mon,=2008=20Dec=202014=2007:15:07=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20problems=20installing=20svg=20pkg =20....|References:=20<5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net>=20<5484DC3C.90 60900@hiwaay.net>=20<14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.307828963701268081 4@bsdjunk.com>=20<5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net>=20<14a270a7c9d.e9ba 1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com>=20<5484E2AE.1000105@hi waay.net>=20<44388rqacu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>|In-Reply-To:=20<44388 rqacu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>; b=HjWOzi57o+Jg/Oz5+vj8LoQkmwBBS2fsgdLgAo762Wrt3Yrw+kM5yoChC9TOKpQS8 Cfj4+G392zj1+zY1IGZjTsdCQwl7jsi6mfQsIDmRyepjbEwoop5SSKO8CR/YaeY6Ci ucfrL06400Hc7JMEIb0TL1UMSZxYFjvZE/Fo3ivk= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <54854FFB.7030204@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:15:07 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> <5484E102.9060403@hiwaay.net> <14a270a7c9d.e9ba1df8332384.1403959691871347766@bsdjunk.com> <5484E2AE.1000105@hiwaay.net> <44388rqacu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44388rqacu.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wiudpvv7nCROoMIm0vbwmqFgd29BxLFKG" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:15:34 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Wiudpvv7nCROoMIm0vbwmqFgd29BxLFKG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/12/2014 00:00, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "William A. Mahaffey III" writes: >=20 >> Rats !!!! I have been trying to avoid mixing ports & pkg's AMAP >=20 > There is Absolutely No Reason to follow this approach. >=20 > There was, at one time, but that time is now many > years in the past. Mixing pkgs and ports is doable now, but... Yes, with pkg(8) and the new pkg repositories with weekly package updates it is much more feasible to mix standard pkgs and pkgs you compile yourself. However you need to understand that - - Standard packages have the default options settings. This means that where there are alternate dependency choices then the default dependencies are what you're going to get from the standard pkgs. - There's a delay of 4--5 days while the standard pkgs are compiled, and they are on a weekly cycle, so your local ports tree may well be up to 10 days ahead of what's available from the pkg repos. The first of these is a structural problem in the ports, in that package dependencies are 'baked in' as being on exact versions of the upstream pkg dependencies at compile time. This contrasts with the flexibility available before compiling. In practice this means that substituting your own-built pkgs works best for leaf ports. The second is usually pretty harmless and would tend to only affect a few ports most of the time. However, on occasion there will be wide-scale changes in the ports which have a more significant impact. The recent changes from getopts to getopts-runtime and to the way perl ports are installed are cases in point. You can work round it by always checking out the ports tree using the revision that was current on the previous Wednesday night. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --Wiudpvv7nCROoMIm0vbwmqFgd29BxLFKG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUhVAMXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATqKUP/jEcPd9qUp12wnb4wiL9qggz WR7lBtd2KydpsXuTrjouaBTvqzdaoS9uNXZTR6ARtZK23dnP+viIUsI7lsP4ufXt FCrh/qaUlwfhXXUp5UO7+pc1RfTNQDCkttXIISWCwi1wHevXsabVVcTBBnrNvAdL P2ySBNYtI3LS1/LOHetLESXHLq86vj8szOTHQEB9WaI7wN6LFhIlVNXpANyxx7/p Qd65FeXplE12FowuAyEssoOjOcWPwdnI6I9Bwx9AIjZWEoHlR+4JuezPqW/snFvt 1HkwjUqe6dFMRCYee4gwt16hCI4sB+MLob268Bfa57MHAkS0+UcxCbTyi0daGWvr QkNKYHNwIzChwCqUwcFp0MQIESSe80SvnqMBSVS952lrQ7N73WOc3lL0RiXS2pi7 /9zQbfgF1jLLNvIFRkV4lkXz9zxbG8pNNY0xdHdJCp8g4FlGhESo3obE5whW2lYQ hvIELbCJtKMP0cpbK9u4dl8/swbXzHX0V+MosQdqsh9H3LoRphmRlZNbiMcTDH+x Zd8zp3YmtOSawrfcbOE3zcSagtjtvPcZZUYo1A8LnRlZZhRWjRWh+wyWppKIovwK V5BvlpFcarx14gIFhIHirAHp76rDuRYYFdw0FUQf1PdF0IssZLweoP6T4yjJVwA5 w1tScCUCXh/qvbc+Mlmt =k9Tr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Wiudpvv7nCROoMIm0vbwmqFgd29BxLFKG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 07:18:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771A49FE; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34854357; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XxsWv-001jls-Ol>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:14:49 +0100 Received: from p578a69f9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.138.105.249] helo=prometheus) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XxsWv-002M6F-Kx>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:14:49 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:13:45 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access Message-ID: <20141208081345.6960d593@prometheus> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 87.138.105.249 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:18:44 -0000 Running CURRENT (FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #2 r275512: Fri Dec 5 16:00:34 CET 2014 amd64), I ran into some kind of obscurity I can not fathom. Updating ports fails since a couple of days by now (I do updates on a daily basis). fetch isn't capable of reaching any(!) server it tries to download sourcecode tarballs from (neither via ports ftp, http, https). When manually copied the sources of the tarball to Firefox' URL requester, I can luckily download the sources to whatever destination I like and I have to copy them to the /usr/ports/distfiles[/blabla] destination manually. As I understood "fetch" it establishes a simple ftp, http or https connection, as Firefox does. But it seems that something is going terribly wrong. It would be nice if someone could push me towards a hint or something to solve the problem. I hope it's not a serious bug but a simple error in the configuration. Thanks in advance, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 08:29:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54211A1F for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x243.google.com (mail-pa0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23173C97 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f67.google.com with SMTP id lj1so2535661pab.10 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:29:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=WUVGzgIevQEDvpr/7i1eVvCgKQAJES0YVVoxXlDeQUs=; b=pghzElbovCBDFVsLOXULRil/2JCSe+mN70G2IxgKmxahsXTUPZncAgn0MNrd6X+Urj fmoEFf4M47vCEzf+MWt+flZ6+hqSRbFMXA51iB0nrTZPyHKfcRyrlfMQvmHMm1Lgr24i iEv0yRGJqNwt2dSiQ5FAWDFrVm0RAhd9U9TLONTcg8pYffaXGcwIrwMwxUWjtRRkkNOE YTPVPYGGb+tNeIlKP3LVR+LJOrne59ozOqN386swrN+4gwY04pvTYdFkALnRll7PcACx +WsjPxgo/OCFY4EZYBhbW3MI5+Iv1L5QbmRvPAo3nh2/dzHM6bzea6q+GR9UKdkQQz+x Tm1A== X-Received: by 10.68.108.67 with SMTP id hi3mr58634256pbb.19.1418023352699; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.116] ([120.29.118.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ql6sm35362528pbb.39.2014.12.07.23.22.30 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:22:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <548551C9.2050004@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:22:49 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Staal Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:29:43 -0000 Daniel Staal wrote: > --As of December 7, 2014 9:06:14 PM +0800, Ernie Luzar is alleged to > have said: > >> Hello list >> >> Keep getting spam email from some guy selling bulk solar panels. >> I know SpamAssassin has built in check of different places that provide >> list of known spam email addresses. >> Where can I find a list of places to notify them of this spam email >> address? list@beawindhog.com > > --As for the rest, it is mine. > > There's several good ways to report this to Spamassassin - write a > rule that catches it, or contribute to their spam corpus so that they > can test rules against it, or use spamassassin's reporting features. > > For the first, the best place to start is the Spamassassin mailing list: >> list-help: >> list-unsubscribe: >> list-subscribe: >> List-Post: > (See also: > , as > you're asking one of them.) > > For the second, I'd still start with the mailing list, but > instructions on setup are here: > > (Note they will want you to analyze all your mail - spam and ham - not > just a few messages. Actual emails are not uploaded - just the record > of what rules your messages hit.) > > The most direct answer for your question - in the FAQ above - is to > use Spamassassin's reporting features - `man spamassassin-run` lists > them, or as I said the FAQ above. Short version: `spamassassin -r < > fullemailmessage.txt` (Fuller details in the FAQ and man page.) > > Daniel T. Staal > > --------------------------------------------------------------- My domain name, website and email is all hosted by namecheap.com. Their email is run on apache storing email in sqlite database and running spamassassin under apache. They provide a cpanel menu system for me to customize my hosted world. I do not have direct access to their servers /root. This means I have no way to perform the tasks talked about by above posts. The basic default spamassassin rules have cut the spam by 80%. But was still getting spam from china and Korea and spam in languages other then English. I had namecheap tech support enable the following options for my hosted email system. Changed* required_score* from 5 to 3. This stopped 15% of the spam that was still getting through. Then enabled the following tests, *ok_languages en **blacklist_from *.cn *to kill all email from China* **blacklist_from *.ke *to kill all email from Korea* **blacklist_from *@beawindhog.com *to kill all email from that domain name that I posted about *score CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER 3.1* *score UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY 5.1 *both of these options kill email not in English language.* * Since this was enabled I have not had any spam get through. My thanks goes out to all who replied. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 08:59:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE6A817B for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C08DF79 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob118.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVIVoT9QHrEAIQxV37bjhVGo6qKMwAFPt@postini.com; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:59:24 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k14so5554763wgh.24 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:58:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=29Q3lhVtQc8d3qi6J2XgExVGtkvAZ+HH8vZetYsG2V8=; b=D7Ve2unqvPWTNTEg19oT18uFuou2JzXOFNl6AvrfFWzE188sfP7OG0TEWTiHIX9B1J 3c5/nTx31/1uNt0fy+FOZbDRwgY4pHQvnYhV98CYlewfBYS8kGmolboUwSgZZ+Yf+rAz R+2TVRAwW66bIlLnWRHd+T50UsvUzFnROQO7jni67k2VKQKLh4OCdiGYEDKSl2/+xLgQ sBcx4fhvBa+5eAAD43fEWxNWpbApOgMrSzTwBzJZnD8avq0QgWYOzFrPN+/6mIzh19cK vWsZubL2t0Uh1Jx418r2ZfbhVAG5JK4z+pau4GvzR5Q2mWv6KmGn4gs/mevXSP0UxErs ivng== X-Received: by 10.180.126.99 with SMTP id mx3mr22476290wib.66.1418027371715; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:29:31 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn2rDDCF08MpVR/cU2isClrs1/dtG43XLvefawoZioFHqXF6cefLqGu6lDkgFfMKHrhSH20J/eMzvrGBoxtAib2trxbCVGRj1XH429Pjv1xgCzIgpdo5/qz9dnovYHGL+T5kv7ruv6K3ihxehZd7tiz0XFNjGc4cyTS3Y0D9epYHT3kW7Q= X-Received: by 10.180.126.99 with SMTP id mx3mr22476280wib.66.1418027371626; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pf4sm55674094wjb.36.2014.12.08.00.29.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:29:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:29:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:29:29 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB88TT2n021216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:29:29 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sB88TTRV021215; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:29:29 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201412080829.sB88TTRV021215@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, mark@msen.com Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi issues Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <54850E3C.7030206@msen.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:59:25 -0000 I'll having a reatively easy life with RPi-B and 10.1-release. I've now built 316 packages with few panics, which I attribute to file system errors, later fixed with fsck. So I suggest try 10.1-release first. Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 09:09:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DECBC466 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B360FD for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bret-dd-workstation.busby.net (d175-38-164-61.per801.wa.optusnet.com.au [175.38.164.61]) by mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA4C91041CEB; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:09:16 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:09:28 +0800 (AWST) From: Bret Busby To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out In-Reply-To: <548551C9.2050004@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> <548551C9.2050004@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=dMCfxopb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=KI902hRDt/leh1fqGGDsvg==:117 a=KI902hRDt/leh1fqGGDsvg==:17 a=KyKAJ3vZAAAA:8 a=PO7r1zJSAAAA:8 a=Fbz3YZ2NP88A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Fa5_YPFaAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=VfFCN93eAAAA:8 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=RWJ7mqTdAAAA:8 a=ZEaZD8YCAAAA:8 a=8wnplr4fZANIH-qIxlkA:9 a=lkvy4SPa1CGfN3iM:21 a=zoPvLT6qWbMMp7WP:21 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=T4o0C1l1TcQA:10 a=aL0BRIZNGg8A:10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:09:26 -0000 On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:22:49 > From: Ernie Luzar > To: Daniel Staal > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out > > Daniel Staal wrote: >> --As of December 7, 2014 9:06:14 PM +0800, Ernie Luzar is alleged to have >> said: >> >>> Hello list >>> >>> Keep getting spam email from some guy selling bulk solar panels. >>> I know SpamAssassin has built in check of different places that provide >>> list of known spam email addresses. >>> Where can I find a list of places to notify them of this spam email >>> address? list@beawindhog.com >> >> --As for the rest, it is mine. >> >> There's several good ways to report this to Spamassassin - write a rule >> that catches it, or contribute to their spam corpus so that they can test >> rules against it, or use spamassassin's reporting features. >> >> For the first, the best place to start is the Spamassassin mailing list: >>> list-help: >>> list-unsubscribe: >>> list-subscribe: >>> List-Post: >> (See also: , >> as you're asking one of them.) >> >> For the second, I'd still start with the mailing list, but instructions on >> setup are here: >> >> (Note they will want you to analyze all your mail - spam and ham - not just >> a few messages. Actual emails are not uploaded - just the record of what >> rules your messages hit.) >> >> The most direct answer for your question - in the FAQ above - is to use >> Spamassassin's reporting features - `man spamassassin-run` lists them, or >> as I said the FAQ above. Short version: `spamassassin -r < >> fullemailmessage.txt` (Fuller details in the FAQ and man page.) >> >> Daniel T. Staal >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- > > My domain name, website and email is all hosted by namecheap.com. Their email > is run on apache storing email in sqlite database and running spamassassin > under apache. They provide a cpanel menu system for me to customize my hosted > world. I do not have direct access to their servers /root. This means I have > no way to perform the tasks talked about by above posts. The basic default > spamassassin rules have cut the spam by 80%. But was still getting spam from > china and Korea and spam in languages other then English. I had namecheap > tech support enable the following options for my hosted email system. > Changed* required_score* from 5 to 3. This stopped 15% of the spam that was > still getting through. Then enabled the following tests, > *ok_languages en > **blacklist_from *.cn *to kill all email from China* > **blacklist_from *.ke *to kill all email from Korea* > **blacklist_from *@beawindhog.com *to kill all email from that domain > name that I posted about > *score CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER 3.1* > *score UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY 5.1 *both of these options kill email not > in English language.* > * > Since this was enabled I have not had any spam get through. > > My thanks goes out to all who replied. > > Hello. I would be wary of using the filtering that you have detailed. The two blacklist lines are, I believe, too non-specific. I use alpine as my email application for this list, and, multiple other lists and people, and all of my spam handling is done (quite laboriously) by the use of the powerful filtering in alpine, which filtering, I have built up, over many years. The problems that I see with those two blacklist lines, include, as examples, for the first line; "*.cn", all *.cnet.com<|.*> email addreses; that is, extrapolating that possibility, all *.cne*.*.* addresses, being excluded, and, thence, for the second line, all *.ke*.* addresses, being excluded, so, including all *.kent.*.*, all *.kerry.*.*, et al, addresses. The thing is that filters, from my understanding, apart from the gmail filters, generally search for matches of substrings, so, and email addresses with the substrings that your blacklits rules entail, will be excluded, not just email addresses from the two countries involved. I do not know for what, you use your email, but, if you do any kind of research, or, your communications are not exclusive (limites to a small set of known people), then you could be inadvertently, accidentally, excluding people whose communications you may want to receive, and who may give up trying to contact you. I may be completely wrong, about how the particular rules are applied, in your case, but, from my exsperience, as I said, apart from gmail filters, filters use matches of substrings, and so, you could lose alot more than you intend, through the processs aplied in your case. Spo, you may want to review that method of email filtering, as specified. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of Book 1 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 09:19:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8AD1990; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB4F24F; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x19so4143925ier.27 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:19:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/nhiNwtV1tlbrj0qih3uPfN2hjsC97Z5R5UIcKBaB60=; b=OgMdcXGJgT3DPQSy3ig3/jsaAZOyxGk70Cmq2QOSLsWwNRgTWPB2rm+/nJ75KkGjat 5BZlbbmRFjnK3tQmJ5qM+Xabou44erzoPWlWTTWa2wAAdv/vGB0vYQQ/5dK2xzbLaAh4 2FlSbDJAOzYr6TSqYOKOy08/em09FXJi0hE4EY68Z1HzFo1VLdeRTNdKc5cQKMvxvWUE p4ilCk5qztaIUvIufohsU+AciC1QvRnVFTYKuGlJUEUbWjjxaX/Y1PAFXS+pJ2rjAriy uOTKxDK3Wny8ThgZWFng/AP8Z200XRYZ23kOTr2suNxL9t3mQA2NOY9qH6FF50IwTrS/ HYBg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.103.3 with SMTP id fs3mr13559150igb.6.1418030341088; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:19:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: olivier2553@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.44.18 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 01:19:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141208081345.6960d593@prometheus> References: <20141208081345.6960d593@prometheus> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:19:01 +0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c1nOwWWgwZlVgcthfxa_b90d-Ms Message-ID: Subject: Re: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access From: Olivier Nicole To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:19:02 -0000 Olivier, > Running CURRENT (FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #2 r275512: Fri Dec 5 16:00:34 > CET 2014 amd64), I ran into some kind of obscurity I can not fathom. > > Updating ports fails since a couple of days by now (I do updates on > a daily basis). fetch isn't capable of reaching any(!) server it tries > to download sourcecode tarballs from (neither via ports ftp, http, > https). > > When manually copied the sources of the tarball to Firefox' URL > requester, I can luckily download the sources to whatever destination I > like and I have to copy them to the /usr/ports/distfiles[/blabla] > destination manually. Did you try to fetch the source manually: fetch URL... Just to confirm/infirm the problem with fetch. Do you have some HTTP_PROXY env variable set? Olivier > > As I understood "fetch" it establishes a simple ftp, http or https > connection, as Firefox does. But it seems that something is going > terribly wrong. > > It would be nice if someone could push me towards a hint or something > to solve the problem. I hope it's not a serious bug but a simple error > in the configuration. > > Thanks in advance, > Oliver > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 09:32:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48965E44 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA071639 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so4103233wiv.12 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:32:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lAOEXtFkbzAFGNe/W80rojtYog7BBjuon/7hf9tcKSo=; b=EE2oYk1EGNsjSvVq/qW5u9Ez/034OLG7fuMmlTYAX+dnUaQmIZKBcjuJU1zzRrOjSs 6YyfndTNHdLVUc34+vfNRhshkltQgvrn1xJzPA7z/I41vaDge9dDBBhpo8TG8P9c6Cwc CHzR8unYEBBjQsX43Rzrb5usz3ZAyToUkWIZN5lYIaezmin5Qlf74CkzrYeKjU0ISsFo vpxocLXZuJzRfhAFUmUQHfDCIuJMmcMrorg0Hd7mxO7suj1gbhuENmFAFZVJd1dUq+8J +X/nB+A0UilzEY4NRAIl043pGbC9J6W4UUZsfuOrwS8kMOqmaDBl+EX4bKnL3lJIgdcu ln/w== X-Received: by 10.194.20.98 with SMTP id m2mr43790923wje.52.1418031138192; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (169-8-170-95.reverse.btadsl.fr. [95.170.8.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nb8sm9055358wic.7.2014.12.08.01.32.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:32:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54857020.3020704@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:32:16 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems installing svg pkg .... References: <5484DC09.2000203@hiwaay.net> <5484DC3C.9060900@hiwaay.net> <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> In-Reply-To: <14a2700039c.cff56e7f331868.3078289637012680814@bsdjunk.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:32:20 -0000 Le 08/12/2014 00:05, chris a écrit : > You fail to read UPDATING. > > I'm not sure if UPDATING is still necessary when using pkgng. Oh, you fail to not top post btw. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 09:43:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D321B9; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EB87A9; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so5743656wgg.0 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:43:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jtfu6pSC2KlrzcqpzWEScy8RbVrsr4JSBaPM6VTsl7g=; b=c19ymOvfYVx6BhfFfUxpvs2AZAWxJ+4mscjENQt4PBzTWgafyBGvwI5wKgP+mBDHeQ 2NF6hFeg118zuUSnxVRiDwVwV+NWhI+vl5wpcjRNXftTyufAqheF/EzNnofuuuce0xsm 9CVaLOJhnVsrmG1p95KksP5yvjr/YG8WZ3tAodL/cLk+CW3TIAjVS27o7jFtV9zsMuUj wIDw0jYLa6t/dyvCd1jzAFhpPLL28EcCAFIo9yW4K8Qew9CpVT+3VXp9wM/ebWqT7J1P rg6fL9VLSwQfVD4n/Yw3+i2eN4Tx6GyE46qaHiO0lG4K4idQz4lb0FLk3qzbSmboPf9c tk3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.68 with SMTP id r4mr22073776wiv.33.1418031785120; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:43:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.151.130 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 01:43:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:43:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? From: grarpamp To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:43:07 -0000 HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? What bits of FreeBSD are aware and can take proper advantage of Intel HTT, such as its thread/process schedulers (sched-BSD/ULE/...), etc? What system/app loads are, or are not, likely to benefit with today's HyperThreading CPU's? Kernel (ZFS/crypto/net/...) vs. Userland (apps)? Does anyone have performance stats for this current class of CPU to post comparing HT (enabled and disabled) while using more than four processes/threads in parallel? For instance, these two Intel Xeon Haswell four core CPU's are identical except for HT [1] (e3-1226v3 and e3-1246v3), and you can always turn HT off for testing. http://ark.intel.com/compare/80917,80916 There are some Core i3/i5/i7 Haswell parts with HT as well. http://ark.intel.com/Search/Advanced?s=t&ECCMemory=true&VTD=true&AESTech=true There don't seem to be many reviews of Xeon processors, let alone HT. And most Unix talk of HT seems dated by at least a few years and a couple processor generations. Also, was the HT cache leak security issue from a decade ago ever fixed in hardware? "Cache missing for fun and profit" http://www.daemonology.net/papers/ Being unsure of the best list, please direct replies to whichever is good. Thanks. [1] Plus 200MHz/6% clock per core and $59/27% market price bumps, but this thread is about whether or not there is any benefit to HT in current Intel CPU's such as Haswell, how much of one, and where. Once that is determined, then you can factor in other parameters like these to see if it's an overall value. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 10:01:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A947B4; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4BD9BB; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Xxv7i-002rS2-FC>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:00:58 +0100 Received: from p578a69f9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.138.105.249] helo=prometheus) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Xxv7i-002fo0-CJ>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:00:58 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:59:54 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Olivier Nicole Subject: Re: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access Message-ID: <20141208105954.4a456a6a@prometheus> In-Reply-To: References: <20141208081345.6960d593@prometheus> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 87.138.105.249 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:01:02 -0000 On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:19:01 +0700 Olivier Nicole wrote: > Olivier, > > > Running CURRENT (FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #2 r275512: Fri Dec 5 > > 16:00:34 CET 2014 amd64), I ran into some kind of obscurity I can > > not fathom. > > > > Updating ports fails since a couple of days by now (I do updates on > > a daily basis). fetch isn't capable of reaching any(!) server it > > tries to download sourcecode tarballs from (neither via ports ftp, > > http, https). > > > > When manually copied the sources of the tarball to Firefox' URL > > requester, I can luckily download the sources to whatever > > destination I like and I have to copy them to > > the /usr/ports/distfiles[/blabla] destination manually. > > Did you try to fetch the source manually: fetch URL... Yes I did, no success, see below for the magic solution of the "problem" ... > > Just to confirm/infirm the problem with fetch. Do you have some > HTTP_PROXY env variable set? That was the hint of the hints. I swapped from a "secured" environment back to a more open and forgot to reset/unset the http_proxy and ftp_proxy environment variables :-( I wasn't aware of the fact that I had set them. So, the problem is bewtween my eyes ... Sorry for the noise, many thanks for the quick solution ... Oliver > > Olivier > > > > > As I understood "fetch" it establishes a simple ftp, http or https > > connection, as Firefox does. But it seems that something is going > > terribly wrong. > > > > It would be nice if someone could push me towards a hint or > > something to solve the problem. I hope it's not a serious bug but a > > simple error in the configuration. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Oliver > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:28:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7FDA191; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7FDA343; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34ADBDC30; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:28:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B398DBDC2E; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:28:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333C460E8; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:28:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9B1794900B; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:28:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:28:24 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Ram=C3=B3n_Molina_Menor?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds Message-ID: <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:28:28 -0000 +--On 7 d=C3=A9cembre 2014 11:15:35 +0100 Juan Ram=C3=B3n Molina Menor wrote: | Hi! |=20 | Now that the new_xorg and ssp repositories are not being updated any | more, what is the reason for the 'beefy' machines to build ports only | once a week? Can we expect the frequency of package upgrades to be higher | soon? Right now, it does take 3 to 4 days to build the packages each week, so it's a bit hard to make it more often than once a week. We have plans for the future, with more building machines, it will be announced when it happens. --=20 Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 12:28:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9F7B63 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (smtp22.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2287B5D for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2214.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BBAE470000BA for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:22:05 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (137.34.4.93.rev.sfr.net [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2214.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 954F070000AB for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:22:05 +0100 (CET) X-SFR-UUID: 20141208122205611.954F070000AB@msfrf2214.sfr.fr Message-ID: <548597EB.3000102@club-internet.fr> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:22:03 +0100 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:28:23 -0000 > +--On 7 décembre 2014 11:15:35 +0100 Juan Ramón Molina Menor > > wrote: > |/ Hi! > /|/ > /|/ Now that the new_xorg and ssp repositories are not being updated any > /|/ more, what is the reason for the 'beefy' machines to build ports only > /|/ once a week? Can we expect the frequency of package upgrades to be higher > /|/ soon? > / > Right now, it does take 3 to 4 days to build the packages each week, so > it's a bit hard to make it more often than once a week. We have plans for > the future, with more building machines, it will be announced when it > happens. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold Thanks for the explanation Mathieu. Best regards, Juan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 13:23:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F10E7BC5 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tweddell.vserver-on.de (tweddell.de [84.38.66.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C3B13C for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bastian by tweddell.vserver-on.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XxyHa-0007KD-46 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:23:22 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:23:22 +0100 From: bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Error in pkg mgnt of libintl Message-ID: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:23:27 -0000 Hey all, I run a recently installed FreeBSD myHost 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 I use a quite simple set of packages, base system + X11 + i3wm. Nearly all work is done via rvxt. Last weekend I tried to mount a ntfs partinioned disk, which urged me to install ntfs + fuse related tools: """ Dec 6 20:03:44 myHost pkg: fusefs-libs-2.9.3_3 installed Dec 6 20:03:44 myHost pkg: libublio-20070103 installed Dec 6 20:03:44 myHost pkg: ntfsprogs-2.0.0_4 installed Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext-0.18.3.1_1 deinstalled Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext-runtime-0.19.3 installed Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext-tools-0.19.3 installed Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext upgraded: 0.18.3.1_1 -> 0.19.3 Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: libspectrum-1.1.1_3 installed Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: fuse-1.1.1_5 installed Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: libaudiofile-0.3.6_1 installed Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: rlog-1.4_2 installed Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: fuse-utils-1.1.1_3 installed Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: fusefs-sshfs-2.5 installed Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: fusefs-encfs-1.7.4_7 installed """ (BTW, I question my self, if r/o ntfs support is available in 10.1) After that I install VLC (I guess, now you know what my intention was): """ Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: flac-1.3.0_3 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libdaemon-0.14_1 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libsndfile-1.0.25_4 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: xdg-utils-1.0.2.20130919_1 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: qt4-corelib-4.8.6_3 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libebml-1.3.0 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libdvdread-4.9.9_2 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libcddb-1.3.2_3 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: avahi-app-0.6.31_3 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libmpeg2-0.5.1_6 installed Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: taglib-1.9.1_2 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libsamplerate-0.1.8_5 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libmad-0.15.1b_5 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: qt4-gui-4.8.6_2 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libmatroska-1.4.1_1 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libdvdnav-4.2.1_1 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libdvbpsi-1.2.0 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libdca-0.0.5_1 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: twolame-0.3.13_3 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: liba52-0.7.4_3 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: faad2-2.7_5,1 installed Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost dbus[766]: [system] Reloaded configuration Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost dbus[766]: [system] Reloaded configuration Dec 6 20:24:54 myHost pkg: vlc-2.1.5_11,4 installed """ Whitin one of these steps above, a failure sneaked into my package management system. Quite a number of tools fail to work due to unfulfiled library dependency: """ 109 # vim /etc/inetd.conf Shared object "libintl.so.9" not found, required by "vim" """ Looking into the lib dir, I revealed the existence of libintl.so.8. I guess somehow a downgrade took place, byt I do not know why. To just help my self in quick and realy ugly way, I created a link, libintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 which eventually made vim running agai. (I am totally surpised by that working). Can you give me a hint how I can comprehensively solve this problem? Many thanks, -- Bastian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 13:27:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC05C89 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com (mail-vc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA660165 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hy10so2138677vcb.28 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 05:27:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=PDEu5YPkYMtZ+zE+RuAi3OEJjS5vpKwzC1BJCo21qOc=; b=W+JhRe8QZTBxxrbhSZDNhZp4N73Huk1orPmvZY6PaGD7Eix7xgZcvR402ss2T49TQ2 oUI7uBeDL9mF5b1T/ox2G0hIY8w+cZzQyCq5SH1I+VhQbxH2LEsytzRUGwwqrhXwbRUJ Fldmq+qkUqwKO+2tC+qDJC94+P1kInbeCznieiE6FZLlZmZwjJi1oOwY52PV8Lmyxxcq s5SX51/NO9sMv/nFITKg6hNnLcwhZpHLSfAtuutfV+1CQ4AQfoxA8MLT0jRLK1CMnS45 GGoM9rQ9vb66pZNNvpI9DPPLU8qR3Xd08pfMh5STjiMIKC+va2lDgu09G6e395RNvPJk 31Zw== X-Received: by 10.52.228.67 with SMTP id sg3mr20898840vdc.2.1418045275851; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 05:27:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.139.51 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 05:27:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> References: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> From: Konstantin Kulikov Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:27:35 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Error in pkg mgnt of libintl To: bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:27:57 -0000 Hello. Yesterday had the same problem, pkg upgrade -f worked in my case. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:23 PM, wrote: > Hey all, > > I run a recently installed > FreeBSD myHost 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 > > I use a quite simple set of packages, base system + X11 + i3wm. Nearly > all work is done via rvxt. > > Last weekend I tried to mount a ntfs partinioned disk, which urged me to > install ntfs + fuse related tools: > > """ > Dec 6 20:03:44 myHost pkg: fusefs-libs-2.9.3_3 installed > Dec 6 20:03:44 myHost pkg: libublio-20070103 installed > Dec 6 20:03:44 myHost pkg: ntfsprogs-2.0.0_4 installed > Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext-0.18.3.1_1 deinstalled > Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext-runtime-0.19.3 installed > Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext-tools-0.19.3 installed > Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: gettext upgraded: 0.18.3.1_1 -> 0.19.3 > Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: libspectrum-1.1.1_3 installed > Dec 6 20:15:52 myHost pkg: fuse-1.1.1_5 installed > Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: libaudiofile-0.3.6_1 installed > Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: rlog-1.4_2 installed > Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: fuse-utils-1.1.1_3 installed > Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: fusefs-sshfs-2.5 installed > Dec 6 20:17:26 myHost pkg: fusefs-encfs-1.7.4_7 installed > """ > > (BTW, I question my self, if r/o ntfs support is available in 10.1) > > After that I install VLC (I guess, now you know what my intention > was): > """ > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: flac-1.3.0_3 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libdaemon-0.14_1 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libsndfile-1.0.25_4 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: xdg-utils-1.0.2.20130919_1 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: qt4-corelib-4.8.6_3 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libebml-1.3.0 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libdvdread-4.9.9_2 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libcddb-1.3.2_3 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: avahi-app-0.6.31_3 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: libmpeg2-0.5.1_6 installed > Dec 6 20:24:52 myHost pkg: taglib-1.9.1_2 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libsamplerate-0.1.8_5 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libmad-0.15.1b_5 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: qt4-gui-4.8.6_2 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libmatroska-1.4.1_1 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libdvdnav-4.2.1_1 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libdvbpsi-1.2.0 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: libdca-0.0.5_1 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: twolame-0.3.13_3 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: liba52-0.7.4_3 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost pkg: faad2-2.7_5,1 installed > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost dbus[766]: [system] Reloaded configuration > Dec 6 20:24:53 myHost dbus[766]: [system] Reloaded configuration > Dec 6 20:24:54 myHost pkg: vlc-2.1.5_11,4 installed > """ > > Whitin one of these steps above, a failure sneaked into my package > management system. > > Quite a number of tools fail to work due to unfulfiled library > dependency: > > """ > 109 # vim /etc/inetd.conf > Shared object "libintl.so.9" not found, required by "vim" > """ > > Looking into the lib dir, I revealed the existence of libintl.so.8. > I guess somehow a downgrade took place, byt I do not know why. > > To just help my self in quick and realy ugly way, I created a link, > libintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 which eventually made vim running agai. > (I am totally surpised by that working). > > > Can you give me a hint how I can comprehensively solve this problem? > > > > Many thanks, > > -- > Bastian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 13:39:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE2EFD9 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out8.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out8.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237EA295 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:39:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnsGAEuphVR90bfD/2dsb2JhbABagwZSWLMQAQEBAQEBBpJ7hhsCgS0WAQEBAQF9hAMBAQMBJxM/BQsLDRQlDwUYRIgyCNU9AQEBAQYBAQEBHoYniigHFoMLgRUFk0SGGoEjNIUKKIhVg2KEAyswgkMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,538,1413216000"; d="scan'208";a="879718200" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([125.209.183.195]) by icp-osb-irony-out8.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2014 21:39:56 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4339435C; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:39:56 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:39:56 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de Subject: Re: Error in pkg mgnt of libintl Message-ID: <20141208133956.GA35579@ozzmosis.com> References: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:39:59 -0000 On Mon 2014-12-08 14:23:22 UTC+0100, bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de (bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de) wrote: > 109 # vim /etc/inetd.conf > Shared object "libintl.so.9" not found, required by "vim" > > Looking into the lib dir, I revealed the existence of libintl.so.8. > I guess somehow a downgrade took place, byt I do not know why. > > To just help my self in quick and realy ugly way, I created a link, > libintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 which eventually made vim running agai. > (I am totally surpised by that working). > > > Can you give me a hint how I can comprehensively solve this problem? I can't explain the cause of your missing libintl.so.9, but out of curiosity I took a look at my 10.1-REL system, where evidently libintl.so.9 is already symlinked to libintl.so.8. