From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 5 05:48:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA18281 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 05:48:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA18273 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 05:48:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703051348.FAA18273@freefall.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA053059526; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 00:45:26 +1100 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: ok, final sockhash changes, new diff To: davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu (David S. Miller) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 00:45:26 +1100 (EDT) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, mingo@pc5829.hil.siemens.at, wong@rogerswave.ca, alan@cymru.net, imb@scgt.oz.au, dg@root.com, netdev@roxanne.nuclecu.unam.mx, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199703051328.IAA14097@jenolan.caipgeneral> from "David S. Miller" at Mar 5, 97 08:28:06 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In some mail from David S. Miller, sie said: > > From: Darren Reed > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 00:24:04 +1100 (EDT) > > > [the hash table should be kept compressed to avoid cache pollution] > > Why can't it "autoconfigure" according to the size of your RAM ? > > i.e. more RAM => bigger server => more users/network connections > > Extra silly cycles in the critical code path. Yes, if you were doing it all the time to make sure the table was a good size, but I was referring to doing it once - at boot. (I should ahve made myself more clear).