Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:55:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com (Harlan Stenn) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: am-utils: contrib or port? Message-ID: <199804230055.RAA16205@usr02.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <12791.893229096@brown.pfcs.com> from "Harlan Stenn" at Apr 22, 98 03:11:36 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It's been suggested that we upgrade the existing amd stuff to am-utils. > > Should this be done as a port or should it be put in contrib? I think it's a prat of the base system. I guess the question is "why isn't it on a vendor branch"? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804230055.RAA16205>