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 104872 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so -> libintl.so.8.1.2 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 -> libintl.so.8.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 55166 2014-12-05 14:17:37 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8.1.2 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 $ pkg which /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 was installed by package gettext-runtime-0.19.3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 13:50:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7093E316 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tweddell.vserver-on.de (tweddell.de [84.38.66.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D8C3D3 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bastian by tweddell.vserver-on.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XxyhV-0007Mf-Mj; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:50:09 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:50:09 +0100 From: Bastian To: Konstantin Kulikov Subject: Re: Error in pkg mgnt of libintl Message-ID: <20141208135009.GG8479@tweddell.de> References: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:50:12 -0000 On 08Dec14 17:27 +0400, Konstantin Kulikov wrote: > Yesterday had the same problem, pkg upgrade -f worked in my case. Indeed, that solved the problem here, too. Many thanks, -- Bastian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 13:53:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08B94EC for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tweddell.vserver-on.de (tweddell.de [84.38.66.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41B2678 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bastian by tweddell.vserver-on.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xxyl4-0007Nd-QV; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:53:50 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:53:50 +0100 From: Bastian To: andrew clarke Subject: Re: Error in pkg mgnt of libintl Message-ID: <20141208135350.GH8479@tweddell.de> References: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> <20141208133956.GA35579@ozzmosis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141208133956.GA35579@ozzmosis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:53:53 -0000 On 09Dec14 00:39 +1100, andrew clarke wrote: > On Mon 2014-12-08 14:23:22 UTC+0100, bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de (bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de) wrote: > > > 109 # vim /etc/inetd.conf > > Shared object "libintl.so.9" not found, required by "vim" > > > > Looking into the lib dir, I revealed the existence of libintl.so.8. > > I guess somehow a downgrade took place, byt I do not know why. > > > > To just help my self in quick and realy ugly way, I created a link, > > libintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 which eventually made vim running agai. > > (I am totally surpised by that working). > > > > > > Can you give me a hint how I can comprehensively solve this problem? > > I can't explain the cause of your missing libintl.so.9, but out of > curiosity I took a look at my 10.1-REL system, where evidently > libintl.so.9 is already symlinked to libintl.so.8. > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 104872 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so -> libintl.so.8.1.2 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 -> libintl.so.8.1.2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 55166 2014-12-05 14:17:37 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8.1.2 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 > > $ pkg which /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 > /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 was installed by package gettext-runtime-0.19.3 Yes, here, too. I was very astonished to see that link showing up again, after I removed it just before the proposed 'pkg upgrade -f'. Cheers, -- Bastian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 14:00:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D821A1B for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB910751 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB8E0TBx039349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:00:44 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk sB8E0TBx039349 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1418047244; bh=WvCMdr98Eu2EtIlGTd23Ihy6ppN5dNfTfzQuALHHKNQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Mon,=2008=20Dec=202014=2014:00:29=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Error=20in=20pkg=20mgnt=20of=20li bintl|References:=20<20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de>=20<2014120 8133956.GA35579@ozzmosis.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<20141208133956.GA355 79@ozzmosis.com>; b=HanJjgHXLIBh/4zHRAw3N20z/C0Ui76K9LJaNs4ZGK14lTkaGTbGKqYN6eGfyo0BA YI01C/DwKtD2NMsAmkPDaiVmAqhkj90VUkkrDdsYOjRArHsNDh89Ybq6iKsnULUuiC zIXkUBqoDqD0G3JGI0rtqNz/9npz46awkeUy5dFs= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <5485AEFD.4030908@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:00:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error in pkg mgnt of libintl References: <20141208132322.GF8479@tweddell.de> <20141208133956.GA35579@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <20141208133956.GA35579@ozzmosis.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hnPnX6raX70dUnnce2W1rJ7mAFEwR9G1n" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RDNS_NONE,SPF_FAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:00:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --hnPnX6raX70dUnnce2W1rJ7mAFEwR9G1n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/08/14 13:39, andrew clarke wrote: > On Mon 2014-12-08 14:23:22 UTC+0100, bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de (bastian= -freebsd-ml@t6l.de) wrote: >=20 >> 109 # vim /etc/inetd.conf=20 >> Shared object "libintl.so.9" not found, required by "vim" >> >> Looking into the lib dir, I revealed the existence of libintl.so.8. >> I guess somehow a downgrade took place, byt I do not know why. >> >> To just help my self in quick and realy ugly way, I created a link, >> libintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 which eventually made vim running agai.= >> (I am totally surpised by that working). Yeah. Usually the advice is *not* to do this sort of thing, as ABI version numbers are incremented for good reason. This is a special case -- apart from anything else the ABI version here is going backwards... >> Can you give me a hint how I can comprehensively solve this problem? >=20 > I can't explain the cause of your missing libintl.so.9, but out of > curiosity I took a look at my 10.1-REL system, where evidently > libintl.so.9 is already symlinked to libintl.so.8. >=20 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 104872 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/li= bintl.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/li= bintl.so -> libintl.so.8.1.2 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/li= bintl.so.8 -> libintl.so.8.1.2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 55166 2014-12-05 14:17:37 /usr/local/lib/li= bintl.so.8.1.2 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 2014-12-05 14:17:38 /usr/local/lib/li= bintl.so.9 -> libintl.so.8 >=20 > $ pkg which /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9=20 > /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 was installed by package gettext-runtime-0.= 19.3 This is a well-known problem to do with the split of the old gettext port into gettext-runtime and gettext-tools. The fix in UPDATING says to 'pkg delete -f gettext' before you start. However, seeing as you've missed the opportunity to do that, you can fix things up now by: pkg install -f gettext-runtime Cheers, Matthew --hnPnX6raX70dUnnce2W1rJ7mAFEwR9G1n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUha79XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnDR8P/15J00OXPi2OLOGTZx6nW/KO 1uozxqDaMbz2szaqZbPlMMOlxc0dMq9e03qM+4IJgvWBrhLfe7/oj6hSFYN14Y29 rmeeJfVqlBUYZTKBU0m6DX7HeN5qhX363Z99qRZd2hoao6IuIAiuJjKkKxAwmojo Y0dKG99DE4xXDViEvJwNeBc1CD6Pa98dO7Ap9aXsXPKMine0BGn3XditN9N+pWfm 6086PVrCp204KGfSCTbmJh+c0uzTtNLaRpz3HC3oqaMgNNKkYYMf/T4sabps3ohl ixggzDoLhQ8shr9jXdS1VuLwn6U7iXs2jCJHoOtVCjsc5LRwgI4Vc8qOocXRHNn3 EkeP/li2gXyq+G9coiuR9ydim47obbfA2AiylT7Ocxzn/8nk/90w2+0d13pZ3t9F kIaRf2JVa0enxijIqHtbJcGty0fWJy+8iSjZuZvBPt7Ye7Kr2bKoaVPghpUvFgPO 2tWE6hQ9FmpAVO69xtFD/Kq1dnZonXyrNiWJPLa/qrxc2ZtVt2BroM86D/hIEthi uDu3LhjBtti/J3kBy/8szITcglpYvIqohZjzSr8WvYA1bNjzZ7kHw8s4apiRKhlN w+MHyq2lFdU/qOKWx4nPEAokkprrNduPpEEJVNvNLlLJJpXRhwcxAkysJ0aPvGWC 1uvqrBmv245DFAqLubNx =40oR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hnPnX6raX70dUnnce2W1rJ7mAFEwR9G1n-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 14:40:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59E5414D; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DADB0B36; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XxzUE-000eeK-A0>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:40:30 +0100 Received: from p578a69f9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.138.105.249] helo=prometheus) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XxzUE-003Nid-4l>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:40:30 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:39:25 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: grarpamp Subject: Re: HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? Message-ID: <20141208153925.5df90587@prometheus> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 87.138.105.249 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:40:33 -0000 On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:43:05 -0500 grarpamp wrote: > HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? >=20 > What bits of FreeBSD are aware and can take proper advantage of > Intel HTT, such as its thread/process schedulers (sched-BSD/ULE/...), > etc? >=20 > What system/app loads are, or are not, likely to benefit with today's > HyperThreading CPU's? Kernel (ZFS/crypto/net/...) vs. Userland > (apps)? >=20 > Does anyone have performance stats for this current class of CPU > to post comparing HT (enabled and disabled) while using more than > four processes/threads in parallel? >=20 > For instance, these two Intel Xeon Haswell four core CPU's are > identical except for HT [1] (e3-1226v3 and e3-1246v3), and you > can always turn HT off for testing. > http://ark.intel.com/compare/80917,80916 >=20 > There are some Core i3/i5/i7 Haswell parts with HT as well. > http://ark.intel.com/Search/Advanced?s=3Dt&ECCMemory=3Dtrue&VTD=3Dtrue&AE= STech=3Dtrue >=20 > There don't seem to be many reviews of Xeon processors, let alone > HT. And most Unix talk of HT seems dated by at least a few years > and a couple processor generations. >=20 > Also, was the HT cache leak security issue from a decade ago ever > fixed in hardware? > "Cache missing for fun and profit" > http://www.daemonology.net/papers/ >=20 > Being unsure of the best list, please direct replies to whichever > is good. Thanks. >=20 > [1] Plus 200MHz/6% clock per core and $59/27% market price bumps, > but this thread is about whether or not there is any benefit to HT > in current Intel CPU's such as Haswell, how much of one, and where. > Once that is determined, then you can factor in other parameters > like these to see if it's an overall value. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello. Well, I have a very narrow and some sort of naive experience, so be warned. =46rom my experience, mostly compiling FreeBSD sources from scratch (deleted /usr/obj, no sophisticated caching subsystems used), compiling world and kernel with as many threads allowed as possible (using value of possible threads via PARA=3D`sysctl -n hw.ncpu` and use then $PARA as variable for "make -j${PARA} ..."), a dual core, 4-thread CPU at 3.3 GHz takes ~ 60 minutes to build world, the same as a 4-core castrated i3 with disabled SMT. Switching off SMT on the dual core results in roughly 90 - 100 minutes compile time in my case, depending on the average load of the box while compiling. So, for the INTEGER performance, I see some real benefits of SMT. The picture is somehow different for the floating point performance. Using SMT in some FPU heavy caclulations on Sandy- and Ivy-Bridge CPUs (Haswell is not available as XEON to me at this very moment), I see only 10% - a max. of 25% (roughly estimated on some crude manually timed calculations!). There is some sligt benefit, even better with most recent Ivy-Bridge than Sandy-Bridge and bot latter seem to be superior in that matter to some Westmere 6-Core XEONS we used to use a couple of years ago (this may be related to some other architectural design improvements other than SMT, like the ring bus introduced in Sandy Bridge and improved in Ivy Bridge and maybe Haswell). In earlier times (pre Sandy-Bridge era) there were issues were it would be beneficial switching off SMT for heavy FPU load in some BLAS/LAPACK based benchmark scenarios, but this knowledge is years ago with older P4 designs and early Core i7. I lost track of that.=20 To make it short: I would highly recommend using/purchasing SMT capable CPUs since there is a benefit in performance. But at the end the performance gain has to meet the costs of a SMT capable XEON. As far as I know, most of the "value" XEONs do have SMT by default. There are some disadvantages regarding the amount of memory the kernel has to consume for each core (logical and/or physical) found, so systems with small amounts of physical RAM (< 8 GiB) could run into disadvantageous situations - if I'm not wrong. But for all FreeBSD users considering using ZFS fro professional/semiprofessional usage, 8 GiB at least is a must, otherwise the ZFS system is crippling performance, not SMT. oh =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 19:46:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8539B7A for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tweddell.vserver-on.de (tweddell.de [84.38.66.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FDB1782 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bastian by tweddell.vserver-on.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy4Gb-0007pe-Vu; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:46:46 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:46:45 +0100 From: bastian-freebsd-ml@t6l.de To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Invalid partition table Message-ID: <5475042E.2050102@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Paul Pathiakis X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:46:49 -0000 Paul, thanks for answering. Sorry for coming back this late, I was not on the -questions mailinglist, but found your reply in the archives. > I don't understand your partitioning. What is wrong with it? > Typically, due to the 'pool' concept of storage with ZFS versus the > filesystem types, things have changed from traditional partitioning. At the time during installation, I did not try to customise any setup configuration. I just selected auto partitioning with zfs-on-root. This is the result. > Try a 'man gpart' to start off. > > Look at the 'gpart recover' and see if that helps. > > Commands/flags that you will want to look at in more detail: > > gpart add -t -a -i geom > gpart create -s provider > > Now, looking at these: > > gpart create -s GPT provider (where provider is /dev/ada? in your case > or /dev/da? for example) > > This command labels the type of partitioning scheme. > > gpart add -t (type in your case: freebsd-boot, freebsd-swap, > freebsd-zfs) -a 4k (4k boundaries) -i etc> ada0 (in your case) > > Now, in my case, the following: > > gpart create -s GPT ada0 > gpart add -t freebsd-boot -a 4k -i 1 ada0 (This creates /dev/ada0p1) > gpart add -t freebsd-swap -s 2g -i 2 ada0 (This creates a 2GB swap > on /dev/ada0p2) > gpart add -t freebsd-zfs -i 3 ada0 (This creates the large ZFS > pool on the remaing part of the disk on /dev/ada0p3) > > gpart show For me it prints: """ => 34 500118125 ada0 GPT (238G) 34 1024 1 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 4194304 2 freebsd-zfs (2.0G) 4195362 16777216 3 freebsd-swap (8.0G) 20972578 479145581 4 freebsd-zfs (228G) """ I use ZFS encryption. Maybe this explains the additional partition.? > will give you a much more succinct output so you can see your partition > table. > > Now, when you have created this, you want to make sure that your have > the correct bootstrap written to the partition. This is a master boot > record (MBR) that needs to be written to a PARTITION -> pmbr > > Back to gpart for a zfs bootstrap for gpt using the MBR for partitions: > > gpart -p /boot/pmbr -b /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 (<-- partition 1 is your > freebsd-boot partition) ada0 > > You should see "bootcode installed on ada0" I also did that, but it did not change the behaviour. The message is still popping before the boot menu is shown. Still "Partition table invalid!" Cheers, -- Bastian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 19:54:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60969E6A for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C536865 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id eu11so5851012pac.39 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:54:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vj5hrQSAfHgeTQNwxZctXUbLOwqFB3sI0+lxKzttIBQ=; b=ECNOkLQx9zZTIheBBMPMqXShf4sRQMrl+CK1qOTudR+JPZPma+vjL4UYarsy59H9rw hcuwjQXD6BatiGRTZVxr0aLPPHX9joi9O5nurmnKVOu0KstFbZxBhGkSeNHXlPrQF7va 0jgJKDaY/LuHG0eyffnSiYwbqpVqa9GAgtKiHFRxUXZxyC1KkSQSZG7rqu9Ij7xWptvx uUyQLjO5/eRzl19jTd0LO7ymHbtrFn/KyMk0hIZRqI2xTQwhLoFJtvqSBpGS2/gUl95s rXSrAdaHDoAj/DaMT8Kq87mxi9UVAmrC/g4LC/1iIQXEYAzHLa04u9BX5LteR8MpE5FW Yh8A== X-Received: by 10.68.232.104 with SMTP id tn8mr18785431pbc.31.1418068479609; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([209.12.167.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm37233333pds.57.2014.12.08.11.54.38 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:54:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <548601F2.5030100@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:54:26 -0800 From: Jungle Boogie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:54:40 -0000 Dear Mathieu, -------------------------------------------- From: Mathieu Arnold Sent: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:28:24 +0100 To: Juan Ramón Molina Menor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds > >> +--On 7 décembre 2014 11:15:35 +0100 Juan Ramón Molina Menor >> wrote: >> | Hi! >> | >> | Now that the new_xorg and ssp repositories are not being updated any >> | more, what is the reason for the 'beefy' machines to build ports only >> | once a week? Can we expect the frequency of package upgrades to be higher >> | soon? > > Right now, it does take 3 to 4 days to build the packages each week, so > it's a bit hard to make it more often than once a week. We have plans for > the future, with more building machines, it will be announced when it > happens. > Oh, very nice to hear that it's a considered possibility that package building will happen more frequently. Any word on if the new build environment can prioritize vulnerable ports/packages over those without vulnerabilities? -- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboogie@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boogie@jit.si From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 20:03:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127DC491 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net (mail.kulturflatrate.net [46.163.119.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937D0961 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36165F5AC0E3; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:55:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at kulturflatrate.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.kulturflatrate.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sC-KKBfzgmIw; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:55:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from len-x61s.klaas (175.210.broadband18.iol.cz [109.81.210.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E8B0F5AC0E2; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:55:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by len-x61s.klaas (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BDD6E660C; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:19:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:19:02 +0100 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ZFS "cannot open [...]: dataset does not exist" Message-ID: <20141208191902.GG31701@len-x61s.klaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.kulturflatrate.net/niklaas/niklaas-baudet-von-gersdorff.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:03:18 -0000 Dear Mailinglist, I am currently using zfssnap.sh [1] to make a regular backup of the entire ZFS pool on our server. In principal, this works great, nevertheless, every time I am running the script I get the following error: cannot open 'tank/usr/ports': dataset does not exist cannot open 'tank/usr/src': dataset does not exist 1: https://bitbucket.org/mmichele/zfssnap I did some research on the net and I guess this is related to an already asked question that has never been answered [2], to a bug whose record I cannot find on the net [3] and a solution I do not completely understand [4]. 2: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/spurious-zfs-dataset-does-not-exist-errors.19878/ 3: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2010-December/010224.html 4: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2010-December/010225.html Please have a look at [4] especially. It seems like there are certain "state files" still existing. As far as I understand it, these state files are responsible for ZFS looking for a dataset that actually does not exist. Unfortunately, I cannot find anything under `/dev/` that I might be able to delete. (There is `/dev/zfs/` which is not a directory I can `cd` into.) In case someone could hint me to these state files or any other tip is very much appreciated. $ zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT tank 14.7G 1.68T 31K none tank/jails 12.8G 1.68T 32K /usr/local/jails tank/jails/ezjails 12.8G 1.68T 62K /usr/local/jails/ezjails tank/jails/ezjails/basejail 2.41G 1.68T 1.63G /usr/local/jails/ezjails/basejail tank/jails/ezjails/fulljail 31K 1.68T 31K /usr/local/jails/ezjails/fulljail tank/jails/ezjails/[** censored ** ] 577M 1.68T 469M /usr/local/jails/ezjails/[** censored ** ] tank/jails/ezjails/newjail 2.72M 1.68T 1.85M /usr/local/jails/ezjails/newjail tank/jails/ezjails/[** censored ** ] 367M 1.68T 336M /usr/local/jails/ezjails/[** censored ** ] tank/jails/ezjails/[** censored ** ] 9.51G 1.68T 7.85G /usr/local/jails/ezjails/[** censored ** ] tank/root 1.78G 1.68T 974M / tank/root/tmp 328K 1.68T 39K /tmp tank/root/var 660M 1.68T 401M /var $ uname -a FreeBSD [** censored ** ] 10.0-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p12 #0: Tue Nov 4 05:07:17 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Thank you and best, -- Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff niklaas@kulturflatrate.net http://www.twitter.com/NBvGersdorff http://www.kulturflatrate.net/niklaas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 20:18:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FB082A for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F64AAB for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id bs8so5814487wib.4 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:18:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oXxcfx44O4jYwZKCM5SlK3V1gTjc8A8jbHeaYnsCehc=; b=kShrlyl8kQ0i6k//IzISk5GX9uxcm7JA7djt4b8JRueA4R6CwsnmD9tdVAJH9bubqc S0Cvb/Hv0dZAHvMqDqF9L59H0sQCwZ+ZJLDkcSv90/BOW8AfxR+cJrxfznh9H/mmV+vD 1I9GdLGvdBFsQL5E67h2CUvPgkhRc6b+tyOTWAIWu/6WaYFFp2K2RKxbE8fvBpKVfDtS 84QJAYweZT0uddG57pLf0qqh5ha1zkbyxun13pPTqVrejSi8rR30T+cZInfy2UkUMWVW VXYOtKOI+FAWq/lbdOwceYVRw5vWyTkwcCSMWusIcaNdT3w4NHN7poK5/LriBnEZbE/K 2tvw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.78.3 with SMTP id x3mr46942717wjw.127.1418069888128; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:18:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.73.2 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:18:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:18:08 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Pkg upgrade 'SAT solver' problem From: Peter Harrison To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:18:10 -0000 Can someone help with a pkg upgrade problem please? I've been relying solely on binary pkg for a while now without problem. However, on doing the latest upgrade I get: root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from request? [Y/n]: n pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver If I answer 'y' I get a much longer sequence of similar errors and the upgrade still bombs. This is on: FreeBSD thinkpad 10.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Sep 15 14:35:52 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Thanks for your help. Peter Harrison. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 21:28:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3BFD7E for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D296220D for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z12so7332712wgg.29 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:28:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gPJ55i9swrbhUElUTgRY2uPU1q6wEelCsI4d7u1dLj0=; b=a8FtS1esUBpTKAZlxuFifgiDfZVmeNrTDI3SarAOWR5KkU2FDMxCTNUGdGvtD4Xx0Y HAk8vOM5QvOcVG3SfZHMVqX+o+5g1si0B5DZ94LGCXlGdO6EAJQ53+c/PcepLZm03w50 q7yecv7Exjg69rMZUjLEgM+OUdpINV1HOrjx8yb9X04VRJBkdZOiJ7ucRQ+DaIFTo8+/ mIMcmOT/uCfZ58kyXepp+F2dqTWrL/wR0D3ax/VEV9VhJo07LNUkKMmrwUhNnbhbDzR3 PHXWPoiwqJGIOqFNBKbBmFu5Zf/oxg+x0nyUIDPTYD7KUeX2QdC1th11tlCxfdQjGwyd 20Zg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.10 with SMTP id bs10mr37431796wjb.43.1418074127163; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:28:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.130.196 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:28:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:28:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pkg upgrade 'SAT solver' problem From: pete wright To: Peter Harrison Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:28:49 -0000 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Peter Harrison wrote: > Can someone help with a pkg upgrade problem please? > > I've been relying solely on binary pkg for a while now without problem. > However, on doing the latest upgrade I get: > > root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from > request? [Y/n]: n > pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver > > If I answer 'y' I get a much longer sequence of similar errors and the > upgrade still bombs. is this related to the upgrade of gettext? As per /usr/ports/UPDATING: "20141130: AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) AUTHOR: tijl@FreeBSD.org The devel/gettext port has been split up in devel/gettext-runtime, a lightweight package containing runtime libraries, and devel/gettext-tools, a package containing developer tools. The devel/gettext port still exists as a metaport. You must first delete the existing installation of gettext and then reinstall it. This will break sudo, so you *must* do this in a root shell (sudo -i) if you use sudo. " I did an upgrade last week and this package pretty much broke everything (including most of xfce4) causing me to do a pretty big uninstall/reinstall dance. Of course if I read /usr/ports/UPDATING first I would have saved myself some drama :) Cheers, -pete -- pete wright www.nycbug.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 21:34:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8BCDFF for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4089320 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 114F133C1E; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:34:35 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: helen ly To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File Transfer Protocol ftpd(8) References: Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:34:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: (helen ly's message of "Mon, 8 Dec 2014 00:19:52 +0100") Message-ID: <44egs93jx1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:34:41 -0000 helen ly writes: > i installed ftpd an run with ftpd -D and > I edit ftpchroot with each user can access the files on their home-directory (users=moon and sun) > and i created /World directory > there is a Group called friends and friends Group member moon and sun > how to only the users that belong to the friends Group shoudd be able to access the /World directory Normally, chroot is something you use when you want a user account to access its own home directory and nothing else. How to give your users the access you wish can be done in a number of different ways, all of which have different security implications. 1) You can skip the chroot and use normal permissions to give the appropriate access. 2) You can keep the chroot and mount the common directory into the users' home directories via NFS or a nullfs or something along that line. 3) You can put the users in a jail created specifically for them, so the jail can be locked down without annoying the other users or programs running on the overall system. There are probably other choices as well. For one thing, you could check into alternative FTP daemons or even alternative protocols. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 21:59:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1DC9E7 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD41F7A3 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so7339559wgg.0 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:59:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r5dSeqi5TvnMLsJWxu3LSk8nf2x5OSD5mTfbUzEPpdM=; b=kyUX1dfOx1bMreykRB/GXWHf32O78oWovjJyTaPCDqZDtuyEuynW52mJBiD0+8kRWM kb35pfwhJf0rJ2XFOKYX9DC3DfnkQaJyK5xx1ickBuFkegViI12TvqEMjmf0/e9cAwWo tZEtqjdXeW3THIwyUNkQyXFaqdwT0USMrMrxdziaLoA9Wh3sme+eVaGtKqmNdonrb5PK ThWEkQWF/5xhWh2M+fPRJFAI1FYn3Q/LBZ4D9UCCRtir9eolrsJfLPJUeGt40bearQ1V bCeaAK8ToMH3Hr4gDzmSKkdkBNCZEUN+I8v/Rbx310vkE+ZRT3I6HO7QBXvsS79gN7d1 1nEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.61.168 with SMTP id q8mr48071608wjr.53.1418075957120; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:59:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.73.2 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:59:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:59:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pkg upgrade 'SAT solver' problem From: Peter Harrison To: pete wright Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:59:19 -0000 On 8 December 2014 at 21:28, pete wright wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Peter Harrison > wrote: >> Can someone help with a pkg upgrade problem please? >> >> I've been relying solely on binary pkg for a while now without problem. >> However, on doing the latest upgrade I get: >> >> root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% >> Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) >> pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: >> cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from >> request? [Y/n]: n >> pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver >> >> If I answer 'y' I get a much longer sequence of similar errors and the >> upgrade still bombs. > > is this related to the upgrade of gettext? As per /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > "20141130: > AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) > AUTHOR: tijl@FreeBSD.org > > The devel/gettext port has been split up in devel/gettext-runtime, a > lightweight package containing runtime libraries, and devel/gettext-tools, > a package containing developer tools. The devel/gettext port still exists > as a metaport. > > You must first delete the existing installation of gettext and then > reinstall it. This will break sudo, so you *must* do this in a root > shell (sudo -i) if you use sudo. > " > > I did an upgrade last week and this package pretty much broke > everything (including most of xfce4) causing me to do a pretty big > uninstall/reinstall dance. Of course if I read /usr/ports/UPDATING > first I would have saved myself some drama :) > > Cheers, > -pete > > -- > pete wright > www.nycbug.org > @nomadlogicLA Thanks - sounds about right but... root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg delete -f gettext Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be REMOVED: gettext-0.19.3 Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: y [1/1] Deleting gettext-0.19.3: 100% root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from request? [Y/n]: Still no dice. Any ideas? Cheers, Peter Harrison. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 22:03:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BDBAAE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA7C85F for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n12so7259960wgh.8 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:03:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oP1dwBdf9fleX91DXr/qpo9zv7mC6pSgN9wRRXtgc0g=; b=IfJzwa6nTg/qGV5dwSG3J2zz5UiUpfmK64JzaylR9YoVXGsApxwJ3Lt7+Ys2KQ7a23 RT0Rwc9a3RDEsiGHjn9N+q82jigVs43xODRaeSoLCU7iZIEXc9TAWP54p7XRNL8OhCYA pxyeB23M8AY1bOsGHLjk8cfd9MDb03tUHHeLDhwfVGnKjYXdyR8kNZ5K6adtCRSJ8oNk J4osn/ArYBWIwYF/gxrWIImMajGFH5w+F3c1/5cwwb1omBNfXfWa6ETjfDFnz9XCmuc6 mIjDM0zPvUZCh0DDwrxtYU7D8RPoxoN4UYzVRy2WgipXgQw6M0XFr9eD+MjfBJqkoL9L ktrg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.110.161 with SMTP id ib1mr50661802wjb.78.1418076188336; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:03:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.130.196 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:03:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:03:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pkg upgrade 'SAT solver' problem From: pete wright To: Peter Harrison Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:03:10 -0000 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Peter Harrison wrote: > On 8 December 2014 at 21:28, pete wright wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Peter Harrison >> wrote: >>> Can someone help with a pkg upgrade problem please? >>> >>> I've been relying solely on binary pkg for a while now without problem. >>> However, on doing the latest upgrade I get: >>> >>> root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>> Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% >>> Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) >>> pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: >>> cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from >>> request? [Y/n]: n >>> pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver >>> >>> If I answer 'y' I get a much longer sequence of similar errors and the >>> upgrade still bombs. >> >> is this related to the upgrade of gettext? As per /usr/ports/UPDATING: >> >> "20141130: >> AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) >> AUTHOR: tijl@FreeBSD.org >> >> The devel/gettext port has been split up in devel/gettext-runtime, a >> lightweight package containing runtime libraries, and devel/gettext-tools, >> a package containing developer tools. The devel/gettext port still exists >> as a metaport. >> >> You must first delete the existing installation of gettext and then >> reinstall it. This will break sudo, so you *must* do this in a root >> shell (sudo -i) if you use sudo. >> " >> >> I did an upgrade last week and this package pretty much broke >> everything (including most of xfce4) causing me to do a pretty big >> uninstall/reinstall dance. Of course if I read /usr/ports/UPDATING >> first I would have saved myself some drama :) >> >> Cheers, >> -pete >> >> -- >> pete wright >> www.nycbug.org >> @nomadlogicLA > > Thanks - sounds about right but... > > root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg delete -f gettext > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 > packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > gettext-0.19.3 > > Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: y > [1/1] Deleting gettext-0.19.3: 100% > root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from > request? [Y/n]: > > > Still no dice. Any ideas? man bummer - yea i'm not sure on my end sorry. -pete -- pete wright www.nycbug.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 22:48:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22146541 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7B0AC5A for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id kx10so6114581pab.30 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:48:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=cpY7KDcHAv6vA2YOJF/WTJIVK9QNzS3+cid0Lj2sPYs=; b=FtTiP2/Jvpe18nf3hhyTRNHvwBmzzpK1soDhPYJtzr7BL0H+7mW+hsqtlG4kXMTK5p 21AYITo4WWtUEeccC6f5qhcA3a8e9GM6VyU4W5kHX96S4hnniwRMZJIiXYBjxDKFVQkd 2m0yNUyI8DKBkZrQSihcWXE0QpL7TYQLVO15wGynwgB6OfezwB0eJPmCrHDBzs8XPjqJ 05ZVsAzLTn+PwhS3fszcSt1XOHJ/yuYj0lmnL2IUli1foLbZestgeFJJ9reZcYVIXDI1 zE/tJV9sDZCK1bCkjjD4lbmT2ZQX9rKM1rhFNJ3hBX8ArGMmXS3+G3BVqYYH3ZCE07dC 5e1g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4R+eRGzludqG2NJ6v3Dz8Tfb6NXJLXGVDt8LSEBuF8GESO72xoxE9ks/Gt2xG2hEJlmlo X-Received: by 10.68.111.37 with SMTP id if5mr64118823pbb.140.1418078888359; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:48:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from elk.localnet ([2604:8800:100:82aa:6ef0:49ff:fe05:658b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm37456910pdm.12.2014.12.08.14.48.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:48:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from carlj by elk.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy764-0000Sj-DK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:48:04 -0800 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg upgrade 'SAT solver' problem References: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:48:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Peter Harrison's message of "Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:18:08 +0000") Message-ID: <8761dlpxln.fsf@elk.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:48:15 -0000 Peter Harrison writes: > Can someone help with a pkg upgrade problem please? > > I've been relying solely on binary pkg for a while now without problem. > However, on doing the latest upgrade I get: > > root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from > request? [Y/n]: n > pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver > > If I answer 'y' I get a much longer sequence of similar errors and the > upgrade still bombs. > > This is on: > > FreeBSD thinkpad 10.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Sep 15 > 14:35:52 UTC 2014 > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > > Thanks for your help. I just went through that a few days ago. I ended up just answering y to everything and letting it remove the packages. I then went back and used pkg to reinstall the ones it had just removed. I had thought that pkg would fix these types of problems, but obviously not. When I asked here at that time, someone suggested 'pkg check -Ba' to see if there are pkg problems. In my case there were some, but fixing them didn't help the solver problem. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 23:29:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A8DCD69 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 23:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E76F66A for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 23:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id bs8so6210334wib.10 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:29:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P9JyitcWJRM1loe6v24PcFN4JrOaBYMiYde7Yp7D3gE=; b=Y64e9J1J+z+7HnMH9K7qoIsT7eGSSuKMZ+d9osol2pMjtPJ/+anoOcakmM4IcLB7Hb DZhv0nDivffyuh4hrSHNj51ZsO1YxJkysX8AvHJJee4/Ar/KuHVhu6BVO9r0k03LB22y vGX/H30zKN8SqZZgxaFQINPBDrfG17888YTEMTeWJuLuaAin+wbCLIj5ftXapshtE/AA k5ZpqbT/jCUw0RijCtXGLN0NtNe318xAH/sb/fV2PxPo0/4kMWa0KrudaUk+JJpIaE7y mYOteSvuhfcYQMsSUeBAk/zlUFwgfIsfM4gvpGS13TgOkIGASPp8COdWxmuljHrMCGqo QteQ== X-Received: by 10.180.221.72 with SMTP id qc8mr27829473wic.19.1418081397374; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:29:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (5ec3c54b.skybroadband.com. [94.195.197.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id je12sm11546841wic.22.2014.12.08.15.29.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:29:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 23:29:55 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to report a spammer so SpamAssassin can filter it out Message-ID: <20141208232955.6033e569@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <548450C6.4040207@gmail.com> <548551C9.2050004@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 23:29:59 -0000 On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:09:28 +0800 (AWST) Bret Busby wrote: > I would be wary of using the filtering that you have detailed. > > The two blacklist lines are, I believe, too non-specific. >... > The problems that I see with those two blacklist lines, include, as > examples, for the first line; "*.cn", all *.cnet.com<|.*> They are globs, as in filename globbing in a unix shell; *.cn matches only email addresses that end in ".cn". If *.cn matched *.cnet.com there wouldn't be any point in supporting the "*" wildcard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 00:55:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6474DD07; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E556ACC6; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l15so110627wiw.10 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:55:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4khdb4mlVE6cSFpYnhnQ0jkK+tQEEktXi8LSePXgrJk=; b=sJj1VFNOdgHF9oUVq2QfT89tOofTqgznCeTQoCSJ18S+qe6mYr3CehutmJQdBS7cjN XYdWh5IJw0tutoKi4T6ODUIF64/AtWpBIUf1+uofmyjYDlJ3ELZBYRy+Fn8pcUoJU6cX 990Ljs5spIezFP71sN3tGuATxkmvJ8PnY+K7GXxblFulFs11vw0KQ7d3X/J0fLd2lz86 vMlviMgF3+z8oFsTRFUjagxhLl/1/VIRggHgPgE3mRXY6R2a8pmaKYs0rjga4wDB1hXU NuN/3SuNMJWaCqppxssUdS4KjTi7cceOVaFPdipI5C/OxXFWNO5kDj7GDPszEZo+Y9ns MlgA== X-Received: by 10.194.85.161 with SMTP id i1mr280256wjz.35.1418086513477; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (5ec3c54b.skybroadband.com. [94.195.197.