Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 16:03:33 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Cc: paulbeard@mac.com, advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: web write-up] Message-ID: <20030108160333.2b88a669.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030108203848.GA17423@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <3E1C8287.1020506@mac.com> <20030108203848.GA17423@pasternak.w.lub.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:38:48 +0100 Micha³ Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> wrote: > paul beard [Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:56:55AM -0800]: > > I wonder if anyone has any comment on this web article. The > > results of the benchmarking seem to portray FreeBSD in a less than > > favourable light. > > UFS is worse, than EXT2? > > I can't belive it. > > Do you think that comparsion is _real_? Who could pay for stuff > like that? Lindows.com? :S Actually, looking over the article, it never mentioned the use of softupdates on the FreeBSD file system. I wonder who exactly was doing the configuration and tuning. -- Tom Rhodes To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030108160333.2b88a669.trhodes>