Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:12:25 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com>
Cc:        'Liste FreeBSD' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Backup strategy for zfs + jail 
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201172310530.3856@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <03a501ccd562$5b2f4e80$118deb80$@fisglobal.com>
References:  <885A2A83-A6FF-4E03-AB67-09BE0D2E557E@todoo.biz> <03a501ccd562$5b2f4e80$118deb80$@fisglobal.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>> --> Efficiency
>> --> Compatibility with ZFS
>>
>>
>
> If you're running 9, give HAST a shot.
maybe a stupid question but what is a practical difference between hast 
and doing ggate+gmirror and setting "prefer" load balancing to local disk?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1201172310530.3856>