From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 20:00:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356BA16A46B for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC6213C458 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l91K0Csr093567 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:00:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l91K0Cks093566; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:00:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:00:12 GMT Message-Id: <200710012000.l91K0Cks093566@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Daniel Roethlisberger Cc: Subject: Re: ports/116778: security/nmap ping-scan misses some hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Roethlisberger List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:00:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/116778; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Roethlisberger To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: "Mark D. Foster" Subject: Re: ports/116778: security/nmap ping-scan misses some hosts Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:23:25 +0200 Can you verify that it's actually nmap that is either not sending all the ICMP Echo Requests you'd expect, or not correctly registering all returning ICMP Echo Replies, using tcpdump on all the involved boxes? Also, please compare what you see on the wire with what nmap claims to be doing (enable verbose mode and packet tracing). -- Daniel Roethlisberger