Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:12:59 -0800 From: Dennis Glatting <freebsd@penx.com> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Updated llvm/clang to 3.4 in r261991 Message-ID: <1392599579.45152.9.camel@btw.pki2.com> In-Reply-To: <4702D3BA-E020-4787-86E9-2AB13E4562E3@FreeBSD.org> References: <6FA0FC8C-ABAA-433A-94AF-43AF84AD2AE4@FreeBSD.org> <1392581782.45152.6.camel@btw.pki2.com> <4702D3BA-E020-4787-86E9-2AB13E4562E3@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 21:38 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 16 Feb 2014, at 21:16, Dennis Glatting <freebsd@penx.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 21:06 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> I have just upgraded our copy of llvm/clang to 3.4 release, in r261991. > >> This version supports all of the features in the current working draft > >> of the upcoming C++ standard, provisionally named C++1y. > ... > > Is OpenMP supported in this version? Clang 3.4 from ports barfs: > > No, this is still being worked on in trunk. Support from Intel was > announced last August, here: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-August/031595.html > > I hope it will be ready to appear in 3.5 release. There is currently an > experimental version, based on clang 3.3, published here: > > http://clang-omp.github.io/ > Thanks. I was confused between Phronix, the clang web site content, and trying to compile. > -Dimitry >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1392599579.45152.9.camel>