Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:13:26 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 28159 for review Message-ID: <200304050413.h354DQ3c003641@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=28159 Change 28159 by peter@peter_overcee on 2003/04/04 20:13:01 we wont be saving %gs in the trapframe for now. We should, but I dont have to just yet. When we start using the swapgs instruction for fast syscalls, we will have to use %gs for local storage rather than %fs, which means we'll save/restore %gs instead of %fs. This segment saving thing is all up in the air anyway and is probably bogus since there aren't segment registers in the i386 sense. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/hammer/sys/x86_64/include/frame.h#5 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/hammer/sys/x86_64/include/frame.h#5 (text+ko) ==== @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ */ struct trapframe { - int64_t tf_gs; int64_t tf_fs; int64_t tf_es; int64_t tf_ds; @@ -83,7 +82,6 @@ struct intrframe { int64_t if_vec; - int64_t if_gs; int64_t if_fs; int64_t if_es; int64_t if_ds; @@ -117,7 +115,6 @@ struct clockframe { int64_t cf_vec; - int64_t cf_gs; int64_t cf_fs; int64_t cf_es; int64_t cf_ds;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304050413.h354DQ3c003641>