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm136965wiy.19.2014.12.08.16.55.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:55:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:55:11 +0000 From: RW To: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access Message-ID: <20141209005511.4df5d798@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20141208105954.4a456a6a@prometheus> References: <20141208081345.6960d593@prometheus> <20141208105954.4a456a6a@prometheus> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:55:15 -0000 On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:59:54 +0100 O. Hartmann wrote: > Sorry for the noise, many thanks for the quick solution ... For future reference, cross-posting to multiple mailing lists is widely considered to be bad netiquette (unless it's absolutely essential). If you don't get a quick answer, threads can descend into chaos because not everyone will be subscribed to all the lists. Even if no broken threads are created, some people will still find it annoying to have a second unread version of the same thread. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 01:44:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B59058F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.eskimo.com (mail.eskimo.com [204.122.16.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 740361C6 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shellx.eskimo.com (shellx.eskimo.com [204.122.16.2]) by mail.eskimo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C26119D for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by shellx.eskimo.com (Postfix, from userid 51518) id 416EDCB5; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:44:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:44:34 -0800 From: Joseph Olatt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: clang compilation issues on FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE Message-ID: <20141209014434.GA11497@shellx.eskimo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mail.eskimo.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 01:44:40 -0000 I'm able to compile the following code on FreeBSD 8.x and 9.x. However, on a FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE system, I'm not. The code is: /* Begin code */ #include int main(int argc, char * argv[]) { EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx; /* Initialize the context */ EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(&ctx); } /* End code */ /* Begin compile command */ c++ tt.cpp -lssl /* End compile command */ /* Begin compile error */ /usr/bin/ld: //lib/libcrypto.so.7: invalid DSO for symbol `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init' definition //lib/libcrypto.so.7: could not read symbols: Bad value c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) /* End compile error */ Anybody have any ideas how I can overcome the above error? I suspect it has something to do with clang/llvm on FreeBSD 10.x. Any suggestions/insight will be greatly appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 01:56:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68367EC for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out2.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out2.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C35F31C for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:56:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AloFAIBWhlR90bfD/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBKoI1sG4GmGkCgSwWAQEBAQF9hAMBAQQ6PxALDQETJQ8FGDETiDfWZwEBAQcBAQEBHoYjihkHgyGBFQWXIYEOhGMkC4tLhAIrMIJDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,541,1413216000"; d="scan'208";a="282411310" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([125.209.183.195]) by icp-osb-irony-out2.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2014 09:56:50 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AE3C546F; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:56:49 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:56:49 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: Joseph Olatt Subject: Re: clang compilation issues on FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE Message-ID: <20141209015649.GA95798@ozzmosis.com> References: <20141209014434.GA11497@shellx.eskimo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141209014434.GA11497@shellx.eskimo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 01:56:59 -0000 On Mon 2014-12-08 17:44:34 UTC-0800, Joseph Olatt (joji@shellx.eskimo.com) wrote: > /* Begin compile command */ > c++ tt.cpp -lssl > /* End compile command */ > > > /* Begin compile error */ > /usr/bin/ld: //lib/libcrypto.so.7: invalid DSO for symbol `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init' definition > //lib/libcrypto.so.7: could not read symbols: Bad value > c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > /* End compile error */ It links for me on 10.1-REL if I replace -lssl with -lcrypto. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 02:16:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81771A86 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 02:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.eskimo.com (mail.eskimo.com [204.122.16.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6801D75B for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 02:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shellx.eskimo.com (shellx.eskimo.com [204.122.16.2]) by mail.eskimo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA11A04; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by shellx.eskimo.com (Postfix, from userid 51518) id B7348D3A; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:16:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:16:21 -0800 From: Joseph Olatt To: andrew clarke Subject: Re: clang compilation issues on FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE Message-ID: <20141209021621.GA22065@shellx.eskimo.com> References: <20141209014434.GA11497@shellx.eskimo.com> <20141209015649.GA95798@ozzmosis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141209015649.GA95798@ozzmosis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mail.eskimo.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 02:16:22 -0000 On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:56:49PM +1100, andrew clarke wrote: > On Mon 2014-12-08 17:44:34 UTC-0800, Joseph Olatt (joji@shellx.eskimo.com) wrote: > > > /* Begin compile command */ > > c++ tt.cpp -lssl > > /* End compile command */ > > > > > > /* Begin compile error */ > > /usr/bin/ld: //lib/libcrypto.so.7: invalid DSO for symbol `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init' definition > > //lib/libcrypto.so.7: could not read symbols: Bad value > > c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > > /* End compile error */ > > It links for me on 10.1-REL if I replace -lssl with -lcrypto. Yes, -lcrypto works. I was using -lssl all along since FreeBSD 8.x. Since EVP headers were under openssl (openssl/evp.h), I had used -lssl and it had worked till now... Thanks for your prompt response and help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 02:49:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EFF3136 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 02:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB004-OMC4S17.hotmail.com (dub004-omc4s17.hotmail.com [157.55.2.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32FA5A51 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 02:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB126-W43 ([157.55.2.72]) by DUB004-OMC4S17.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:48:07 -0800 X-TMN: [ty1NKrZ6qu/ljZ+lBFHgvzzH+A14OETA] X-Originating-Email: [onoffon@live.it] Message-ID: From: helen ly To: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: File Transfer Protocol ftpd(8) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:48:06 +0100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <44egs93jx1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: , <44egs93jx1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2014 02:48:07.0195 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FA90EB0:01D0135A] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 02:49:17 -0000 dGhhbmtzIEkgc29sdmVkIGl0IHdpdGggeW91ciBoZWxwLi4uIG5vcm1hbCBwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyBh bmQgamFpbCB3b3JrIGdvb2QuDQoNCj4gRnJvbTogZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMtbG9jYWxAYmUt d2VsbC5pbGsub3JnDQo+IFRvOiBvbm9mZm9uQGxpdmUuaXQNCj4gVG86IHF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVl YnNkLm9yZw0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogRmlsZSBUcmFuc2ZlciBQcm90b2NvbCBmdHBkKDgpDQo+ IERhdGU6IE1vbiwgOCBEZWMgMjAxNCAxNjozNDozNCAtMDUwMA0KPiANCj4gaGVsZW4gbHkgPG9u b2Zmb25AbGl2ZS5pdD4gd3JpdGVzOg0KPiANCj4gPiAgaSBpbnN0YWxsZWQgZnRwZCBhbiBydW4g d2l0aCBmdHBkIC1EIGFuZA0KPiA+IEkgZWRpdCBmdHBjaHJvb3Qgd2l0aCBlYWNoIHVzZXIgY2Fu IGFjY2VzcyB0aGUgZmlsZXMgb24gdGhlaXIgaG9tZS1kaXJlY3RvcnkgKHVzZXJzPW1vb24gYW5k IHN1bikNCj4gPiBhbmQgaSBjcmVhdGVkICAvV29ybGQgZGlyZWN0b3J5DQo+ID4gdGhlcmUgaXMg YSBHcm91cCBjYWxsZWQgZnJpZW5kcyBhbmQgZnJpZW5kcyBHcm91cCBtZW1iZXIgbW9vbiBhbmQg c3VuDQo+ID4gaG93IHRvIG9ubHkgdGhlIHVzZXJzIHRoYXQgYmVsb25nIHRvIHRoZSBmcmllbmRz IEdyb3VwIHNob3VkZCBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIGFjY2VzcyB0aGUgL1dvcmxkIGRpcmVjdG9yeQ0KPiAN Cj4gTm9ybWFsbHksIGNocm9vdCBpcyBzb21ldGhpbmcgeW91IHVzZSB3aGVuIHlvdSB3YW50IGEg dXNlciBhY2NvdW50IHRvDQo+IGFjY2VzcyBpdHMgb3duIGhvbWUgZGlyZWN0b3J5IGFuZCBub3Ro aW5nIGVsc2UuDQo+IA0KPiBIb3cgdG8gZ2l2ZSB5b3VyIHVzZXJzIHRoZSBhY2Nlc3MgeW91IHdp c2ggY2FuIGJlIGRvbmUgaW4gYSBudW1iZXIgb2YNCj4gZGlmZmVyZW50IHdheXMsIGFsbCBvZiB3 aGljaCBoYXZlIGRpZmZlcmVudCBzZWN1cml0eSBpbXBsaWNhdGlvbnMuDQo+IA0KPiAgMSkgWW91 IGNhbiBza2lwIHRoZSBjaHJvb3QgYW5kIHVzZSBub3JtYWwgcGVybWlzc2lvbnMgdG8gZ2l2ZSB0 aGUNCj4gICAgIGFwcHJvcHJpYXRlIGFjY2Vzcy4gDQo+IA0KPiAgMikgWW91IGNhbiBrZWVwIHRo ZSBjaHJvb3QgYW5kIG1vdW50IHRoZSBjb21tb24gZGlyZWN0b3J5IGludG8gdGhlDQo+ICAgICB1 c2VycycgaG9tZSBkaXJlY3RvcmllcyB2aWEgTkZTIG9yIGEgbnVsbGZzIG9yIHNvbWV0aGluZyBh bG9uZyB0aGF0DQo+ICAgICBsaW5lLg0KPiANCj4gIDMpIFlvdSBjYW4gcHV0IHRoZSB1c2VycyBp biBhIGphaWwgY3JlYXRlZCBzcGVjaWZpY2FsbHkgZm9yIHRoZW0sIHNvDQo+ICAgICB0aGUgamFp bCBjYW4gYmUgbG9ja2VkIGRvd24gd2l0aG91dCBhbm5veWluZyB0aGUgb3RoZXIgdXNlcnMgb3IN Cj4gICAgIHByb2dyYW1zIHJ1bm5pbmcgb24gdGhlIG92ZXJhbGwgc3lzdGVtLg0KPiANCj4gVGhl cmUgYXJlIHByb2JhYmx5IG90aGVyIGNob2ljZXMgYXMgd2VsbC4gRm9yIG9uZSB0aGluZywgeW91 IGNvdWxkIGNoZWNrDQo+IGludG8gYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmUgRlRQIGRhZW1vbnMgb3IgZXZlbiBhbHRl cm5hdGl2ZSBwcm90b2NvbHMuDQogCQkgCSAgIAkJICA= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 12:07:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66ECB6D7 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 215C2AFA for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z60so252774qgd.20 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 04:07:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=4OV0JIDWqiqDYYWNxovZEBcnDiNtEgHIpHyWIvv4kiw=; b=eyiCLQ2Wx56anm+4v4Ss7+453+1z+LB0S4S12FN8Wpk/bgVPeXnU8xF8J+rAmwdC/t l+F39wYptJAmZ1QIxMJIE39PjVIEF73TrhRQITm/7WGfZAagVAX7Sntvc2zxfOHSoJet Mo07mOXl85JciE9VOOz61vELxi4PJrxNlTuq5atkzWgrwZOGoQ9jc1z2JSsmW6CUbWBv FqhlSVYi97Fi2XzoGXOtt621rjy0du3L/URbkinwRrsjQfq8TTzQ8rlbqIMuNh71TeEX l3O5rLA9j/eTdYR7P/sGXEMGzZzJa6MWjt924oZDK2g2pce/5FhBPCgHci+J+yirDLy7 RNvw== X-Received: by 10.224.79.212 with SMTP id q20mr4849977qak.4.1418126826206; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 04:07:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bf.mbox@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.194.193 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 04:06:34 -0800 (PST) From: Barry Friedman Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:06:34 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uI52xZbk2nD8hbvWz28v0OSOUZo Message-ID: Subject: Problem with upgrade to 10.1 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:07:07 -0000 After upgrade from 10.0 to 10.1 using freebsd-upgrade the system failed to boot. Investigating revealed that one of the devices in fstab no longer appeared to exist. The disk configuration is a Dell Raid system with the primary data disk located on the first raid device and the bootable system on the second i.e. cat /etc/fstab # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/amrd1p2 / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/amrd1p3 none swap sw 0 0 #/dev/amrd0p1 /disk0 ufs rw 2 2 I was able to comment out the line for /disk0 and now the system boots. However /dev/amrd0p1 no longer exists although /dev/amrd0 does. gpart show -lp => 63 1171783617 amrd0 MBR (559G) 63 1171783617 - free - (559G) => 34 286515133 amrd1 GPT (137G) 34 128 amrd1p1 (null) (64K) 162 276823936 amrd1p2 (null) (132G) 276824098 8388608 amrd1p3 (null) (4.0G) 285212706 1302461 - free - (636M) Seems to indicate that the amrd0 raid array has been converted to MBR So my questions are: 1) Why did this happen? 2) Is it possible to recover the data disk? Regards, -- Barry Friedman Emax Computer Systems Inc., 480 Tweedsmuir Ave., Ottawa, Ont. Canada K1Z 5N9 bfriedman@emax.ca 613-725-3198 Mobile: 613-261-0767 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 12:44:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCDD1C64 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm15-vm5.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm15-vm5.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D822E82 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:44:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1418129051; bh=MyfXiJXfZStomzQRLLZ0RW0lAgprgDgcv4q/GPqIslw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=JrqIsKv9IsErPZL88tm9HiRC3k7R+mXt+Re+V6S8Fd/q2OEXMkp0G4dgpT0VC51NALweFSo9ttwMDYvoj0s3egOPcT7X7hXtsX5LORVxTA2s24FqOo91W9dB0O5wa0H690aZlFVURJhtkGuCd/nVLR1fVJpiYUqjJ97KS9AbGAZlOOBUGn1ruRcFnm3Ux4ffaZNCG5JeVri8VNRaEdCPYVxaDMBN8wmPebogGEm7trDYxAuvelMWHJ/53zfHs3/i7b4q8ccsMOnn/yRDfqKckcvk0QjAJzmtoz5k8Q6cMFmoy8FI2eOhQMmAOQIWS1mA48Spanu877e6TVL7uvoBZw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.es; b=uZCkU+AJwZYmtSeUbRTSAB6A2S5oWtSMDM7Wg+CBzM3AqcH+M2HStgeGO8VUQk+XWbrmdeWwdxX6Mp2zTNKzImTJGcZOX52z2zFbUruPkiMuELQ9V22NUNLqMcsniRaQKyhgkhuk5lMRDBs5c/o+AiJ/MCyjuXUqsXNmZorzsry/fH6acdXzBfVuRX/LYOQDZ2RHHBNEsLrjjnebjngadT5zS/qt/4RkOefpvNaX7Lw2JDW5SDJdp0tYUnd1sjMf4UVFlFV50WPFcIJkX7RWXpqEGP3Ev7xAuGV/DyAOIQPNNDQW9hWyM7r/H6/MzJB1HV/8OyqMikvcj9WGeFUwOw==; Received: from [212.82.98.126] by nm15.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2014 12:44:11 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.99] by tm19.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2014 12:44:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp136.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2014 12:44:10 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 340432.49122.bm@smtp136.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Rm1CQpIVM1nizUEJr2b8.i6Cz9Mnzp_wtmjR5mbv44oZ0cl jFByYr0jKJ1pIlkhQSwad9b8v9tg4N5KKtEsSeruT1QtrFnIlGVSOpZHIR1K XMGZDN3qXRheCjYtid9Y6GzVk2w9cDXx8SADxE0eFUe1nWA61ATEXUTLb9a2 TnmyiPmJhMg9RCFi5Q335Ab.84u3T6CHvtvlwA89KHubZ9hy_EHUuHHQMXlD _2jwJnAgIhRjrA0bLJ1ozaxyM6.ZjRosJ.uLD7X.AyLyTS18427SwM15Wc3N Ich3hqnH9uts6drIrnQO9v9Nw.4zTLTlj6cMYQZ2OQQx3VBXCWCxPkuZl1Wy udPq3.hVWEwzC79UKxGFLinev0DMSwatodrbSxlrHOvwVYi2Qt_zkmplBNiF gnldGCa01pp.VOQNjqrwSy7l9zJIx2g0Hfmf6FpCZpdgPZeot6yGdWjHTvqi D0tkahXTn2SwctiZSzWvjP7btNpecJNcD8MVL_aWUIRdtrODVLJ45HoI- X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:44:17 +0100 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi issues [SOLVED] Message-Id: <20141209134417.c10fe46a072f1ebea67c0136@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <54852A6D.7040208@msen.com> References: <54850E3C.7030206@msen.com> <54852A6D.7040208@msen.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:44:23 -0000 On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:34:53 -0500 Mark Moellering wrote: > I hope this helps someone. > > Mark Thanks a lot Mark. I have the same raspberry b+ and was impossible to me to use FreeBSD there. Thanks again. --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 12:59:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216F5225 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6612FC1 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB9CxU5H089115; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:31 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5486F232.5080004@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:59:30 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Harrison , pete wright Subject: Re: Pkg upgrade 'SAT solver' problem References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:59:40 -0000 On 08/12/2014 21:59, Peter Harrison wrote: > On 8 December 2014 at 21:28, pete wright wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Peter Harrison >> wrote: >>> Can someone help with a pkg upgrade problem please? >>> >>> I've been relying solely on binary pkg for a while now without problem. >>> However, on doing the latest upgrade I get: >>> >>> root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>> Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% >>> Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) >>> pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: >>> cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from >>> request? [Y/n]: n >>> pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver >>> >>> If I answer 'y' I get a much longer sequence of similar errors and the >>> upgrade still bombs. >> >> is this related to the upgrade of gettext? As per /usr/ports/UPDATING: >> >> "20141130: >> AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) >> AUTHOR: tijl@FreeBSD.org >> >> The devel/gettext port has been split up in devel/gettext-runtime, a >> lightweight package containing runtime libraries, and devel/gettext-tools, >> a package containing developer tools. The devel/gettext port still exists >> as a metaport. >> >> You must first delete the existing installation of gettext and then >> reinstall it. This will break sudo, so you *must* do this in a root >> shell (sudo -i) if you use sudo. >> " >> >> I did an upgrade last week and this package pretty much broke >> everything (including most of xfce4) causing me to do a pretty big >> uninstall/reinstall dance. Of course if I read /usr/ports/UPDATING >> first I would have saved myself some drama :) >> >> Cheers, >> -pete >> >> -- >> pete wright >> www.nycbug.org >> @nomadlogicLA > > Thanks - sounds about right but... > > root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg delete -f gettext > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 > packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > gettext-0.19.3 > > Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: y > [1/1] Deleting gettext-0.19.3: 100% > root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from > request? [Y/n]: > > > Still no dice. Any ideas? When was your previous upgrade? If it was before 2014-11-26 you may have been caught by the switch from perl 5.16 to 5.18. That required a pkg upgrade -f although that's time consuming and can't be done under sudo (see devel/gettext note). Alternatively trying "pkg check -Ba" and "pkg check -da" might shake something loose. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 13:36:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D21AB07 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E445E6 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:36:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 37503547 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:36:53 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB9DanLA082069 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:36:52 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id sB9Dan2d082068 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:36:49 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:36:49 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Two local X-servers Message-ID: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: OAO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:36:57 -0000 Colleagues, I would like to run two local X-servers on the same desktop box, like maybe one on :0 and the other on :1. How do I do that? Currently i run xdm from /etc/ttys like this: # grep xdm\ /etc/ttys ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure # grep -v ^# /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers :0 Digital-QV local /usr/local/bin/X -ac -nolisten tcp :0 When I add another line to /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers like :1 Digital-QV local /usr/local/bin/X -ac -nolisten tcp :1 nothing good happens. I cannot switch into another X-server with Alt+Fn or any other key combination. I think another X-server is not even started. Is there a good recipe? Thank you in advance for any input. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 13:46:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1D4EC4 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F976ED for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id rp18so488856iec.39 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 05:46:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OjQKgf4ROq53/LpsUn0JoOwIVtCPEQUtCTjstw3b8Cg=; b=ko71Axzng0valdnQ2WnPYuuG4ilIlgzFt61hiKeYSSjAZiQKKLzA9s2CJC/P3WT5fu q/r52aeptwznee/AFzY55yujPlhrOhP3xb2VrJmvB54XQXJ5agdFPC6DZVWV3kdWiTjG Y4vyFy8Hduu0stiKMhoyXBfTuGOaC//kgVjWs7IiUGA3WI1+4cZ9voXd8aXiTZZ0W7Cq olAl18GLARBaRotrfpLuVAWRS/ZBi77TBXNz5yka5M5G+bFcOx9TS/x16yT8faZVFh88 HwPWAaKCzUVua+vnrNazajAOZTotCD1K1LE+UUezJdj3HewrR2UwAi2CGm387JenITMc iikw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.67.113 with SMTP id m17mr2365769igt.4.1418132760994; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 05:46:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: adamartin.freebsd.org@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.83.100 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 05:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.83.100 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 05:46:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:46:00 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CVXj9py9TRmKqXx4udh4Zmx3rxM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Two local X-servers From: Adam Martin To: Victor Sudakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:46:01 -0000 I have had success running multiple X11 sessions, but I do not use login managers like xdm. I run startx directly from my TCSH prompt. To run a second session from my prompt I run with another number, i.e.: startx -- :1 Note that you need Ctrl-Alt-F1 or similar to change ttyv devices from X11. Hope this helps, -- ADAM David Alan Martin On Dec 9, 2014 8:37 AM, "Victor Sudakov" wrote: > Colleagues, > > I would like to run two local X-servers on the same desktop box, like > maybe one on :0 and the other on :1. How do I do that? > > Currently i run xdm from /etc/ttys like this: > > # grep xdm\ /etc/ttys > ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure > > # grep -v ^# /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers > :0 Digital-QV local /usr/local/bin/X -ac -nolisten tcp :0 > > When I add another line to /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers like > :1 Digital-QV local /usr/local/bin/X -ac -nolisten tcp :1 > > nothing good happens. I cannot switch into another X-server with > Alt+Fn or any other key combination. I think another X-server is > not even started. > > Is there a good recipe? > > Thank you in advance for any input. > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 14:23:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3A45C0; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED14BB1; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:23:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 37503961; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:23:36 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB9ENXKT082668; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:23:36 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id sB9ENX34082667; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:23:33 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:23:33 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: Adam Martin Subject: Re: Two local X-servers Message-ID: <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: OAO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:23:40 -0000 Adam Martin wrote: > I have had success running multiple X11 sessions, but I do not use login > managers like xdm. I would like to keep xdm. According to xdm(1), it should be possible for xdm to manage several local X-displays. > > I run startx directly from my TCSH prompt. To run a second session from my > prompt I run with another number, i.e.: > > startx -- :1 > From your experience we can at least conclude that two X-servers can share one videocard. I was not even sure about that. > Note that you need Ctrl-Alt-F1 or similar to change ttyv devices from X11. On my box, after an X-server is started, there is no return to the text console. This is because of the Intel video card or Intel video driver. Once I start an X-server, there is no text prompt for me. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 14:37:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB8085A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-173.corporate-mail-sp.com (smtp-173.corporate-mail-sp.com [177.12.167.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A82CBB for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corporate-mail-sp.com (smtp [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-173.corporate-mail-sp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9230DA1A542 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:28:39 -0200 (BRST) Received: from localhost (web-ded-1619g.kinghost.net [177.185.196.151]) by smtp.corporate-mail-sp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BD66356F69F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:28:39 -0200 (BRST) From: Professora Antonieta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Agenda de cursos Message-Id: <3341283322.jnXOjsYcvCM52_cbDb9VaExxVi5pgk1yBOjXZFhTFbVI9ozQNqMQ6I76zOCtGWaCn4UEEkCdNJ2BkMWclyvT0w@profantonieta.com.br> Reply-To: mkt@profantonieta.com.br Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:28:39 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:37:28 -0000 Problema com a visualização da mensagem? Clique aqui [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/visualizar/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVb2efqiIMNApFnMKs57jxgbnhOxPBTC-zSbZ7pm5jXVGpbsCERaU7ONaTw7Vc0YX4dGhsBIS3jG-0tqgP8l9a8w].   [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/emailmarketing_novo-02-600x207.jpg] [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/link/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVbBeZk6t4eVrw9Ja1YBIZbp4ivpRzZTqP1BwsXMjpz2gQ] [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/emailmarketing_novo-01.jpg] [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/link/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVZLB1Odhb9Ql85wxs0gF-agYrEwWiQENQuBAYhvJN-hDA] --- [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/wysija/dividers/sketchy.png] [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/emailmarketing_novo-03.jpg] [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/link/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVbC5ZEDBcwGJj7VtLHTQP9vreXlWwKQM-HU0kYuMmBYCw] --- [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/wysija/dividers/sketchy.png] [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/link/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVaUXEuoud7iRyEoY2gpaFgF4Tm-r0YYjLA6xyH_eFfJYA] --- [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/wysija/dividers/sketchy.png] [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/emailmarketing_novo-05-600x206.jpg] [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/link/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVY_fS4HQgDw6HOQWNsrZukCt5EeVU6L1boh0ClqoV63cg] [http://www.bicalhobalancas.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/emailmarketing_novo-06-600x88.jpg] [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/link/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVYXI4W_k4HpNAFFehFOVS-HdsLurTB5M8lqk-dsJr0beA]   Nós respeitamos a sua privacidade e somos contra o spam. Se você não deseja mais receber nossos e-mails, cancele seu recebimento acessando aqui [http://mbox12.profantonieta.com.br/descadastro/RLQvSUg1YI1WzB8TOr9s-j-0xsCwEPJzkHg22Mk2OVb2efqiIMNApFnMKs57jxgbnhOxPBTC-zSbZ7pm5jXVGpbsCERaU7ONaTw7Vc0YX4dGhsBIS3jG-0tqgP8l9a8w]. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 14:49:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AAF2AB0 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com (mail-lb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D75DD0 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n15so625044lbi.2 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:49:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CsvrJWpI3YuJQ2H7uZM26bG0Va+CAUAYOoygt+gqB4Y=; b=JL/1wnb3EymL6b0cqocKG37uO4VIy40EipsMF7Qu46VkC4FhFchTFq0g6QqzFYYWxG MqUTKAmWOBoudO0j074/ROdQ5h691TPUcvxa5YzdLF8e+8q4bbywhp/OuWcS8f6gV3bc iy4Fks8WOQs+bGBHLX6DiaDqvEdGCr9lGQ6CRhRMZvvyRPHqlV68LF9paVttVC2Xbea5 CdSBgsqvHpP7yOhIXzmOtv3SQV7sqQJbL2L3HXXgtWM56kljVPHVe+T+XvfBWH1JRhPD 6LloKOvr7hzG5BOw8kDc7QQaiX/W2bUOAlUtqxyy8AiPLJtOaItNanlTn4s7OSptHjgF 7lQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.161.161 with SMTP id xt1mr22762746lbb.9.1418136580987; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.170.130 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 06:49:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:49:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: eurobsdcon website From: Andreas Nilsson To: Mailinglists FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:49:44 -0000 Hello, this might not be the place, but I noticed today that the eurobsdcon and eurobsdconfoundation website both are "down". On load I get: "Error establishing a database connection" Best regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 15:11:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC03A177; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88FD9EA; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB9FBuVu027080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:11:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id sB9FBu50027077; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:11:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:11:55 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Victor Sudakov Subject: Re: Two local X-servers In-Reply-To: <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Message-ID: References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:11:56 -0700 (MST) Cc: Adam Martin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:11:59 -0000 On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Adam Martin wrote: >> I have had success running multiple X11 sessions, but I do not use login >> managers like xdm. > > I would like to keep xdm. According to xdm(1), it should be possible > for xdm to manage several local X-displays. > >> >> I run startx directly from my TCSH prompt. To run a second session from my >> prompt I run with another number, i.e.: >> >> startx -- :1 >> > > From your experience we can at least conclude that two X-servers can > share one videocard. I was not even sure about that. > >> Note that you need Ctrl-Alt-F1 or similar to change ttyv devices from X11. > > On my box, after an X-server is started, there is no return to the > text console. This is because of the Intel video card or Intel video > driver. Once I start an X-server, there is no text prompt for me. It is there, just not visible. On 10.1 and probably 9-STABLE, use vt(4) by adding kern.vty=vt to /boot/loader.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 16:00:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A33F6A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog131.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog131.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F66C831 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob131.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVIccaoEsHEutYGkgQwzoYrG9H+X7lhCt@postini.com; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:00:01 UTC Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ex7so8361857wid.9 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:59:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=OyavXj6oyzH4ymHUcHqm3JqVtJdHCBfO+dKoAS9NS54=; b=EN4/3P/8mzaWLLMVvzqR6UIw78x+GXhXda7uZAAsjBjdC89pPqfYmORNcScbb0uFFn b3ngwTeCmfTTbgsJozZi1DxPjkPG8zNBV7RGXx8ueQXwFP894lHAmkqOzfjgWzikSoJx 1c89Xpnyh7AQb9HCftCzY9ZFx+CHkgKvvxwR76KWMoiTlZLBNy7CDGRwDEhoIp4AFmi1 39MHapfROoKKXmplMB6+jbwOZ0xXOcZs/hJNCkyQS9YB8nO4yAME2TGR8ruryWTUm+sg QWwHMVWOUR0OdCMyQ+vgNuxWdV0CCm6gvXUNxZzj4aq6RO8qaIoBl6ryZ6M7Lu5D2ma9 NYMw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdzcrW8I8lJJ61wXh+mjzLZwmOTUYFezXCtgOE5z/jGt0aXg8NCMV3tro/HpP2obnDCqqLBrvLuEtxWR5j4+FEVKX7EnAoxYs7hJoAjsSKngYX7hj36CGFp9IBkQIv/qy0/fNMhErLqeSz2FNEck4aquuIrmQx7e9EwNkBuOdYAOv73/Y= X-Received: by 10.194.110.161 with SMTP id ib1mr6450523wjb.78.1418140778704; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:59:38 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.110.161 with SMTP id ib1mr6450514wjb.78.1418140778619; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm14355641wix.7.2014.12.09.07.59.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:59:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:59:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:59:36 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB9FxaSs072833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:59:36 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sB9FxaIV072832 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:59:36 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201412091559.sB9FxaIV072832@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Emulex Zephyr-X LightPulse supported on 10.1-release amd64? Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:00:02 -0000 Is this adapter supported on 10.1-release amd64? none2@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x0c0400 card=0xfc2110df chip=0xfc2010df rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Emulex Corporation' device = 'Zephyr-X LightPulse Fibre Channel Host Adapter' class = serial bus subclass = Fibre Channel I cannot find a driver for it. Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 16:33:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08DA9B31 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog118.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF8DCA3 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob118.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVIckUsmVYHJyajxAMhudZ6WT5qNeABYj@postini.com; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:33:52 UTC Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so8464231wiv.17 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=GxJ9tw10gXK+CTJqC+dliFSMq68TaCjRT3GFiFuCKqA=; b=X03edK5Hdre9Sxl7jHLX0ywltaa99ez1sm3Wk+BmEdBlZUR1qcW9XEC/++WphObcXz 4pcUcKGLLg7NQcmyzYuVN79LWS8bMOX1ZfOB8mMP8Qn/JwAtrgBQmxPGfTFvYeKUHOhk xFXZIHiYhKjuZsVhOmp5DnZNJyGhxiYySAn+YgPVtenPDgapzZAayC2DGBEWxBSmL1Yi fDRbxsPIut9WE6T9IN3WeEvm35MNvlrA3zkjlJz/WOcTrHyT6GMREDg8ntkbIRBgnXXe elFXV8K27jSM8F7nCiVJNEeyO4LKlFsNRgceSdERl0EMVCJtwpFbeByvhZzr18f8MYhg Qzww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRGtdVu84a8NKRJZDOpVp4UYgpqZBLMIqLIlUVL+jNyIEvv1BLYVehhsTVIjhjEFKffhje5aB5nsTlHSFsMVqvIAQ/h1Ul9xyuSs4yGM/wqVXWMeaCYeb9uXseb6jd6LXwuvpj0tXhCWYmLLV5mHoeVecIgQnstG8TJ7sONtX6/1A8Axk= X-Received: by 10.180.88.165 with SMTP id bh5mr5671053wib.77.1418142802608; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.88.165 with SMTP id bh5mr5670972wib.77.1418142801961; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm2871515wiz.12.2014.12.09.08.33.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:33:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:33:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:33:19 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB9GXKJg073040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:33:20 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sB9GXJBo073039 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:33:19 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201412091633.sB9GXJBo073039@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: will isp(4) support Qlogic 2460 or 2462? Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:33:53 -0000 I'm trying to find a fibre adapter that fits into SunFire X4100. The PCI slots there are very short. From Qlogic family it seems only 2460 or 2462 cards will fit there. The isp(4) driver does not mention these particular models. Has anybody got either of these 2 models working with isp(4)? Alternatively, can anybody confirm that these 2 cards are not supported by isp(4)? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 16:54:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F4A4FC for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.neu.net (neu.net [162.217.113.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gaq5.x.rootbsd.net", Issuer "gaq5.x.rootbsd.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF0DF0B for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [162.217.113.162]) by mail.neu.net (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB9GsXbJ015410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:54:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:54:33 -0500 (EST) From: AN To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:653:9: error (fwd) Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:54:35 -0000 Hi List: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #15 r275578: Sun Dec 7 15:25:11 EST 2014 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 [root@mail /usr/src]# svnlite info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f Revision: 275623 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: ngie Last Changed Rev: 275622 Last Changed Date: 2014-12-08 13:29:20 -0500 (Mon, 08 Dec 2014) I ran into this bug yesterday while trying to do installworld: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195537 [xen] vt console somehow causes failures to boot and disk errors this is on a VPS with Rootbsd. The system froze and I rebooted into single user mode and did full fsck several times. I added kern.vty="sc" in loader.conf and am able to boot normally. I tried to do svnlite up and had failures, so I deleted /usr/src and did svnlite co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/ /usr/src which finished successfully. My problem now is when I try to do buildworld I receive the following failure: c++ -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support -I. -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -fno-strict-aliasing -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0\" -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=\"\" -Qunused-arguments -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wno-c++11-extensions -c /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/APFloat.cpp -o APFloat.o In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/APFloat.cpp:15: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h:20: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:19: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:14: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:19: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h:18: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/SwapByteOrder.h:18: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.h:36: /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:638:9: error: no member named 'signbit' in the global namespace using ::signbit; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:639:9: error: no member named 'fpclassify' in the global namespace using ::fpclassify; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:640:9: error: no member named 'isfinite' in the global namespace using ::isfinite; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:641:9: error: no member named 'isinf' in the global namespace using ::isinf; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:642:9: error: no member named 'isnan' in the global namespace using ::isnan; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:643:9: error: no member named 'isnormal' in the global namespace using ::isnormal; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:644:9: error: no member named 'isgreater' in the global namespace using ::isgreater; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:645:9: error: no member named 'isgreaterequal' in the global namespace using ::isgreaterequal; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:646:9: error: no member named 'isless' in the global namespace using ::isless; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:647:9: error: no member named 'islessequal' in the global namespace using ::islessequal; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:648:9: error: no member named 'islessgreater' in the global namespace using ::islessgreater; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:649:9: error: no member named 'isunordered' in the global namespace using ::isunordered; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:650:9: error: no member named 'isunordered' in the global namespace using ::isunordered; ~~^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:652:9: error: no member named 'float_t' in the global namespace; did you mean '__float_t'? using ::float_t; ~~^ /usr/include/x86/_types.h:80:16: note: '__float_t' declared here typedef float __float_t; ^ In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/APFloat.cpp:15: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h:20: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:19: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:14: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:19: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h:18: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/SwapByteOrder.h:18: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.h:36: /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:653:9: error: no member named 'double_t' in the global namespace; did you mean '__double_t'? using ::double_t; ~~^ /usr/include/x86/_types.h:79:17: note: '__double_t' declared here typedef double __double_t; ^ In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/APFloat.cpp:15: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h:20: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:19: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:14: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:19: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h:18: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/SwapByteOrder.h:18: In file included from /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.h:36: /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:660:34: error: use of undeclared identifier 'fabsf' abs(float __x) _NOEXCEPT {return fabsf(__x);} ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:664:35: error: use of undeclared identifier 'fabs'; did you mean 'abs'? abs(double __x) _NOEXCEPT {return fabs(__x);} ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:664:1: note: 'abs' declared here abs(double __x) _NOEXCEPT {return fabs(__x);} ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:668:40: error: use of undeclared identifier 'fabsl' abs(long double __x) _NOEXCEPT {return fabsl(__x);} ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/cmath:675:9: error: no member named 'acos' in the global namespace using ::acos; ~~^ fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=] 20 errors generated. