Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:31:43 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 107125 for review
Message-ID:  <200610021731.43477.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200610022120.k92LK4cA000243@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200610022120.k92LK4cA000243@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 02 October 2006 17:20, Robert Watson wrote:
> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=107125
> 
> Change 107125 by rwatson@rwatson_peppercorn on 2006/10/02 21:19:13
> 
> 	Audit events for getpath system calls, POSIX message kqueues.
> 	(Query: FreeBSD system calls are kmq*, but library interfaces are
> 	mq_* -- should the audit identifiers be MQ_*?).

I would use MQ_* to stick with the userland API.  Don't the audit events 
typically reflect the userland API?

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610021731.43477.jhb>