From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:19:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2036616A420; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9078A43D46; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1EDJYtb066755; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:19:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id k1EDJYOp066754; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:19:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:19:34 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20060214051934.A66704@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200602141310.k1EDACg3098670@repoman.freebsd.org> <1139922838.64601.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1139922838.64601.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>; from pav@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:13:58PM +0100 Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk-devel Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:35 -0000 On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: ... > > Too bad we *must* use spaces for indentation, because > > TABs are misinterpreted by 'make'... > > Uh, what about being consistent with the rest of the Ports tree and not > indent variables at all inside .if constructs? if it is a requirement, sure. but this way it seems more readable... don't know, do we have a rule or opinions for one or the other choice ? The only drawback i can see in indenting .* constructs is that if you indent by 2 levels then your editor might put a tab in place of the spaces... cheers luigi > -- > Pav Lucistnik > > > "Ragtime" contained about forty-five seconds of Elizabeth McGovern completely > topless, but it got a "PG" in 1980. I have no idea why that did, or "Titanic" > got PG-13, yet "Merchant of Venice" gets tagged with an "R". The MPAA is an > intellectual and aesthetic embarassment. > -- comment from IMDb board on US movie rating system