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/src *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/src *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/src Any help to fix this problem would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 16:58:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 083746F7 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog115.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog115.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58695F4D for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob115.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVIcqL4u1mdIdIUrD6iTaMPIXejPtnizl@postini.com; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:58:47 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l2so1389474wgh.27 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:58:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=jk6qdaB0FD4J9DQJ43KhU/zLdBRkcQ7RQNgLyRYyPl0=; b=lNFqUWMZ3+5E5XslKyVdaZMe4FJlgct4zgHvwGIcznLZAoIqoCosbfD+SI+2XdxPSU 6F6tOcUBN3iak5uccgnnC0PpG5GudpD8Xq+rZoWyYpBRD27ndX/pBMfbhfbwe2j3T5Ra RNj9cyx17vD9c+Pc4gNxDafSt8vQFtFGLs3v58JbrxMqCY5TMk85bexdYGOt8HuJ4BfM huWO4f6lJadiW4Thq1EPWx4nbuWFOYUuJt3AzHqA+1AK+H2gtTMhmMXS+q4L7FBSLP8B f0L8HIBi2fpT1UI7sj7WQkn73HUq6do+tUhvoCatsgrpuoYaFr5bN+Ar/fgCaRxInJok nypw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmI3BZPfqsdiXdLgU7Mzs6wnk+k1WeCgvBu5UUKr9mt4OvneZgMgRzeunkca4GmelkdPHKvqvOF3bVvEUox6hYyTlPbhOGe3mvDtYFY5xEN4Ku3hnmd8beDtPP6vQjdc6aJTEmYXZrpbtbKZUtOc4vrtJVHIzDolVTNcpP6buAM8+yjxTI= X-Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr34185122wib.32.1418144303249; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:58:23 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr34184932wib.32.1418144301528; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:58:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gy8sm14536594wib.23.2014.12.09.08.58.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:58:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:58:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:58:19 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB9GwJTw073151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:58:19 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sB9GwJbV073150; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:58:19 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201412091658.sB9GwJbV073150@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: allan@physics.umn.edu, mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: will isp(4) support Qlogic 2460 or 2462? Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <20141209164846.GA15745@physics.umn.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:58:48 -0000 >From allan@physics.umn.edu Tue Dec 9 16:50:00 2014 > >On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:33:21AM -0800, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> I'm trying to find a fibre adapter that >> fits into SunFire X4100. The PCI slots >> there are very short. From Qlogic family >> it seems only 2460 or 2462 cards will fit >> there. The isp(4) driver does not mention >> these particular models. Has anybody got >> either of these 2 models working with isp(4)? >> Alternatively, can anybody confirm that these >> 2 cards are not supported by isp(4)? > >We've been using isp-based qlogic FC cards since FreeBSD 6-ish (along >with some mpt-based LSI cards. Overall I'd say the qlogic ones seem to >work best. Currently using QLE-2462 on FreeBSD 9.3. Multipath works well >with this too! Thank you for the confirmation. Perhaps you could send a PR to update isp(4) man page to include 2460 and 2462 as supported. I'll buy a 2460 and give it a go. Thanks again Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 17:13:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23D3C89 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.physics.umn.edu (smtp.spa.umn.edu [128.101.220.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDF8E1C9 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peevish.spa.umn.edu ([128.101.220.230]) by mail.physics.umn.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XyNxu-0003ze-Mz; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:48:46 -0600 Received: by peevish.spa.umn.edu (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 9123F34C; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:48:46 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:48:46 -0600 From: Graham Allan To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: will isp(4) support Qlogic 2460 or 2462? Message-ID: <20141209164846.GA15745@physics.umn.edu> References: <201412091633.sB9GXJBo073039@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201412091633.sB9GXJBo073039@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:13:13 -0000 On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:33:21AM -0800, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm trying to find a fibre adapter that > fits into SunFire X4100. The PCI slots > there are very short. From Qlogic family > it seems only 2460 or 2462 cards will fit > there. The isp(4) driver does not mention > these particular models. Has anybody got > either of these 2 models working with isp(4)? > Alternatively, can anybody confirm that these > 2 cards are not supported by isp(4)? We've been using isp-based qlogic FC cards since FreeBSD 6-ish (along with some mpt-based LSI cards. Overall I'd say the qlogic ones seem to work best. Currently using QLE-2462 on FreeBSD 9.3. Multipath works well with this too! Graham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 17:57:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C73F0A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91739C3 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id rl12so1017445iec.30 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:57:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IuFAArdn6bCECGCAz53cKTfbV8KiTHQc0wPveVtQkZE=; b=wQ/lMRi+PMSVw4PSNzWf5MswU9TKlJqqd4rIE4nWoVUHEtrrHAVI7MSRx6Uj3EM8kG 8l9n/qs7vHCSBjprp4bgvE79hkkjIuNLunRg5L73CUmywV5x53NeRAACCwILSjt+hN2a 9QOne57fUJMPHrYru6IFLWZtQPaGyhbUHbblMzjREMiQk2qXNwIpbK9vaCnTXRGm/4dY t8Xan1sU9iAnMrPq6jk3Kgae4vrVXjlJaSlAhlcpRMaQKjNetxLMQ/H1sFqPWKOaQ3Eg nQQLet3f+Qk9sO6NIfW7d53/VnTRWYmX6AUDSMaulg9Z5vR7hOHo9frgQlLH/2TuG3Gb vyVg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.72.65 with SMTP id b1mr21120830igv.47.1418147865070; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:57:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: adamartin.freebsd.org@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.83.100 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.83.100 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:57:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:57:44 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ck_WMLdxY4WbZYNk0ezQ5lYiReY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Two local X-servers From: Adam Martin To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:57:46 -0000 On Dec 9, 2014 10:11 AM, "Warren Block" wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >> Adam Martin wrote: >>> >>> I have had success running multiple X11 sessions, but I do not use login >>> managers like xdm. >> >> >> I would like to keep xdm. According to xdm(1), it should be possible >> for xdm to manage several local X-displays. >> >>> >>> I run startx directly from my TCSH prompt. To run a second session from my >>> prompt I run with another number, i.e.: >>> >>> startx -- :1 >>> >> >> From your experience we can at least conclude that two X-servers can >> share one videocard. I was not even sure about that. >> >>> Note that you need Ctrl-Alt-F1 or similar to change ttyv devices from X11. >> >> >> On my box, after an X-server is started, there is no return to the >> text console. This is because of the Intel video card or Intel video >> driver. Once I start an X-server, there is no text prompt for me. > > > It is there, just not visible. On 10.1 and probably 9-STABLE, use vt(4) by adding > kern.vty=vt > to /boot/loader.conf. Indeed. I was experimenting with the lack of visual in ttyv from leaving X11, on my laptop, and I discovered that you can get visual back by using vidcontrol to change modes and bounce back and forth from X11 after doing so. The issue there is that X11 won't show again. Sorry to go a bit OT, but maybe someone reading this can figure out what vidcard registers VESA changes tickle so we can keep character terminals in Intel cards. I really don't like frame buffer terminals. Anyhow, check your xorg configurations for "no-switch" I think it's called. It and "dontzap" affect ctrl-alt-F# and ctrl-alt-backspace. Cheers, -- ADAM David Alan Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 18:48:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4F0AF for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AC422A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b13so1654829wgh.3 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:48:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4TOLOkfCZJRh6sim+lO/S9Cur2jxqq6084BbIFJzqE4=; b=lj/aPt3hn4vH2xkRdSlOlXt+QIGSS2ETWXQKM2PZy8b8Fy3DN+wRsuiuDuheqYRVOg EQfSGxejgSud0SjZl8Vgxy8ESBmpeTkRZk6StulXGg3nnzhXgYzvlszQa8r+Mt9Dvamv 67Yb6s+1mwOsnZc9ZgD+AdF+4OQuDzRKKIVRLvqlEK6Wl5O+Q8KgutNOOxLolruHTODS lrD26tqko5Wj8gB4WsiijJn3Dw32J8do+mywipBoKKyGVLIdC+wa9dgQrHFMSMqnImrI 4Rn6dg5Q4zxI1HDSdxhre+a77a0vsQyfMqPwBaT82lsIXu75VGcgiUi8KsrDC+kAqpek fpTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.181.28.3 with SMTP id jk3mr6794811wid.16.1418150924225; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.73.2 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:48:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5486F232.5080004@qeng-ho.org> References: <5486F232.5080004@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:48:44 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pkg upgrade 'SAT solver' problem From: Peter Harrison To: Arthur Chance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: pete wright , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:48:46 -0000 On 9 December 2014 at 12:59, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 08/12/2014 21:59, Peter Harrison wrote: >> >> On 8 December 2014 at 21:28, pete wright wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Peter Harrison >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can someone help with a pkg upgrade problem please? >>>> >>>> I've been relying solely on binary pkg for a while now without problem. >>>> However, on doing the latest upgrade I get: >>>> >>>> root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade >>>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>>> Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% >>>> Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) >>>> pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: >>>> cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from >>>> request? [Y/n]: n >>>> pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver >>>> >>>> If I answer 'y' I get a much longer sequence of similar errors and the >>>> upgrade still bombs. >>> >>> >>> is this related to the upgrade of gettext? As per /usr/ports/UPDATING: >>> >>> "20141130: >>> AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) >>> AUTHOR: tijl@FreeBSD.org >>> >>> The devel/gettext port has been split up in devel/gettext-runtime, a >>> lightweight package containing runtime libraries, and >>> devel/gettext-tools, >>> a package containing developer tools. The devel/gettext port still >>> exists >>> as a metaport. >>> >>> You must first delete the existing installation of gettext and then >>> reinstall it. This will break sudo, so you *must* do this in a root >>> shell (sudo -i) if you use sudo. >>> " >>> >>> I did an upgrade last week and this package pretty much broke >>> everything (including most of xfce4) causing me to do a pretty big >>> uninstall/reinstall dance. Of course if I read /usr/ports/UPDATING >>> first I would have saved myself some drama :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -pete >>> >>> -- >>> pete wright >>> www.nycbug.org >>> @nomadlogicLA >> >> >> Thanks - sounds about right but... >> >> root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg delete -f gettext >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >> Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 >> packages in the universe): >> >> Installed packages to be REMOVED: >> gettext-0.19.3 >> >> Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: y >> [1/1] Deleting gettext-0.19.3: 100% >> root@thinkpad:/home/peter # pkg upgrade >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> Checking for upgrades (377 candidates): 100% >> Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) >> pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: >> cannot install package libxfce4util~x11/libxfce4util, remove it from >> request? [Y/n]: >> >> >> Still no dice. Any ideas? > > > When was your previous upgrade? If it was before 2014-11-26 you may have > been caught by the switch from perl 5.16 to 5.18. That required a > > pkg upgrade -f > > although that's time consuming and can't be done under sudo (see > devel/gettext note). > > Alternatively trying "pkg check -Ba" and "pkg check -da" might shake > something loose. > > -- > Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to > GOTO 1 Bingo! That was it. All sorted now - thanks for the pointer. In my defence, "pkg updating" didn't show me anything about Perl (although now you've mentioned it I can see it in /usr/ports/UPDATING). Is that a bug in pkg? Thanks for your help. Peter Harrison. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 19:04:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC125B8 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2DC643 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XyQ4w-0002ev-CX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:04:10 +0100 Received: from c-76-28-97-53.hsd1.ct.comcast.net ([76.28.97.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:04:10 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by c-76-28-97-53.hsd1.ct.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:04:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: pkg breakage after updating ports tree Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 44 Message-ID: Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-97-53.hsd1.ct.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:04:19 -0000 After doing "portsnap fetch update" on a 9.3-RELEASE system, I find that updating ports is broken because of dependencies on pkg. The attempt to update pkg-1.3.8_3 to pkg-1.4.0 results in: ======================================================================== ... cc1: warnings being treated as errors set.c: In function 'exec_set': set.c:103: warning: 'depfield' may be used uninitialized in this function set.c:103: warning: 'field' may be used uninitialized in this function *** [pkg-set.o] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.0/src. *** [all-recursive] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.0. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.0. *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. *** [/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/.build_done.pkg._usr_local] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. ===>>> make build failed for ports-mgmt/pkg ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for pkg-1.3.8_3 failed ===>>> Aborting update ======================================================================== This is using portmaster, but running make from the ports directory is similar. (As a side question, "which pkg" shows /usr/sbin/pkg. Why are there dependencies on the version of pkg in ports?) What can I do to fix this? -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 22:24:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17ECAB7 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host203.r-bonomi.com (host203.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBA8E7C for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by host203.r-bonomi.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) id sB9MEfOq099096 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:14:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bonomi) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:14:41 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201412092214.sB9MEfOq099096@host203.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: mplayer configuration question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:24:56 -0000 I've got an HP DX5150 with ATI Radeon X300 on-board graphics. 'X' start-up indicates ATI R400 drm drivers are active. I've got both the VGA and DVI-D ports enabled in BIOS, and everthing shows up just fine on both displays. EXCEPT for mplayer output, that is. when I launch mplayer (or gmplayer), I get a new window on both screens, but _only_ the display on the VGA port has the movie displayed. on the DVI port, it's an empty window. HOW do I get movies to display on the DVI port?? sign me 'baffled' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 22:28:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E31C3B6F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host203.r-bonomi.com (host203.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22B2EA3 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by host203.r-bonomi.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) id sB9MKZAS099110 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:20:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bonomi) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:20:35 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201412092220.sB9MKZAS099110@host203.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: HP DX5150 and screen-savers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:28:10 -0000 I'm pretty sure I've done something 'wrong', but can't figure out what. :(( I'm running a stripped-down monolithic kernel, with evrything built-in (no modules being run-time loaded), and cant get a screen-saver to work with the built-in ATI Radeon x300 graphics. I've got the 'sc' console driver, and 'vesa' support compiled-in, and fire_saver bitches at boot time, failing to install. (-that- machine is at another location, so I don't have the exact boot-time error message handy) Any suggestions as to where to start beating on it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 22:37:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC439DB0 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phlegethon.blisses.org (phlegethon.blisses.org [50.56.97.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB4AF8C for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blisses.org (cocytus.blisses.org [23.25.209.73]) by phlegethon.blisses.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6887F1489EC for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:32:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:32:14 -0500 From: Mason Loring Bliss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Bootloader bombing out with USB disk attached - suggestions? Message-ID: <20141209223214.GL4402@blisses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:37:30 -0000 Hi, all. I noticed this this morning, on rebooting: http://imgur.com/IX2vIgw I've got a USB hard drive plugged in, and when it's plugged in, FreeBSD won't boot, giving me the error message I photographed and linked, above. If I unplug the USB drive, FreeBSD will boot. I can then plug the drive back in and use it. I'm writing because I'm curious about how I'd go about debugging this usefully. Here's an excerpt from what dmesg says about the device: da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 121601C) da0: quirks=0x2 -- Mason Loring Bliss mason@blisses.org http://blisses.org/ "I am a brother of jackals, and a companion of ostriches." (Job 30 : 29) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 23:05:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B96C21EE; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 23:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497D92EC; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 23:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so11688349wib.5 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:04:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8M4ZjLcM+5XpetWShd+SbrXov4i/y3vHTXT1bztH6Bc=; b=MmVtZvfcunztCwgdt73K9pLphEZWt+4MhHAYxE95CObi97Kh5CmetXI7yFZRbV4uqQ HQtQHipH5lDqP7jdR6QaNz1R/tXuUV5Xkrhxq1Q7ccKFsZr9+nQ6rlLW5byBiXP0gj7I Fgw4ZEOop2RdO9OmVQc6R8S7IivOJH+TGjZOWjGLPJEIL4MursGA+TkNsYyrcWdCCnOA hbO3+EeOPiPiTGY62Y02oXzY9SL7KwVDMhAlYwqgWlcyKJS4aL/t3IqknKya1HfCB4TS +AWbtgU74LyqbvSTq2HNqit8sguD7mmJcXnLTrBklseXUzKpvPtuLoLJVZJK16AsoMpy 5xPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.103.162 with SMTP id fx2mr8014463wib.42.1418166298671; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:04:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.151.130 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:04:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141208153925.5df90587@prometheus> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:04:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? From: grarpamp To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:05:00 -0000 > Ohartmann: > From my experience, mostly compiling FreeBSD sources from scratch > ... > a dual core, 4-thread CPU > at 3.3 GHz takes ~ 60 minutes to build world, the same as a 4-core > castrated i3 with disabled SMT. Switching off SMT on the dual core > ... > Using SMT in some FPU heavy caclulations on Sandy- and Ivy-Bridge CPUs > (Haswell is not available as XEON to me at this very moment), I see > Adrian: > I've done some basic experimenting with SMT on network loads. > ... > I've found that a memcpy heavy load (read: normal, non-zero copy Ohartmann, Adrian... Good introductory info. What were your CPU models / lines / sSpec numbers above? Anyone else? Expanding... This evaluation should not be strictly confined to Intel, after all, AMD has CMT which is similar to HTT (not clear whether it's on Opteron, FX or APU lines). Though it will probably be 2016 before AMD really capitalizes and shines on their full architecture vision. By then Intel will just shift a few gears to match. So we should probably stay on subject Intel HTT for now. http://wccftech.com/amds-high-performance-processor-cores-coming-2015-giving-modular-architecture/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simultaneous_multithreading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper-threading http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2381524 My thought is that the available evaluations of SMT are all 'old'... discontinued processors, old compilers, old schedulers, etc, all dating back to the Intel P4 arch. So let's bring this current in terms of today's Intel Haswell and AMD APU/FX processors, with new tests and community data. (Opteron is still on an even 'older' architecture [refresh] compared to FX and APU.) http://anandtech.com/show/8742/amd-announces-carrizo-and-carrizol-next-gen-apus-for-h1-2015 http://wccftech.com/amd-berlin-server-apu-glimpse-upcoming-kaveri-apu-4-steamroller-cores-512-gcn-sps/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 04:21:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD866217 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2D19CB for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id et14so1971534pad.31 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:21:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=awp3StI/Lh4kDxn78SlQEHMBb/FTGbNz/XRSKdYXYVw=; b=gz2fwuyowNXFs6qaVShcoIjHpdacyA5Z8y7kxnAu1sRYQ7YZ4FgkklI6Yz27vtQ6B7 1yN2Cb1XNrgtotq/SPREtjuV08mpCjYdlHXiO9ibGLIIahJYXQ5rIfWeiqh0gWQidu5v tKSNvo0eCjGfausA8iruhC9yQ5gS9VSAdIvkcUnUfz/ar5kqaTqaFLE3Y4sma9czXUcM Z8YlFNlqOx4k/mLZox18k6/9ciaQi/wcCrRLSXaY+Ore8ZCUXSMHH30gPDutUSPblVzK v3tmvt7JlUwokY1hazjTeY2fMuHxkntgpH/0dmnaE7zpJPtDHgb6oHF/OprbYx8NDPtV oxAw== X-Received: by 10.70.103.102 with SMTP id fv6mr3518731pdb.92.1418185293136; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:21:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.116] ([120.29.118.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm2851121pdn.20.2014.12.09.20.21.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:21:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5487CA59.6030905@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:21:45 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: "Maia Mailguard" web based control of apache/SpamAssassin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ek@purplehat.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:21:34 -0000 Hello list; Hosting sites have a cPanel application for remote control of their clients hosted environments. I am looking for a web based application for controlling my FreeBSD host SpamAssassin email filter configuration. In the FreeBSD ports collection I found "Maia Mailguard". From it's description I sounds like just what I need. All the FreeBSD install info for "Maia Mailguard" on the net is pre 2011 and nothing after FreeBSD version 8.x. Looking for a how-to using 10.x with postfix and pkg command. Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 04:42:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11BD1921 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0EABB3 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:47 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=bsdjunk; d=bsdjunk.com; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; b=cn7RbXBVIR1bDbQer3wWI/n3oRtZGhzE8I6TMYeQFbpqf0acLR1TwECAGkkAmiGb/PSIu0yAyVMu B1az/oAxQu9PlsAfazivgcgmaGhjshInWpFrzpuHuCcQjAoCYJm54yq81mLhWwcPqqKqfLhrBw8H yBQ9U+ziqjATEtZoRAU= Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1418186558826583.4568475084869; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:42:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:41:36 -0600 From: chris To: Ernie Luzar Message-Id: <14a32809ac7.ee433a35178479.7864736764309363507@bsdjunk.com> In-Reply-To: <5487CA59.6030905@gmail.com> References: <5487CA59.6030905@gmail.com> Subject: Re: "Maia Mailguard" web based control of apache/SpamAssassin MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Medium User-Agent: Zoho Mail X-Mailer: Zoho Mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , ek@purplehat.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:42:48 -0000 ---- On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:21:41 -0600 Ernie Luzar<luzar722@gmail.com> wrote ---- Hello list; Hosting sites have a cPanel application for remote control of their clients hosted environments. I am looking for a web based application for controlling my FreeBSD host SpamAssassin email filter configuration. In the FreeBSD ports collection I found "Maia Mailguard". From it's description I sounds like just what I need. All the FreeBSD install info for "Maia Mailguard" on the net is pre 2011 and nothing after FreeBSD version 8.x. Looking for a how-to using 10.x with postfix and pkg command. Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated Thanks. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, I am sure webmin can do that. www/webmin I think is the dir Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 04:46:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503DABA1 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31687BFA for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:46:20 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=bsdjunk; d=bsdjunk.com; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; b=Ofy3d8mmHEIf4Sthd0Sidnl65/BF464DzsQEE+8zuim9rq8P+jb/qgTRsApWAxH1k1C252eQXdsj wV5isBTfPA5cuE1ZweGSZ7Pemasq+kQd9WjI6WhUc6B9FTxjxt9kt0u5ajOzLr0qZ+OuRO5AZCsI cDzCYRhsax4+qkqfNBg= Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1418186775150792.3804265016288; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:46:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:45:14 -0600 From: chris To: chris Message-Id: <14a3283ec1b.b04072de178769.8620292601599237097@bsdjunk.com> In-Reply-To: <14a32809ac7.ee433a35178479.7864736764309363507@bsdjunk.com> References: <5487CA59.6030905@gmail.com> <14a32809ac7.ee433a35178479.7864736764309363507@bsdjunk.com> Subject: Re: "Maia Mailguard" web based control of apache/SpamAssassin MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: Medium User-Agent: Zoho Mail X-Mailer: Zoho Mail X-ZohoMail: Si SS_10 UW UB CHF_INT_SMD_EXT SGR4_1_27114_1 X-ZohoMail-Owner: <14a3283ec1b.b04072de178769.8620292601599237097@bsdjunk.com>+zmo_0_ X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Ernie Luzar , ek@purplehat.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:46:21 -0000 ---- On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:41:36 -0600 chris<chris@bsdjunk.com> wrote ---- ---- On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:21:41 -0600 Ernie Luzar&lt;luzar722@gmail.com&gt; wrote ---- Hello list; Hosting sites have a cPanel application for remote control of their clients hosted environments. I am looking for a web based application for controlling my FreeBSD host SpamAssassin email filter configuration. In the FreeBSD ports collection I found "Maia Mailguard". From it's description I sounds like just what I need. All the FreeBSD install info for "Maia Mailguard" on the net is pre 2011 and nothing after FreeBSD version 8.x. Looking for a how-to using 10.x with postfix and pkg command. Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated Thanks. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, I am sure webmin can do that. www/webmin I think is the dir Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Did you try : http://www.maiamailguard.com/maia/wiki/Install ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 04:47:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1C5C4D for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stig.purplehat.org (bill.goatse.unfs.us [50.243.134.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CBDDC18 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (bill.goatse.unfs.us [50.243.134.106]) by stig.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE683ECF3; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:41:46 -0700 (MST) Received: from stig.purplehat.org ([50.243.134.106]) by localhost (stig.purplehat.org [50.243.134.106]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12428-04; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:41:45 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [50.243.134.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ek@purplehat.org) by stig.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CF683ECEF; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:41:45 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <5487CF09.5000809@purplehat.org> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 21:41:45 -0700 From: Janky Jay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ernie Luzar , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: "Maia Mailguard" web based control of apache/SpamAssassin References: <5487CA59.6030905@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5487CA59.6030905@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:47:50 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ernie, On 12/09/2014 09:21 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Hello list; > Hosting sites have a cPanel application for remote control of their clients hosted environments. > I am looking for a web based application for controlling my FreeBSD host SpamAssassin email filter configuration. > In the FreeBSD ports collection I found "Maia Mailguard". From it's description I sounds like just what I need. > > All the FreeBSD install info for "Maia Mailguard" on the net is pre 2011 and nothing after FreeBSD version 8.x. > > Looking for a how-to using 10.x with postfix and pkg command. > > Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated > > Thanks. > > I'm the maintainer of the Maia-Mailguard port as well as the writer of the PHO "how-to". I am currently working on getting the PHO how-to much more up-to-date for the many, MANY changes that have happened between FBSD 8.X and 10.X as well as the plethora of changes in Maia, Postfix, Dovecot, SpamAssassin, etc... I'm hoping to have this done sometime in the very near future. However, I do not have a set date (sorry!). Also, the guide/how-to will not be using "pkg" for the installation or maintenance. I will be using the ports tree for everything (I'm a source kind of guy...) However, I would think that much of it could be used with "pkg" provided there are ways to pull in and install with the correct options (Such as SSL/TLS, Postfix options for Dovecot, etc...) Hopefully this will be helpful to you when it is finished. Regards, Janky Jay, III -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlSHzwUACgkQZ5znzUsaCyTDrQCfUWiTM44d9bBLlNEGjyquygc2 SMYAoJT39jIDrp4xPzfRiM77XBYV2ZVU =3D4zIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 05:14:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4E4148 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C203DF17 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-5-37.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.5.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C894B2763B; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:14:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sBA5ET7q002074; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:14:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:14:29 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: mplayer configuration question Message-Id: <20141210061429.07d0cc64.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201412092214.sB9MEfOq099096@host203.r-bonomi.com> References: <201412092214.sB9MEfOq099096@host203.r-bonomi.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:14:40 -0000 On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:14:41 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi wrote: > when I launch mplayer (or gmplayer), I get a new window on both screens, > but _only_ the display on the VGA port has the movie displayed. on the > DVI port, it's an empty window. > > HOW do I get movies to display on the DVI port?? Check which output driver addresses that port, for example % mplayer -vo x11 test.avi % mplayer -vo xv test.avi % mplayer -vo gl test.avi % mplayer -vo sdl test.avi You can get a list of the available output drivers with % mplayer -vo help Then put the result, for example "vo=gl", in the ~/.mplayer/config file. Note that direct rendering might be supported, and not all output drivers support things like manual brightness control or fullscreen... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 05:16:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D29E1FB; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE37DF3C; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:16:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 37510139; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:16:41 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBA5GcIU000365; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:16:40 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id sBA5GcUR000364; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:16:38 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:16:38 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: Warren Block Subject: Re: Two local X-servers Message-ID: <20141210051637.GA99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: OAO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Adam Martin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:16:44 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > > On my box, after an X-server is started, there is no return to the > > text console. This is because of the Intel video card or Intel video > > driver. Once I start an X-server, there is no text prompt for me. > > It is there, just not visible. On 10.1 and probably 9-STABLE, use vt(4) > by adding > kern.vty=vt > to /boot/loader.conf. It may well be there, but on my 9.3-STABLE with the following kernel config: include GENERIC ident VT nodevice sc nodevice vga device vt device vt_vga I cannot see it no matter what I do. I did not set kern.vty=vt in /boot/loader.conf though, is it also required with this kernel config? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 05:19:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13890451; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CC0F6B; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:19:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 37510133; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:19:01 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBA5J12V000554; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:19:01 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id sBA5J14R000553; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:19:01 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:19:01 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: Warren Block Subject: Re: Two local X-servers Message-ID: <20141210051901.GB99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141210051637.GA99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141210051637.GA99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Organization: OAO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Adam Martin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:19:04 -0000 And returning to the original question of running two local X-servers from xdm, how do I go about that? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 07:55:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F38FBA for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025CB2E7 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBA7tXAu060097 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:55:33 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk sBA7tXAu060097 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1418198133; bh=HXCphBCdPtFDKGte/EpGqu9ckNL54FW3WWaMBFtn8sw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Wed,=2010=20Dec=202014=2007:55:32=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20pkg=20breakage=20after=20updating =20ports=20tree|References:=20| In-Reply-To:=20; b=ZPtQWChv/kQDGW5FZp5KEtE4FlovPw1PPIs6fVqSyKXz0e4iscaHyawdhJ8eUA4Kr Sg+akY+7+9c4nJr3VEEVKd3dasaFmkcg4k05dKRVuuIYU66LjQYnGRxOVyx5WeFSv4 3wFhOAmkPxBzvkFFcHhsNO9wvyNMI1VqaOdAfLPc= Message-ID: <5487FC74.2010807@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:55:32 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg breakage after updating ports tree References: In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Tl8fKXl7suf5ISQ6k5FC8gcxdKnfPjFcm" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:55:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Tl8fKXl7suf5ISQ6k5FC8gcxdKnfPjFcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/12/2014 19:03, Will Parsons wrote: > After doing "portsnap fetch update" on a 9.3-RELEASE system, I find tha= t > updating ports is broken because of dependencies on pkg. The attempt > to update pkg-1.3.8_3 to pkg-1.4.0 results in: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ... > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > set.c: In function 'exec_set': > set.c:103: warning: 'depfield' may be used uninitialized in this functi= on > set.c:103: warning: 'field' may be used uninitialized in this function > *** [pkg-set.o] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.0/src. > *** [all-recursive] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.0. > *** [all] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.0. > *** [do-build] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. > *** [/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/.build_done.pkg._usr_local] Error c= ode 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. >=20 > =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for ports-mgmt/pkg > =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update >=20 > =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for pkg-1.3.8_3 failed > =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > This is using portmaster, but running make from the ports directory is > similar. >=20 > (As a side question, "which pkg" shows /usr/sbin/pkg. Why are there > dependencies on the version of pkg in ports?) >=20 > What can I do to fix this? >=20 /usr/sbin/pkg is pkg(7) and serves only to ensure that the actual pkg(8) gets installed. There was an update to ports-mgmt/pkg fairly soon after pkg-1.4.0 was released which added some compilation flags to prevent gcc bombing out -- do you have the latest version? If that doesn't help, can you try compiling pkg(8) with clang instead? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --Tl8fKXl7suf5ISQ6k5FC8gcxdKnfPjFcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUh/x0XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATGqcQAIDtxq5u/X6paXcsIshOJwc0 L5TCMPgZjSFWDP2U9bGOZ5/Qr9Ggm+Cpw67Z2ZNK3hZ0XNZLSNQ2qFGhXsigkQwM P3dUca+ps0xFmmKXrzvcahaSJWCyGEp7w6/Kl+u7S8Gp7vte4DFQQyVvqEgFOPhz VGsA9Trhi90p6kPceYkJJDjYGjkVyk1VB5QpiZdBuANf8yfvHBmW/bsFnSr6P/Sv vahV6eyHAIBx7z2lwpcj/R46h7xdg8ZdsaQ77/SoJtdIlSqD0E7ZGGUJvfJ4FbWT jdfxzlkCusRuf8S/D8Lu4m7cyAAMXHymShtFF6eEHK5dQS0Zt65fGL4FZ5NtKZW0 2YgJYXfrpGJZUfBJbwaUTFvxUTAY+1kmFyngN39sx+n1OGuqmf3tqbk1UIjTrXYP kOoLSft26Ex00dbBouJMeAhQHcI7TeIIH2e5uGawEiXc5MfC2rIKecHuxF7SEn7n g99bO2ByWnPB0aGrVcwMBusz5OzQiHRiusHhLx2R9q+xdWPU2Nb6lZAREXZhbjlk zAcbX4Sn8DyDGiD+2k/1cFa7j9PD7G4PiiyqA/N0mLjkf6A686IBLEfPxUKuhHo0 8wgj70BNM0VekkjYjC7E4/nLcMbr9HnAc7WKWtSPxd+f6fPZN8Hhn/Rp2+336MeO 6/TCgp/RH4av9/GuWc3v =H1s1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Tl8fKXl7suf5ISQ6k5FC8gcxdKnfPjFcm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:04:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A9A2159 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net (mail.kulturflatrate.net [46.163.119.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBAA73CA for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC99F5AC0DA for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:04:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at kulturflatrate.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.kulturflatrate.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qxp_i4wRZR1Z for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:04:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from len-x61s.klaas (c2.eduroam.cuni.cz [195.113.15.