Date: Wed, 08 Nov 1995 15:58:55 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Karl Denninger, MCSNet" <karl@mcs.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Impact of upcoming 2.1 release on the STABLE branch? Message-ID: <29760.815875135@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Nov 1995 11:09:56 CST." <m0tDE0a-000IDUC@venus.mcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I thought that STABLE was something *less than* 2.1? So once 2.1 "ships", > then STABLE will be 2.1 as-is, plus perhaps patches? No, -stable was always "2.1 in production and beyond." While we haven't reached 2.1 I suppose it's accurate to say that it's "less than 2.1", but that won't hold true much longer (I hope! :-). > For a production system, STABLE has been ok for us -- is this the continuing > recommendation? Definitely. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29760.815875135>