Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Randall Stewart <rrs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-8@freebsd.org
Subject:   svn commit: r206180 - stable/8/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <201004051333.o35DXs5X042651@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: rrs
Date: Mon Apr  5 13:33:54 2010
New Revision: 206180
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/206180

Log:
  MFC of 204670:
  -------------------------
  sched_getparam was just plain broke for time-share
  processes. It did not return an error but instead
  just let garbage be passed back. This I fix so
  it actually properly translates the priority the
  process is at to a posix's high means more priority.
  I also fix it so that if the ULE scheduler has bumped
  it up to a realtime process you get back a sane value
  i.e. the highest priority (63 for time-share).
  
  sched_setscheduler() had the setting of the
  timeshare class priority disabled. With some notes
  about rejecting the posix high numbers is greater
  priority and use nice instead. This fix also
  adjusts that to work, with the cavet that a t-s
  process may well get bumped up or down i.e. the
  setscheduler() will NOT change the nice value only
  the current priority. I think this is reasonable
  considering if the user wants to play with nice then
  he can. At least all the posix'ish interfaces now
  respond sanely.
  -----------------------

Modified:
  stable/8/sys/kern/kern_resource.c
  stable/8/sys/kern/ksched.c
Directory Properties:
  stable/8/sys/   (props changed)
  stable/8/sys/amd64/include/xen/   (props changed)
  stable/8/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/   (props changed)
  stable/8/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/   (props changed)
  stable/8/sys/contrib/pf/   (props changed)
  stable/8/sys/dev/xen/xenpci/   (props changed)

Modified: stable/8/sys/kern/kern_resource.c
==============================================================================
--- stable/8/sys/kern/kern_resource.c	Mon Apr  5 11:00:21 2010	(r206179)
+++ stable/8/sys/kern/kern_resource.c	Mon Apr  5 13:33:54 2010	(r206180)
@@ -471,14 +471,20 @@ rtp_to_pri(struct rtprio *rtp, struct th
 	u_char	newpri;
 	u_char	oldpri;
 
-	if (rtp->prio > RTP_PRIO_MAX)
-		return (EINVAL);
 	thread_lock(td);
 	switch (RTP_PRIO_BASE(rtp->type)) {
 	case RTP_PRIO_REALTIME:
+		if (rtp->prio > RTP_PRIO_MAX) {
+			thread_unlock(td);
+			return (EINVAL);
+		}
 		newpri = PRI_MIN_REALTIME + rtp->prio;
 		break;
 	case RTP_PRIO_NORMAL:
+		if (rtp->prio >  (PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE - PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE)) {
+			thread_unlock(td);
+			return (EINVAL);
+		}
 		newpri = PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE + rtp->prio;
 		break;
 	case RTP_PRIO_IDLE:

Modified: stable/8/sys/kern/ksched.c
==============================================================================
--- stable/8/sys/kern/ksched.c	Mon Apr  5 11:00:21 2010	(r206179)
+++ stable/8/sys/kern/ksched.c	Mon Apr  5 13:33:54 2010	(r206180)
@@ -81,9 +81,8 @@ ksched_detach(struct ksched *ks)
  *	higher priority.  It also permits sched_setparam to be
  *	implementation defined for SCHED_OTHER.  I don't like
  *	the notion of inverted priorites for normal processes when
- *  you can use "setpriority" for that.
+ *      you can use "setpriority" for that.
  *
- *	I'm rejecting sched_setparam for SCHED_OTHER with EINVAL.
  */
 
 /* Macros to convert between the unix (lower numerically is higher priority)
@@ -93,6 +92,9 @@ ksched_detach(struct ksched *ks)
 #define p4prio_to_rtpprio(P) (RTP_PRIO_MAX - (P))
 #define rtpprio_to_p4prio(P) (RTP_PRIO_MAX - (P))
 
+#define p4prio_to_tsprio(P) ((PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE - PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE) - (P))
+#define tsprio_to_p4prio(P) ((PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE - PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE) - (P))
+
 /* These improve readability a bit for me:
  */
 #define P1B_PRIO_MIN rtpprio_to_p4prio(RTP_PRIO_MAX)
@@ -134,9 +136,6 @@ ksched_setparam(struct ksched *ksched,
 
 	if (e == 0)
 	{
-		if (policy == SCHED_OTHER)
-			e = EINVAL;
-		else
 			e = ksched_setscheduler(ksched, td, policy, param);
 	}
 
@@ -152,7 +151,16 @@ ksched_getparam(struct ksched *ksched,
 	pri_to_rtp(td, &rtp);
 	if (RTP_PRIO_IS_REALTIME(rtp.type))
 		param->sched_priority = rtpprio_to_p4prio(rtp.prio);
-
+	else {
+		if (PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE < rtp.prio) 
+			/*
+		 	 * The interactive score has it to min realtime
+			 * so we must show max (64 most likely
+			 */ 
+			param->sched_priority = (PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE - PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE);
+		else
+			param->sched_priority = tsprio_to_p4prio(rtp.prio);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -191,11 +199,14 @@ ksched_setscheduler(struct ksched *ksche
 		break;
 
 		case SCHED_OTHER:
-		{
+		if (param->sched_priority >= 0 &&
+			param->sched_priority <= (PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE - PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE)) {
 			rtp.type = RTP_PRIO_NORMAL;
 			rtp.prio = p4prio_to_rtpprio(param->sched_priority);
 			rtp_to_pri(&rtp, td);
-		}
+		} else
+			e = EINVAL;
+
 		break;
 		
 		default:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201004051333.o35DXs5X042651>