Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:33:09 +0900 From: TAOKA Satoshi <taoka@infonets.hiroshima-u.ac.jp> To: andrews@technologist.com Cc: qa3507@email.mot.com, ports@FreeBSD.org, morishim@cig.mot.com Subject: Re: net/xisp -> comms/xisp + new import of comms/yawmppp Message-ID: <20000629153309W.taoka@infonets.hiroshima-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20000629011914.F13914@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <20000628222044.B13914@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <200006290446.XAA24389@timbre.cig.mot.com> <20000629011914.F13914@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 11:46:53PM -0500, Takeshi Morishima wrote: > > It's upto the xisp's original pr committer. I have no problem with > > moving it from comms to net. (In my opinion, it should be under comms > > anyway. I believe netbsd also has it under comms.) It was originally > > in that category when pr was submitted, and got moved when committed. > > Ok, then perhaps TAOKA-san can explain, please, why it was imported in > net instead of comms? net/xisp/pkg/DESCR has the following sentence: The xisp package implements a user-friendly X interface to pppd/chat and provides maximum feedback from the dial-in and login phases on a browser screen, as well as a manual login terminal window. Note that it includes "pppd". And ports for ppp (e.g. ppxp, ppp-nt and so on) are in net category instead of comms. So I prefered net category rather than comms. Is that incorrect decision ? Do ports for ppp (e.g. ppxp, ppp-nt and so on) have to move into comms category, if so? S.TAOKA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000629153309W.taoka>