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC9A3F5AC0C6 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:04:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by len-x61s.klaas (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6832E057C; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:05:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:05:55 +0100 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS "cannot open [...]: dataset does not exist" Message-ID: <20141210080555.GG16346@len-x61s.klaas> References: <20141208191902.GG31701@len-x61s.klaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141208191902.GG31701@len-x61s.klaas> X-PGP-Key: http://www.kulturflatrate.net/niklaas/niklaas-baudet-von-gersdorff.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:04:47 -0000 Dear Mailinglist, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff [2014-12-08 20:19 +0100] : > I am currently using zfssnap.sh [1] to make a regular backup of > the entire ZFS pool on our server. In principal, this works great, > nevertheless, every time I am running the script I get the following > error: > > cannot open 'tank/usr/ports': dataset does not exist > cannot open 'tank/usr/src': dataset does not exist > > 1: https://bitbucket.org/mmichele/zfssnap > I figured out that the problem is not ZFS itself but `zfssnap.sh`. Please refer to my explanation at https://bitbucket.org/mmichele/zfssnap/issue/2/excludes-not-working In short, the default behaviour for `zfssnap.sh` is to exclude the datasets mentioned above. Though, these datasets do not exist on the server I am administrating. I was aware of that and tried to hand over an empty `EXCLUDES` variable as it is explained in the programs documentation. If you do not want these excluded, pass an empty EXCLUDES envvar. https://bitbucket.org/mmichele/zfssnap/overview Unfortunately, handing over an empty environment variable does not work. The solution is to use the following code EXCLUDES=" " Be aware of the white space! Best, -- Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff niklaas@kulturflatrate.net http://www.twitter.com/NBvGersdorff http://www.kulturflatrate.net/niklaas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:12:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF042FB for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C03A68A for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id bj1so2335232pad.37 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:12:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xhvXUJj3fpwxl1npW+tkd8V/dqTq6GuB3TeDCzlK8M0=; b=MAITy8a1VFqah8lPfuZhdjNThL1mMvhQuCDYt5CuJ1hD3gP1M2oSX8NEkJnS7PlzCw tp4gqHIBf3DrQtC7hpJt7zVu9scRUmjeI717qKP+J5YNMcerGXn4J3t4lx1U/d5z7Kiy Z8XRnM7Xonl2XNmGjrxQKIgBS3/lB5e3ekRMN8458voOewjYCbgbNqosJMqgX2l0OtEO CH1bnT8RtQQYnvC/T/P59ikXp2MAoZNg6N7Q73x6tt+1c5AluTau1hCqnjV+ErMn6DE+ IZFpbM/u16nO2sZLDdcmb0GC68stzyyS7D0raTOna1FXSPGHMF3RMd/7ZzN2ekerHGJa b/1w== X-Received: by 10.66.228.131 with SMTP id si3mr5061528pac.32.1418199147844; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:12:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.116] ([120.29.118.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ug6sm3515899pab.7.2014.12.10.00.12.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:12:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54880081.3070907@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:12:49 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Janky Jay Subject: Re: "Maia Mailguard" web based control of apache/SpamAssassin References: <5487CA59.6030905@gmail.com> <5487CF09.5000809@purplehat.org> In-Reply-To: <5487CF09.5000809@purplehat.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:12:28 -0000 Janky Jay wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Ernie, > > On 12/09/2014 09:21 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > >> Hello list; >> Hosting sites have a cPanel application for remote control of their >> > clients hosted environments. > >> I am looking for a web based application for controlling my FreeBSD >> > host SpamAssassin email filter configuration. > >> In the FreeBSD ports collection I found "Maia Mailguard". From it's >> > description I sounds like just what I need. > >> All the FreeBSD install info for "Maia Mailguard" on the net is pre >> > 2011 and nothing after FreeBSD version 8.x. > >> Looking for a how-to using 10.x with postfix and pkg command. >> >> Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> > > I'm the maintainer of the Maia-Mailguard port as well as the writer > of the PHO "how-to". I am currently working on getting the PHO how-to > much more up-to-date for the many, MANY changes that have happened > between FBSD 8.X and 10.X as well as the plethora of changes in Maia, > Postfix, Dovecot, SpamAssassin, etc... I'm hoping to have this done > sometime in the very near future. However, I do not have a set date > (sorry!). > > Also, the guide/how-to will not be using "pkg" for the installation > or maintenance. I will be using the ports tree for everything (I'm a > source kind of guy...) However, I would think that much of it could be > used with "pkg" provided there are ways to pull in and install with the > correct options (Such as SSL/TLS, Postfix options for Dovecot, etc...) > Hopefully this will be helpful to you when it is finished. > > Regards, > Janky Jay, III > > I am a long time qjail user and plan to run apache/php/Maia-Mailguard in a jail and the complete email world in another jail. Do you foresee any reason why this would not work? My time frame for starting this is March of 2016 so I have plenty of time before I would really need an updated "how-to". Thanks for your work on this port. Ernie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:13:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D173A2 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5554E6A2 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBA8DqgP091185; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:13:52 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <548800C0.4080909@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:13:52 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov Subject: Re: Two local X-servers References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141210051637.GA99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20141210051637.GA99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:13:56 -0000 On 10/12/2014 05:16, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Warren Block wrote: >>> On my box, after an X-server is started, there is no return to the >>> text console. This is because of the Intel video card or Intel video >>> driver. Once I start an X-server, there is no text prompt for me. >> >> It is there, just not visible. On 10.1 and probably 9-STABLE, use vt(4) >> by adding >> kern.vty=vt >> to /boot/loader.conf. > > It may well be there, but on my 9.3-STABLE with the following kernel > config: > > include GENERIC > ident VT > nodevice sc > nodevice vga > device vt > device vt_vga > > I cannot see it no matter what I do. I did not set kern.vty=vt in > /boot/loader.conf though, is it also required with this kernel config? > I believe the current default is to use sc if booted via BIOS and vt if booted via UEFI. Unless you have a relatively modern machine you'll need the loader directive. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:45:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC48A5AC for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40150A52 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id s18so2022582lam.16 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:45:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CNov9rnIbzYpjfEpw6zKIjIdPhGNKNKA2u5ZZ4kJV/s=; b=fTIQDmLNaMEt48DKnFzzNvJ4+R4Xg7tUehtz8GBFE5MLu9BtGp4dr78sd4h2aFtxTd /wzYxEfM+C04TM5UHDmGWQnZqRISUIhJ5/mZpvjLf0e23ssxkCVaGSRYNQW+BC3fmJhQ QoFlYc7Dk1cMFUzfWwz8sXSPQioxAd9IZISjRORDDyOYuvvACQ7d/jYfG41K1SjE70YB w/wLmY/rjBK8YF5vXvTc254K7bNZUoBiibcMCEvyW4G5tAjqi98ak/Ees2BN+efDphD+ DxALhfCPpIK+//cgqt1z2/FdoyPNKcPEU4yhnxFrVMxZPaFeRVB85iF2WU/65hc+nQwG XmQg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.5.67 with SMTP id q3mr2714240laq.73.1418201129250; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.161.135 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:45:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:15:29 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: top- what negative priority means? From: s m To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:45:31 -0000 hello everybody i have problem with my FreeBSD9.2. my ssh connection becomes down after some minutes. i check top and see that sshd daemon is locked and has priority -100. 14610 root 1 -100 0 74196K 5860K *Linux 2 0:05 0.00% sshd what priority -100 means? i googled a lot but found nothing. any comments or hints are appreciated. thanks, SAM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:00:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9E4B88 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relaygateway01.edpnet.net (relaygateway01.edpnet.net [212.71.1.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E82D626 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:00:13 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqcEABg1iFTV04h3/2dsb2JhbABZg1iDXcMDhXICgSsBAQEBAX2EAwEFIzMzCxgJEw4CAg8FJYhzv3ySIoUTDCCQChaCWYFHBZFChTABkVqDbz0wgkMBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AqcEABg1iFTV04h3/2dsb2JhbABZg1iDXcMDhXICgSsBAQEBAX2EAwEFIzMzCxgJEw4CAg8FJYhzv3ySIoUTDCCQChaCWYFHBZFChTABkVqDbz0wgkMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,552,1413237600"; d="scan'208";a="292907965" Received: from 213.211.136.119.static.edpnet.net (HELO mordor.lan) ([213.211.136.119]) by relaygateway01.edpnet.net with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Dec 2014 12:23:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:00:04 +0100 From: Julien Cigar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg + poudriere: shared library change detected .. but not handled ? Message-ID: <20141210120004.GJ31063@mordor.lan> References: <20141125111100.GG1089@mordor.lan> <20141202124630.GN6162@mordor.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141202124630.GN6162@mordor.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:00:15 -0000 --J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:46:30PM +0100, Julien Cigar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:11:00PM +0100, Julien Cigar wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > I'm using poudriere (3.0.19) to build my own repos, it works well but it > > seems that shared library changes are not handled properly, for example > > in https://dpaste.de/3yJM/raw I don't understand why bootstrap-openjdk > > is not reinstalled when I upgrade java-zoneinfo and vice-versa ..? > >=20 > > The manpage of pkg-upgrade says: > >=20 > > "The difference to pkg-install(8) is that pkg upgrade tries to upgrade > > dependencies of packages matched as well while pkg-install(8) is more= =20 > > conservative during dependencies upgrade." > >=20 > > Have I misunderstood something? > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Julien >=20 > no one on this ? :) I just had the same issue with another package > (libiconv) .. FYI this problem is fixed in pkg 1.4 (https://dpaste.de/S2RO/raw) >=20 > >=20 > > --=20 > > Julien Cigar > > Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) > > PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 > > No trees were killed in the creation of this message. > > However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Julien Cigar > Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) > PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 > No trees were killed in the creation of this message. > However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJUiDXEAAoJEAi2KiTKQR5pg3EP/ii9EM9HRm0DIr6fZPMa0T4F ySSTP2mdmaXOxcbEd7eNtXoPYBEoUVr06uBMgkfnx6sQg7ZL1qf+SHBP08Yr3c6R PRHu+vWSe8Gc536WBaGsAmih7EZdLKSDHd4071Cab1JKp80NPIOWu2u89NfhJkuJ 51fjgLb2NOxSiB3tnp/3Q+ElkkJWbnsv0r/JbGu8JAAc9z5LI2GMko4ZWLNYgJI/ JQSsYkKKDonsgWF5T8rrbi3bIYRc/5AqGCftnBNjpUefZtGCyzRFzIE4V9xTdiDT YYUo5NIk2xrcGij5+koiNOxP05cnxwRqWdw+rT2nNNGJawqxeq3vDuL2gra88/51 GaAzQQtZNf/kNZv6Hx+b37KzQ5TEUh3bK/xddlL5OCgtMyz5/5dun8bvOi60aGM8 5yw2CCBOQ3tFSizW9uIWMYOCStNsVasfTIswpEsl6h3ameDwAORMhVF7KRPvC3Sf 0LnuNMkDHKAXqZzfA7W0jhuQxJPDQ6pibiLs2fLQCbQ9G1Bc0qdU5A/r0ZTwa9ip XPfquce3FgcGB7fKfOAA//QlzbiwBNmh1TekIQlVI6jN3KP5BXvg/TfxswvDM+Hd 95/xM3HsK8KgSUXSBtKzPga6Y7iqTlw/8p+Is+xdBFxjA5icyMOX5IB2DQ2pjTB5 XyKhELGLkOat0kvfGcER =oqXa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:01:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 365EED2B for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D1774A for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp14-2-30-215.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.30.215]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2014 22:26:36 +1030 Message-ID: <548834F2.2080607@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 22:26:34 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: s m , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: top- what negative priority means? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:48 -0000 On 10/12/2014 19:15, s m wrote: > hello everybody > > i have problem with my FreeBSD9.2. my ssh connection becomes down after > some minutes. i check top and see that sshd daemon is locked and has > priority -100. > > 14610 root 1 -100 0 74196K 5860K *Linux 2 0:05 0.00% sshd I wouldn't expect to see "*Linux" - that column is the state which is normally something like uwait, select, kqread, zio, CPU0, CPU1.... > what priority -100 means? i googled a lot but found nothing. > The PRI column is the scheduling priority, an indication of what gets cpu time first, high numbers mean use cpu when no-one else is using it, negative numbers indicate get all the the cpu time you need. See man nice - the NICE value is a user specified priority in the range of 20 to -20 (limits are actually documented in man renice) while the PRI value is the kernel assigned priority value. I only guess that the kernel uses priority values greater than the 20 to -20 range used by nice. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:18:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17478EAF for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lmtp.galacsys.net (webmail.galacsys.net [IPv6:2001:1b78:0:1:d918:51d7:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48E3F16 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from martymac.org (webmail.galacsys.net [217.24.81.215]) by lmtp.galacsys.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A6B1FA5DD3; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:18:35 +0100 (CET) From: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" To: mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: Emulex Zephyr-X LightPulse supported on 10.1-release amd64? X-Openwebmail-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:18:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20141210131402.M90328@martymac.org> In-Reply-To: <201412091559.sB9FxaIV072832@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201412091559.sB9FxaIV072832@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.01 20030425 X-OriginatingIP: 198.50.239.246 (ganael.laplanche@martymac.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:18:38 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:18:38 -0000 On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:59:38 -0800 (PST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote Hi Anton, > Is this adapter supported on 10.1-release amd64? > [...] As far as I know, it is not, but the oce(4) driver (written by Emulex) mentions the following email at Emulex : freebsd-drivers@emulex.com Maybe you can try to reach them this way ? Regards, -- Ganael LAPLANCHE http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org FreeBSD: martymac , http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:20:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF4D4F4C; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B418EF34; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hl2so6384072igb.11 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:20:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nwuHLsGBfhIOwgIY7jtzObmlQb2X22oM6WPpbNylYMQ=; b=WNteIjP7CS3pBRJSQpgDDeSvqT2lnGM/7/yaD6yiToPyT3cGllALGs0pSUmTObtgf1 NWlDh7XILF1N+HCKhMkGmKx5/d4B7fiP2s92UI6vLVoymhQeMidLEJJs0FD9R8QzP85O +mCepv55J7gT98B/3PBKP2YN98oQ4OFPM5Pj5hUiXgu+Gt0kMIpCWZIuW8MTseGFlBXr vB3LWTsc4qA2S5INxdglZ2WkURlLv2TRb11CPt2kvaq/nWoMFeZwi93kBI+oMh2FfP73 lsSXK95n1RQZdimN4PvU0xxeHJ30teuB6ngFyvn3ymrqT6SswCb/cSYANW179NtIwyMf eiCw== X-Received: by 10.51.16.37 with SMTP id ft5mr7927393igd.6.1418217619146; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:20:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.175.4 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:19:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141208153925.5df90587@prometheus> From: Jia-Shiun Li Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:19:48 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:20:54 +0000 Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, grarpamp , "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Mailing Lists , "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:20:20 -0000 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I've found that a memcpy heavy load (read: normal, non-zero copy > network traffic) brings SMT threads to their knees. A pair of threads > gets as much work done in normal UDP transmit/receive as a single > non-SMT thread. It looks like it's because the ports doing memory > input/output are full and there's not really any other work that's > being done. > > I think haswell still only has one store data port per core. :( Yes, Haswell has an additional store addr but still only one store data unit. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4770k-haswell-review,3521.html But I guess they'd argue that they meant to saturate memory channels with all available cores as possible first, and additional threads are only for last resort. And that's probably what the most schedulers do. I benchmarked it on a 4th gen i3. Buildkernel got 5~10% benefit IIRC. The best way to tell is still to conduct tests with your own workload. If the claimed 5% transistor cost brings 10% benefits, that's already a win. OTTH how much you paid for it is another story. - Jia-Shiun. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:27:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C783E4 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog135.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog135.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90EA2A2 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob135.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVIhKOj2d1KQp5n69z8nge+t7F9TJ+PW5@postini.com; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:51 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n12so3570416wgh.6 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:27:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=UvShJUAJRn4/zYFsGORS51q4Y+NxEEfZoQytAIA3ZL8=; b=mpMYXZJ7BQqohehRxbrAw+hfA6ueH5DSav9Q7uNMXkP7K5OvPFHu9zEyO+fD5Kp8EU 2sFO+4xmdOdYGBH+DjTUSlXPE01ifs+Xj0l4LWwV5uiW7Kg6Lz7iII/003Gh0KEH05jF z3vLMr4V9EYtJZI6KNCDE2bZVftpqa52MA1FAlz9Q5jW7rZJDVF493qXSw7CoqLcGZQS TtuwnSvo1jZmW8D0Oop3WBO3ZABJiA0T3ur75LXWittjL5qz0U5z4oVgBFmf0QPp1ynT rKQxvJD6XilwS0aknPaajGseRRWLkYlW2DjZ8wzer6tk5WMuXwB+iKQWFgOlJsULMJIV R0Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmgzAExJWwEb1RQ/oQ2F0c2sEOM3o4hJUKqQtpFFOQiMZeATo3LlT8tPxKf1p4CylrEaN4JHxVy5zCFupCi0RD75klxi+URNtWWBRN4rayNACfAb+3uDvj6UHSA1XeJXpknZm+fudXY5o7S/HSMxZdNnC/cU4UEa/OcLh4190iwTrtR/uQ= X-Received: by 10.180.206.47 with SMTP id ll15mr13589898wic.34.1418218042684; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:27:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.206.47 with SMTP id ll15mr13589873wic.34.1418218042483; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gl5sm17924915wib.0.2014.12.10.05.27.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:27:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:27:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:20 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBADRKOK077560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:20 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBADRKvO077559; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:20 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201412101327.sBADRKvO077559@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: ganael.laplanche@martymac.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: Emulex Zephyr-X LightPulse supported on 10.1-release amd64? Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <20141210131402.M90328@martymac.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:52 -0000 >On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:59:38 -0800 (PST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote > >Hi Anton, > >> Is this adapter supported on 10.1-release amd64? >> [...] > >As far as I know, it is not, but the oce(4) driver (written by Emulex) >mentions the following email at Emulex : > >freebsd-drivers@emulex.com > >Maybe you can try to reach them this way ? Thanks, will do Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:52:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 309F6C4A; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCE43D7; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBADq60I058168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:52:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id sBADq5Ee058165; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:52:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:52:05 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Victor Sudakov Subject: Re: Two local X-servers In-Reply-To: <20141210051637.GA99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Message-ID: References: <20141209133649.GA81979@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141209142333.GA82357@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20141210051637.GA99705@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:52:06 -0700 (MST) Cc: Adam Martin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:52:09 -0000 On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Warren Block wrote: >>> On my box, after an X-server is started, there is no return to the >>> text console. This is because of the Intel video card or Intel video >>> driver. Once I start an X-server, there is no text prompt for me. >> >> It is there, just not visible. On 10.1 and probably 9-STABLE, use vt(4) >> by adding >> kern.vty=vt >> to /boot/loader.conf. > > It may well be there, but on my 9.3-STABLE with the following kernel > config: > > include GENERIC > ident VT > nodevice sc > nodevice vga > device vt > device vt_vga > > I cannot see it no matter what I do. I did not set kern.vty=vt in > /boot/loader.conf though, is it also required with this kernel config? No, setting kern.vty is only needed if both sc(4) and vt(4) are built into the kernel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 16:22:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E968B0 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.mgedv.net (mail.mgedv.net [83.64.34.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926429FB for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from my.loop (client.my.loop [255.255.255.255]) From: "no@spam@mgedv.net" To: References: <042a01d011bd$e4cb1530$ae613f90$@mgedv.net> In-Reply-To: <042a01d011bd$e4cb1530$ae613f90$@mgedv.net> Subject: RE: freebsd 10.1-RELEASE: jail security errors - GID 0 not dropped completely Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:22:39 +0100 Message-ID: <000001d01495$8b36ee60$a1a4cb20$@mgedv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQF5i+UaGMeUKDAjpw8l+49pqiUlUJ02EKlA Content-Language: de X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:22:59 -0000 really, no one running jails on 10.1 with chmod o-rwx of the jail-home? ;-) cheers > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of no@spam@mgEDV.net > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 2:34 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: freebsd 10.1-RELEASE: jail security errors - GID 0 not dropped > completely > > hi guys, > > as the "real" application faces the same problems, i created a test > jail on a clean box just to check the behaviour using "/usr/bin/id". > > problem description (hopefully i nailed it): > if a jailed process needs any .so for startup, the path to those *.so > needs to be world r-x, although the GID of the jail execute user > is allowed to r/x the dirs, where the *.so files are to be found. > there could be (ordering) errors with SET(e)GID in jail_* functions, > because it works as expected when prefixing with "chroot -g test /". > the EGID is dropped to the jail user's gid, but the GID is still 0! > we end up with a jailed proc (UID=999, GID=0), which of course is > not allowed to access the dirs for the *.so's to be loaded by exec. > [see end of message for setup details] > > === the symptom === > /jail# /jail/a.sh > Shared object "libbsm.so.3" not found, required by "id" > jail: /bin/id: failed > > === details from truss === > 619: access("/lib/libbsm.so.3",0) ERR#13 'Permission denied' > 619: access("/usr/lib/libbsm.so.3",0) ERR#13 'Permission denied' > > === some UID/GID details from kdump === > /jail# grep -i '[g|s]et.*id' jail.kdump > 64746 100091 jail CALL issetugid > 64746 100091 jail RET issetugid 0 > 64746 100091 jail CALL issetugid > 64746 100091 jail RET issetugid 0 > 64747 100093 jail CALL geteuid > 64747 100093 jail RET geteuid 0 > 64747 100093 jail CALL setuid(0x3e7) > 64747 100093 jail RET setuid 0 > 64747 100093 jail CALL getuid > 64747 100093 jail RET getuid 999/0x3e7 > 64747 100093 jail CALL geteuid > 64747 100093 jail RET geteuid 999/0x3e7 > 64747 100093 jail CALL getegid > 64747 100093 jail RET getegid 999/0x3e7 > 64747 100093 jail CALL setegid(0x3e7) > 64747 100093 jail RET setegid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted > 64747 100093 jail CALL seteuid(0x3e7) > 64747 100093 jail RET seteuid 0 > 64747 100093 jail CALL seteuid(0x3e7) > 64747 100093 jail RET seteuid 0 > 64747 100093 jail CALL setegid(0x3e7) > 64747 100093 jail RET setegid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted > 64747 100093 id CALL issetugid > 64747 100093 id RET issetugid 1 > > === proof 1: chroot fixes the jail .so load problem === > # outside the jail - just to know what's changing: > /jail# chroot -g test / id > uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) egid=999(test) groups=999(test),5(operator) > # inside the jail - this is our "fix": > /jail# chroot -g test / /jail/a.sh > uid=999 gid=999(test) groups=999(test) > > === proof 2: chmod fixes *.so load, but GID=0 here! === > if i chmod the jail homedir and jail's lib dir, it works: > /jail# chmod a+rx /jail /jail/lib > /jail# ./a.sh > uid=999 gid=0(wheel) egid=999(test) groups=999(test) > > user and group names are read fine from the jailed "id", > although the file perms are as listed beyond. > > is this a bug or am i missing something? > any help/info/enlightenment appreciated ;-) > [just reply to the list, i'm on it] > > > ==== CONFIG (tested 3 different times with GENERIC and a CUSTOM kernel): > LiveCD install source: FreeBSD-10.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso > sha256: > 0c3d64ce48c3ef761761d0fea07e1935e296f8c045c249118bc91a7faf053a6b > fresh install on 2 different ESXi 5.5 hosts and a 3rd physical PC. > only base.tgz+kernel.tgz or liveCD, tried on UFS2 (gpt) and tmpfs. > i used the www user and tmpfs on the liveCD, but everything else was the > same. > > === the test user === > /jail# id -P test > test:*:999:999::0:0:User &:/home/test:/bin/sh > > === the jail (before the mentioned chmod) === > /jail# ls -Ralo > total 68 > dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 . > drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel - 512 Dec 7 00:06 .. > -rwx------ 1 root test - 773 Dec 7 01:00 a.sh > dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:58 bin > drwxr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:01 etc > -rw-r----- 1 root test - 37157 Dec 7 01:02 jail.truss > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:59 lib > dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 00:00 libexec > > ./bin: > total 24 > dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:58 . > dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. > -r-xr-x--- 1 root test - 12432 Nov 11 22:03 id > > ./etc: > total 60 > drwxr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:01 . > dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. > -rw-r----- 1 root test - 473 Dec 7 00:04 group > -rw-r----- 1 root test - 321 Dec 7 01:01 nsswitch.conf > -rw-r----- 1 root test - 1570 Dec 7 00:27 passwd > -rw------- 1 root test - 40960 Dec 7 00:27 spwd.db > > ./lib: > total 1744 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:59 . > dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. > -r--r----- 1 root test - 106264 Nov 11 22:03 libbsm.so.3 > -r--r----- 1 root test - 1631216 Nov 11 22:03 libc.so.7 > > ./libexec: > total 124 > dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 00:00 . > dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. > -r-xr-x--- 1 root test - 118520 Nov 11 22:03 ld-elf.so.1 > > > === the start command ==== > /jail# cat a.sh > > umask 027; > rm -f /jail/jail.truss /jail/jail.kdump /jail/jail.ktrace > > #/usr/bin/truss -f -e -a -o /jail/jail.truss -s 1000 \ > ktrace -d -f /jail/jail.ktrace -i -t cinpstuy \ > jail -c jid=1 \ > name=test \ > path=/jail \ > ip4.addr=1.1.1.1 \ > host.hostuuid=c91e438a-1a44-4b7e-8732-0441ca9e2b97 \ > host.hostid=6146666201 \ > allow.sysvipc=0 \ > allow.raw_sockets=0 \ > exec.jail_user=test \ > exec.system_user=test \ > exec.system_jail_user=true \ > host.hostname=test \ > host.domainname=test.me \ > allow.set_hostname=0 \ > allow.chflags=0 \ > allow.mount=0 \ > allow.quotas=0 \ > allow.socket_af=0 \ > enforce_statfs=2 \ > ip4=new \ > ip6=disable \ > command=/bin/id \ > > kdump -H -f /jail/jail.ktrace >/jail/jail.kdump > > === EOM === > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 16:27:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6AE2C66 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6352EA64 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xyk6N-0001OW-Oh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:26:59 +0100 Received: from c-76-28-97-53.hsd1.ct.comcast.net ([76.28.97.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:26:59 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by c-76-28-97-53.hsd1.ct.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:26:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: pkg breakage after updating ports tree Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <5487FC74.2010807@infracaninophile.co.uk> Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-97-53.hsd1.ct.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:27:10 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) > --Tl8fKXl7suf5ISQ6k5FC8gcxdKnfPjFcm > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On 09/12/2014 19:03, Will Parsons wrote: >> After doing "portsnap fetch update" on a 9.3-RELEASE system, I find that >> updating ports is broken because of dependencies on pkg. > > There was an update to ports-mgmt/pkg fairly soon after pkg-1.4.0 was > released which added some compilation flags to prevent gcc bombing out > -- do you have the latest version? If that doesn't help, can you try > compiling pkg(8) with clang instead? Thanks. I refreshed the ports tree and that seems to have fixed it. -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 17:18:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62234DC6 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog115.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog115.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3BD8109 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob115.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVIiAPzio3jn4u6MSp0uyL42sSiUjqrQX@postini.com; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:18:18 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so4227443wgg.14 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:17:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=LD3Gru1D1qWifZDxfHx42sVWu0oJeBDGAXNC0r0obRg=; b=W/w4YInrLgqir4QmiKTu3XcL6RJ2rD+MOW02D8Lo1PdCBRvF6NZrPfat+HBqCjXxW1 bgC2eaceMuKK2QHF7x1KsuDF7Gfamo5fcT8BtwiYEpjDkEHWwgpuoYIiOqeVw2bT9Jr1 4qtW5iyZc8u8XQpkvxtKMkzOQdNy2QCuPcX9p12DdOX3hzF0PL3sLohVjGps134pN8Ce tk1VUQA1mbIUNytBJ7Rb+iDSLqnjf36YbUFfoYKokTOqk09/Caba7LicCRsYONJeYwzC JQU6tFatJwXqvxuDUP2jzllru0F265J1Lb8Tk1cTRJwoaF+YWcq0AXPzXAFK+CK43zYW LWJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmmXRJBn27u/Do5LGXg3yjQ1lRLEgObEy4GjOfdHdkrCuxWp6oHncYAk53nUYQoj7XnvaT32bvdpzlyQGa0cjJev/iqq/Jl3PYCGLLH84x3OoxVZdNrMAA/g6GMp8e2gw08ZVJMDwfL1Ii12Pu/o0sIKphcSSghu0g+6ndCn5se97fRJk= X-Received: by 10.180.94.230 with SMTP id df6mr15301022wib.25.1418231870924; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:17:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.94.230 with SMTP id df6mr15301007wib.25.1418231870845; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mw7sm7113407wib.14.2014.12.10.09.17.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:17:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:17:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:17:48 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBAHHmGT078391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:17:48 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBAHHmt4078390 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:17:48 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201412101717.sBAHHmt4078390@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD driver for Emulex Zephyr-X LightPulse PCI fibre card? Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:18:19 -0000 Here's the reply I got from Emulex, in case somebody else is interested. Anton >Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:49:19 +0000 (GMT) >From: Tim Malloroy >To: "mexas@bris.ac.uk" >Subject: RE: FreeBSD driver for Emulex Zephyr-X LightPulse PCI fibre card? [ > >Case SR141210104626 > >Hello Anton, > >Emulex only provides support for 10 GbE adapters on FreeBSD. Fibre Channel = >and iSCSI drivers are not provided and there are no current plans of provid= >ing such drivers. There are no drivers for this particular adapter on FreeB= >SD. >Best Regards, >Tim Malloroy >Emulex Technical Support Staff Engineer > >3333 Susan Street >Costa Mesa, CA 92626 USA >US/Canada:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 800-854-7112 >International: +1-714-885-3402 >tech.support@emulex.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 17:34:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9634CC for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oms-m02.mx.aol.com (oms-m02.mx.aol.com [64.12.231.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16EEF7EB for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omr-m08.mx.aol.com (omr-m08.mx.aol.com [64.12.222.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oms-m02.mx.aol.com (AOL Outbound OMS Interface) with ESMTPS id 0BE2C38003772 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:32:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mtaomg-mac02.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mac02.mx.aol.com [172.26.222.208]) by omr-m08.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id F40BC70385D58 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:32:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-mma003a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mma003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.191.137]) by mtaomg-mac02.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 15C2638000085 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:32:03 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: kernel panic on 10.1-RELEASE X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Xavier Freebsd Questio X-Mailer: AOL Webmail STANDARD Received: from 88.3.199.222 by webmail-vm116.sysops.aol.com (149.174.148.86) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:32:02 -0500 Message-Id: <8D1E2B658035B8D-F94-2CE5C@webmail-vm116.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [88.3.199.222] Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:32:03 -0500 x-aol-global-disposition: S X-SPAM-FLAG: YES DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aim.com; s=20140625; t=1418232724; bh=oXdybogWOuubAmuflc6TGvToMiEvg2azqdbGrP0N69w=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KDvcoA3s/1VRL3BhyBnHQsqZG0T4MhdzE/mbq4bMgkvNyNzhDbo00+gdo2UGerjO0 3CmrDsYqSfABCHb7mav018CXBgMUiKoFKDP2MS8VhT3lwNEeeWndMGSZRXlq56Kp+7 yUt8EhAMuYLjfvF5V5a7bU+PExRq6+lsALCk31yM= X-AOL-REROUTE: YES x-aol-sid: 3039ac1aded0548883933dee Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:34:46 -0000 Hi,=0A=0AI=20get=20this=20kernel=20panic=20http://pastebin.com/TCnNbM3e=0A=0ASom= eone=20can=20help=20me=20to=20debug=20this=20kernel=20panic=20?=0A=0AThanks.=0A=0A= =0A=0A=20=0A=0A=20=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:03:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC1CD9A for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC79B90 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBAHjCtJ011988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:45:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:45:11 -0600 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: FreeBSD-SA-14:28 & FreeBSD-SA-14:27 Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: <3a006dbeca446b011d9d7fb4e4d95a69@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1-beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:03:55 -0000 Did something get missed in these updates to the releng branch, my source updates don't show the RELEASE-p1 in the BRANCH tag in the sys/conf/newver.sh TYPE="FreeBSD" REVISION="10.1" BRANCH="RELEASE" Or is this a bad place for me to base my script off of that I use to generate names for my ZFS boot environments on rebuild, also the test system I did a full buildworld/kenrel and installworld/kernel on after seeing the source updates doesn't show the -p1 on the uname output. uname -a FreeBSD freebsd.dweimer.local 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r275674: Wed Dec 10 08:24:15 CST 2014 dweimer@freebsd.dweimer.local:/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/obj/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 svn info from source code tree: URL: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1 Relative URL: ^/releng/10.1 Repository Root: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f Revision: 275682 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: delphij Last Changed Rev: 275670 Last Changed Date: 2014-12-10 02:35:55 -0600 (Wed, 10 Dec 2014) -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:26:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8A8740 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1171DE02 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id m20so2641971qcx.12 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:26:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=QIseuSpjFB9Nz2ncfqCYXWqEyvGRTa1df81nc0AtGx0=; b=Vj1mNAQ7bIHTnRchSMT9jI+oLW4fdVyozAP3Vi1WYc4fbVS1T/HnOothtWqtilJII1 tsjrxAtwKE3sx9KeMM1VM0vT3aBYbKAAvUkko/+XyH6tuoFNZSII5hDXFIpNtqqQ1jaT 6o4gNiCDPkAxxjqthzD8grfuoKefwLrnHs3xw0t950gJfy0JwFx2Iev51ZTlWuXi892Q wXoRQjuJSe5L5N1enmwY1lmhgqVmVgMhfeLKxowV5d0i0FRrNtHcBhX7v2paoo2TBn50 vmxSIzi9lEaLEoitFyiFMEQz+bWYkewRAd4+Oy4yaKUjjOcltZtKjz5+qSs7JamvbpXL uSnw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm4sqb0CjGK2HsI14TosI7eoL6EhTG/sPbXhaUALGY02Pth6qjcbz9ECqvXq7mEWhkzqMVI X-Received: by 10.140.105.164 with SMTP id c33mr10594549qgf.11.1418235987908; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:26:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.149.71 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:26:07 -0800 (PST) From: Shlok M Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:56:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Commands to Configure - instances s within a VPC in one region to another instances within a VPC in another region To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:26:35 -0000 Hi, I am working on an where I need to configure an internet getaway from one Amazon EC2 instance within a VPC in one region to communicate with another Amazon EC2 instances within a VPC in another region. Any posts / tutorial regarding that? --=20 Shlok Malik =E2=80=9CTransacting the world's illiquid =E2=80=AAasset classes via Online= P2P Decentralized Marketplace @ *Nexchanges *=E2=80= =9D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:33:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 239C3996 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp24.services.sfr.fr (smtp24.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6D5AF00 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2408.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0705F700012F for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:32:53 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (137.34.4.93.rev.sfr.net [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2408.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B98267000115 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:32:52 +0100 (CET) X-SFR-UUID: 20141210183252759.B98267000115@msfrf2408.sfr.fr Message-ID: <548891D2.6090109@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:32:50 +0100 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD-SA-14:28 & FreeBSD-SA-14:27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:33:02 -0000 > Did something get missed in these updates to the releng branch, my > source updates don't show the RELEASE-p1 in the BRANCH tag in the > sys/conf/newver.sh > > > TYPE="FreeBSD" > REVISION="10.1" > BRANCH="RELEASE" > > Or is this a bad place for me to base my script off of that I use to > generate names for my ZFS boot environments on rebuild, also the test > system I did a full buildworld/kenrel and installworld/kernel on after > seeing the source updates doesn't show the -p1 on the uname output. > > > uname -a > FreeBSD freebsd.dweimer.local 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 > r275674: Wed Dec 10 08:24:15 CST 2014 > dweimer at freebsd.dweimer.local :/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/obj/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > > svn info from source code tree: > URL:https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1 > Relative URL: ^/releng/10.1 > Repository Root:https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base > Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > Revision: 275682 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: delphij > Last Changed Rev: 275670 > Last Changed Date: 2014-12-10 02:35:55 -0600 (Wed, 10 Dec 2014) I don’t know if /sys/conf/newver.sh has to change for this case, but: # freebsd-version -uk 10.1-RELEASE 10.0-RELEASE-p1 Hope it helps, Juan > > > -- > Thanks, > Dean E. Weimer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:35:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8058A87 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp24.services.sfr.fr (smtp24.