Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:09:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Kenneth Culver <culverk@yumyumyum.org>, Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting libc_r from -current to -stable Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10208291706370.16346-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3D6E85D5.BF12289E@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > -stable already has flockfile and friends in both libc and libc_r. > > The only work in porting -current's libc_r to -stable in this > > case is to keep libc_r's uthread_file.c which implements them. > > Whoops! That's what I get for assuming, based on the error > message, instead of trusting the code! > > I see the weak symbol. > > How is it that he's getting an "undefined symbol"?!? He's porting -current's lack of uthread_file.c ;-) In -current, flockfile and friends are in libc. That's not the case in -stable, so by removing uthread_file.c in -stable, you also remove the symbols within it. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10208291706370.16346-100000>