Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Apr 2011 23:52:12 +0400
From:      Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: graphical representation of `du`
Message-ID:  <20110406195212.GC5257@external.screwed.box>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=dhpN2q6vzyPEhaZyMtQGUgdHm=g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <E1Q6SwY-0007EI-00.avstin-mail-ru@f23.mail.ru> <0DD2BF5C-7387-4AFA-BF43-B1683F3773E8@d3photography.com> <BANLkTikj8-zRqtj_CZqw=zswcqQM38sOQ@mail.gmail.com> <E1Q6tsu-0006aH-00.avstin-mail-ru@f3.mail.ru> <20110406183439.GA5257@external.screwed.box> <BANLkTi=dhpN2q6vzyPEhaZyMtQGUgdHm=g@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Nobody knows that you're in for that, freebsd-questions!
2011/04/06 20:34:42 +0100 Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> => To Peter Vereshagin :

CR> > Again, why don't you guys just use perl to provide a graphical du? I believe
CR> > perl is just present on every freebsd machine where graphical du is needed.
CR> Why on Earth would you use Perl when a simple awk script will do???

Me?
I personally find Perl more usable.

73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB  12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627)
--
http://vereshagin.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110406195212.GC5257>