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78953F29 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2408.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8F71970001B0 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:35:27 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (137.34.4.93.rev.sfr.net [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2408.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4C91A700019C for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:35:27 +0100 (CET) X-SFR-UUID: 20141210183527313.4C91A700019C@msfrf2408.sfr.fr Message-ID: <5488926C.1010408@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:35:24 +0100 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD-SA-14:28 & FreeBSD-SA-14:27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:35:29 -0000 >> Did something get missed in these updates to the releng branch, my >> source updates don't show the RELEASE-p1 in the BRANCH tag in the >> sys/conf/newver.sh >> >> >> TYPE="FreeBSD" >> REVISION="10.1" >> BRANCH="RELEASE" >> >> Or is this a bad place for me to base my script off of that I use to >> generate names for my ZFS boot environments on rebuild, also the test >> system I did a full buildworld/kenrel and installworld/kernel on after >> seeing the source updates doesn't show the -p1 on the uname output. >> >> >> uname -a >> FreeBSD freebsd.dweimer.local 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 >> r275674: Wed Dec 10 08:24:15 CST 2014 >> dweimer at freebsd.dweimer.local :/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/obj/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> amd64 >> >> svn info from source code tree: >> URL:https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1 >> Relative URL: ^/releng/10.1 >> Repository Root:https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base >> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f >> Revision: 275682 >> Node Kind: directory >> Schedule: normal >> Last Changed Author: delphij >> Last Changed Rev: 275670 >> Last Changed Date: 2014-12-10 02:35:55 -0600 (Wed, 10 Dec 2014) > > I don’t know if /sys/conf/newver.sh has to change for this case, but: > > # freebsd-version -uk > 10.1-RELEASE > 10.0-RELEASE-p1 Sorry, copied by hand, it should surely read: # freebsd-version -uk 10.1-RELEASE 10.*1*-RELEASE-p1 > > Hope it helps, > Juan >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Dean E. Weimer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:48:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B877E89 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp24.services.sfr.fr (smtp24.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13C1BE4 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2408.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 53FCA7000115 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:48:51 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (137.34.4.93.rev.sfr.net [93.4.34.137]) by msfrf2408.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0F2497000098 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:48:50 +0100 (CET) X-SFR-UUID: 20141210184851621.0F2497000098@msfrf2408.sfr.fr Message-ID: <54889590.20307@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:48:48 +0100 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD-SA-14:28 & FreeBSD-SA-14:27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:48:53 -0000 >> Did something get missed in these updates to the releng branch, my >> source updates don't show the RELEASE-p1 in the BRANCH tag in the >> sys/conf/newver.sh It was forgotten: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=275684 Sorry for the noise! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 19:33:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6BB9D3; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17A88DF; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBAJX0YE056517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:33:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:33:00 -0600 From: dweimer To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Ram=C3=B3n_Molina_Menor?= Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-14:28 & FreeBSD-SA-14:27 Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <54889590.20307@club-internet.fr> References: <54889590.20307@club-internet.fr> Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1-beta Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:33:11 -0000 On 12/10/2014 12:48 pm, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: >>> Did something get missed in these updates to the releng branch, my >>> source updates don't show the RELEASE-p1 in the BRANCH tag in the >>> sys/conf/newver.sh > > It was forgotten: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=275684 > > Sorry for the noise! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Good to know, it did through 9.2 & 10.0-RELEASE cycle, I wrote the script when using 9.2, when I switched over to ZFS and using beadm to manage boot environments. I wasn't sure I didn't pick a bad spot, or a change in the process hadn't been intentionally made. I wanted more input to see if I had found an error, or I was at fault. After this update it works correctly. root@freebsd:/usr/src # /scripts/create-beadm-name.sh 10.1-RELEASE-p1-r275684-2014.12.10 Its a really simple script, probably could be made better by someone who knows more about grep and awk than I do: REVISION=`cat /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | grep "^REVISION=" | awk -F= '{print $2}' | awk -F\" '{print $2}'` BRANCH=`cat /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | grep "^BRANCH=" | awk -F= '{print $2}' | awk -F\" '{print $2}'` SVNLASTCHANGE=`svnlite info /usr/src/ | grep "^Last Changed Rev:" | awk '{print $4}'` DATE=`date "+%Y.%m.%d"` echo "${REVISION}-${BRANCH}-r${SVNLASTCHANGE}-${DATE}" makes creating a new Boot Environment under a standard naming convention a breeze. beadm create `/scripts/create-beadm-name.sh` The SVN revision isn't to helpful usually on a release, but since I use the same script when testing STABLE as well, I just left it in there. On the production systems I generally do a new boot environment even when updating applications so I may end up with several dates on the same BRANCH with different dates so I can roll back if an updated application fails. I am rebuilding world on my test system now, so I can found out if the uname issue resolves as well, though I expect it will, then time to start rolling through my production servers. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 20:56:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 504BB6E2; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13AF1189; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBAKu22k002285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:56:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:56:02 -0600 From: dweimer To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Ram=C3=B3n_Molina_Menor?= Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-14:28 & FreeBSD-SA-14:27 Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: <54889590.20307@club-internet.fr> Message-ID: <596c6ec4f4b0bcd549794259fb5509b8@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1-beta Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:56:10 -0000 On 12/10/2014 1:33 pm, dweimer wrote: > On 12/10/2014 12:48 pm, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: >>>> Did something get missed in these updates to the releng branch, my >>>> source updates don't show the RELEASE-p1 in the BRANCH tag in the >>>> sys/conf/newver.sh >> >> It was forgotten: >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=275684 >> >> Sorry for the noise! >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Good to know, it did through 9.2 & 10.0-RELEASE cycle, I wrote the > script when using 9.2, when I switched over to ZFS and using beadm to > manage boot environments. I wasn't sure I didn't pick a bad spot, or > a change in the process hadn't been intentionally made. I wanted more > input to see if I had found an error, or I was at fault. > > After this update it works correctly. > > root@freebsd:/usr/src # /scripts/create-beadm-name.sh > 10.1-RELEASE-p1-r275684-2014.12.10 > > Its a really simple script, probably could be made better by someone > who knows more about grep and awk than I do: > > REVISION=`cat /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | grep "^REVISION=" | awk > -F= '{print $2}' | awk -F\" '{print $2}'` > BRANCH=`cat /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | grep "^BRANCH=" | awk -F= > '{print $2}' | awk -F\" '{print $2}'` > SVNLASTCHANGE=`svnlite info /usr/src/ | grep "^Last Changed Rev:" | > awk '{print $4}'` > DATE=`date "+%Y.%m.%d"` > echo "${REVISION}-${BRANCH}-r${SVNLASTCHANGE}-${DATE}" > > makes creating a new Boot Environment under a standard naming > convention a breeze. > > beadm create `/scripts/create-beadm-name.sh` > > The SVN revision isn't to helpful usually on a release, but since I > use the same script when testing STABLE as well, I just left it in > there. On the production systems I generally do a new boot > environment even when updating applications so I may end up with > several dates on the same BRANCH with different dates so I can roll > back if an updated application fails. > > I am rebuilding world on my test system now, so I can found out if the > uname issue resolves as well, though I expect it will, then time to > start rolling through my production servers. uname reports correctly now: FreeBSD freebsd.dweimer.local 10.1-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p1 #0 r275684: Wed Dec 10 14:44:37 CST 2014 dweimer@freebsd.dweimer.local:/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/obj/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 as well as freebsd-version: freebsd-version -uk 10.1-RELEASE-p1 10.1-RELEASE-p1 -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 20:59:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671149A8 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350AF1C8 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-57.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sBAKxc0n023209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:59:38 -0600 Message-ID: <5488B5B0.7000803@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:05:52 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: mouse lockup again .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:59:46 -0000 .... I just had another instance of my mouse locking up upon restart from a period of inactivity. It happened to leave me in a screen logged in as root, but I didn't know how to do anything to try to restart the mouse. The relevant lines from my messages file are below: Dec 4 10:50:43 kabini1 su: wam to root on /dev/pts/26 Dec 10 14:23:42 kabini1 kernel: ugen4.2: at usbus4 (disconnected) Dec 10 14:23:42 kabini1 kernel: ukbd0: at uhub4, port 3, addr 2 (disconnected) Dec 10 14:23:42 kabini1 kernel: ums0: at uhub4, port 3, addr 2 (disconnected) Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ugen4.2: at usbus4 Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ukbd0: on usbus4 Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: kbd2 at ukbd0 Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ums0: on usbus4 Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ums0: 3 buttons and [XYZ] coordinates ID=3 Dec 10 14:26:57 kabini1 su: wam to root on /dev/pts/16 Dec 10 14:29:15 kabini1 amd[709]: Unknown host: .Trash Dec 10 14:29:15 kabini1 amd[709]: Unknown host: .Trash-1110 Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2014 The FreeBSD Project. Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 kernel: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. i.e. six days of nothing to report, then mouse events at the time I tried wiggling the mouse to wake the screen back up, then a hard reset after I got logged back in & brought up the XFCE desktop, only to have the mouse hovering over the vidalia dialog box, so that CTRL-ALT-DEL wouldn't reboot :-/ .... Are there any keystrokes under XFCE to change desktop from the keyboard ? I can post my xorg.0.log, but no errors reported: [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:50:30pm] 323 % grep EE /var/log/Xorg.* /var/log/Xorg.0.log: (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 34.704] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old: (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[531940.567] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER /var/log/Xorg.1.log: (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. /var/log/Xorg.1.log:(II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:50:41pm] 324 % ( lltr20 /var/log/Xorg.* ) -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 52741 Aug 15 10:52 /var/log/Xorg.1.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60955 Dec 10 14:29 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 62407 Dec 10 14:33 /var/log/Xorg.0.log [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:51:14pm] 325 % ( lltr20 /var/log/dmesg.* ) -rw------- 1 root wheel 42229 Dec 4 03:07 /var/log/dmesg.yesterday -rw------- 1 root wheel 44364 Dec 5 03:05 /var/log/dmesg.today [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:51:21pm] 326 % wc -l /var/log/dmesg.today 831 /var/log/dmesg.today [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:51:34pm] 327 % I can post whatever is needed to help debug this .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 21:19:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA52DBF for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F943E9 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-57.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sBALJXeu008233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:19:33 -0600 Message-ID: <5488BA5B.2050308@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:25:47 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: mouse lockup again .... References: <5488B5B0.7000803@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <5488B5B0.7000803@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:19:35 -0000 On 12/10/14 15:05, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > .... I just had another instance of my mouse locking up upon restart > from a period of inactivity. It happened to leave me in a screen > logged in as root, but I didn't know how to do anything to try to > restart the mouse. The relevant lines from my messages file are below: > > > Dec 4 10:50:43 kabini1 su: wam to root on /dev/pts/26 > Dec 10 14:23:42 kabini1 kernel: ugen4.2: at usbus4 (disconnected) > Dec 10 14:23:42 kabini1 kernel: ukbd0: at uhub4, port 3, addr 2 > (disconnected) > Dec 10 14:23:42 kabini1 kernel: ums0: at uhub4, port 3, addr 2 > (disconnected) > Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ugen4.2: at usbus4 > Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ukbd0: rev 1.10/1.10, addr 2> on usbus4 > Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: kbd2 at ukbd0 > Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ums0: rev 1.10/1.10, addr 2> on usbus4 > Dec 10 14:23:43 kabini1 kernel: ums0: 3 buttons and [XYZ] coordinates > ID=3 > Dec 10 14:26:57 kabini1 su: wam to root on /dev/pts/16 > Dec 10 14:29:15 kabini1 amd[709]: Unknown host: .Trash > Dec 10 14:29:15 kabini1 amd[709]: Unknown host: .Trash-1110 > Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel > Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2014 The FreeBSD > Project. > Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, > 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > Dec 10 14:32:49 kabini1 kernel: The Regents of the University of > California. All rights reserved. > > > i.e. six days of nothing to report, then mouse events at the time I > tried wiggling the mouse to wake the screen back up, then a hard reset > after I got logged back in & brought up the XFCE desktop, only to have > the mouse hovering over the vidalia dialog box, so that CTRL-ALT-DEL > wouldn't reboot :-/ .... Are there any keystrokes under XFCE to change > desktop from the keyboard ? I can post my xorg.0.log, but no errors > reported: > > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:50:30pm] 323 % grep EE /var/log/Xorg.* > /var/log/Xorg.0.log: (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not > implemented, (??) unknown. > /var/log/Xorg.0.log:[ 34.704] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER > /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old: (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not > implemented, (??) unknown. > /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old:[531940.567] (II) Loading extension > MIT-SCREEN-SAVER > /var/log/Xorg.1.log: (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not > implemented, (??) unknown. > /var/log/Xorg.1.log:(II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER > [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:50:41pm] 324 % ( lltr20 /var/log/Xorg.* ) > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 52741 Aug 15 10:52 /var/log/Xorg.1.log > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60955 Dec 10 14:29 /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 62407 Dec 10 14:33 /var/log/Xorg.0.log > [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:51:14pm] 325 % ( lltr20 /var/log/dmesg.* ) > -rw------- 1 root wheel 42229 Dec 4 03:07 /var/log/dmesg.yesterday > -rw------- 1 root wheel 44364 Dec 5 03:05 /var/log/dmesg.today > [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:51:21pm] 326 % wc -l /var/log/dmesg.today > 831 /var/log/dmesg.today > [root@kabini1, /etc, 2:51:34pm] 327 % > > I can post whatever is needed to help debug this .... > > .... A downpayment on my system info .... [wam@kabini1, ~, 3:18:01pm] 300 % grep -i xorg /etc/LIST.installed.txt linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4_1 Xorg libraries (Linux CentOS 6.6) xorg-7.7_1 X.Org complete distribution metaport xorg-apps-7.7_1 X.org apps meta-port xorg-docs-1.7,1 X.org documentation files xorg-drivers-7.7_2 X.org drivers meta-port xorg-fonts-7.7 X.org fonts meta-port xorg-fonts-100dpi-7.7 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-75dpi-7.7 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-7.7 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-7.7 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-7.7_1 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-7.7 X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-libraries-7.7_1 X.org libraries meta-port xorg-macros-1.19.0 X.Org development aclocal macros xorg-server-1.12.4_9,1 X.Org X server and related programs [wam@kabini1, ~, 3:18:09pm] 301 % ^org^f86^ grep -i xf86 /etc/LIST.installed.txt libXxf86dga-1.1.4_2 X DGA Extension libXxf86misc-1.0.3_2 X XF86-Misc Extension libXxf86vm-1.1.3_2 X Vidmode Extension xf86-input-keyboard-1.8.0_6 X.Org keyboard input driver xf86-input-mouse-1.9.0_5 X.Org mouse input driver xf86-video-ati-7.5.0 X.Org ati display driver xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_5 Driver for Intel integrated graphics chipsets xf86-video-mach64-6.9.4_4 X.Org mach64 display driver xf86-video-nv-2.1.20_5 X.Org nv display driver xf86-video-openchrome-0.3.3_4 X.Org openChrome display driver xf86-video-r128-6.9.2_4 X.Org r128 display driver xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_4 X.Org vesa display driver xf86dga-1.0.3_1 Test program for the XFree86-DGA extension xf86dgaproto-2.1 XFree86-DGA extension headers xf86driproto-2.1.1 XFree86-DRI extension headers xf86miscproto-0.9.3 XFree86-Misc extension headers xf86vidmodeproto-2.3.1 XFree86-VidModeExtension extension headers [wam@kabini1, ~, 3:18:24pm] 302 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Mon Nov 3 22:38:58 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [wam@kabini1, ~, 3:19:07pm] 303 % Anything else, just ask .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 23:26:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81989F48 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 038415EC for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id pn19so3395539lab.9 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:26:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2PRd/LxTPQ47RLHUscikP/cUXo4xWqDzRNu/2+6GZ4w=; b=cybXTVwwqh+7fmrQRQ8mgo9kTCQGX2TTflGdl1DBuZV5UsHNItVO6eU5oKB9S+N3jO A+3wcjNhom5Q/fNOlN6leUD/EdSscCExqVI9qwH5kjCRH5Pq/vD0WF2co43Tc7RO1Qnz bBdXJaqcFGdwQHXI9tlwMjvU42E1r8+cbxsnD4DMY0LeZudYn6AobaYlfOy3HaRuVTdr iWUoHl26TwhIDFQEFF9NtOIhnU+YqnqkCN6q51nq4iflI5yw4fpf8R1vWJ1ilWG3jmRp jNFGKwry/nSYp5BNXnkXuDPA5Jjq1qLDeNurEhzt/lmplr+PLovpCLEBrbQVwapxfjr6 jekQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.14.69 with SMTP id n5mr6737718lbc.34.1418253961086; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.168.136 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:26:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:26:01 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Setting up 4.1 audio in FreeBSD 10.1 From: Luciano Rottava da Silva To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:26:03 -0000 Hello list, My desktop has a 4.1 speaker system, connect to an Asus motherboard with a built-in ALC887 sound card. $ dmesg | grep ALC hdacc0: at cad 0 on hdac0 hdaa0: at nid 1 on hdacc0 pcm0: at nid 20,26 and 24 on hdaa0 pcm1: at nid 27 and 25 on hdaa0 pcm2: at nid 17 on hdaa0 I am able to listen to the front but not to the rear speakers. I would like to adjust my audio system to 4.0/4.1, i.e., same audio in the rear and in the front speaker. Don`t care too much about real surround sound. All relevant sound modules are there, so I think problem is related to the configuration of the sound chipset. Searching in the Internet I figured out I could redefine a line-in jack (blue, where my rear speakers are connected) to line-out. So I did it: $ cat /boot/device.hints hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid20.config="as=1 seq=0" #hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid24.config="as=1 seq=1 device=Line-out" #hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config="as=1 seq=2 device=Line-out" hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config="as=1 seq=1 device=Line-out" $ cat /dev/sndstat Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default pcm1: (play/rec) pcm2: (play) pcm3: (rec) After boot in verbose mode I got: hdaa0: Pin sense: nid=20 sense=0x80000000 (connected) hdaa0: Pin sense: nid=26 sense=0x80000000 (connected) hdaa0: FG config/quirks: forcestereo ivref50 ivref80 ivref100 ivref pcm0: at nid 20,26 and 24 on hdaa0 pcm0: Playback: pcm0: Stream cap: 0x00000001 PCM pcm0: PCM cap: 0x000e0560 16 20 24 bits, 44 48 96 192 KHz pcm0: DAC: 2 3 pcm0: pcm0: nid=20 [pin: Line-out (Green Jack)] pcm0: + <- nid=12 [audio mixer] [src: pcm, mix] pcm0: + <- nid=2 [audio output] [src: pcm] pcm0: + <- nid=11 [audio mixer] [src: mix] pcm0: pcm0: nid=26 [pin: Line-out (Blue Jack)] pcm0: + <- nid=13 [audio mixer] [src: pcm, mix] pcm0: + <- nid=3 [audio output] [src: pcm] pcm0: + <- nid=11 [audio mixer] [src: mix] pcm0: This means that both jacks in the motherboard are set to line-out and shoud work, right? Is there anything else I should set, maybe mixer in order to have a 4.0/4.1 audio system? Any ideas? Thanks, Luciano. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 00:15:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D8F33B for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BD93B60 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id p10so3811316pdj.27 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:15:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+nd19sBven9bxw6wP6Zp04tXmjO4jbcAMl3EJOPQjno=; b=VWyczjGUlP+OjdJ4uGy4dy16almvYlGZcargJcbmfIyer64Jgl91OpR+NTEI215P9D AedabK4FPRKW4UCq6KTAmaI7i9TDqlgN3qPuv3LXUyxpdtRrWd6GQRsue02lNcL+W479 0lLIr648kl+GL6R+zxcYYS/da4rp9nBfX6cG8vuG9tfOqvFFfAAAz69FTQkQ9g2yxzoH /2bK1ihTntJ8ql+bSNsoSdtd0n/qHDcZJsHRYXCnVSODGu1Gtn/6tubdSRAy2qYFUBLP PSrQlbhXXde1HiC1NnAAbqyE/Uae2aBlsHULzwAPc+UynfKbKDxJGEpJirA2x0ktdHAq nh4g== X-Received: by 10.70.134.197 with SMTP id pm5mr11970999pdb.72.1418256955405; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.116] ([120.29.118.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ye3sm5160822pbb.93.2014.12.10.16.15.54 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:15:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5488E23A.9020002@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:15:54 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) To: "no@spam@mgedv.net" Subject: Re: freebsd 10.1-RELEASE: jail security errors - GID 0 not dropped completely References: <042a01d011bd$e4cb1530$ae613f90$@mgedv.net> <000001d01495$8b36ee60$a1a4cb20$@mgedv.net> In-Reply-To: <000001d01495$8b36ee60$a1a4cb20$@mgedv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:15:56 -0000 [1]no@spam@mgedv.net wrote: really, no one running jails on 10.1 with chmod o-rwx of the jail-home? ;-) cheers -----Original Message----- From: [2]owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [[3]mailto:owner-freebsd- [4]questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of [5]no@spam@mgEDV.net Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 2:34 AM To: [6]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd 10.1-RELEASE: jail security errors - GID 0 not dropped completely hi guys, as the "real" application faces the same problems, i created a test jail on a clean box just to check the behaviour using "/usr/bin/id". problem description (hopefully i nailed it): if a jailed process needs any .so for startup, the path to those *.so needs to be world r-x, although the GID of the jail execute user is allowed to r/x the dirs, where the *.so files are to be found. there could be (ordering) errors with SET(e)GID in jail_* functions, because it works as expected when prefixing with "chroot -g test /". the EGID is dropped to the jail user's gid, but the GID is still 0! we end up with a jailed proc (UID=999, GID=0), which of course is not allowed to access the dirs for the *.so's to be loaded by exec. [see end of message for setup details] === the symptom === /jail# /jail/a.sh Shared object "libbsm.so.3" not found, required by "id" jail: /bin/id: failed === details from truss === 619: access("/lib/libbsm.so.3",0) ERR#13 'Permission denied' 619: access("/usr/lib/libbsm.so.3",0) ERR#13 'Permission denied' === some UID/GID details from kdump === /jail# grep -i '[g|s]et.*id' jail.kdump 64746 100091 jail CALL issetugid 64746 100091 jail RET issetugid 0 64746 100091 jail CALL issetugid 64746 100091 jail RET issetugid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL geteuid 64747 100093 jail RET geteuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL setuid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET setuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL getuid 64747 100093 jail RET getuid 999/0x3e7 64747 100093 jail CALL geteuid 64747 100093 jail RET geteuid 999/0x3e7 64747 100093 jail CALL getegid 64747 100093 jail RET getegid 999/0x3e7 64747 100093 jail CALL setegid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET setegid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted 64747 100093 jail CALL seteuid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET seteuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL seteuid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET seteuid 0 64747 100093 jail CALL setegid(0x3e7) 64747 100093 jail RET setegid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted 64747 100093 id CALL issetugid 64747 100093 id RET issetugid 1 === proof 1: chroot fixes the jail .so load problem === # outside the jail - just to know what's changing: /jail# chroot -g test / id uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) egid=999(test) groups=999(test),5(operator) # inside the jail - this is our "fix": /jail# chroot -g test / /jail/a.sh uid=999 gid=999(test) groups=999(test) === proof 2: chmod fixes *.so load, but GID=0 here! === if i chmod the jail homedir and jail's lib dir, it works: /jail# chmod a+rx /jail /jail/lib /jail# ./a.sh uid=999 gid=0(wheel) egid=999(test) groups=999(test) user and group names are read fine from the jailed "id", although the file perms are as listed beyond. is this a bug or am i missing something? any help/info/enlightenment appreciated ;-) [just reply to the list, i'm on it] ==== CONFIG (tested 3 different times with GENERIC and a CUSTOM kernel): LiveCD install source: FreeBSD-10.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso sha256: 0c3d64ce48c3ef761761d0fea07e1935e296f8c045c249118bc91a7faf053a6b fresh install on 2 different ESXi 5.5 hosts and a 3rd physical PC. only base.tgz+kernel.tgz or liveCD, tried on UFS2 (gpt) and tmpfs. i used the www user and tmpfs on the liveCD, but everything else was the same. === the test user === /jail# id -P test test:*:999:999::0:0:User &:/home/test:/bin/sh === the jail (before the mentioned chmod) === /jail# ls -Ralo total 68 dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 . drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel - 512 Dec 7 00:06 .. -rwx------ 1 root test - 773 Dec 7 01:00 a.sh dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:58 bin drwxr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:01 etc -rw-r----- 1 root test - 37157 Dec 7 01:02 jail.truss dr-xr-xr-x 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:59 lib dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 00:00 libexec ./bin: total 24 dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:58 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -r-xr-x--- 1 root test - 12432 Nov 11 22:03 id ./etc: total 60 drwxr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:01 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -rw-r----- 1 root test - 473 Dec 7 00:04 group -rw-r----- 1 root test - 321 Dec 7 01:01 nsswitch.conf -rw-r----- 1 root test - 1570 Dec 7 00:27 passwd -rw------- 1 root test - 40960 Dec 7 00:27 spwd.db ./lib: total 1744 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root test - 512 Dec 6 23:59 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -r--r----- 1 root test - 106264 Nov 11 22:03 libbsm.so.3 -r--r----- 1 root test - 1631216 Nov 11 22:03 libc.so.7 ./libexec: total 124 dr-xr-x--- 2 root test - 512 Dec 7 00:00 . dr-xr-xr-x 6 root test - 512 Dec 7 01:02 .. -r-xr-x--- 1 root test - 118520 Nov 11 22:03 ld-elf.so.1 === the start command ==== /jail# cat a.sh umask 027; rm -f /jail/jail.truss /jail/jail.kdump /jail/jail.ktrace #/usr/bin/truss -f -e -a -o /jail/jail.truss -s 1000 \ ktrace -d -f /jail/jail.ktrace -i -t cinpstuy \ jail -c jid=1 \ name=test \ path=/jail \ ip4.addr=1.1.1.1 \ host.hostuuid=c91e438a-1a44-4b7e-8732-0441ca9e2b97 \ host.hostid=6146666201 \ allow.sysvipc=0 \ allow.raw_sockets=0 \ exec.jail_user=test \ exec.system_user=test \ exec.system_jail_user=true \ host.hostname=test \ host.domainname=test.me \ allow.set_hostname=0 \ allow.chflags=0 \ allow.mount=0 \ allow.quotas=0 \ allow.socket_af=0 \ enforce_statfs=2 \ ip4=new \ ip6=disable \ command=/bin/id \ kdump -H -f /jail/jail.ktrace >/jail/jail.kdump === EOM === First off I can not give you an answer of the type your looking for. But I run 47 jails {a jail per class room student] all built using qjail on a 10.0 system without any problems. So my guess is your problem may be related to the way you built your jail directory filesystem. Secondly you have way too many jail.conf statements that are not needed to define a jail. All the statements that end in =0 do not need the =0, just the statement name will work. allow.sysvipc, and allow.raw_sockets options break the security of the jail and should never be used on a production jail accepting traffic from the public internet. When you start a jail you should us the jails name not the JID that you hope is correct. You may be interested in the jail-primer port. It provides jail documentation that should be in the handbook. [7]http://jail-primer.sourceforge.net/ Try building your jail using qjail or the jail-primer scripts to see if your problem goes away. Good luck References 1. mailto:no@spam@mgedv.net 2. mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 3. mailto:owner-freebsd 4. mailto:questions@freebsd.org 5. mailto:no@spam@mgEDV.net 6. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 7. http://jail-primer.sourceforge.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 00:52:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E236E8D for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63DFBEFA for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a108so2997006qge.39 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:52:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=q8ooHW54GupjD0dIt133eScyolPdWfGqmuIu8Jg8mTE=; b=rQXWXFIBBOiikZMKm8qEFa5X8DA6UZSh96l8NXWDIs2LauMpGF25q2s+B6nNpYK9YH Jp6dtYgWD44s/S2GpunbfmrERhckoiLFFhaC9BZOVcQeRwjlipRt/q9i9RHKt1kubuc6 H0hs9GcSVacj7gb8GQe6PZM0aCATRogHzaDeGWZe03CUPkwHW0Khg4iTaJyS0OxLO5D+ KEdVCpOFiz3ojMkd/p3+/IRlI5gzQiW1DA8QNiJsAXuPJgWtnkIt7eQBSWsZKDWUY8KI Ju4KCN3ZJVssCQWq8GF2NX3jIkRpu6u3CRQQcr6XGNBD0ZzxoNxEVgfF8y6JuKuj7uA/ Ds7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.40.72 with SMTP id j8mr14621254qae.59.1418259128608; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:52:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: lordofhyphens@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.241.200 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:52:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:52:08 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1oNluhtmo3Ks34fxaB5TvVoaUNc Message-ID: Subject: [OT] Identifying a MTI storage array? From: Joseph Lenox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:52:09 -0000 My advisor was given an old HP83000 IC tester a few years ago and I got stuck with trying to figure out how to evaluate if it is worth trying to set up. To that end, I am investigating the HP C360 visualize workstation that came with it. It is booting, but there are entries in the fstab that imply that there were more hard drives. It came with this hard drive array: http://imgur.com/a/0JSZW I am having trouble even identifying the make and model, let alone finding some sort of manual. Anyone got an idea of what is going on here and possibly where I can source the correct cabling for it? The workstation has 2 scsi busses, an ultrawide single ended and a narrow single ended. --Joseph Lenox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 06:40:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E441B8C for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E1B2B2 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBB5ije5010789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:44:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be www.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:44:44 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:40:34 -0000 Asking here because it is used in FreeBSD a lot. Most google queries about Bourne Shell aspects bring answers like this: Not sure, but if this was in bash, you could .... And most documents found online aren't comprehensive, and only cover beginner questions. No books on amazon look promising either. There are some quite tricky areas and questions about sh and hard to find information. Anybody knows of some good book that would cover all essential issues of Bourne shell programming? Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 12:52:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E36B52 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990C5E5B for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id sBBCqc2F040080; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:52:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <54899396.9070909@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:52:38 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luciano Rottava da Silva , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Setting up 4.1 audio in FreeBSD 10.1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:52:53 -0000 On 2014-12-11 00:26, Luciano Rottava da Silva wrote: > Hello list, Hello. > My desktop has a 4.1 speaker system, connect to an Asus motherboard with a > built-in ALC887 sound card. > > $ dmesg | grep ALC > hdacc0: at cad 0 on hdac0 > hdaa0: at nid 1 on hdacc0 > pcm0: at nid 20,26 and 24 on hdaa0 > pcm1: at nid 27 and 25 on hdaa0 > pcm2: at nid 17 on hdaa0 > > I am able to listen to the front but not to the rear speakers. I would like > to adjust my audio system to 4.0/4.1, i.e., same audio in the rear and in > the front speaker. Don`t care too much about real surround sound. > > All relevant sound modules are there, so I think problem is related to the > configuration of the sound chipset. > > Searching in the Internet I figured out I could redefine a line-in jack > (blue, where my rear speakers are connected) to line-out. So I did it: > > $ cat /boot/device.hints > hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid20.config="as=1 seq=0" > #hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid24.config="as=1 seq=1 device=Line-out" > #hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config="as=1 seq=2 device=Line-out" > hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config="as=1 seq=1 device=Line-out" > > > $ cat /dev/sndstat > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play/rec) default > pcm1: (play/rec) > pcm2: (play) > pcm3: (rec) > > > After boot in verbose mode I got: > > hdaa0: Pin sense: nid=20 sense=0x80000000 (connected) > hdaa0: Pin sense: nid=26 sense=0x80000000 (connected) > hdaa0: FG config/quirks: forcestereo ivref50 ivref80 ivref100 ivref > pcm0: at nid 20,26 and 24 on hdaa0 > pcm0: Playback: > pcm0: Stream cap: 0x00000001 PCM > pcm0: PCM cap: 0x000e0560 16 20 24 bits, 44 48 96 192 KHz > pcm0: DAC: 2 3 > pcm0: > pcm0: nid=20 [pin: Line-out (Green Jack)] > pcm0: + <- nid=12 [audio mixer] [src: pcm, mix] > pcm0: + <- nid=2 [audio output] [src: pcm] > pcm0: + <- nid=11 [audio mixer] [src: mix] > pcm0: > pcm0: nid=26 [pin: Line-out (Blue Jack)] > pcm0: + <- nid=13 [audio mixer] [src: pcm, mix] > pcm0: + <- nid=3 [audio output] [src: pcm] > pcm0: + <- nid=11 [audio mixer] [src: mix] > pcm0: > > > This means that both jacks in the motherboard are set to line-out and shoud > work, right? > > Is there anything else I should set, maybe mixer in order to have a 4.0/4.1 > audio system? > > Any ideas? You can always fiddle with sysctl hw.snd.default_unit 0-3 And see what happens. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 14:48:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D4ECB7 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com (mail-lb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12631D9C for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id b6so4237739lbj.36 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:48:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ufAuUg6nCOLcmOL9GrHxJQfxwRv+kXEy7x3HWJHG43U=; b=dQL/W6Hk42I2UnnZWKzyEYY3qj1IXc/hSfXXvHWsbXp/ikLkJQpMUmm63UPxgoQLck u0a2Z0s4X1D8M6ymViWZn5VaAEECEg0xfUftSqp1F5o/ZQe6fw7TeYHGp5VarAwN75BB p8VhBkE5ujeKkYVkWBYdh1xIb4hWHz+7izT1iLX5UVZfmcvXmCG0Yqh2keKRaMR/J6Rg bwvvcwS76pjTkz7lWuBPl4d47O1aHNIi3+vDmQEJpreJAAe/KLaSsbpjvQEuXcFxhN2k Hr7vu42HXl1TQh0XRe97uhgzj2+r1IiJa+r/aQ373RDvZv+qla13xOfeWRUB4RGuyhRt PtYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.43.12 with SMTP id s12mr10028594lal.67.1418309296066; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:48:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.168.136 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:48:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54899396.9070909@bananmonarki.se> References: <54899396.9070909@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:48:16 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setting up 4.1 audio in FreeBSD 10.1 From: Luciano Rottava da Silva To: Bernt Hansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:48:18 -0000 Hi Bernt, Sound is coming out from front speakers, so pcm0 is the right default unit. Problem is that rear speakers are mute. That=C2=B4s why I am playing with p= in configuration of the sound card. Besides, during some of these tests with "nid", mouse stopped working in X! Anyone experienced this as well? Cheers. On 11 December 2014 at 10:52, Bernt Hansson wrote: > On 2014-12-11 00:26, Luciano Rottava da Silva wrote: > >> Hello list, >> > > Hello. > > > My desktop has a 4.1 speaker system, connect to an Asus motherboard with= a >> built-in ALC887 sound card. >> >> $ dmesg | grep ALC >> hdacc0: at cad 0 on hdac0 >> hdaa0: at nid 1 on hdacc0 >> pcm0: at nid 20,26 and 24 on hdaa= 0 >> pcm1: at nid 27 and 25 on hdaa0 >> pcm2: at nid 17 on hdaa0 >> >> I am able to listen to the front but not to the rear speakers. I would >> like >> to adjust my audio system to 4.0/4.1, i.e., same audio in the rear and i= n >> the front speaker. Don`t care too much about real surround sound. >> >> All relevant sound modules are there, so I think problem is related to t= he >> configuration of the sound chipset. >> >> Searching in the Internet I figured out I could redefine a line-in jack >> (blue, where my rear speakers are connected) to line-out. So I did it: >> >> $ cat /boot/device.hints >> hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid20.config=3D"as=3D1 seq=3D0" >> #hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid24.config=3D"as=3D1 seq=3D1 device=3DLine-out" >> #hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config=3D"as=3D1 seq=3D2 device=3DLine-out" >> hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config=3D"as=3D1 seq=3D1 device=3DLine-out" >> >> >> $ cat /dev/sndstat >> Installed devices: >> pcm0: (play/rec) default >> pcm1: (play/rec) >> pcm2: (play) >> pcm3: (rec) >> >> >> After boot in verbose mode I got: >> >> hdaa0: Pin sense: nid=3D20 sense=3D0x80000000 (connected) >> hdaa0: Pin sense: nid=3D26 sense=3D0x80000000 (connected) >> hdaa0: FG config/quirks: forcestereo ivref50 ivref80 ivref100 ivref >> pcm0: at nid 20,26 and 24 on hdaa= 0 >> pcm0: Playback: >> pcm0: Stream cap: 0x00000001 PCM >> pcm0: PCM cap: 0x000e0560 16 20 24 bits, 44 48 96 192 KHz >> pcm0: DAC: 2 3 >> pcm0: >> pcm0: nid=3D20 [pin: Line-out (Green Jack)] >> pcm0: + <- nid=3D12 [audio mixer] [src: pcm, mix] >> pcm0: + <- nid=3D2 [audio output] [src: pcm] >> pcm0: + <- nid=3D11 [audio mixer] [src: mix] >> pcm0: >> pcm0: nid=3D26 [pin: Line-out (Blue Jack)] >> pcm0: + <- nid=3D13 [audio mixer] [src: pcm, mix] >> pcm0: + <- nid=3D3 [audio output] [src: pcm] >> pcm0: + <- nid=3D11 [audio mixer] [src: mix] >> pcm0: >> >> >> This means that both jacks in the motherboard are set to line-out and >> shoud >> work, right? >> >> Is there anything else I should set, maybe mixer in order to have a >> 4.0/4.1 >> audio system? >> >> Any ideas? >> > You can always fiddle with sysctl hw.snd.default_unit 0-3 > And see what happens. