Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:25:03 -0700 (PDT) From: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Diomidis Spinellis <dds@aueb.gr>, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFT: BSD-licensed grep [Fwd: cvs commit: ports/textproc/bsdgrep Makefile distinfo] Message-ID: <216970.93731.qm@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <48593673.8030607@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Mer 18/6/08, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> ha scritto: ... >=20 > No, "here is a new bsd grep, but change all your > scripts that have=20 > relied on legitimate behavior of grep in the past" is > a non-starter. I=20 > haven't checked POSIX to see whether the particular > construction I am=20 > using fits the spec or not, but I really don't care. We > need to be=20 > feature-compatible with the GNU versions of these tools, > both for=20 > legacy scripts and also for those users migrating over from > linux. >=20 OK, I probably exaggerated in that GNUisms are not all that bad. Let's look= at it this way.. the problem is in regex so I don't see fit to start adapt= ing ugly workarounds in BSD grep. If we really *need* the workaround I want= to be able to ifdef it out for my own testing purposes. By all means we will still need a GNU grep port available so we can have th= e best from both worlds (I already a port and sent it to Gabor for testing = but I don't want to maintain it). Pedro. =0A=0A=0A ___________________________________ =0AScopri il Blog di Yah= oo! Mail: trucchi, novit=E0, consigli... e la tua opinione!=0Ahttp://www.ym= ailblogit.com/blog/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?216970.93731.qm>