From owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 15 06:56:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE99416A419 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.kandeler@hob.de) Received: from mailgate.hob.de (mailgate.hob.de [212.185.199.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1FF13C459 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.kandeler@hob.de) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.hob.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A758728152 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:56:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailgate.hob.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate.hob.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02879-03 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:56:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap.hob.de (mail2.hob.de [172.25.1.102]) by mailgate.hob.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2570C28146 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:56:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.22.0.192] (linux04.hob.de [172.22.0.192]) by imap.hob.de (Postfix on SuSE eMail Server 2.0) with ESMTP id C3785DF7B2 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:56:22 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Kandeler Organization: HOB To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:56:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <6C851D25-4B3A-4563-8363-C1BD9A14C1AC@mac.com> <200802141452.24071.christian.kandeler@hob.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200802150756.22455.christian.kandeler@hob.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at hob.de Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Montecito: solved... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the IA-64 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:56:25 -0000 On Friday 15 February 2008 01:03, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Will you incorporate this patch into a snapshot or are you going > > to wait with that until the cleaner solution is there? > > It's in -CURRENT and 7-STABLE and will also be in 7.0-RELEASE. Thanks. By the way: Do you see any obvious reason why the failure would happen on Montecito systems, but not on earlier ones? It's not as if those didn't have caches... Regards, Christian Kandeler