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 17:21:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257D2C7E for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x231.google.com (mail-yh0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D972B1E7 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f10so2489744yha.36 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:21:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uSNWJ08C9q3S0kNt2Ap6cUyepLC/1/H/nLKQPr617iI=; b=wBdHsRjhEmbn8409f3K4z/hPdNahaSJ+233rVBySWS64tAtfGgQdlUAlK3+PfBwOIg EFWIksmtEsFMTQh0PNaVoD3rpKQ5hqoOMukHu1TTbjEM1+CoTPMShDGrDYoXFF113KDj YoLK9RC4YVT/ImpbJjgrNXgGLKzpS790+Kr4+xI01qcfvEkKTi+ZG1/np8fxp0POOSBA TEOWOydi0+zWbKb0+kba6Aymr3nZnCWRlrgGTEAhus71zXCvaCtOsReo+C40wUMAiXlq sTKyZdxuxv9iugzUCBE9Bl5bNYOSsbdhQHj1uOUKTG56qwjo4VIjZzDIrUug+qlXpFcy WdoQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.31.33 with SMTP id l21mr8167521yha.14.1418318494980; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:21:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.82.134 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:21:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:51:34 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Implementation of ACL's for pkg repos From: Alberto Mijares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:21:36 -0000 Hi list, Does pkg offer any facility to implement ACL's? Any expirience you'd like to share? I'm thinking of some kind of license based distribution, just like RH does with yum updates. Thanks in advance. Regards Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 16:19:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04CC1C32 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E2BA89 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by bucksport.safeport.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBBFuXDU092300 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:56:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:56:33 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: pkg no better than the old system Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:56:34 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:19:16 -0000 Color me disappointed. I did an upgrade for pidgin and WITHOUT WARNING xfce. firefox and a number of libraries were uninstalled. Putting firefox back begets artemis:~> firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: Shared object "libicui18n.so.53" not found, required by "libxul.so" Couldn't load XPCOM. Not asking for help just warning and bitching _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 20:08:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F530EDB for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stangl.us (stangl.us [66.93.193.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DEFA95 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scout.stangl.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB7E22807 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:02:42 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stangl.us Received: from stangl.us ([127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (scout.stangl.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id swK_Ay9Fg778 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:02:41 -0600 (CST) Received: by scout.stangl.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C50B522805; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:02:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:02:41 -0600 From: Alex Stangl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-ID: <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:08:11 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:44:44PM -0800, Yuri wrote: > There are some quite tricky areas and questions about sh and hard to > find information. > > Anybody knows of some good book that would cover all essential issues of > Bourne shell programming? Classic Shell Scripting (from O'Reilly) is good. Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 20:17:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 878D018B for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm6-vm2.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm6-vm2.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51C2BED for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:17:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s2048; t=1418329035; bh=NQSVPd45YdkGS9UvBGX4amzXy/m/+xTNgBYiBJZ4mp4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=VoMjG+KcP9RCozOBqet3KYomsXprcD/Qnr/ImlhSafMuIzUe5CO8rzjm/4/xKiHXAYY7D/A3Sxj9O3XVenEgqm7XUz1Dg9mDn/oAlfACzNrVwblEXcwUhp5lgrWJlxQKVzTqqFm9eu/iQfQT56e7hZpBa2zvIN38MZHmcEuCgohKshp795U9ILSnSWf4xhmn4igvn8Ah7uo+Q4WWB0mMkHeUMTIflODX9ktOyk1j1ssBDTUXZ0/kpQrG5M19Nsv5GSAIHp5vCHKVj8jqi1hSv+uJuMJoumX2dEjsYTM9xt3XQUNJKyW7MJZUSITwBxlzX/YTIW55C5085wwuzehuJg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=rocketmail.com; b=gAd+pIe09KjScLp4GSTwvvf+pgsZh1ZA3l710w6TcxW6Tcbq31cYpzrUNhG3ogutYUBADKH5nukpTgqFrWxE9RY/Hb1s+iqayKP6nHOAcXvY7rMxJ9jemX+nFllVFgGyxgonoDh5XG8I2e+dbIeMU4A8DT5HANoRXoGrdyNOV1wIxXUDL3o3xIf+al4KhTaQnOjrTh0r4zI1Jw9wAfkSyUTxkQc/MtDWhR++LarE50PKpMyB4yetRTYTP5DtAEHUmmjnV6NNRO8vqRgg8aZRuPG4aV3/r0m1mVJ0AOtjludIJUBpVLo3j9YJmSA9L/b6pTIwc7UpkDbm3TNOI8eENg==; Received: from [212.82.98.125] by nm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 20:17:15 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.85] by tm18.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 20:17:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp122.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 20:17:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 975105.94813.bm@smtp122.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: RovbBDoVM1l7gHEZon8hJWe_W2uvIvUkaKE8lxNwvh8145f RiQW4hA8xKA.XHzUZBjMvbTxR832icli8KpxNTPk7d6KAW666fLfAQvVGlO3 ugrRiNUW6SKL0pZvDaleuXLKwqxVGflkbnuplDngOcZ3xWsZ2RoJJgDal3OT iMkmsEm7SLJnP0i5Aq1rnDXgpb4pruSbBhqtXeIryq5RUDMwosFPcAyL3cen TT6FlzdLU7w_ud9kMtUT4_SV8QurMOk6cL6PunKMuiNmJt7WynbSU.jT.BIY DxbAgVUwNsIM_SMDTHzwQ.HjRAbWYqssj4CdhANweOJnHh1DOFELqFhFnp9c .c71K8ocg_iZhSDEse7mjU8La42O0m29dHdgaTdHmbMNsXqdOur6EbQa3GG6 aMmdJ6tGFFW.fdmb.fb22clDhS6AfDiVmSIvapejz0SptQowOP0CIu_lPHWA 5Fk57q30hPAMSrbzdv46ODwBtIZOsPiCZfhin6pj7J5.rYAqjojn0g9ByVa7 vaaJPwqiVG3_BfB8k7wdEsuzHPWKsQpZpLd3Rj4.d13uAox6h4qpt9NQxC_Y hbS7N50mPkl7PcpxTJ2CdwSOjhJvJ1ysw2DwvNCUixQZcVK72QfLDbmnNMin w4CdYmYnc X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:17:14 +0100 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-ID: <20141211211714.7594eeaa@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1-41-g9f4528e (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-arch-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:17:23 -0000 I heard that this should be one of the good explanations, but didn't use it myself: Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/ Hth, Ralf -- "Pull a Homer -- to succeed despite idiocy." - The Simpsons From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 21:41:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5530E629 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm14-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm14-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F3280E for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1418334059; bh=75gNsBQnlUILGwCiKd7L2CC/94/5UsNizyA7iBTHd4I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=W/YU6joobOBHFezOK0ZXabKhRkslsCxfUQTxNrlrdktQA7N/vyQAMwoziarsywI9vV0dnmy2VVa4bwkZqr9fSi3lQ4cp/uvmx0ZIxmArI/v8oJLKXP/dyDG4LLBlq+dJJDnUvmyt0v9wHeX+Lnupi9zwUN4K6pvKqciUel2lL+qGpxuxFGXBSSQrbU7pQ1771kuOMqQtx8tSv8vfCpoRs7m+rHNgkxqNrisyW3OJylQFf5BgdjcM+oQXMv+8/KAtQjCaUCZ88bfeDVOY3oJpasV27w1FoTB6hz+VeTdrOdROY4y/oO1nC9eMBcHoijn1OTt2kTd/4xkH2ZZNUgz0ZQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.com; b=a1zsaaIAKtSJlF8uoWMJdAJKhoU4w+70gffKm0dsSKHxlO4lxS3aCCmSmcX6VpUPiZJDjL4rR8j6iK6XQXJ+sgfwZDs+UVuCq2nJgRnFzrPToKxrfcUxVrR/QoaqhpUnvPDZe4I/MPuMm1SxmgdiEQw4yjv09GMoyH6amxqt1Ad3qlNMmtPq59BIdgsUI3LNa7u3KrDPASiJFOCLn8sEBGCpWU3CJRhvV6z3PG+w/HqT9l2a+3vTlizmW3uLaWqmuoNQ0L0ItFlrVMykjj+o6gR3Y1Gbv/R1o34oQflBxJsS7bWGKsE1vVPpDoc5pw9OBNGEEZwRizI2HeEgB3kEwA==; Received: from [98.139.212.149] by nm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 21:40:59 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.207] by tm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 21:40:59 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp216.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 21:40:59 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 576143.11677.bm@smtp216.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: P4XFSZ0VM1m6P2R4toK19yiW6USfgY0jQBjF.ZFpJBOBSjy SXJVOFDuKpsUlwVNqomUWXx_DdwxBPDsctK571vDqmWZJBVDdluMmVlL4Cuk p8DqEGcrk.gapQvQVuhTAm4ar68uC4L6sbFv4siiN_ohqURs2vd88RJaxpd_ CpgNwJaU7Gnj3Bvm7RIW3WvkdHRcAgUoZXw1rpYH9kaTufyAJIyI5RDwXa7K FuaL6Goa7HQauRtgyl0bkCabqOLNvBrIMjH.v1x3C5UMqLXHZyQc0fFFni.k .8qhKlb1XVhZI3Em2tIoBk3JCFiBJrG6H6SDbmPcFSgaanBXh3WjhLkgpT8a dS_c7I7jp1ngkTIFUUid7.RCPpXhDTyEwWEF_5PTil6NJU6eWYU7O0mM_B.4 l_YmzDtplO0OflIiLrEA5LMTyC1PCgbMPfuYh8KJYJJBRzTEj9oLqWvffLpI VHg84RHFTf2GTJcLrl7n_4POYfQ87dHQpPFsU5hiWFlbyV0XfNAw1C5qZkwG m16IKPAjS7Y_SCdMO3kq7TZFD0c4MyaiOVAbVrVf8qa3rI_3c.J_saUNR59I lknA7awBwHXDV2nmB9ValzWH0SHit3MEjWhMALGPiNwywUw46RY3.NO0j9nq x_uFMOZVsFCy1.mFlD7.qRZ7OOH78aoInVDa7AItDlfQ4N2uDZbBMA1jnsB8 TdZzAmKIkvpsbhlB5 X-Yahoo-SMTP: EcccYZqswBAGDF4cU.9t70.3zG.jS5CutQ-- Received: from nostromo.ui50.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nostromo.ui50.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBBLfdAt005794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:41:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bhd@nostromo.ui50.org) Received: (from bhd@localhost) by nostromo.ui50.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBBLfdQO005793 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:41:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bhd) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:41:39 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Heidotting To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-ID: <20141211214139.GA5707@nostromo.ui50.org> References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:41:01 -0000 The 'Shell Scripting Primer' from Apple is also a good resource. https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/OpenSource/Conceptual= /ShellScripting/Introduction/Introduction.html --=20 Bj=F6rn Heidotting From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 21:46:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335F6737 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED9E8E7 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:46:19 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.16.8 (ClamAV engine v0.97.8) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:70cd:1b48:b0d5:fab3] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.4 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 480466 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:46:11 +0000 Message-ID: <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:45:57 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> In-Reply-To: <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040701040800080305010503" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:46:20 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms040701040800080305010503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/11/14, 3:02 PM, Alex Stangl wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:44:44PM -0800, Yuri wrote: >> There are some quite tricky areas and questions about sh and hard to >> find information. >> >> Anybody knows of some good book that would cover all essential issues = of >> Bourne shell programming? > Classic Shell Scripting (from O'Reilly) is good. > > I would second this. It's my current go-to reference when writing a=20 script where I actually care about POSIX and the script being used for more than a day= =2E --Jon Radel --------------ms040701040800080305010503 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILBDCC BRowggQCoAMCAQICEG0Z6qcZT2ozIuYiMnqqcd4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoT FVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQg RW1haWwwHhcNMTEwNDI4MDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0Ix GzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UE ChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBAJKEhFtLV5jUXi+LpOFAyKNTWF9mZfEyTvefMn1V0HhMVbdClOD5J3EHxcZppLkyxPFA GpDMJ1Zifxe1cWmu5SAb5MtjXmDKokH2auGj/7jfH0htZUOMKi4rYzh337EXrMLaggLW1DJq 1GdvIBOPXDX65VSAr9hxCh03CgJQU2yVHakQFLSZlVkSMf8JotJM3FLb3uJAAVtIaN3FSrTg 7SQfOq9xXwfjrL8UO7AlcWg99A/WF1hGFYE8aIuLgw9teiFX5jSw2zJ+40rhpVJyZCaRTqWS D//gsWD9Gm9oUZljjRqLpcxCm5t9ImPTqaD8zp6Q30QZ9FxbNboW86eb/8ECAwEAAaOCAUsw ggFHMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFImCZ33EnSZwAEu0UEh83j2uBG59MB0GA1UdDgQWBBR6E04AdFvG eGNkJ8Ev4qBbvHnFezAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADARBgNV HSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwWAYDVR0fBFEwTzBNoEugSYZHaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tL1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwdAYI KwYBBQUHAQEEaDBmMD0GCCsGAQUFBzAChjFodHRwOi8vY3J0LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20vVVRO QWRkVHJ1c3RDbGllbnRfQ0EuY3J0MCUGCCsGAQUFBzABhhlodHRwOi8vb2NzcC51c2VydHJ1 c3QuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCF1r54V1VtM39EUv5C1QaoAQOAivsNsv1Kv/av QUn1G1rF0q0bc24+6SZ85kyYwTAo38v7QjyhJT4KddbQPTmGZtGhm7VNm2+vKGwdr+XqdFqo 2rHA8XV6L566k3nK/uKRHlZ0sviN0+BDchvtj/1gOSBH+4uvOmVIPJg9pSW/ve9g4EnlFsjr P0OD8ODuDcHTzTNfm9C9YGqzO/761Mk6PB/tm/+bSTO+Qik5g+4zaS6CnUVNqGnagBsePdIa XXxHmaWbCG0SmYbWXVcHG6cwvktJRLiQfsrReTjrtDP6oDpdJlieYVUYtCHVmdXgQ0BCML7q peeU0rD+83X5f27nMIIF4jCCBMqgAwIBAgIQUaWQdTU6RvxxeOjTUN4DtDANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFADCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4G A1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENP TU9ETyBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTAeFw0xMjAz MjcwMDAwMDBaFw0xNTAzMjcyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwGA1UEERMFMjIx NTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UECRMRNjkxNyBS aWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMpSXNzdWVkIHRo cm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNvcnBvcmF0ZSBT ZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYNam9uQHJh ZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMuufqoh9QnyjZTH7UdO wpx6XnRz/94zoK1C1SaAepIRMyInXiwOVwT7iXKtkeRGEQA2vwTyqu5JVcvWkGxlTWPACgDW dDE3296Up2K9CFfrm+RKdlc6xfMklR7qQWyNw5ULkeOZZOIoSAlVAJPhjIvHcf0UPxjTqgtP 4JafBBvL8RFhMAm74I1kWltMcFPVm1sLFDR1CDZ48/zqmhK/0ppbiBGapi8vAO382laFgHaN 8ODBFBffom5zjL/I9SggGGAdtwi7Vp2cjzgtuNVyORPv5Jz9zLylVKlhNvyq3VjbWXuJNw0E J03F/UkjQsqsCkQnSdHAxtPkGhoBw/UvqEsCAwEAAaOCAccwggHDMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFHoT TgB0W8Z4Y2QnwS/ioFu8ecV7MB0GA1UdDgQWBBR8oxwxzLSB4/equQ4EqdH5Fld3sTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUH AwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwVwYDVR0fBFAwTjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRTZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNy bDCBiAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEfDB6MFIGCCsGAQUFBzAChkZodHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bS9DT01PRE9DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsG AQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVs LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAJB+JWM2MbG5rR7/RCEm8bQRziBfl/FztfoV6dDGU Y0uTRegiwM2LA/GHGju7xtp49MrcmEciZs6Di2pvGzS5m/v5IBT0gMK6dyplBmBe4BXzwckE 1MH/iui+VstVHds+36SsQqPCtVmFWlX6QN56F6aGSCjI27f2mUYL3NBr6DPsslRIhF9PamKQ Bp4Y25/hnd+paEGIF6AZM3Uv7TvsTdCaBOt3dLrwUIpyQex5yqO8GPKWwgEPKxKiro7uLNNY yZU4dEEenQIi/4SD49XHd9Zqwf60jKVPeZjcrK7QSSQ8dlOYOGH60WBBFVwD1CCBCLSJnglY Dwh5wcgQG9ZRvjGCBBkwggQVAgEBMIGoMIGTMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3Jl YXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0Eg TGltaXRlZDE5MDcGA1UEAxMwQ09NT0RPIENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2Vj dXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBRpZB1NTpG/HF46NNQ3gO0MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJFMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE0MTIxMTIxNDU1OFowIwYJKoZI hvcNAQkEMRYEFMU+edv/10zyZi7h+QaKAFQR8FiqMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZI AWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgbkGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBqzCBqDCB kzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMH U2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBD bGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQUaWQdTU6RvxxeOjT UN4DtDCBuwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgauggagwgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJH cmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBD QSBMaW1pdGVkMTkwNwYDVQQDEzBDT01PRE8gQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBT ZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEFGlkHU1Okb8cXjo01DeA7QwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAdtnU xOhZxbsS9fJUXZs25d9WUC29k3Q2xG4F52y/pKBM9Dv7KaekVq+4sfqtJZb5Adq0D2zSWZnY 9cDG5mjkWC87B31fSmYNMMtDP3Jgrz6AnaG85siE9GtwUPmEEr8PH6VJOupyhnby57HY6/LZ +CC9767Q3OCEEWO/nnO9WmJNEYc2rGtiu34QZ9jEiQ6Ae0P7dDVaFlwkJOHNIZ5qagWHjq+o 3S9U1w4+ZA1eeYMHxqVgUy/XmXBhoQiZQLgaSrX/1uqQVYNgPWd03ykRihZ4jLYzm3DHrr7A bUB7cbVjNMGF2R3prIB4Ovt8nwiqfTwzeqVRa2C4xYyZB+NQ0wAAAAAAAA== --------------ms040701040800080305010503-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:16:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E248EDCE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm26-vm5.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm26-vm5.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2012C22 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:16:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s2048; t=1418336178; bh=LmtGbuYqA0+pZIGYfso/QOt/4ZHZhWXpZcpM+4QaRsw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=GT8bLDktvKtfLEu4ccqpeFFm+SGtySFPJQf8Yvv644NXeGFEEgtvbgKie6Au0Hspq9p5nTK2hDKHtlJBal5VFtEkLl5JpGIfBIt5VyaizOZWPQTagvpQt3aoFlaJ9lvnQlRSStY9YHE2pupJs+rSnup9cqic1ZN4YaGRcQdeF2T5S58gEvIUJQl+c+NUZdfY4DAd/YlFDO6hQ/sAcFuEqwb1bxSRLX0B2dnkLUjteLUxIK7R6jJB8pAFDQUWTLKc7btRE8ohIoKzxml/Hz5dIPuw1mN9NdFLnUe0haoNXsoRcZtSVz+RHJqczqDFICCEE/v7/GQy2188BzaI/rem5Q== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=rocketmail.com; b=s60z4OMenELMZVZTRDuSX0IX3GN2KuegXdVSLMDhJLVQcreo3+6jZdDMOyieqwYAojYRdwP1/HB94z5tgPbhbVbNFvObgX4e0ge1AyLRZ9DKPHmzofsisnlrr/58C8odxmH9NEk8JR+0MEfKGqWmNmcwfRcdLXNEZBLpX3mkifbVMGedzJaYkB7hU99+jDdhcFLExICg5Fgu4IjUqLNsDFrzC5+JKyPB39fwxpY9JWId5VFSk0aZpZeGJ2C15nXS4LMNWavPNpOLEyUp1qFuvFmOcltu5HeGVZzU/hW7cn8ZlXaOG4syJ2hANcssatS2jLkYYOPqh3v2w9qb0dPS8Q==; Received: from [212.82.98.48] by nm26.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 22:16:18 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.73] by tm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 22:16:17 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp110.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 22:16:17 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 373472.67538.bm@smtp110.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Ue3YnRAVM1kyjKGVOVFYOe1Ovh2Cleq1Uvi9gS0NLmQJwdq 6GpvL._7F9nCWnxpjj_H7n341ngZeDSgea99yKeZItl9iuJVbrKO02xx8TSR zalewTA6oplZ93ia3nIy2iqrpJhuugQTFvYOFZBLA1NsXYlWG0P86wFX4Fey fgi_mc5hg1QsmNoTOR5NGwGVBOJ41Qlfv3YEmSP1ORUcALswN2LpxkGpDTHE wCg5r.12fgoxXTrUnFK1yD3LNa8Vl7p9yRqVhBuHTxUHlfGZLDaL0oMQUV9i _wuNSaclhF7HsLlgrskt1F6wws36p_T3snujjgBMB_V5e12OyzLzkQpsZFad r4fIrGeEpPZfJaEUGcQI41rxSNhrTNn15VKhNV4OVh9W93OjHpQGWM4FYIyJ wlwyyDpxwxu67OMDcQz6vSK1dbX9r53.OP3TiGhoL1cnNOYjGMqJeLAZp97c KW9yam1mCbJWGxOKikTV2c4IxBoEK7ZCQInYNYTw_FFuXFROSwS51WEFmXNz Xu.jNU33dLlqisnmgB8JmEtyprwnKfgsCG2dszabireB6jOEH4_Xv74RiXWf rBGoI9g-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:16:16 +0100 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-ID: <20141211231616.255cac2e@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1-41-g9f4528e (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-arch-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:16:27 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:45:57 -0500, Jon Radel wrote: > On 12/11/14, 3:02 PM, Alex Stangl wrote: > > Classic Shell Scripting (from O'Reilly) is good. > > > > > I would second this. It's my current go-to reference when writing a > script where > I actually care about POSIX and the script being used for more than a > day. JFTR bashisms aren't POSIX. A bash script using bashisms won't work in dash. -- "Pull a Homer -- to succeed despite idiocy." - The Simpsons From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:35:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4E4161 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D18FE11 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:35:05 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.16.8 (ClamAV engine v0.97.8) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:70cd:1b48:b0d5:fab3] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.4 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 480494 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:35:04 +0000 Message-ID: <548A1C0C.3080601@radel.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:34:52 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> <20141211231616.255cac2e@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20141211231616.255cac2e@archlinux> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090704040906080503070509" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:35:06 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms090704040906080503070509 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/11/14, 5:16 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:45:57 -0500, Jon Radel wrote: >> On 12/11/14, 3:02 PM, Alex Stangl wrote: >>> Classic Shell Scripting (from O'Reilly) is good. >>> >>> >> I would second this. It's my current go-to reference when writing a >> script where >> I actually care about POSIX and the script being used for more than a >> day. > JFTR bashisms aren't POSIX. A bash script using bashisms won't work in > dash. > Since the OP was calling for less bash-centric documentation I'm not quit= e sure what your point is supposed to be. As for me, yes, I'm aware that non-POSIX extensions are non-POSIX. :-) --Jon Radel --------------ms090704040906080503070509 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILBDCC BRowggQCoAMCAQICEG0Z6qcZT2ozIuYiMnqqcd4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoT FVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQg RW1haWwwHhcNMTEwNDI4MDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0Ix GzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UE ChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBAJKEhFtLV5jUXi+LpOFAyKNTWF9mZfEyTvefMn1V0HhMVbdClOD5J3EHxcZppLkyxPFA GpDMJ1Zifxe1cWmu5SAb5MtjXmDKokH2auGj/7jfH0htZUOMKi4rYzh337EXrMLaggLW1DJq 1GdvIBOPXDX65VSAr9hxCh03CgJQU2yVHakQFLSZlVkSMf8JotJM3FLb3uJAAVtIaN3FSrTg 7SQfOq9xXwfjrL8UO7AlcWg99A/WF1hGFYE8aIuLgw9teiFX5jSw2zJ+40rhpVJyZCaRTqWS D//gsWD9Gm9oUZljjRqLpcxCm5t9ImPTqaD8zp6Q30QZ9FxbNboW86eb/8ECAwEAAaOCAUsw ggFHMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFImCZ33EnSZwAEu0UEh83j2uBG59MB0GA1UdDgQWBBR6E04AdFvG eGNkJ8Ev4qBbvHnFezAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADARBgNV HSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwWAYDVR0fBFEwTzBNoEugSYZHaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tL1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwdAYI KwYBBQUHAQEEaDBmMD0GCCsGAQUFBzAChjFodHRwOi8vY3J0LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20vVVRO QWRkVHJ1c3RDbGllbnRfQ0EuY3J0MCUGCCsGAQUFBzABhhlodHRwOi8vb2NzcC51c2VydHJ1 c3QuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCF1r54V1VtM39EUv5C1QaoAQOAivsNsv1Kv/av QUn1G1rF0q0bc24+6SZ85kyYwTAo38v7QjyhJT4KddbQPTmGZtGhm7VNm2+vKGwdr+XqdFqo 2rHA8XV6L566k3nK/uKRHlZ0sviN0+BDchvtj/1gOSBH+4uvOmVIPJg9pSW/ve9g4EnlFsjr P0OD8ODuDcHTzTNfm9C9YGqzO/761Mk6PB/tm/+bSTO+Qik5g+4zaS6CnUVNqGnagBsePdIa XXxHmaWbCG0SmYbWXVcHG6cwvktJRLiQfsrReTjrtDP6oDpdJlieYVUYtCHVmdXgQ0BCML7q peeU0rD+83X5f27nMIIF4jCCBMqgAwIBAgIQUaWQdTU6RvxxeOjTUN4DtDANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFADCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4G A1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENP TU9ETyBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTAeFw0xMjAz MjcwMDAwMDBaFw0xNTAzMjcyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwGA1UEERMFMjIx NTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UECRMRNjkxNyBS aWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMpSXNzdWVkIHRo cm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNvcnBvcmF0ZSBT ZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYNam9uQHJh ZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMuufqoh9QnyjZTH7UdO wpx6XnRz/94zoK1C1SaAepIRMyInXiwOVwT7iXKtkeRGEQA2vwTyqu5JVcvWkGxlTWPACgDW dDE3296Up2K9CFfrm+RKdlc6xfMklR7qQWyNw5ULkeOZZOIoSAlVAJPhjIvHcf0UPxjTqgtP 4JafBBvL8RFhMAm74I1kWltMcFPVm1sLFDR1CDZ48/zqmhK/0ppbiBGapi8vAO382laFgHaN 8ODBFBffom5zjL/I9SggGGAdtwi7Vp2cjzgtuNVyORPv5Jz9zLylVKlhNvyq3VjbWXuJNw0E J03F/UkjQsqsCkQnSdHAxtPkGhoBw/UvqEsCAwEAAaOCAccwggHDMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFHoT TgB0W8Z4Y2QnwS/ioFu8ecV7MB0GA1UdDgQWBBR8oxwxzLSB4/equQ4EqdH5Fld3sTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUH AwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwVwYDVR0fBFAwTjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRTZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNy bDCBiAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEfDB6MFIGCCsGAQUFBzAChkZodHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bS9DT01PRE9DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsG AQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVs LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAJB+JWM2MbG5rR7/RCEm8bQRziBfl/FztfoV6dDGU Y0uTRegiwM2LA/GHGju7xtp49MrcmEciZs6Di2pvGzS5m/v5IBT0gMK6dyplBmBe4BXzwckE 1MH/iui+VstVHds+36SsQqPCtVmFWlX6QN56F6aGSCjI27f2mUYL3NBr6DPsslRIhF9PamKQ Bp4Y25/hnd+paEGIF6AZM3Uv7TvsTdCaBOt3dLrwUIpyQex5yqO8GPKWwgEPKxKiro7uLNNY yZU4dEEenQIi/4SD49XHd9Zqwf60jKVPeZjcrK7QSSQ8dlOYOGH60WBBFVwD1CCBCLSJnglY Dwh5wcgQG9ZRvjGCBBkwggQVAgEBMIGoMIGTMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3Jl YXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0Eg TGltaXRlZDE5MDcGA1UEAxMwQ09NT0RPIENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2Vj dXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBRpZB1NTpG/HF46NNQ3gO0MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJFMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE0MTIxMTIyMzQ1MlowIwYJKoZI hvcNAQkEMRYEFH+ld0BhWV7UbnPfCGsMRsZoldmfMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZI AWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgbkGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBqzCBqDCB kzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMH U2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBD bGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQUaWQdTU6RvxxeOjT UN4DtDCBuwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgauggagwgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJH cmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBD QSBMaW1pdGVkMTkwNwYDVQQDEzBDT01PRE8gQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBT ZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEFGlkHU1Okb8cXjo01DeA7QwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEADLaZ 1lnVbbUB/LQV3p6TipNY+MjzQD442mG2mRgsexfbQ6V1YtqZycB4r5+nVz2T9st493I5R9jn KcdBSxs+9VdFYnl9+pdQ/fANnAnk1PvJdUUVOlLzWVPWCw0hil3Ea59Mj9/dnNiD5oZRXYrr 4gQz6e18Dsp0czRSUgzyLgZzGmPxjxng4XJyhcKPDuDsgSUWzemjqFVsp9KmUeOeQtJgN+8T 1bNtuPdpV79ZKHeV6aQTvOfdHeDCXFwBUGjSBa/t+oSzX09PoOFmumJDg6K60Ebi2BWIUA07 l5dRdruWC7MTTYHGrhj+0fFhAog0cXEPU8Nk3GSpA8wCZ0dK9AAAAAAAAA== --------------ms090704040906080503070509-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:37:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9865022C for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA9EE3C for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h11so836992wiw.3 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:37:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:hackerspace:user-agent; bh=nbsD+6E0jy6mK/LYRyA9EHtafTteUrHfrwdyN/fCAJw=; b=Dw/ulAEQh41poqWDoIqCaRGrfaLj7GHihiel2RwcKe8WlkExu7PfVN8hTI4iKuMYWN t4qQwAWM3z72BA9A1x7D6Drgb94yAO8gQlisnbOUS/J2fNueGZMq3XrngIEf8b5Z5KfY icxOQk/sSGAPnvoJwu2seo56lM0JNiQjYZwEY2cuaz5/wWVEOzQpgP1+A1YuRvM3hRNq 8Q19QxIBt5bDE6ByDheMu2Ni1EZsIJpgbWBV6uaPOZlX4c0x7+0JoBHbMOeKDQCTBo85 swz0Ty878E+vOpKAJjsiMyuV+hVjvsKGZkFLA49txHDTF6r1adCmwiQeO4mOPQRDwlKk WJ7w== X-Received: by 10.180.99.163 with SMTP id er3mr2132801wib.18.1418337475573; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (host109-149-43-109.range109-149.btcentralplus.com. [109.149.43.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gf6sm3355874wjc.11.2014.12.11.14.37.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:37:54 -0800 (PST) Sender: Tom Jones Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:37:53 +0000 From: Tom Jones To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Booting on Asus T100TA Convertible Tablet Message-ID: <20141211223750.GA4426@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline Hackerspace: 57North Hacklab User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:37:57 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Hackers, I have an Asus T100TA Convertible tablet thing that I have been unable to g= et FreeBSD to boot on. I have installed Ubuntu on it with these[1] instruction= s. There was some discussion[2] on getting FreeBSD on this hardware in April, = but the thread sort of died off. =20 The issue with the hardware stems from the 32bit UEFI with no compatibility mode. The BayTrails SOC is 64 bit. There does not seem to be 32 bit EFI support available in FreeBSD currently. The UEFI[3] mentions that i386 support will be added a later tim= e. I also came across this[4] summer of code project that claimed to add 32bit E= FI support. So EFI seems to be a dead end for now, so I thought I would try to use Grub= 2 to boot. I have a -CURRENT amd64 memstick img, I have tried booting it in the usb po= rt on the dock and via an USB OTG cable on the main tablet itself. I have also copied the root partition from the memstick image onto a partition on the internal mmc. I then attempt to boot using the grub cli like so: > insmod ufs2 > insmod bsd > set root=3D(hd0,gpt3) > kfreebsd /boot/kernel/kernel or > kfreebsd /boot/loader > boot Attempting to boot loader results in the grub cli hanging. Trying to boot t= he kernel directly adds a bar of noise at the top of the screen[5] and the pro= mpt hangs. The noise at the top appears to scroll slightly. On the suspicion that this might be a video issue I have tried setting the following loader variables from grub with the following command: > set kFreeBSD.hw.vga.textmode=3D1 set kFreeBSD.hw.vga.textmode=3D1 hw.vga.textmode=3D1 kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1024x768" kern.vty=3Dvt kern.vty=3Dsc Setting these options either results in the same as[5] or no noise added at= the top of the screen. I am at a loss for what else to try, does anyone on the list have suggestio= ns or pointers? [1]: http://liliputing.com/2013/10/booting-ubuntu-asus-transformer-book-t10= 0.html [2]: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-April/257777= =2Ehtml [3]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/UEFI [4]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2012/IntelEFIBoot [5]: http://imgur.com/SdhXDxS --=20 Tom @adventureloop adventurist.me #pragma summon cthulhu :wq --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAABCgAGBQJUihy9AAoJEDetXgJOHpB8J44P+gP8sctAWLbbKN24czyEBKW2 +QOijiNhONMxcppfVX/BIH/d0rljSpxBIyKOFRKN0ux8n6CQtW/pD0J5VLT8JHTc 6nzQizhyKCiUXXu9kkepqJ6En3qYWlnb3NBFifKJVznkzcM0wwMIka68l59jtY10 7JRTKP0zOgkFbWMOdlwbe+LzOsfFP2Ues30kQh2EP4qYnzoGel0XLKEaRMCur9JS kthyOiEhDQSS0ZuejR8fhLAMOAQioIKp4sU5V7UFMY1nmFW62cj69HMldMf6elSn Fp2Esxg8R4O65ONyls5Jo04yTwCGf4cZpt674TowlC99mn/dxHN6ylKbE3g6pZ7J cmYdHoAKlkE4Or8/Eo1wQRMnHUq4XtXXWD5glKQQong3njxODyr0VbXg+ArVVExo mH/SJyZGu6P0kj+ubi3KjNzLSj5ngmGHmbP6bKzA29YPMUip+LZ3M+ynEEUjj3V+ i1prWVoUpUs4LUrUWuxyEk4aW7pBTtVjZ+mQMT3HQsVeAc+UEn8cjrRTdYfWFNRC lEi+zxeFAnZiq7ZipLXJL+Lx21Tw3d1FASs7nxUbu/06qKIRaCd3ri9Ze1conCAj JcHJercwOg7gd+0TQELW1zOdR5Rzs1+GUW6GokZMAvNec37R9rG23Jw+ILNxfrNW aI6qHNfJg8faGRniq0Il =sErr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:44:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD9435F for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm19-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm19-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57636F1A for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:44:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s2048; t=1418337848; bh=bx3Oi0KiyyVaNECovNfASghTL0BuXOIssmWZ1QCZu5Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=X7WPsF5oeybBvusXIt1bhLHFyJ8IJRXX/afzjoSRi+mpi9l8OdNd3huP3bWBCJbabZhBfyqj2B4aCXyOrOBqK3CU+AeoNImn9cflokQ0pf9+goh+m9ziyoRTAVptcMYg2SVqkalr32c27jqUUCp2mZDf3A3T6AzbnkpYOqfT/iczWp1pBUw/tbuCSzbg6jZPDOJSCtjIfUeoWWaRUP76NMzDubJg0FifkLqT2dR1D9jMYqnOyBoBjrjnH4NB5jlJhCw5cjfARkXcltEdQJCyLnljOtwiF6KiGy6e2OZpN8PWzdZBx6pXu0sG3pCD+8RoWGmweI5ZMSNbRvaw01DnPg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=rocketmail.com; b=WnszMw7PcDI8ieBiyyh4JYDC36F2I+6P0rmVbxui785dpb4auEFJCjOa/2cNLlh9QIGLBoNiI0ngw6BXFgRAq+6kZ2w1dGH6YiW3bQ+QoO1+n8UoRhBIkxYhItIxQNm8jlVPrI5KrqydX8XvFbPVa7alNnUcG3/gpsZ3PjBATb0Odk0TAdMq/dCCxeLwn+/snJKiepqD8T8PSqUMNdN1DjwpjRv+J0UM03F3A+F9aSbniIYLWE8AJiQCSBUXbEChH1EH/w2URbZV/kJH9x4pIET6d9e+sYCxD0x7zxtIz4P9dMXJWnfn2JHl7u83gRmXbV+DAX6EzH9H6815RN8GOA==; Received: from [212.82.98.54] by nm19.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 22:44:08 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.65] by tm7.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 22:44:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp102.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Dec 2014 22:44:08 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 762608.13544.bm@smtp102.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: xokSYpIVM1kGa9vODiysASiv8syuuGgnq2z36U96p7ZtX59 nTauHEU9gDT1pJtOMzf0bEVh86LDuoB3L9Tg8hQMCEUSWZPhpLAnONrctZAY 8uofByjcEGmdUMiZn8wtwvxcAFwiL7emVOqjr6diuzPhflnPP0FkrseQOECi T6Elgu8M6NiAEsZSxr2cKOX208XdEX2cf9XXuHELvHdwEXJcKf9gH.i4eN_h wWl64xaKXCCUINR7Achz08a6Nv8Ql55TAqeDQoPgON9IyRQDSSTN9u7jfwaY GnQoxD.XX74dz3uhzLAfpZaLbB055WtjvyVSFFLDWuiVL16g97cr1vXxKaQK RE2w9fV44sVbOQcqpkJRrcTPnPTsb20xsVsUa_C8NZvIqXHKXEhcdB8BN1MK dyZMoA3gYaco6_cJLbOOdVXrtCfB2qi7Xu1fZYuk8Dd6mYEDem8A2Mp62BNC 0AIrMq8xyLEglR9HsnoR6xcMbH60xbDLUtBxXyjXYTH0MR85nxkvRSBfAxZz 9TKmF_y64pk5WCnDOrhIoBEOwoWcCXA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:44:08 +0100 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-ID: <20141211234408.3aa7a0fb@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <548A1C0C.3080601@radel.com> References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> <20141211231616.255cac2e@archlinux> <548A1C0C.3080601@radel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1-41-g9f4528e (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-arch-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:44:13 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:34:52 -0500, Jon Radel wrote: > On 12/11/14, 5:16 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:45:57 -0500, Jon Radel wrote: > >> On 12/11/14, 3:02 PM, Alex Stangl wrote: > >>> Classic Shell Scripting (from O'Reilly) is good. > >>> > >>> > >> I would second this. It's my current go-to reference when writing > >> a script where > >> I actually care about POSIX and the script being used for more > >> than a day. > > JFTR bashisms aren't POSIX. A bash script using bashisms won't work > > in dash. > > > Since the OP was calling for less bash-centric documentation I'm not > quite sure what your point is supposed to be. As for me, yes, I'm > aware that non-POSIX extensions are non-POSIX. :-) Oops, that was a misunderstanding. English isn't my native language. In that case the link I posted is quite useless. -- "Pull a Homer -- to succeed despite idiocy." - The Simpsons From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:56:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFAAA619; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BEED98; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBBMuFMA033464; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:56:15 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:56:15 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds In-Reply-To: <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> Message-ID: References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:56:15 +0300 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Juan_Ram=F3n_Molina_Menor?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:56:42 -0000 Mat, On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > | Now that the new_xorg and ssp repositories are not being updated any > | more, what is the reason for the 'beefy' machines to build ports only > | once a week? Can we expect the frequency of package upgrades to be higher > | soon? > > Right now, it does take 3 to 4 days to build the packages each week, so > it's a bit hard to make it more often than once a week. We have plans for > the future, with more building machines, it will be announced when it > happens. Am I right supposing that each build is a full one? What are the downsides of incremental builds which should take less than, say, 2 days (if not deepest beats like gettext updates involved)? -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 23:03:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B567B9 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5255117C for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ex7so852177wid.12 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:03:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9H4fDxwLZlU1beCMUIn0qwr9xeo5UJBUDzuucavDDck=; b=Whqn4XecfEr+3L4/hBwj4vHVHUnZp0p0g8ki283dHoC/nRhhk/bQW6q2Pg0BjdLCvg IJNZjREy8kwrrGiU3ozWRZlQarHU1amtMpAwBFCUnz0OwMjWy/bscrPRgoVjNulJ1gPZ QIid2pAE3qONnQH5oV4P3XjHTXIwwfEHiut+ZxIvR+DDYMXBqJuRb8EAG/jI5hqaQ2kj gkCm4ZZCMhwIc2RrofkTyuBP/l2tnvimTfNa7Gz303EfS27sFU3AYTaBId8yM4tuCHjC fA6Rl2CRt9LYda/P0Mk/ZCaJh4t9YIJgFHo/sN4xHSHlm0LY51KCN/GJqNuP8DsSxv95 KpqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.20.6 with SMTP id j6mr2029390wie.59.1418339007825; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:03:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.106.195 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:03:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:03:27 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IKTAVK1_Ve8uX0sOYXasuHiprME Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg no better than the old system From: Adrian Chadd To: doug@safeport.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:03:29 -0000 Hi! I suggest you file a bug (https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/) about this. The ports team is pretty responsive about messups like this. Thanks! -adrian On 11 December 2014 at 07:56, wrote: > Color me disappointed. I did an upgrade for pidgin and WITHOUT WARNING xfce. > firefox and a number of libraries were uninstalled. Putting firefox back > begets > > artemis:~> firefox > XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: > Shared object "libicui18n.so.53" not found, required by "libxul.so" > Couldn't load XPCOM. > > Not asking for help just warning and bitching > > _____ > Douglas Denault > http://www.safeport.com > doug@safeport.com > Voice: 301-217-9220 > Fax: 301-217-9277 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 23:19:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3321140 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (e.febed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.254.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62ACA38F for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBBNJEtF060307; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:19:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:10:45 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Yuri Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? In-Reply-To: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> Message-ID: References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:19:34 -0000 On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Yuri wrote: [ snip ] > Anybody knows of some good book that would cover all essential issues > of Bourne shell programming? This is not a book, but there are a number of useful links at http://www.shelldorado.com/links/index.html#tutorials - many of which pertain to Bourne shell. In particular http://www.grymoire.com/Unix/Sh.html and http://steve-parker.org/sh/sh.shtml have been helpful for me. Maybe they will be for you also. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 23:38:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08BFC495 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B868F7E8 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by bucksport.safeport.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBBNclH6010081 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:38:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:38:47 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pkg no better than the old system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:38:47 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:38:50 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 11 December 2014 at 07:56, wrote: >> Color me disappointed. I did an upgrade for pidgin and WITHOUT WARNING xfce. >> firefox and a number of libraries were uninstalled. Putting firefox back >> begets >> >> artemis:~> firefox >> XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: >> Shared object "libicui18n.so.53" not found, required by "libxul.so" >> Couldn't load XPCOM. >> >> Not asking for help just warning and bitching > > Hi! > > I suggest you file a bug (https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/) about > this. The ports team is pretty responsive about messups like this. > I appreciate the thought, but a PR on this particular instance is not going anywhere because my system was 9.2 and pkg was 1.3.8 something or other. If anyone connected with pkg happens to read this, the problem is I think, due to two things. First with the immense number of interdependencies it seems (to me) that trivial errors in the requirements/dependencies in a make file can have far reaching consequences. E.g., updating pidgin should not require that perl be updated, much less wandering up the tree to xfce and some of the Xorg drivers. pkg is dependent on reasonable (if not correct) definitions within the ports. So given that (assuming the above point is accepted), pkg should not wander too far up the dependency tree, certainly not without warning. Easy to say, probably much harder to implement. If the developers accept both my points, then the later point is the 'bug' not what happened in this specific instance. _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 00:08:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ACFEBE9; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B526B01; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597F8BDC25; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:08:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 39C58BDC24; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:08:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ADB1EDECC4; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:08:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:08:08 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Dmitry Morozovsky Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds Message-ID: <77E4DBD49647EB45C3CF72B7@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Ram=C3=B3n_Molina_Menor?