From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 30 11:38: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B07B15131 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 11:37:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: from holly.dyndns.org ([216.62.157.60]) by mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8) with ESMTP id <0FKF007C4IFA53@mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 13:37:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA06608; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 13:38:52 -0500 (CDT envelope-from chris) X-URL: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~chris/ Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 13:38:51 -0500 From: Chris Costello Subject: Re: -current build fails In-reply-to: To: Vincent Poy Cc: Will Andrews , FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chris@calldei.com Message-id: <19991030133851.I535@holly.calldei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (i386) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Oct 30, 1999, Vincent Poy wrote: > Well, I try to stay up to date but there are times when I am busy > so things do get behind... I've ran -current since 1993. There is no > real reason to use -STABLE. Give me one single reason why there is on real reason to use -STABLE and I'll give you 10 reasons to use -STABLE. -- |Chris Costello |Performance is easier to add than clarity. `------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message