Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:58:42 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD arm64 on EC2 requires boot1.efifat Message-ID: <CANCZdfoJ6JAib4YPEgRB5k24bRARGVyrpdb%2Bw48YNCijhm%2BJyA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y73qL4twxJamsczOK1=T2y33EZifs0CVvz53MG8w1UHhxw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHu1Y73qL4twxJamsczOK1=T2y33EZifs0CVvz53MG8w1UHhxw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote: > For both 12-STABLE and 13-RC2 I have been successful in creating working > instances in AWS EC2 only with boot1.efifat =E2=80=93 which does not appe= ar to be > included in base.txz > No. It's not needed. It has been retired. > If anyone has succeeded with boot1.efi, I stand ready to be enlightened. > The ESP is just a FAT filesystem. newfs_msdos /dev/XX mount -t msdos /dev/XX /mnt mkdir /mnt/efi/boot cp /boot/boot1.efi /mnt/efi/boot/bootx64.efi I've added this to the release notes recently... > Thanks! > > =E2=80=93 M > > -- > > "Well," Brahm=C4=81 said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool i= s no > wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred.= " > > - The Mah=C4=81bh=C4=81rata > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfoJ6JAib4YPEgRB5k24bRARGVyrpdb%2Bw48YNCijhm%2BJyA>