Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:20:27 +0300
From:      Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
Cc:        sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Message-ID:  <20031219152027.GB52845@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <20031219093718.GC21503@FreeBSD.org.ua>
References:  <200312190139.hBJ1dWTf054216@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> <20031219093718.GC21503@FreeBSD.org.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:39:32PM -0500, Tinderbox wrote:
> > TB --- 2003-12-19 00:25:09 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
> > /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.c: In function `ng_pppoe_rcvdata':
> > /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.c:1007: warning: field width is not type int (arg 3)
> > /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.c:1013: warning: field width is not type int (arg 3)
> > *** Error code 1
> > 
> Fixed!  (sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int) on our 64-bit platforms.)

Shame on me!  I should have tested my change on different platforms.
By the way, is there a document on 64-bit C programming pitfalls?
I can see the first entry above if there isn't.

-- 
Yar



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031219152027.GB52845>