Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:20:15 -0700 From: Marcus Reid <marcus@blazingdot.com> To: Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Options for zfs inside a VM backed by zfs on the host Message-ID: <20150827062015.GA10272@blazingdot.com> In-Reply-To: <20150827061044.GA10221@blazingdot.com> References: <CALd%2BdcfJ%2BT-f5gk_pim39BSF7nhBqHC3ab7dXgW8fH43VvvhvA@mail.gmail.com> <20150827061044.GA10221@blazingdot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:10:44PM -0700, Marcus Reid wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:25:52PM -0400, Vick Khera wrote: > > Opinions? Preferably well-reasoned ones. :) > > However, having the ARC eating up lots of memory twice seems pretty > bletcherous. You can probably do some tuning to reduce that, but I > never liked tuning the ARC much. I just realized that you can turn primarycache off per-dataset. Does it make more sense to turn primarycache=none on the zvol on the host, or on the datasets in the vm? I'm thinking on the host, but it might be worth experimenting. Marcus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150827062015.GA10272>