Date: Tue, 09 Jul 1996 20:49:48 +0100 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Russell Epstein <drizzt@shadowlands.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multi-processors Message-ID: <28696.836941788@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jul 1996 12:54:01 CDT." <199607091754.MAA03074@shadowlands.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[CC:'d back to questions as I dunno the answer to the second part ] Russell Epstein wrote in message ID <199607091754.MAA03074@shadowlands.com>: > I know mudos does not support multi-processors. I mainly wanted it > for use of running other apps like emacs and compiling drivers > etc... I also use the machine for a few other purposes. But I > think we are just going to buy a P-166 and be done with it. Probably wise. I'd love to see a MUD that could eat a P166! I know that LambdaMOO too a SPARC down to it's knees, but that was a memory problem (it's a memory hog) as far as I remember. That, and SPARC's (or the ones that were used to run LambdaMOO on) aren't all that fast by modern standards :-) > Ohh yea one more question. I noticed you have support for the > Cyrinx chips. I was looking at the Cyrinx 166 and it is 100 bucks > cheaper than the P-166. Have you seen any problems with the Cyrinx > chips? Dunno. Other readers of -questions care to comment? Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28696.836941788>