Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:43:52 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RANDOM_IP_ID sysctl? Message-ID: <20040629194352.GA1684@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <200406291643.39705.max@love2party.net> References: <200406291413.ab33924@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <20040629134008.GA356@frontfree.net> <200406291643.39705.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:43:32PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: >=20 > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 15:40, Xin LI wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:13:38PM +0100, David Malone wrote: > > > It seems to me that RANDOM_IP_ID might be better as a sysctl rather > > > than a kernel option. Would anyone mind if I changed this? >=20 > I personally think that RANDOM_IP_ID is something that should be tweakabl= e on=20 > a per-interface basis (at least). I usually want randomized IDs on my upl= ink=20 > interface while it could harm my GigE internal network due to faster ID r= euse=20 > cycles. Hmm... You are right and I concur with your idea now. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4cZ4OfuToMruuMARArogAJ43PwjX/ozXfFW5Sp9n2wwHEPLbbwCeJHG5 w9BG8ajiQI9uynR68jMzF2I= =QM64 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040629194352.GA1684>