From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:33:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D5020C for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596AD1696 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id s0TFSela046026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:28:40 GMT Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:28:40 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD 10.0-R as Xen 'guest' - clarification? Message-ID: <18819F918745D984B618D518@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:33:26 -0000 Hi, With FreeBSD 10 being out now (Great!) - GENERIC appears now has everything needed for Xen to run in PVHVM for amd64. The man page for xen (man 4 xen) states you should have: options NO_ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES options NO_ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS options NO_ADAPTIVE_SX In the kernel as well - when running under Xen - these (obviously) aren't in the GENERIC kernel, should they still be used for FreeBSD 10? And for 'xen tools' - we're still correct to install the port of 'sysutils/xe-guest-utilities' - correct? Thanks, -Karl