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:08:14 -0000 +--On 12 d=C3=A9cembre 2014 01:56:15 +0300 Dmitry Morozovsky = wrote: | Mat, |=20 | On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |=20 |> | Now that the new_xorg and ssp repositories are not being updated any |> | more, what is the reason for the 'beefy' machines to build ports only |> | once a week? Can we expect the frequency of package upgrades to be |> | higher soon? |>=20 |> Right now, it does take 3 to 4 days to build the packages each week, so |> it's a bit hard to make it more often than once a week. We have plans |> for the future, with more building machines, it will be announced when = it |> happens. |=20 | Am I right supposing that each build is a full one? What are the | downsides of incremental builds which should take less than, say, 2 days | (if not deepest beats like gettext updates involved)? No, it is incremental builds, for all port versions of FreeBSD except CURRENT, because ABI change often, and it's safer to just rebuild everything everytime. Right now, there are two boxes, one for amd64 and one for i386, and the build order is the current quarterly branch for 9 and then 10, then head for 10, 9, CURRENT and 8. Also, when there is a security advisory or errata notice and the jails get updated, there is always a full rebuild. This week, the quarterly branches took about 12 hours to build and had each ~6680 ports to build, and for head, the 10 build wanted to build 11744 (out of 24k) took 15h28 to do so, the 9 wants to build 11747 ports, and has been running for 4h50 as of right now. If I look at last week, on the amd64 box, both quarterly only had ~700 ports to build and it took ~1h20, but on head, 10 had 16779 and took 18h26, 9 had 18638 and took 20h33, CURRENT had 24384 (full) and took 27h13, and 8 had 18652 in 19h17. That's about 90 hours of build, which is 3.75 days. I can say off the top of my head that 2*3.75 > 7, so you can't do it twice a week. Also, we *do* need some time to do maintenance, like updating the host, and other stuff. There was a few SA out today, so next week it'll be full build for everybody, it *will* take about 20 hours for each architecture (except CURRENT where it'll be 27h) that'll be a bit more than 5 days. So, long story short, no, we cannot do twice a week *right now* we have more hardware on the way, that will allow us to triple the build power, and when that gets here, we will certainly do package more often, but it's in the future. --=20 Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 01:51:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F00CBF7; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F31C6B4; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBC1llXj035643; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:48:17 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:47:47 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds In-Reply-To: <77E4DBD49647EB45C3CF72B7@atuin.in.mat.cc> Message-ID: References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <77E4DBD49647EB45C3CF72B7@atuin.in.mat.cc> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:48:17 +0300 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Juan_Ram=F3n_Molina_Menor?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:51:46 -0000 Mat, On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > | Am I right supposing that each build is a full one? What are the > | downsides of incremental builds which should take less than, say, 2 days > | (if not deepest beats like gettext updates involved)? > > No, it is incremental builds, for all port versions of FreeBSD except > CURRENT, because ABI change often, and it's safer to just rebuild > everything everytime. > Right now, there are two boxes, one for amd64 and one for i386, and the > build order is the current quarterly branch for 9 and then 10, then head > for 10, 9, CURRENT and 8. Also, when there is a security advisory or [snip all the very detailed explanaition] Thank you, and all of portmanager team, very much to bring us full up-to-date packages besides all the whole debris you've just described! ;-P Seriously, pretty much of work. Thank you again. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 05:26:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B085C22 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE81CF03 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-5-37.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.5.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F58B3CD90; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:26:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sBC5QVg2002204; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:26:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:26:31 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jon Radel Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-Id: <20141212062631.a3d891fe.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:26:42 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:45:57 -0500, Jon Radel wrote: > On 12/11/14, 3:02 PM, Alex Stangl wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:44:44PM -0800, Yuri wrote: > >> There are some quite tricky areas and questions about sh and hard to > >> find information. > >> > >> Anybody knows of some good book that would cover all essential issues of > >> Bourne shell programming? > > Classic Shell Scripting (from O'Reilly) is good. > > > > > I would second this. It's my current go-to reference when writing a > script where > I actually care about POSIX and the script being used for more than a day. In this case, especially when you care about portability and interoperability, I'd like to suggest reading the following two articles about how to deal with filenames: David A. Wheeler: Fixing Unix/Linux/POSIX Filenames: Control Characters (such as Newline), Leading Dashes, and Other Problems http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/fixing-unix-linux-filenames.html David A. Wheeler: Filenames and Pathnames in Shell: How to do it correctly http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/filenames-in-shell.html Additionally, it's worth knowing the _difference_ between the Bourne Shell and the BASH extensions, because those two shells aren't the same, even though there are people who seem to think this. When the "dash" shell enters the stage, the fun is about to start. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 05:58:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1007E19B for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stangl.us (stangl.us [66.93.193.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEBB20F for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scout.stangl.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16A222806 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:58:03 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stangl.us Received: from stangl.us ([127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (scout.stangl.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id la2MQxB21DEA for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:58:02 -0600 (CST) Received: by scout.stangl.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F09222805; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:58:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:58:02 -0600 From: Alex Stangl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-ID: <20141212055802.GB45115@scout.stangl.us> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> <20141212062631.a3d891fe.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141212062631.a3d891fe.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:58:07 -0000 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:26:31AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > Additionally, it's worth knowing the _difference_ between > the Bourne Shell and the BASH extensions, because those > two shells aren't the same, even though there are people > who seem to think this. When the "dash" shell enters the > stage, the fun is about to start. ;-) Many of us prefer to just target the POSIX standard. This way our scripts should just work on any POSIX-compliant shell. Oftentimes it seems like people use BASH-isms not because there is any requirement to do so, or any performance reason, but simply because they always use BASH and it just seems natural to them to use all of its scripting language. For those of us sticking with POSIX, I'm not sure what the value of looking at BASH extensions is, except possibly if needing to translate a script littered with BASH-isms. If dash helps people see the value of sticking to standards, that seems like a good thing. Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 06:13:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7BB4438 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762343EB for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-5-37.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.5.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E863CD71; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:13:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sBC6DvKJ002329; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:13:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:13:57 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Alex Stangl Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? Message-Id: <20141212071357.c0676fa9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20141212055802.GB45115@scout.stangl.us> References: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> <20141211200241.GA43214@scout.stangl.us> <548A1095.6010301@radel.com> <20141212062631.a3d891fe.freebsd@edvax.de> <20141212055802.GB45115@scout.stangl.us> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:13:59 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:58:02 -0600, Alex Stangl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:26:31AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > Additionally, it's worth knowing the _difference_ between > > the Bourne Shell and the BASH extensions, because those > > two shells aren't the same, even though there are people > > who seem to think this. When the "dash" shell enters the > > stage, the fun is about to start. ;-) > > Many of us prefer to just target the POSIX standard. > This way our scripts should just work on any POSIX-compliant > shell. In this context, always make sure that things you assume to be POSIX _actually are_ POSIX. Many years ago, I had to deal with a problem on... I think it was Solaris (or even SunOS?) with a shell that the "person of wisdom" told me was a POSIX shell. In fact, it wasn't _fully_ POSIX-compliant, and the very exceptional worst case bit. ;-) > Oftentimes it seems like people use BASH-isms not > because there is any requirement to do so, or any performance > reason, but simply because they always use BASH and it just > seems natural to them to use all of its scripting language. Depends. If your learning environment is Linux (or at least a distribution defaulting to bash), you'll probably don't get aware of the differences between shells "of the same production line". And as long as you stick to that environment, you will be safe from surprises. > For those of us sticking with POSIX, I'm not sure what the > value of looking at BASH extensions is, except possibly > if needing to translate a script littered with BASH-isms. That's the situation I was thinking of: Porting bash scripts to regular sh. It's often not as easy as replacing "#!/bin/bash" by "#!/bin/sh". > If dash helps people see the value of sticking to standards, > that seems like a good thing. In my opinion, the _knowledge_ that there are standards like POSIX which help with portability is important, and it helps to fight the statement that "there is only one shell, and that shell is bash, and it's the same shell everywhere and for everyone". :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 07:34:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FEC0F98 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C7F4D93 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554C3160B08 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:28:31 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received:received; s= selector1; t=1418369310; x=1420183711; bh=c2NkOuLT+CE1fsRVVxvU+j zYew/6AZPTMkuwGSG3sO0=; b=FjxqaSGcPr8cGGIgZ9tG0kqMKJjTyW/AQrOOz1 0MR1aZ1JCW7hbKgP2PSQ23wK2X3rHiSLFbiCMQhjLyWTacqt7eUAsxrfCWiOVnSW 0R1MrVEyQH3Tjq5BBDI2mMw/Mg4JEje74c8AFEBm1ReJbuQgHIKbJ7uQ1+JsU5+G afixQ= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 4zsdZVFkqU-V for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:28:30 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A01160B05 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:28:30 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id sBC7Sj38059463; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:28:45 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) From: Olivier Nicole To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: apache2 mod_jk tomcat8 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:28:45 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:34:58 -0000 Hi, Anybody has a working example of using Apache2, mod_jk and tomcat8? Preferably the one installed from FreeBSD ports. I cannot find accurate documentation on how to make these work and if I pull on my hair anymore I will end-up bald before the end of the week-end. TIA, Olivier -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 13:47:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96736A74 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A791AF2 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q200so3111933ykb.21 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:47:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:mime-version :content-type; bh=1PxyKRerScCIJm3iEY8vBmAKFXDEdVn7/Vrw02z3pCg=; b=p7gCAGLIiR+fI/ePBcl7gnHNdMAVceNnpl5eimvwitE+bBesfB76dgalo2nmInw//V joq2NKZkvpzTLxNk+QO1xgzJxeSNoZhf1w20z02J3LZNNBbmVtP3Liy7KqULaWSpbxZ9 oEYBSdfPZBh0EPXLhqb9tfMDBS18me/7EuDjM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=1PxyKRerScCIJm3iEY8vBmAKFXDEdVn7/Vrw02z3pCg=; b=C8WyKsQFkxZzBxxxthlvxfmnxkHWOAEzjGnR3ardVREuDmIGTAgMhVl1KmP1LqPs7f +LYohnLdKvJe/mQOrDYVwOxu3S+90hiRTGbo8ZXo6gZlSTBYGO+bvuGFO8KLGgtvDLZq LB6ohqFa52Vjv7z30e85jjlJTfAd/LM6AtSgc6H0elWPc9fQVI94NJcFtAG34lEzv2KA HJh+KD5jtFvQy3l+mQOFFCt37K/hr0j0iLX5A8NYsjGYriWS5d1EAzpRZLCWQu+RRVfM QA5dyvSvIr2ke788++xKa616+AZyOnehChikzkKejahE7uBhHxkSr/8ZjSehPmKBMDXb F3Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmzdJRluNU2yKHcJd+AzxGWcheHNsmeQBzxyuDYQNtpwBFNkSQfxBVtg4vV7xetrGTvftAs X-Received: by 10.170.150.213 with SMTP id r204mr13027768ykc.48.1418392041196; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:47:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c70sm711433yho.12.2014.12.12.05.47.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.104.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3jzYFz6fPSz5T6R0 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:47:19 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:47:12 -0500 From: Jerry To: User questions Subject: KGpg unable to detect "gpg-agent" Message-ID: <20141212084712.4c3de69b@scorpio> Reply-To: User questions Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/zcgJ3u+alfi8iVKqa_INiTG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:47:22 -0000 --Sig_/zcgJ3u+alfi8iVKqa_INiTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:44:48 -0500 When attempting to use KGpg, I receive this error message: The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file (/home/gera= rd/.gnupg/gpg.conf). However, the agent does not seem to be running. This could result in proble= ms with signing/decryption. Please disable GnuPG Agent from KGpg settings, or fix the agent. The agent is running: gerard 37899 0.0 0.1 45412 3248 - Ss Sun08AM 0:06.36 gpg-a= gent What is the problem? I tried rebooting without success. --=20 Jerry --Sig_/zcgJ3u+alfi8iVKqa_INiTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUivHgAAoJEElTsHIJnX8eVxMIAMWFXoAixb955V9gi6zPJnBZ fM94NibFO04wyJEWZPRMZk2ms/2FW6KCDCZdwuiIPfRj2KtoN37N/HgLG3IAV1hL P/WqM/F0Ewh8Z7eBjtRyUW3IuvaOeVWO5cmNLuayQIYxBa+NPy7deMur0FBh1zA3 fE1PwgAxvU2PYViDm++mKN/ydVZMwTiEqYK7rkskv/Wbn3DsLdOU33fUON4LGe6O eLiHircXCLdIw/wMwkKPEG7FotGPbeJq2GjqnkeoSIx/Bf5fOaFMlhnMCIvU+tYp Y+K3aN+Y8t6Ny4BvChXd77o7AyqfxkGhRqI+tW5/N8Jryub+ON9cvW0Layor25o= =g2NY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zcgJ3u+alfi8iVKqa_INiTG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 14:11:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF7DD88 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:202::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D89DC7 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D0810209AF15; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:11:37 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:11:37 +0000 From: Matt Smith To: User questions Subject: Re: KGpg unable to detect "gpg-agent" Message-ID: <20141212141137.GD52267@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , User questions References: <20141212084712.4c3de69b@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141212084712.4c3de69b@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:11:42 -0000 On Dec 12 08:47, Jerry wrote: >Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:44:48 -0500 > >When attempting to use KGpg, I receive this error message: > >The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file (/home/gerard/.gnupg/gpg.conf). >However, the agent does not seem to be running. This could result in problems with signing/decryption. >Please disable GnuPG Agent from KGpg settings, or fix the agent. > >The agent is running: > >gerard 37899 0.0 0.1 45412 3248 - Ss Sun08AM 0:06.36 gpg-agent > >What is the problem? I tried rebooting without success. > >-- >Jerry I had a similar problem with the mutt email client since the upgrade from 2.0.x to 2.1.x where it couldn't see that gpg-agent was running. I fixed this by adding a new environment variable in my .bashrc startup: export GPG_AGENT_INFO="$HOME/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent" This may help as it looks like a similar issue. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 15:29:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AEBFF41 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x245.google.com (mail-pa0-x245.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06423880 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id et14so41421335pad.8 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:29:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ck9LezbDOjtsziXuKJ7XWV/fekGUWkboYmKKE81bLDs=; b=IdZHAB/262iZrXmZpwezW8aGtEff+IPNGjmjItYBIRc5kiLcmesr9h8engQLMmEf3H L+U4UxkCcIb8pKyRAIhIfxeYG+pd+fBBpVIQceDSUY20NVc1GoTN89wlBubR1K40s6l9 BMWlghlK9oQnzFERjPU5FsiHQHQ2ldVEb74e6fUNlq4xODM67FLlpRRgZQ4TMwIbxl+Q r4Qur9jo28mEI1WD/x7U/CBSOTc+q4jeoYEF6rNUZDnk+Y54GmTQKrkNr20VSZP4EYnK Ixcb5AZPk0HED3cLbE4EcXB1CH8Mvt2TPKKnste+XuOwu5SUDqYtu1ddB7/xPyLEC6sO 3pJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.69.2.68 with SMTP id bm4mr11220640pbd.9.1418398141371; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:29:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <047d7b5d25dc5ddfd6050a068dfc@google.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:29:01 +0000 Subject: SEO Leads From: Daria Jones To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:29:02 -0000 Hi, I wasn't sure of the exact services your firm offers, but I'm assuming it's more than just SEO? I have a network of businesses (About 300 new prospects daily) that are requesting quotes on SEO and web design. Would you be open to receiving/purchasing these from us? Please let me know. Best regards, Daria Jones Business Development [image: Inline image 2] *We respect your privacy and want to make sure you are aware of a few things. By replying to this email, you authorize Web Leads, Inc and our affiliates that can help with your project to call you at the number you provided, and you understand that they may use automated phone technology to call you. At no time are you required to make a purchase. If you are no longer interested in receiving messages or feel you are receiving this message in error* Click here to opt-out. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 18:29:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB3D8C5 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58624E45 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzUxm-0000pz-AC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:29:14 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:29:14 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:29:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: KGpg unable to detect "gpg-agent" Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:29 -0500 Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <20141212084712.4c3de69b@scorpio> <20141212141137.GD52267@xtaz.uk> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:29:24 -0000 Matt Smith wrote: > On Dec 12 08:47, Jerry wrote: >>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:44:48 -0500 >> >>When attempting to use KGpg, I receive this error message: >> >>The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file >>(/home/gerard/.gnupg/gpg.conf). However, the agent does not seem to be >>running. This could result in problems with signing/decryption. Please >>disable GnuPG Agent from KGpg settings, or fix the agent. >> >>The agent is running: >> >>gerard 37899 0.0 0.1 45412 3248 - Ss Sun08AM 0:06.36 >>gpg-agent >> >>What is the problem? I tried rebooting without success. >> >>-- >>Jerry > > I had a similar problem with the mutt email client since the upgrade > from 2.0.x to 2.1.x where it couldn't see that gpg-agent was running. I > fixed this by adding a new environment variable in my .bashrc startup: > > export GPG_AGENT_INFO="$HOME/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent" > > This may help as it looks like a similar issue. > This is a cosmetic thing, as noted the agent is actually running. There has been a patch for this submitted to KDE so at some time in the future, perhaps the next minor-point release, when kgpg gets rebuilt with the new patch this error will go away. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 19:34:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA243A4 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F1D813 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 142so3424120ykq.30 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:34:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=nE7vJlUzuAobrsVkIjty+BErCmXG1thSE7QWQsLlzx4=; b=o8BrDwV8LCPjgcy0104HvvRUm01xaYncROIvg2YFL9dt1V0mkc+OmfQaamgkPYUlMu Q9dueZCasGCrB7mCNwd+SY8R1mhN8XTocATjQ6qkhN3O5eUyUqmujc4WhHgJbC9xIWI5 UG9Cve8mssTiKd6UFRqHQf0f2IJZfBTQPhauw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=nE7vJlUzuAobrsVkIjty+BErCmXG1thSE7QWQsLlzx4=; b=gpbiJlwe1NRTcyw9BoVZEK7rezVgo/qGKwrCHYPBVR8bm3yDCD6ICp8Lbb88k+7d2b F/PcXRLHGobL/ato8WyS5Yu1c9T445hu1Zj6KErppMemITmCHQWk0mwB/k5nIkcDHhNM eHTEHrT8qHJSRyPdZQ4S4xDjM3kiwdt2ihtTrb9HPPDqU9icRph7DUUP1/vG4Vc30xPi g8gRM2rbv0UL3inF8dwbx6Q44+fOJ+ryAHhxwM6AZJ/OcScKSe39/uJpTrHfE/vyPUlk KRaNvGrMpUvVnnnsT/ShKKf24iKSAvSdTx12uSMm+BLYM90An34AvT2pfPLo8Eb2Coed Ldnw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluNRygIerXq+2Nrpy+nXVnOup5iSPVZcNmVHOXyv06fNzylXmGB6yWEf2DKmkmympz+KxZ X-Received: by 10.236.223.164 with SMTP id v34mr13093760yhp.27.1418412848834; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:34:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s68sm1208090yhp.29.2014.12.12.11.34.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:34:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.104.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3jzhy72vNqz5T6R0; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:34:07 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:34:00 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KGpg unable to detect "gpg-agent" Message-ID: <20141212143400.2a5bfe12@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20141212084712.4c3de69b@scorpio> <20141212141137.GD52267@xtaz.uk> Reply-To: User questions Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/FeevD+9dz1pLEovTtuxBg_Z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:34:10 -0000 --Sig_/FeevD+9dz1pLEovTtuxBg_Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:29 -0500, Michael Powell stated: >Matt Smith wrote: > >> On Dec 12 08:47, Jerry wrote: >>>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:44:48 -0500 >>> >>>When attempting to use KGpg, I receive this error message: >>> >>>The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file >>>(/home/gerard/.gnupg/gpg.conf). However, the agent does not seem to be >>>running. This could result in problems with signing/decryption. Please >>>disable GnuPG Agent from KGpg settings, or fix the agent. >>> >>>The agent is running: >>> >>>gerard 37899 0.0 0.1 45412 3248 - Ss Sun08AM 0:06.36 >>>gpg-agent >>> >>>What is the problem? I tried rebooting without success. >>> >>>-- >>>Jerry >>=20 >> I had a similar problem with the mutt email client since the upgrade >> from 2.0.x to 2.1.x where it couldn't see that gpg-agent was running. I >> fixed this by adding a new environment variable in my .bashrc startup: >>=20 >> export GPG_AGENT_INFO=3D"$HOME/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent" >>=20 >> This may help as it looks like a similar issue. >>=20 > >This is a cosmetic thing, as noted the agent is actually running. There ha= s=20 >been a patch for this submitted to KDE so at some time in the future,=20 >perhaps the next minor-point release, when kgpg gets rebuilt with the new= =20 >patch this error will go away. > >-Mike I used the: export GPG_AGENT_INFO=3D"$HOME/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent" suggestion, = and all is well. Thanks! --=20 Jerry --Sig_/FeevD+9dz1pLEovTtuxBg_Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUi0MoAAoJEElTsHIJnX8eFKYIAMWTu0z2JgjMbtDhShi+L5XM wO8GhHKKk85A2m5/QVGezMJLsnfn6j3MaqPic+h4+eMzk7PoRITBgVqCS1XyFV+J m6HNTPaLamfQiokqPCVVIDrnV8ATgWWmC0gOuQ75aX2D2e5u+7kT5DhByzOwOh+T gIiTdVaC2Rpm95wYFwDDo6qTDPwZ6e0rX561f1GoDerNUXHUpotkRfH71UqUtoWk FuEY8vLc5UTQyesmAdfMd99ZeboIWQ4zI/ymj7bzeKyjomYnFo/ubT2Uv6pTmMKT aXtjj3It35hdepXGc9DiQi66N7OKvyL7Un1I/HH1Yo4zO9QX09XDzstFqN736fo= =BZl4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FeevD+9dz1pLEovTtuxBg_Z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 19:35:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C793528 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omr-m1.mx.aol.com (omr-m1.mx.aol.com [64.12.224.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2413F856 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mtaomg-mab01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mab01.mx.aol.com [172.26.249.83]) by omr-m1.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 45E923800012A for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:35:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-lia04e.mail.aol.com (core-lia04.mail.aol.com [10.76.8.4]) by mtaomg-mab01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 1F80838000082 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:35:34 -0500 (EST) From: Dess222@aol.com Full-name: Dess222 Message-ID: <11aeaf.1e70a9de.41bc9d85@aol.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:35:34 -0500 Subject: Re: KGpg unable to detect "gpg-agent" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 9.7 sub 3039 X-Originating-IP: [71.207.179.81] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1418412934; bh=ULNz+mkPca/5TgY/+PhpmhHxnvP0m186pjRtViZZa7I=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CzoHhLVqByg8dls5/LQO6ShMnMsrU3eI6ucYIB1jeZradMiydIZBZSCb8F8FDnlvL PHT7E7fbtMqacL4VH5VqTZG1PI01Q1p24Wo7Efaem5nJW+0QgMYrNP44W/c83EvYSQ RcSUbWuWBbk3wN+Cm3SKFjqFbB2Vb4Mc2XiwvuvY= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1af953548b43862fef Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:35:41 -0000 Please delete my email address. Lou In a message dated 12/12/2014 1:34:17 P.M. Central Standard Time, jerry@seibercom.net writes: On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:29 -0500, Michael Powell stated: >Matt Smith wrote: > >> On Dec 12 08:47, Jerry wrote: >>>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:44:48 -0500 >>> >>>When attempting to use KGpg, I receive this error message: >>> >>>The use of GnuPG Agent is enabled in GnuPG's configuration file >>>(/home/gerard/.gnupg/gpg.conf). However, the agent does not seem to be >>>running. This could result in problems with signing/decryption. Please >>>disable GnuPG Agent from KGpg settings, or fix the agent. >>> >>>The agent is running: >>> >>>gerard 37899 0.0 0.1 45412 3248 - Ss Sun08AM 0:06.36 >>>gpg-agent >>> >>>What is the problem? I tried rebooting without success. >>> >>>-- >>>Jerry >> >> I had a similar problem with the mutt email client since the upgrade >> from 2.0.x to 2.1.x where it couldn't see that gpg-agent was running. I >> fixed this by adding a new environment variable in my .bashrc startup: >> >> export GPG_AGENT_INFO="$HOME/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent" >> >> This may help as it looks like a similar issue. >> > >This is a cosmetic thing, as noted the agent is actually running. There has >been a patch for this submitted to KDE so at some time in the future, >perhaps the next minor-point release, when kgpg gets rebuilt with the new >patch this error will go away. > >-Mike I used the: export GPG_AGENT_INFO="$HOME/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent" suggestion, and all is well. Thanks! -- Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 22:35:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDC8D9C1 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omr-m06.mx.aol.com (omr-m06.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE947CB7 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.175]) by omr-m06.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id B00A670000089 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:29:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-mmd002c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mmd002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.101.197]) by mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 40A3938000083 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:29:57 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: the FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE installaer don't recognize the "hard disk" of an ACER ES1-111M-C5PH X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Xavier Freebsd Questio Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailer: AOL Webmail STANDARD Received: from 176.85.56.59 by webmail-vm123.sysops.aol.com (64.12.251.106) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:29:57 -0500 Message-Id: <8D1E4724B125908-16E4-F22A@webmail-vm123.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [176.85.56.59] Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:29:57 -0500 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aim.com; s=20140625; t=1418423397; bh=9r0BNAq2xNagXBABffdejERx5MLbWGHLnnos13E9Msw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=q2dCdDo9EzfJhRzRrCPFIKjfB2Vde0DiEv51P9g8GqxNc/xlh+bdinmpB5HODZJ9o E6y8xf49cy87kTuu3UGbEohkyiyAWg1aB1K57BPwTIfnr3xM91FVxjkMu7oyCAa7ob tw1YjZw0F8Id5e7Z7viKtayyE1SytxFhgY9ZNEjk= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afeaf548b6c652046 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:35:57 -0000 Hi,check=20the=20following=20link:=0D=0A=0D=0Ahttp://pastebin.com/Sapbh2FY=0D=0A= =0D=0AYouwill=20see=20that=20FreeBSD=20do=20not=20recognize=20the=20"hard=20disk= "=20thismachine=20=0D=0Ause.Isthis=20hard=20disk=20type=20not=20compatible=20wit= h=20this=20FreeBSD?=0D=0A=0D=0AThanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 05:05:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67BD8B10 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m12-16.163.com (m12-16.163.com [220.181.12.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F217E7B2 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:04:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; bh=wHlTs hDmdIUE40WZc7rqk/RryOOPodL7AgUMQUODYRQ=; b=fZ4ZsGVSuV8O7Fckh41hk xYVgzqKt+Q1EClzHnBXOoDWALAXYjpRcIpLHJApUCgFtyf63g/77ZNqHhh0x/9a2 JII2NoasU3HOP6AsEy8/pqBxShtbJ7jWXXnrsRIfU3aDeGHnksHBXJPGyF0Aelxe EjaVlj2A0Z/Gzm5s9ShuiQ= Received: from nqtvyad (unknown [113.99.171.132]) by smtp12 (Coremail) with SMTP id EMCowECpllzxyItUkJg8Aw--.602S3; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:04:49 +0800 (CST) From: "Michael Xiao" <13712501806@163.com> Reply-To: ming@jacksonoptical.com.cn To: "freebsd-questions" Subject: Intelligent discolor sunglasses availible Message-ID: <201412131308335331233@163.com> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:08:33 +0800 X-Mailer: Foxmail 6, 10, 201, 20 [cn] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-CM-TRANSID: EMCowECpllzxyItUkJg8Aw--.602S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoWxJrWfGr1xXrW5Gw1DAFykuFg_yoW8XF45pr Z5Jr4qvrs5Wry0yw1rG3yxW34FkrsxAw4DZF1qkryDAr45Cr95tFnFk34jqa9rWrn3Z3yF 9w1YgryqvF98C37anT9S1TB71UUUjcUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jGHq7UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [113.99.171.132] X-CM-SenderInfo: zprtliisvqimiqw6il2tof0z/1tbiyRJh0lQGwNLqIQAAsj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:05:00 -0000 RGVhcixQbGVhc2VwYXljbG9zZWF0dGVudGlvbjpJbnRlbGxpZ2VudHBob3RvY2hyb209aWNzdW5n bGFzc2VzaXNhZ3JlYXRpbnZlbnRpb25sYXRlbHlpbnRoZWZpZWxkb2Z0aGVzdW5nbGFzcz1lcy5J dHVzZXNjb21wdXRlcmNoaXBzYW5kbGlxdWlkY3J5c3RhbGxlbnN0ZWNobm9sb2d5LHRoPWVmdW5j dGlvbnNncmVhdGx5c3VwZXJpb3J0b3RoZXRyYWRpdGlvbmFsc3VuZ2xhc3Nlcy5BY2Nvcj1kaW5n dG90aGVpbnRlbnNpdHlvZnN1bnNoaW5lLGl0YXV0b21hdGljYWxseWFkanVzdHRoZWxlbnNjbz1s b3JpbjAuNXNlY29uZHMsc290aGV1c2VyYWx3YXlzc3RheXNpbnRoZW1vc3Rjb21mb3J0YT1ibGV2 aXN1YWxzdGF0ZS5UaGVyZWlzbm9iYXR0ZXJ5YW5kc3dpdGNoLHVzaW5nc29sYXJlbmVyZ3lhPXNr aW5ldGljZW5lcmd5LGZ1bGx5aW50ZWxsZWN0dWFsaXplZC5JbnRlbGxpZ2VudHBob3RvYz1ocm9t aWNzdW5nbGFzc2VzaXN2ZXJ5c2Vuc2l0aXZldG9saWdodC5JdGNhbmRpc2NvbG9yaW5jbG91ZD15 cmFpbnlkYXkuT2Zjb3Vyc2UsdGhlc3VuaXNzdHJvbmdlcix0aGVsZW5zYmVjb21lc2Rhcmtlci5J bnN1bm55ZD1heXNkcml2aW5nLGFzbG9uZ2FzdGhlc3VuYXBwZWFyZWRpbnRoZWZyb250b2Z0aGVj YXIsaXRjPWFuYXV0b21hdGljYWxseWNoYW5nZWNvbG9ydG9rZWVwb3V0c3Vuc2hpbmUsYnV0a2Vl cHRoZT1jbGVhcnZpc2lvbi5UaGlzZ3JlYXRseWltcHJvdmV0aGVkcml2aW5nc2FmZXR5LkludGhl Y2FyZGVtby5MZWZ0IHBpY3R1cmUuQ2hpcGluZHVjdGlvbnRvdGhlc3Vuc2hpbmUsdGhlbGVuc2Vz PWJlY29tZXNkYXJrYXRvbmNlLlJpZ2h0cGljdHVyZS5XaGVudGhlY2hpcGlzYmxvY2tlZCx0aGVs ZW5zZXNjb2xvcnF1aWM9a2x5YmVjb21lc3NoYWxsb3cuICAgICAgICAgIE91dGRvb3JkZW1vTGVm dCBwaWN0dXJlLkNoaXBpbmR1Y3Rpb250b3RoZXN1bnNoaW5lLHRoZWxlbnM9ZXNiZWNvbWVzZGFy a2F0b25jZS5SaWdodHBpY3R1cmUuV2hlbnRoZWNoaXBpc2Jsb2NrZWQsdGhlbGVuc2VzY29sb3Jx dT1pY2tseWJlY29tZXNzaGFsbG93LiAgICAgICAgICAgVGhlcmVhcmUzbWludXRlc3ZpZGVvdG9z aG93aG93aXR3b3Jrcy5odHRwOi8vdi55b3VrdS5jb20vdl9zaG93L2lkX1hPRFEwTkRNME56UTAu aHRtbChQbGVhc2VpZ25vcmV0aGUyMHNlY29uZHNhZHNpbnRoZXZpZGVvKS4gIE5ld3RlY2hub2xv Z3ksIG5ld3Byb2R1Y3RzLCBuZXdidXNpbmVzc29wcG9ydHVuaXRpZXMsIGRvbid0bWlzcy4gICBU aGFua3NNaWNoYWVsWGlhb0phY2tzb25PcHRpY2FsTWFudWZhY3RvcnlMdGQuICA= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 05:15:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15793C4B for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB30B88C for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter21-d.gandi.net (mfilter21-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.149]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD66172085 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 06:15:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter21-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter21-d.gandi.net (mfilter21-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rbvc+3Oz-nhr for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 06:15:43 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.141 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.141]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0E793172074 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 06:15:42 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:45:42 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 10.1 rc3 uefi : kernel trap 12 : during install boot ... Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Message-ID: <7f9e8dcf10e3eaa11077e24e4ddc99d3@kathe.in> X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 05:15:48 -0000 hello, my system is a hp aio 18 with uefi support. i am getting the following while booting from the 10.1-rc3-uefi-memstick installer; unknown: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x13 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80965dc5 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffffff814b4800 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffffff814b4910 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 () trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80961d90 at ??+0 #1 0xffffffff80926eb5 at ??+0 #2 0xffffffff80d23ccf at ??+0 #3 0xffffffff80d23fe8 at ??+0 #4 0xffffffff80d2364a at ??+0 #5 0xffffffff80d09502 at ??+0 #6 0xffffffff8096771d at ??+0 #7 0xffffffff8096797f at ??+0 #8 0xffffffff809582d2 at ??+0 #9 0xffffffff80408007 at ??+0 Uptime: 1s i had no other way to send in the information except typing it in this email. if this isn't the right method, or if this isn't the right mailing list, i apologize, and would appreciate getting pointers to the appropriate approach. best regards, ~mayuresh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 13:27:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D667C929 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9647C917 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter19-d.gandi.net (mfilter19-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.147]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B77441C06A for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:27:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter19-d.gandi.net Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter19-d.gandi.net (mfilter19-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2U2HQTJh6wT for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:27:09 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.145 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.145]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DE65041C04B for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:27:09 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:57:09 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10.1 rc3 uefi : kernel trap 12 : during install boot ... Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in In-Reply-To: <7f9e8dcf10e3eaa11077e24e4ddc99d3@kathe.in> References: <7f9e8dcf10e3eaa11077e24e4ddc99d3@kathe.in> Message-ID: X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:27:14 -0000 okay, got it, it was kind-a nutty on my part to have been trying out rc3 when release has already been out in the wild for a while. getting release memstick image now. ~mayuresh On 2014-12-13 10:45, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > hello, > > my system is a hp aio 18 with uefi support. > > i am getting the following while booting from the > 10.1-rc3-uefi-memstick installer; > > unknown: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0x13 > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80965dc5 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffffff814b4800 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffffff814b4910 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 0 () > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 0 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff80961d90 at ??+0 > #1 0xffffffff80926eb5 at ??+0 > #2 0xffffffff80d23ccf at ??+0 > #3 0xffffffff80d23fe8 at ??+0 > #4 0xffffffff80d2364a at ??+0 > #5 0xffffffff80d09502 at ??+0 > #6 0xffffffff8096771d at ??+0 > #7 0xffffffff8096797f at ??+0 > #8 0xffffffff809582d2 at ??+0 > #9 0xffffffff80408007 at ??+0 > Uptime: 1s > > i had no other way to send in the information except typing it in this > email. > > if this isn't the right method, or if this isn't the right mailing > list, i apologize, and would appreciate getting pointers to the > appropriate approach. > > best regards, > > ~mayuresh > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 20:05:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5261B2 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m2.gritton.org (gritton.org [63.246.134.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583AAFC3 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m2.gritton.org (gritton.org [63.246.134.121]) by m2.gritton.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBDJxYDJ061105 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:59:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jamie@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by m2.gritton.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBDJxXfj061104; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:59:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jamie@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: gritton.org: www set sender to jamie@freebsd.org using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 10.1-RELEASE: jail security errors - GID 0 not dropped completely X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:59:33 -0700 From: James Gritton In-Reply-To: <042a01d011bd$e4cb1530$ae613f90$@mgedv.net> References: <042a01d011bd$e4cb1530$ae613f90$@mgedv.net> Message-ID: <5f292bdb8f6779ab8868d51d8dbce7c3@gritton.org> X-Sender: jamie@freebsd.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:05:08 -0000 On 2014-12-06 18:34, no@spam@mgEDV.net wrote: > hi guys, > > as the "real" application faces the same problems, i created a test > jail on a clean box just to check the behaviour using "/usr/bin/id". > > problem description (hopefully i nailed it): > if a jailed process needs any .so for startup, the path to those *.so > needs to be world r-x, although the GID of the jail execute user > is allowed to r/x the dirs, where the *.so files are to be found. > there could be (ordering) errors with SET(e)GID in jail_* functions, > because it works as expected when prefixing with "chroot -g test /". > the EGID is dropped to the jail user's gid, but the GID is still 0! > we end up with a jailed proc (UID=999, GID=0), which of course is > not allowed to access the dirs for the *.so's to be loaded by exec. > [see end of message for setup details] There does indeed seem to be a missing setgid() in jail (compared to jexec, which gets it right). Could you please file a big report on this? Then I'll get it fixed up. - Jamie