Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Oct 2018 06:17:10 +0100
From:      Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   =?UTF-8?Q?Dependencies_=e2=80=93_drm-kmod=2c_drm-stable-kmod_and_dr?= =?UTF-8?Q?m-next-kmod?=
Message-ID:  <b7e0571c-c233-e4d6-7a2e-86adc49b4600@gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to <https://www.freshports.org/graphics/drm-kmod/#requiredtorun>:

- for drm-kmod, drm-stable-kmod is the sole runtime dependency.

Below, I see -next- (not -stable-):

$ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-kmod
drm-next-kmod
drm-next-kmod
$

– is that contrary to what's at FreshPorts? (Do I misunderstand something?)

----

More:

$ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-kmod
$

$ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-stable-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
$ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-stable-kmod
$

$ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-next-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
$ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-next-kmod
drm-kmod
drm-kmod
$

– is there _truly_ intended to be some dependency between drm-next-kmod and drm-kmod?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b7e0571c-c233-e4d6-7a2e-86adc49b4600>