Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:55:52 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com (Harlan Stenn)
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: am-utils: contrib or port?
Message-ID:  <199804230055.RAA16205@usr02.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <12791.893229096@brown.pfcs.com> from "Harlan Stenn" at Apr 22, 98 03:11:36 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It's been suggested that we upgrade the existing amd stuff to am-utils.
> 
> Should this be done as a port or should it be put in contrib?

I think it's a prat of the base system.

I guess the question is "why isn't it on a vendor branch"?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804230055.RAA16205>