From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 10 16:22:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39C916A4CE; Mon, 10 May 2004 16:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakermmtao12.cox.net (lakermmtao12.cox.net [68.230.240.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E415F43D31; Mon, 10 May 2004 16:22:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040510232244.YTVS164.lakermmtao12.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Mon, 10 May 2004 19:22:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 18:23:32 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200405101926.i4AJQgDB072777@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040510215441.GA58003@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040510223735.GC8419@graf.pompo.net> <20040510231607.GA64644@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040510231607.GA64644@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Thierry Thomas cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/biology/avida Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/biology/avida/files patch-aa patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:22:47 -0000 On Mon, 10 May 2004 16:16:07 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:37:35AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: >> Le Lun 10 mai 04 ? 23:54:41 +0200, Kris Kennaway >> ?crivait?: >> > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:26:42PM -0700, Thierry Thomas wrote: >> > >> > > Upgrade to 2.0b7 and unbreak. >> > >> > > | +PORTVERSION= 2.0b7 >> > >> > This looks like a poor choice of PORTVERSION: >> > >> > kkenn@rot26:~ pkg_version -t 2.0b7 2.0 >> > > >> >> Do you suggest to use 2.0 and concatenate b7 to DISTNAME? > > No, beta releases should use 2.0.b7 > > rot26# pkg_version -t 2.0.b7 2.0 > < > > However, it's too late to fix now, so you'll have to fix it up when > 2.0 is released (e.g. call it 2.0r1) Use PORTEPOCH instead call it 2.0r1? Cheers, Mezz > Kris -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.