Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:13:33 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Standardized make options (or no doesn't always mean no) Message-ID: <20020609101333.A26546@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020609072725.GA47864@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>; from marcel@xcllnt.net on Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 12:27:25AM -0700 References: <20020608210159.B87326@espresso.q9media.com> <3D02AB11.F373AB4@FreeBSD.org> <3D02ACE0.9DAB0822@mindspring.com> <3D02B069.5863B2B9@FreeBSD.org> <3D02E881.2F3F57CB@mindspring.com> <20020609072725.GA47864@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[please take care to NOT CC me, I do read arch@] On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 12:27:25AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Also, I believe in earlier discussions NO_BLA was in favor by most of > the people involved, but I can be wrong here (too). You are correct. I estimate this discussion was 2 years ago now. Everyone except BDE (and maybe a few others) wanted NOFOO, all the rest wanted NO_FOO. In June 2000, Kris Kennaway made a set of patches to change most everything to NO_. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020609101333.A26546>