Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 14:17:35 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Errors during staroffice6.0 tests Message-ID: <20011014141735.A14162@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20011014135317.C63907-100000@levais.imp.ch> References: <20011013132544.A406@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011014135317.C63907-100000@levais.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 01:57:06PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > linux_base-7 has all the symlinks: > > athlon% ls -al *render* > > ... 17890 Mar 30 2001 libXrender.a > > ... 17 Oct 3 21:17 libXrender.so -> libXrender.so.1.0 > > ... 17 Oct 3 20:48 libXrender.so.1 -> libXrender.so.1.0 > > ... 14612 Mar 30 2001 libXrender.so.1.0 > > > > linux_base(-6) doesn't have libXrender at all. > > Hmm, I've just installed Linux_base-7 from scratch. There is _no_ > symlink from libXrender.so.1.0 to libXrender.so ! You're right. I think the links are created by XFree86-devel-4.0.3-5.i386.rpm, which is installed by linux_devtools-7 (not in the ports collection yet). > Can you add it to your linux_base-7 port ? I'm not sure this is the right thing to do. It doesn't look like a bug in the XFree86-libs-4.0.3-5.i386.rpm package, which makes the behaviour intentional. It's our (or mine at least) policy to install packages without any modifications that are not related to them being installed on FreeBSD. Adding a link would be such a modification. It's even more a hack if we're only creating one such link while none of the libraries have *.so links. It looks like a problem that tis local to SO. Thoughts? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011014141735.A14162>