Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:22:57 -0400 From: cykotix <cyko@cykotix.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwn and hostap Message-ID: <BANLkTimog=LznNuEVFZ7h8QQc=cVU%2Bb4ow@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikWPF12nS4upjiJTc5AmrAiUEwNQQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTi=OW7qny9JPOiGDh5-x=Od-nT62TA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinaJPenCqmK6GMN3GdFWK%2Bw3pwf2Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=nZfuQpsxA0Si-Z=QZs6YcVTJ56g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikWPF12nS4upjiJTc5AmrAiUEwNQQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>wrote: > On 26 June 2011 23:26, Patrick Lahni <list@cykotix.com> wrote: > > Adhoc is supported. According to iwn(4): > > > > iwn supports station, adhoc, and monitor mode operation. > > > > I wasn't sure if that means, just for now? Or is hostap not planned for > > these cards supported by iwn? > > The card runs closed-source firmware which we can't get to the insides > of. I don't know the exact details, but there may be some features > which we can't really get to in order to support proper hostap modes. > > > adrian > Makes sense. Hopefully I'll have better luck with a AR9280 instead. Thanks for the input. Patrick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTimog=LznNuEVFZ7h8QQc=cVU%2Bb4ow>