From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 16:19:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC2C106566B for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E520C8FC0A for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LGIu7l003746; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:18:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5LGItWO003743; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:18:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:18:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jason Hellenthal In-Reply-To: <20120621161513.GA88762@DataIX.net> Message-ID: References: <4FE0C123.8030301@gentoo.org> <4FE0F773.1080403@gentoo.org> <4FE100F9.2050009@funtoo.org> <20120620073920.GA5300@lonesome.com> <20120620214006.GA1651@aspire.rulingia.com> <20120621161513.GA88762@DataIX.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:18:57 +0200 (CEST) Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , openrc@gentoo.org Subject: Re: Replacing rc(8) (Was: FreeBSD Boot Times) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:19:02 -0000 > > Try something like the following... > > service_runlevels="1 2 3 4 5" > > And provide a way to say... Well - i agree with you. just invent a syntax to define service runlevels as "all except ...".