Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:57:30 +0900
From:      Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>
To:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/lang Makefile ports/lang/gcc42 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/gcc42/files java-patch-hier
Message-ID:  <20111211225730.bcf74864.daichi@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112112031510.11601@zbenl.fvgr>
References:  <201112110906.pBB96u1e009117@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111211203003.45c70bc4.daichi@freebsd.org> <20111211212323.d224e8a3.daichi@freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112112031510.11601@zbenl.fvgr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From some investigation, now I think I can do to build mozc
in another way. Removed gcc42 ok ;)
Thank you!

On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:37:59 +0800 (CIT)
Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Daichi GOTO wrote:
> > I'm trying to use gcc46 (USE_GCC=4.4+) instead. Wait up a day...
> 
> Cool, thank you.  Looking at the condition in the port
>  .if (${OSVERSION} < 1000000 && ${OSVERSION} > 9000000) || ${OSVERSION} < 802503
> this really was a tight miss in terms of checking INDEX.
> 
> Note, if for some reason gcc46 does not work you could try gcc44 by
> issuing USE_GCC=4.4 (without the +).  Though both that and the original
> gcc42 would be struggling on FreeBSD 10.x, for example, without hacks.

Roger :)

> Thanks for looking into it, and sorry.  This was supposed to be a
> non-brainer (zero dependent ports according to the INDEX), or I would
> not have done it at this point.
> 
> Gerald

-- 
Daichi GOTO



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111211225730.bcf74864.daichi>