From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 5 07:27:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3075A16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:27:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.unixiron.org (mail.unixiron.org [62.80.47.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4C243D5E for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:27:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@unixiron.org) Received: from localhost (mail.unixiron.org [62.80.47.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.unixiron.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i657RWPR009041 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:27:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from michael@unixiron.org) From: Michael Kukat To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:25:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407050925.03251.michael@unixiron.org> X-Authenticated-Sender: user michael from 62.80.47.42 X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.67-1, clamav-milter version 0.67a X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=2.0 tests=USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on calchas.unixiron.org Subject: Solved: sf(4) on PC164 works. Next question: DMA burst sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 07:27:56 -0000 Hello, after hacking around the weekend with this sf(4) driver, i finally got it working fine in the PC164. One of the reasons was my PR kern/68623, the other reason is the PC164 needing the driver to use DMA burst sizes > 0 (i think size 0 means no burst). So, after implementing the code lines to set this DMA burst, i would like to optimize performance here. AFAIK, the optimal DMA burst size depends on the capabilities of the PCI-Host brige. If this is true, does someone have information about the different chipsets used on Alpha systems? Currently, i'm especially interested in Alcor and Apecs chipsets, as i have platforms using those chips here to test it. I'll release the final driver patches as soon as i have tested everything on i386 and maybe sparc64 also to avoid platform incompatibilities. ...Michael