Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:11:22 -0400
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
To: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: LDADD+=-lstdc++ vs. LD=${CXX}
Message-ID: <200207221411.22528.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello!
Which of the two constructs in the subject is better -- more portable,
more reliable, more correct (for some definitions of the adjectives
listed)?
AFAIK, when linking an executable, it is LD=${CXX} (hence the recent
PROG_CXX introduction). But what about linking together a shared C++
library which is supposed to be used in C executables (the relationship
between graphics/libfpx and graphics/ImageMagick)?
Is it time for LIB_CXX define?
Thanks!
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207221411.22528.mi%2Bmx>