Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:51:15 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: nate@yogotech.com, cjm2@earthling.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, n@nectar.cc Subject: Re: Proposed Solution To Recent "firewall_enable" Thread. [Please Read] Message-ID: <15445.54755.551301.284078@caddis.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20020128.154656.123855750.imp@village.org> References: <15445.53283.957773.221016@caddis.yogotech.com> <20020128.153704.109572342.imp@village.org> <15445.54136.731213.811969@caddis.yogotech.com> <20020128.154656.123855750.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : Yes, and I think having this is a good thing. However, what are the > : default values for the variables? > > In previous mail I suggested: > > ipfw_enable=no > ipfw_firewall_enable=yes Gotcha, I confused ipfw_enable with ipfw_firewall_enable. Unfortunately, it's not obvious which one the users should use to enable the functionality. Now we have two variables that *appear* to be redundant.... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15445.54755.551301.284078>