From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 5 16:58:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C96106566C for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EEF8FC16 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1NSCjf-000LqA-L3; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:58:23 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov To: Baginski Darren References: <921262706366@webmail5.yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:58:23 +0300 In-Reply-To: <921262706366@webmail5.yandex.ru> (Baginski Darren's message of "Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:46:06 +0300") Message-ID: <19801584@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LSILogic SAS/SATA Adapter performance under FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2 ( 20!!! times slower then in RHEL ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:58:26 -0000 On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:46:06 +0300 Baginski Darren wrote: > Now is the same server under RHEL5 Is the server really the *same* or *alike*? I've got such difference in performance between similar RAID cards with and without BBU (battery backup unit). -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve