Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:22:16 -0800 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> To: Benjamin Kaduk <bjkfbsd@gmail.com> Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r278479 - in head: etc sys/kern Message-ID: <D10BFD0F-E645-4AB9-AA56-F21A498E39A2@me.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ5_RoDTss2BuRWAyjeT6oC_hBLU_hjGJXriJ5Rd5eK3CnVUMQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <bc7b9fa5-40fd-4d87-88d7-1e7a616561d8@me.com> <CAJ5_RoDTss2BuRWAyjeT6oC_hBLU_hjGJXriJ5Rd5eK3CnVUMQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 9, 2015, at 15:29, Benjamin Kaduk <bjkfbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > The question boils down to: is the time saved by implementing it this = way worth the tradeoff of architectural purity. Yes, that was a tradeoff. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D10BFD0F-E645-4AB9-AA56-F21A498E39A2>