Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:38:46 -0600
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gahr@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds.
Message-ID:  <20120120193846.GD18747@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F194587.8070301@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F18C5F9.2050900@FreeBSD.org> <20120120093057.GA5662@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F194587.8070301@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:44:23AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>   HAS_SSE!=  ${SYSCTL} -i -n hw.instruction_sse 2>/dev/null
> 
> It's only a warning though, so INDEX generation should still work.

Yes, but the warning makes portmgrs sad.  It leaves 'junk' in the
output of the file that's used to document why certain packages were
skipped during a build.

Someone(TM) should write this up as a hint for the Dos-And-Donts in
the Porter's Handbook.

(This particular thing is even worse on clang, where other, non-sysctl,
tests have this same annoying side-effect.)

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120120193846.GD18747>